Just speaking for us, heathens to love freedom. 

Long reason my guns clean and I read books. Take a deep look in the history, they don't teach us. The evidence is being purged from libraries, so lies carry more weight, they try to hide the core strength. People living without the trivia, unaware of the gift their ancestors have given them. It's been hidden, but to get the facts, you know, you gotta get your whip, hat, and coat and dig like Indiana Jones. Before you can take the power back out of nowhere, the power's at. Tragedy and 

hoe. MK Ultra. Something maybe we might should know about. Something maybe we might should know about. Billion seven. Billion. Something maybe we might should know about. Billion is rarely. Something maybe we might should know about. For agreements. Something maybe we might should know about. British East India Company. Something maybe we might should know about. Operation mocking something maybe we might should know about. Paperclips. Something maybe we might should know about. Rich. Something maybe we might should know about. Being worse. Something maybe we might should know about. You can take the power back out of nowhere the power's at. Power at. Tragedy and hope. Before you can take the power back out of nowhere the power's at. 

Tragedy and hope. Welcome, Truthseeker. 

It's not easy to discern truth from fiction on holodeck Earth. Grand Theft World is a fire hose of illumination and inspires the hearts and minds of truthers seeking freedom in a world environment of manipulation and control. Richard Grove and special guests take a deep dive into the people, places, and events that have shaped our world. Through a lens of critical thinking, to polish the gems and sort the chaff, to reveal the true machinations behind world events. Piece by piece, podcast by podcast, a portrait of reality emerges that we can use to take educated action in the fight for consciousness, 

truth, and freedom. Grand Theft World episodes include clips from the brightest and best podcasters and articles every week. A weekly special guest brings their expertise and knowledge. Join the vibrant GTW community of researchers and like minded peers to collaborate on solutions and how we can truly create change. Take your first step on this adventure. Join now. Hi. What's up, everybody? Welcome to the Grand Theft World Podcast, which is hosted and sponsored by the legends at Grand Theft World dot com. If you guys aren't already a member, there's all kinds of benefits. So go check out Grand Theft World dot com and jump in. We got a great show for you guys tonight. Of course, we got Paul Virge in the house. What's going on, Paul? How are you doing today, Scott? I'm doing really well. Thank you so much. And, 

Richard will be here, you guys. He's running a little late, so hang tight. I'm not even gonna look at the chat right now. Just chill. Richard will be here to drop bombs throughout the evening. It's gonna be fantastic. But, anyway, Paul, what's going on in your world, dude? Well, yeah, we're just, putting everything together and doing a lot of editing this weekend. And, yeah, working on that new Woke to the Future project. Almost got the, first draft finished there. And, yeah, been watching a few 

cartoon series that are very interesting, like common side effects. So lots to talk about tonight. Sounds like we'll be learning more about that tonight, which is awesome. So, yeah, man. Apparently, Richard well, we'll probably let him tell the story. Apparently, he'd messaged us a little bit ago, and, he's triggering everybody's complexities, including his own. He said he's under the house working on a plumbing project. He's like, I need a little bit more time. Can can I buy some time with you guys? You guys got it? And we're like, you know how we roll around here. We're just gonna throw the show together real quick and and make it work. So it's you know, that's how I like to operate when when things kinda 

go in an unexpected direction. That's when we get to step up to the plate and and be at maximum output. So that's that's what we like to do around here. So yeah. Well, we got an awesome action packed show for you guys tonight. It's gonna be hilarious. It's gonna be heartbreaking. It's gonna be everything in between. But, we are gonna do another week of Luke Radowski. He's gonna give us the breakdown. And, apparently, we've got some other stuff from Luke that I'm excited to see what he has to say later. But, dude, you guys, we got all kinds of fun stuff. So definitely 

strap in for a fun action packed evening, but let's kick it off with Luke first. I think this is the perfect analogy for our social and political discourse nowadays. Yep. It's a car crash, but, hey, people get to have online brownie points surrounding it as, of course, I expect a whole lot more car crashes to come, especially during the summer of twenty twenty five as political violence is wrapping up in this country, 

specifically, what what just happened against Josh Shapiro and now also Donald Trump that looks like he had another lunatic that tried to take his life. What's really going on here as I think we are reaching our crescendo moment that we deserve to pay full attention to in order to try to prevent, and that, of course, is spread of violence in our political discourse. All of this is just a couple moments ago. We got the news that Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro's home was set on fire by a arsonist while his family 

was sleeping. Horrendous, horrible, tragic news as we have to kind of ask ourselves what is really going on here as I think there's a number of of possibilities that could particularly explain this. And I think both of them are worthy of investigation and inspection right now. As the New York Post writes, Pennsylvania governor, Jess Shapiro, and his family were forced to evacuate the governor's mansion after an arsonist set it on fire during Passover while they were sleeping. 

The blaze broke out Sunday just hours after the governor posted a picture of his family celebrating the first night of Passover. The arson attack remains under active investigation, police said, with no word yet on a motive or how the arsonist was able to enter the gated property. Now, what's going on here? Well, Josh Shapiro is looking like he is being kind of groomed as the next big kind of democratic political figure within the kind of liberal world order. 

A lot of people expect him to run for the presidency in the upcoming next election, and a lot of people see him as the next coming kind of up and coming Barack Obama as he has a very similar cadence. He has a very similar presentation style that was probably at the same CIA MK UltraSchool as Barack Obama. My own opinion my own personal opinion there interjected there a a little bit here as this attack now highlights, I think, two potential explanations. Some say, oh, it was an accident. I I I'm like, we're living in a day and age where accidents are that kind of prevalent, Deb, but but that still is a small possibility. 

I I I think two controversial possibilities that I would want you to explain here is that one, there's a possibility of this being a false flag attack as there's a lot of people setting up situations where they kind of prop up. They kind of set up a situation where they look like the victims, and then they're able to get online victim brownie points. Those are really popular in our online social political discourse. Or another possibility is that this was a lunatic that didn't like Josh Shapiro and just tried to hurt him and take his life. That also is very possible as now a lot of people will be saying, well, it could be because he was Jewish. It could be because it was Passover, and there are a lot of left wing radicals 

that really just don't like Jewish people. That that is true as well here. I think either of these explanations are kind of plausible here, as well as that kind of accident one. But, again, we're not living in a day and age where where accidents are are are, you know, are are that prevalent here. A lot of this does kind of go down to the breakdown of discourse in our country and the pushing of a lot of kind of racial division lines that I think are artificially being pushed on people as I think American foreign policy is bringing us on the brink, 

especially now with what Trump is doing of of a huge kind of clash that is slowly and surely becoming more unavoidable. There's also a crazy situation that happened up in Wisconsin where a seventeen year old who is now being accused of taking the life of his parents now also had a demented plot to, quote, assassinate Donald Trump as he represented our extreme right wing political viewpoint as law enforcement 

are outlining the charges against this man that has been charged with two counts of first decree intentional homicide of his own mother and stepfather according to the Waukesha County Sheriff's Department's press release as he also has been charged with, quote, hiding a corpse, misappropriating ID to obtain money, and theft of property over ten thousand dollars as investigators looked into him, and he had a, quote, deranged fantasy where he tried 

to fund the assassination attempt on Donald Trump while also launching an anti government insurgency in order to put in a right wing, fascistic, overwhelmingly bearing, big, bureaucratic government system. That's what I don't get about a lot of these, like, crazy kind of far riders. They they want a government that that's pretty much like all the communist want. Government controls everything. Government shouldn't control anything. Okay? There's a lot of these kind of super far right wingers. 

They're they're super statists. And, super statists, are definitely not a fan of personal responsibility and, individuals being able to, of course, decide their own destiny here. But, again, this looks like another crazed person, crazed situation as we had a lot of these types of situations kind of come to a head during the last presidential election where even just a few weeks ago, there was a lunatic that showed up on the door of a right wing 

influencer, Nick Effie, for YouTube hates when you just mentioned his name for some certain reason, that tried to take his life. There was doorbell footage from, Nick's security camera system that highlighted an insane person calling out for his name that was ready to, of course, take his life because of his online political opinion. Now where where is all of this coming? Specifically as I think it's fair to call out violence from the left and right, and how will this kind of crescendo and grow here? Well, I'll I'll tell you that in a little bit as I have my own theory about what is kind of developing and building up here that plays along with the Luigi Mignoni effect and plays along with what I think we are slowly and surely headed into with very uncertain 

economic, social, and political times. Before I tell you about that, I wanna tell you about we are changing dot shop where we have take come. I really like this stuff. You click on here with Klaus Schwab sucking down some a thousand full spectrum milligram hemp extract. And if anyone, he needs to chill out. A lot of other people need to chill out too. This thing def and then I'll just kinda relax and it'll just kinda go away. We are changed dot shop. Check it out. Get yourself some take calm right now here as I think it's fair to say here that things are only going to get a little bit more crazy politically 

as there's a lot of very violent, crazy people out there. And let's be real with ourselves. There's going to be some people that are gonna be capitalizing off of it as well here. Now, I I I think we definitely crossed the Rubicon when it comes to just a severe level of insanity that is being normalized in our society. Our society is, pretty sick. It's it's pretty messed up here. The story from New York City, highlights, I think, one of the most kind of harshest wake up calls to to humanity, to how just how harsh and evil the world could be sometimes. Now you enter a world where now everything is political. You enter a world where everything is interconnected with who you are a part of, what gang you represent, and now we're coming on the summer 

of love kind of months of protest that the left so loves to participate and take part in. You look at what happened in twenty twenty and twenty twenty one with the summer of love, BLM riots and how that was kind of excused and normalized here. And now with Donald Trump not playing any games here, now Donald Trump also heating up the rhetoric, talking about Derek Chauvin as there could potentially be another trial set for him that could see him released on the streets. What would happen in response to that? As already, there's another situation with seventeen year old in Texas that's cooking up as well. That's also seen as a very kind of divisive 

racial narrative that we're seeing play out in our social political discourse. So I I'm seeing all these discourse as well as the Luigi Mangione people who were like, yeah. That guy's great. No. He's not. He took a life of a father. He took the life of an innocent man. As as now, you you see these kind of narratives and whether they play up naturally, because there is something to the human kind of instinct to kind of pay attention to the divisions, to the groups, the gangs out there. It's it's a survival mechanism that that that's kind of within a whether it's being played up on, 

by other people who control the algorithms in order to promote certain kind of thinking, certain kind of fear, certain type of manipulation, it's there. Okay? And I don't know about you guys, but there's an unease feeling, specifically, about how a lot of people are seeing less and less pathways and avenues towards political solutions. I think the censorship era has ushered in a lot of radicals on the left and on the right. I would I would argue that there's a lot more radicals on the left here that I think 

are worth, examining a little bit more and trying to deradicalize a little bit more as the left has overwhelmingly dealt with more of a severe mental health crisis than the right, overwhelmingly. Not always, but there's exceptions to the rules. But the reason there's a rule a rule is a rule. And when we look at the left, a lot of the left are some of the most unhappiest, some of the most unhealthiest, some of the most mentally unwell people. Now they are not in power. They don't have congressional representation. They don't have the majority there. They don't have the majority representation in the senate. They don't have the Supreme Court. They don't have the White House. The media is is changing its its tune and abandoning a lot a lot of their far left woke kind of ideology. 

And what's left except for just a bunch of people who are dealing with downtrodden economic times that are also linked to this, who are Alright. Let's go ahead and leave Luke to be there. Thanks. Great job. So that was a nice little summary synopsis of some stories. I hadn't even heard about a couple of those. That's crazy. What are, Paul, what are your first reactions when you hear that this this, governor's mansion gets lit on fire. Yeah. I mean, Josh Shapiro was almost Kamala's running mate before she picked Tim Waltz. So he's had a pretty high profile, but he is definitely 

more leaning in the Zionist camp. And, yeah. I I mean, I can see this being somebody on one side or the other. But I think it's funny when we're talking about the left right paradigm, we also got to remember the top down paradigm paradigm between libertarians and totalitarians because you have totalitarians on the left and the right. And you also have libertarian on the left and the right, primarily more on the right that I've seen. But there are some people that have different social values. And, 

you know, when it comes to Josh Shapiro, there's people on both sides that wouldn't like his politics or wouldn't like decisions that he's made. Are they do they hate him enough to set fire to his house, or is that someone else sending him a message? You know what I mean? Yeah. What are your thoughts? I've been well, driving narratives forward. The first time I ever hear one of these, it's like, that's the ADL. That's definitely the ADL. Just to drive their narrative forward. Right? Like, it's Yeah. Like, who's to benefit from the most from oops. From something like that. Like, it's I mean, it it if you're trying to drive home 

a scenario where antisemitism is the new racism, let's call it, and you wanna focus less on racism like we did four or five years ago in the summer of love of George Floyd, and instead make it primarily about antisemitism. Because you gotta remember, a huge percentage of the hate crimes reported to the ADL, at least in the past, were, like, not getting time off for a Jewish holiday. Or somebody drew a swastika into my general vicinity. And a lot of times, it would turn out to be a Zionist himself or herself who wrote the swastika. 

And so those hate crimes, now that people know, it's like, oh, you know, how many actual anti Semitic hate crimes are happening? And I'm sure they happen, but the high profile ones, a lot of them have turned out to be hoaxes. And so you could argue that someone has an interest in promoting actual tragedies or scenarios like Josh Shapiro's house getting burnt down. And the narrative being pushed is this is for sure anti Semitic. If you're on the left or right, it doesn't matter. These anti Semitic hate crimes need to be stopped. And the only way we can do that is 

real ID, digital ID for the Internet, AI scanning everyone's content to make sure it's not antisemitic, things like that. Those solutions that'll be presented that just result in more loss of civil civil liberties and more of a chilling effect on free speech. That's such a good point, man. It's it's a bipartisan issue, antisemitism, and so it requires a much more heightened response. And, you know, I I do notice that there's a the one disparity I noticed is, like, the reaction to some of these things. And I think, you know, there's some people that think they're all fake. Like, you know, how Tim Pool is always talking about how they're getting swatted all the time and and then, Gavin McGinnis, 

there was a situation where he got swatted, and it was an act. He did get busted on that. He got called out on it. And he admitted that it wasn't he was do trying to pull a prank and a joke on his audience. Wow. But he sold it as, like, it was the middle of a live stream. Like, he acted like police officers came in, and he, like, stepped off camera. And the the live stream just ran for, like, thirty minutes without him there. And then the news was he got swatted. Anyway, so there was some fallout around that. So there's some situations where there's they're they're questioned. But then recently, there's been some really heavy situations like, 

Owen Shroyer from Infowars got docked or, swatted. And a few other notable people were publicly speaking about it. And they mentioned the Nick, the Nick f. I don't know because we're on YouTube. But Yeah. Yeah. The the Fuentes situation. And that's a crazy one too. I was definitely looking into that, and that was a result of doxing. So they doxed his address. It was sat on Twitter for, like, a day, a full day. Now it would I would argue that, like, the the reaction to, like, let's say, a right wing commentator's address being on x for a full day, people are like, whatever. He deserves it. Whereas, like, you know, if it was, like, AOC's address was on 

Twitter for a day, it would like it would be like the the the melting down of it would just be it'd be crazy. It'd be like you could see the disparity in the responses. Yeah. There'd be quite a double standard. Exactly. So just the the the reaction to a lot of these incidents are there. I feel like there's a double standard. And the situation with Nick, he kinda like I don't even if he knows I don't know if Luke knew what really went down there. But, apparently, a guy committed a triple homicide. He murdered three people, like a family, and then drove to Nick's house to take him out. And then the police came. They got in a foot pursuit, and the guy 

ran into someone's neighbor's house, shot the neighbor's dogs, and then escaped from that house, and the police shot the guy. So the guy got killed. The guy that went to assassinate Nick got killed by the police during that incident. Like, that's a pretty intense one. Insane. And I heard Tim one of Tim Pool's swaddlers actually got busted, and he was actually offering swatting for service, like, for hire to people online. And this is a young kid, of course. No no real understanding of the gravity and consequences. And so that kid's gonna be doing, like, twenty, twenty to five years 

easily because every time someone does a SWAT, there's the potential that that person who's getting swatted is gonna get shot by the cops because they don't know what's going on. And, yeah, in the case of, of Nick, you said Fuentes? He's I mean, that guy puts himself out there and definitely does a lot to, let's say, manufacture outrage. So I still think all violence, even against the most abhorrent of speech, is wrong Yep. Because it's like control your feelings. But 

if your job is to purposely provoke people and get the biggest emotional reaction you can, it shouldn't be unexpected. And I think Nick Fuentes understands that there's gonna be people that he pisses off to that degree. And so what's the message there? Does he need to either defend himself more or switch up his rhetoric? Or, like, you know, what do you do going forward when you realize the words that you're saying are inspiring people to come and wanna hurt you? It's a pretty crazy situation. It really is. It really is. And the only other thing I was thinking too was how Luke was kind of alluding to the parallels between where we're at right now and twenty twenty. You know? It's Yeah. It's really crazy because, like, the George Floyd incident 

was on May twenty fifth. So we we are a long ways out from even that having happened in this timeline. Right? So imagine all the fallout that happened post the George Floyd incident. Like, we're, like, a couple months away from that in the twenty twenty slash twenty twenty five timeline. And it's like, right now, COVID was just ramping up. So, anyway, all that to say, just stay vigilant, folks, because, like, hey. You know, it's it's gonna be an interesting summer, I bet. And I don't know, man. It's gonna be fun. We're gonna be here reporting on it and just laughing, having a good time. 

But Yeah. It's still still the season of sacrifice, I believe, up until the end of April, May first. So that's when they tend to, you know, if they're into astrology or any of that kind of stuff, they're looking at different times where they wanna launch wars and launch, you know, new social movements, just like major events. And this is that kind of season. It's from, you know, April tenth to, May first. It's just yeah. A lot of stuff historically has gone down, especially around four nineteen, four twenty, in April. There's tons of things that have gone down historically. 

So I echo that statement to just, like, be vigilant if they were ever gonna do a a power outage or an Internet attack as the first step of a Hegelian dialectic, then that would be kind of the timing, I would imagine. Yeah. I mean, a week from today. Like or no. A week from yesterday. So four nineteen is Saturday. I'm actually going to Austin for a wedding. And so I'll be in Austin. Hopefully, maybe hang out with some of the folks down there. But, yeah. So four nineteen, that was a big one. That was the Oklahoma City bombing. It's like my friends are getting married on four nineteen. I'm like, woah. 

You guys picked the the anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing. That's so cool. You guys would commemorate that with, and they're like, what are you talking about? Okay. So right? But then the next day, four twenty Easter. Right? Four twenty Easter. The next weekend is gonna be a very symbolic weekend. Yeah. A lot of people eating, high fructose, chocolate, I guess. If you wanna call it that, is it technically chocolate anymore? I'd probably not. But yeah. So we have Easter slash Hitler's birthday slash stoner holiday slash corn syrup day, 

Oklahoma City day. Like, next weekend is gonna be interesting. Super meaningful. Yeah. So speaking of meaningful, have you noticed that a lot of these alternate media but still sort of mainstream ish media people are starting to lose a little bit of credibility lately? Oh, yeah. Well, we're gonna get into it. It's really funny. The chat's really excited. I'm over in the chat. We're like, this is the Tim Pool takedown episode, folks. And they're like, we'll believe it when we see it. And this is like this ongoing bit. Like, especially when I host the show, it's like this, it's like this battle between me and the chat. And it's like, if they get out of line, I punish them. I'm like, oh, yeah? I'm gonna use a Tim Pool clip right here for you. So there you go. Oh, play a Tim Pool music video. Really punish them. Yeah. Yeah. We'll close out the show with a Tim Pool music video. You guys behave, 

or the show will end with a Tim Pool music video. Oh my god. K. You guys behave in the chat. You hear me? Okay. But, no, this is the Tim Pool takedown episode. We got a series of these people losing credibility. Nice segue, Paul. Thank you. We got a that's basically the first block. We got, we got this whole situate. Did you watch this, I wanted to talk about this with you. Yeah. So we'll maybe we'll cover this because I haven't listened to it. Okay. I've listened to commentary on it, so I got the gist of what's going on. But I haven't actually listened to the the, Douglas Murray, Dave Smith debate on Joe Rogan. But we'll get the gist of it here. But, yeah. Let's just, yeah. Let's jump into this first block. We got a quartering talking about this debate. 

We got liberal hive mind talking about how Tim Pool we're coming right out the gate with it, guys. Tim Pool has lost his credibility, and then we got some crossfire hurricane declassification from VivaFry. So let's check it out. So the Internet has been ablaze with perhaps one of the most divisive Joe Rogan experience podcast to date. It's difficult to know exactly what is going on if you're just re reading x 

because everybody thinks their guy won. And that's exactly why I don't really care much for debates. They're entertainment. And if you're there for, you know, entertainment purposes and you wanna consume them for entertainment purposes, that's great. Yesterday was a very interesting debate between, Douglas k. Murray, neo conservative, and, Dave, Dave Smith. And the subject was something I deeply don't care about, and that is Israel Gaza. 

So I'm not gonna comment on any particular specifics between, hey. He was right about this or wrong about that with Gaza. I have a bigger problem with what seemed to be, a real love for war from Douglas k Murray and also a lot of tone policing and being seemingly being pro censorship. I know Doug has spoken out in favor of people like Tommy before, and, you know, he's definitely gotten some things right. 

I don't think Dave Smith was a hundred percent right in everything he said either. And I think, like I hope that everyone leaves a like on this video and acknowledges just how brave I'm being by commenting on a podcast that happened, and I've never actually stepped foot inside of Joe Rogan's studio. Another major thing I strongly disagree with. So we're gonna get into some of the most divisive moments from yesterday's podcast after a super quick word from this video sponsor, Fume. Huge shout out to this video sponsor, Fume. Look. We all have bad habits and 

yeah. Shout out Fume for the sponsorship. Now I want to start with a little bit of the kind of the tone policing stuff, that I thought was really weird. So Douglas K. Murray came in hot with this. Can I ask you something? Yes, sir. Since the war in Israel began and since the war in Ukraine began, you've had quite a lot of people who are very against both in different ways. Yes. Do you think you've had enough people on who are supportive by the war? I don't know that word enough, if that's a good word. Let's say let's say enough people are on the side of Israel instead of wild critics. Well, I've had a few. I mean, I believe God Sad is is on the side of Israel, for sure. Jordan is on the side of Israel. Yeah. Mike Baker, Colm Hughes. Yeah. I've had Coleman did it for twenty minutes, so it wasn't why he was here. No. So he's upset that he doesn't have enough 

pro war people on. He names four or five people, and then Doug's first, yeah. But how many more? I mean, how many is enough? Oh, Oh, I mean, none of them. And none of them is why they're here. Oh. You know? It's a good question. Do you think you've tilted one way? Me personally? No. No. No. Just with a guess. Just with a guess? Yeah. Probably more tilted towards the idea that perhaps the way they've done it is barbaric. Mhmm. But why do you think that is, just out of it? Just because interested in your selection of guests because you don't like the words of Netflix. Yeah. It's not By the way, what Douglas Murray here is doing 

is he's already made up his mind that Joe Rogan doesn't have enough pro war guests. Yeah. This clip is sped up just because we've got a lot to get through. I don't I don't think about it that way. I just think I'd like to talk to this person. But can I just Yeah? Yeah. Yeah. Sure. Sure. If you're gonna interview historians of the conflict or historians in general Mhmm. Why would you get somebody like Ian Carroll or Yeah. But Ian Carroll, I didn't bring him on for that purpose. I brought him on because I wanna find out, like, how does one get involved in the whole conspiracy theory business? Because his whole thing is just conspiracies. Sure. You know? But do you have any, I mean, there's been a tilt in the conversation, both conversations in the last couple of years, and it's largely to do with people who have appointed themselves experts, who are not experts. You mean like Ian? I don't think he appoints himself an expert in anything. Who's that other dude who thinks he's an expert on Churchill? Oh, Daryl Cooper does not think he's an expert. In fact, I think it's everybody else who's always calling him an expert, and he's like, I'm just a historian. Have you ever absorbed any of his material? You ever consumed any of his podcasts or anything? I've tried. Yeah? It's pretty hard to listen to somebody who says, I don't know what I'm talking about, but now I'm gonna talk. Or I don't know about this, or I'm not capable of debating this historian, but I'm gonna just tell you a thing. Yeah. But that's not exactly what Daryl was saying. I mean, Daryl's point of view, however By the way, I'll stop him there. There's nothing wrong with that. 

The idea this this guy has, like, a really, goofball position of you're not allowed to talk about anything unless you're an expert on it. Well, I'm pretty sure we had a lot of experts telling us to put face diapers on, just a few years ago. And then a lot of other experts telling us that we should be wearing two face diapers. And then a bunch of other experts who told us everyone needed to get this or that and put in their body or whatever. 

And, there there's I mean, who who exactly determines who an expert is, except for the people who are saying they're an expert. And, again, Douglas Murray might be correct hundred percent correct about the history of what's going on in between Israel and Palestine. But when your opinion is this trash about who can have an opinion on something, I I it was really hard for me, to kind of even wanna listen to you. You know what I mean? Listen to this take. 

That like you're you're saying I claim to be an expert, but then I have, like, a parachute to get out of it by being like, hey. I'm just a comedian who's just saying this. But I don't think I've ever, like, really claimed to be an expert. I Why are you going around? I never well well, but it's been a long in these topics. Yeah. I know. But isn't it weird to go around, for instance, to Isn't it weird to talk about something that you you aren't an expert? But, again, I don't know who determines who's an expert, but, apparently, Douglas k Murray does. Has this guy ever been to a pub? 

So all of so when we were doing the operation, the ridiculous war with Iraq, within Afghanistan. Right? And you went to the bar. Everybody was talking about it. Are they not allowed to talk about it because they're not experts on war? This is the same dumb, I there's a smarter person than me will know the exact term for it. Is it an appeal to authority? There's some, like, logical fallacy thing here where, like, you know, when athletes get butthurt that, like, 

a journalist critiques them and they say, well, you never played the game, so you don't know. That's such a lame, cop out. And again, I'm just saying Douglas k Murray might be an awesome guy. I'm just critiquing these two positions that he has, which I disagree with. I can't agree or disagree with his positions on Israel or Gaza because as you guys all know, I don't care. I don't want America involved in either one of them. Let them fight it out. Ben Shapiro told me Israel can defend herself, so let her do it. I mean, let's get to the the last unit. It's it's a bit weird 

to be simultaneously saying, I'm not an expert on the conflict and talking about it everywhere. No. It's not. I don't think so. Not really. I mean, I don't know. I don't think, like, you I I don't see how you're talking about these things. Which things? All these things that we're talking about. Some of them. Yeah. Are you an expert? I am on some. Yes. On somebody, you're talking about something that you're not an expert on. You'll never get to touch yeah. Oh, look at that Dodge. Point the Dodge. Do you never get to touch? Which things? All these things that we're talking about. Some of them. Yeah. Are you an expert? I am on some. Yes. On some, but you're talking about something that you're not an expert on. You'll never get so what should you do? What should you do if those subjects get breached? Well, I think that you educate yourself as much as you can. Should you say I'm not an expert and then give an opinion if you're in the middle of a conversation? As I say, I think that it's a weird move to say, I'm not an expert on this, but I'm gonna talk about it nonstop. I think It's not a weird move. 

I'm not an expert in, you know, serial monsters, but I'm very interested in them. You wanna talk about BTK or Dahmer or any of these things? I could talk about them for hours. Will I get specific details wrong? Almost certainly. But what Douglas K. Murray appears to be saying here is that he's not allowed you're not allowed to talk about it unless you've been there. In fact, he scolds Joe Rogan for having the wrong people on his show. You feel about this. Darrell what Darrell is saying is he doesn't really like doing debates. He likes to do long format stuff where he can really explain 

He also had this take I wanted to see if I can find this where he literally says the lefty thing. Where he's like, your platforming Hey, guys. Welcome to the liberal hive mind, the channel solely focused on exposing the abundant hypocrisy of the left. Oh, boy. Now this was an embarrassing take. I mean, near credibility shattering. Now I don't wanna go that far just yet because at the end of the day, you know, I like Tim Pool. And I don't think he deserves a lot of the hate that he gets. And, of course, giving bad takes is kinda part of the business. Everybody's done it at some point. You can't get everything right a hundred percent of the time and always have the best most trustworthy analysis, but there's also levels to this stuff. And this particular Tim Pool situation, 

yeah, it's bad. It's real bad. Tim just went on a rant on his podcast defending Carmelo Anthony. And I'm not exaggerating when I say this. This has gotta be one of the dumbest arguments I think I've ever witnessed. And he makes it so confidently too. Let me show you guys Tim Pool's take on the Carmelo Anthony situation. We got some stuff to get into, so let's roll the tape. Alright, folks. So just take a look at this. For one where he says, nothing matters but this. He was at a school event at the wrong team's tent with a knife. He clearly chose murder than to walk away cut and dry here. Nope. Wrong. Imagine you are invited to a party at someone else's house, and you are legally carrying a firearm. 

And then a fight breaks out and you or an altercation breaks out between you and some guy and, you know, there's drinking involved or whatever. I'm not I'm not trying to make a one for one scenario. I'm trying to create a potential scenario separate from this one with similarities. You go to a party. No. Let's say you go to a party. And some guy starts saying stuff like, yo, man, get out in here. Like, I can do what I want. I was invited to the party. You know, verbal altercation escalates. And then the dude, you're standing there and you pull your your your sweater back and you've got a gun. You put your hand up and say, don't come any don't come close to me, bro. I'm warning you right now. Do not come close. Do Do not take another step. Then the guy grabs your arm and makes a move, so you draw your weapon and you use it. Okay. Make the argument you have no right to defend yourself when you're being attacked by a guy. Make the argument. By all means, go ahead and do so. I ain't gonna do it. Not I I don't know the circumstances. You can argue that you're in a place you're not supposed to be. You can argue it's that guy's house, and it it doesn't matter. A guy can invite you into his your neighbor can be like, come on over, brother. And then if he gets physical with you, you can defend yourself. And then what? The place will be like, well, you were in his house. And it's like, yeah. You invited me in. Is this guy freaking serious? This is the standard now? I guess Tim Pool is making a claim that we're being inconsistent. Right? I guess every situation now, the slightest physical altercation is now means for using deadly force. If a kid gets pushed to the track meet, they have the right to whip out a knife and stab somebody in the heart. I guess we're just living in the wild, wild west now. Right? Yeah. That's literally not how self defense works. Being pushed once during a verbal scuffle is not justification for a fatal stabbing. Self defense is based on proportionality. 

You respond with force only when you are in legitimate danger, serious bodily harm or death. A push during an argument? That's not life threatening. It's an unbelievable, unjustifiable overreaction. You know, if Austin Metcalfe had completely lost the plot and he was charging at the kid, yelling threats, claiming he was gonna end him, fists were flying, or he pulled out a weapon, okay, then you've got something to work with. But according to what we're seeing in the police report, not even close. Just take a look at this excerpt right over here. Austin, the victim, told this male that since he did not go to memorial, he had to leave the tent. Austin and the male went back and forth, and then Austin stood up, pushed the male to get him out of the tent. And a witness said during this time of arguing, the male reached around in his bag and it was at this time that the male took out a knife and stabbed Austin and then fled the scene. So he was asked to leave the tent that he didn't belong in. They got into an argument. He was pushed once. And then Carmelo Anthony reached into the bag according to witnesses, pulled out the knife, and just went and stabbed the kid in the heart. He wasn't running away. He wasn't trying to escape. He wasn't facing a serious threat of bodily harm. No. He got pushed once and then reacted by reaching in his bag and escalating the situation from a teen argument to full blown homicide. And Tim Pool, for some reason, thinks that his house party comparison 

justifies that action. It's unreal. And the comparison itself also really doesn't make much sense either. He's He's making the claim, I guess, that you could trespass on somebody's private property then refuse to leave said property. And if the property owner or somebody then attempts to physically remove you, again, not try to kill you, just physically remove you the moment they even put their hands on you, as long as you gave them warning, you have the right to shoot them down like a dog. That is one of the most insane things I think I've ever heard in my life. And look, I know some people are huge Tim Pool fans, and they get really angry if you criticize them. I mean, anytime I talk about anybody on the right, I'm always getting flack for it. But just because we're perceived as being on the same side in the online ideological debate doesn't mean I shouldn't call this out. This argument is completely 

batched insane. There's no freaking way. For self defense to be justified, you need to be seriously under attack. You need to make an effort to remove yourself from the situation to protect your body. Clearly, there was no effort here. It was one of those typical bravado tough guy moments where you had two individuals clearly in a standoff and one of them escalated it to murder. And he also fled the scene. Now I know he didn't get too far, but he stabbed the kid and then ran away. What does that tell you? You know, the facts of the case, at least as we know them now based on witness testimony in the police report, seem extremely clear cut. And I know a lot of people are suggesting that that isn't the case and this is gonna be a tough one. I'm sorry, but no. Unless there's some new wild information 

that completely changes the circumstances here, completely changes the story, absolutely not. And I don't see how Tim Pool could be making this argument and especially making it so confidently. Especially when he himself admits that he doesn't even know the circumstances. I I don't know the circumstances. But then at the same time, when initially reading the super chat responded with this. Nothing matters with this. He was at a school event at the wrong team's tent with a knife. He clearly chose murder than to walk away cut and dry here. Nope. Wrong. Nope. Wrong. He admits on camera that he doesn't know the circumstances, then proceeds to very self righteously 

shut down the Super Chat donor and claim that, no, they're wrong even though he doesn't know the circumstances? I mean, are we watching the same thing here? You don't know the details. You admit it. You admit that you don't know the facts, but you're confidently running defense for this murder? This is a wildly, wildly bad moment. And listen, I don't care if that offends people. That's my opinion. This is my show, and so I'm gonna say it whether or not the big mega Timcast fans are offended or not. And I know that I'm gonna get flack for this because I'm already getting flack for calling out Tim on x. I got people replying to my post furious saying stuff like this. Come on, liberal hive mind. 

Let's start with operation crossfire Hurricane as legacy propaganda media is reporting on it. For those of you who didn't know, there was a recent disclosure of a slew of what had hitherto been two classified documentation, documents relating to Operation Crossfire Hurricane, Russiagate hoax. If you haven't I'm not even I'm not even I'm not even going into summarizing what the Russiagate hoax was. Kevin Klinesmith, FBI attorney falsifying evidence to submit to a secret FISA court to obtain a spy warrant on Carter Page that they then use to go spy on Donald Trump. Christopher Steele producing the Steele dossier, which the FBI knew was bunk bullcrap. That Steele dossier was given to the FBI by Michael Sussman in a meeting where Sussman then lied to the FBI and said that he was not acting for or on behalf of his client, Hillary Clinton or the DNC, except he actually billed Hillary Clinton and the DNC for the meeting in which he fed it to the FBI, the steel dossier that he knew was bunk so that the FBI could then leak it to the Yahoo News, who would then publish it, and then the FBI would use that publication as a basis to obtain a secret unlawful FISA spy warrant on the Trump campaign at large. That's it in a nutshell if you don't know how egregiously sick and corrupt it was. Michael Sussmann, who later faced charges for lying to the FBI, was acquitted in that corrupt urine soaked hellhole, pee pee soaked heckle of DC because they would indict a ham sandwich and convince someone if they wore a red hat and exonerate them if they wore a blue hat. 

That's the summary, people. This is how Newsweek is reporting it, and you know that it's bad the way Newsweek is reporting it. And I'll tell you how. You'll get to it in a second. When they refuse to tell you how bad it is, and instead they say this is how bad it is according to somebody else who we besmirch, that's when you know how bad it truly is. Donald Trump's Russiagate documents read in full. You can't read them in full because there's hundreds, if not thousands, maybe even more pages. You can't sift through it. It's impossible. But Encryptus, with the help of AI, did, and we're gonna break it down and summarize it right now. Hundreds of files documenting the FBI's Russiagate investigation into president Donald Trump's twenty sixteen campaign have been released. The documents from the FBI's Russia probe, known as Crossfire Hurricane, were obtained and published by Just the News and The Federalist after Trump ordered them declassified in late March. Why it matters? 

Why does it matter? Because it was a coup. It was a junta to unseat a democratically elected president, to tie his hands for the first three years of his presidency, and to undermine democracy. It was you wanna call it nonviolent? I call it violent. That was political violence of the highest order. There's a difference between political violence and physical violence, and political violence can be both physical and not physical. That was political violence of the highest order. Why does it matter? Why does it matter? Did you know you left me there? 

Staying at the heartache in my soul as I fell Okay. Okay. Okay. Okay. They get it. They get it. They get it. That was so funny, dude. What a beautiful soprano voice he has. 

Oh, boy. Okay. That was for the chat. I love you guys. You guys are so much fun. We couldn't do the show in that fucking area. So I was like, I'm literally telling Colby. I'm like, I'm declaring war on the chat here. Here we go. You guys ready? Here we go. That's great. And that's and that's Tim Pool talking about the that recent stabbing, and I I really thought that piece was actually gonna be about him meeting with, Netanyahu in another little secret meeting. And that the position he was taking about defending yourself was him being like, this is the Zionist position that I agree with, where you can defend yourself by attacking somebody else and you're still the victim. But it turned out it was, 

it was about last week's story of the, what's his name? Carmelo? Well, there's Austin Metcalf is the Yeah. Gentleman that was killed, and then Carmelo Anthony, which isn't there a famous basketball player named Carmelo Anthony too, I think? And so it's like it's one of those things where you you you type it in and you get you don't get the information you're looking for. Anyway, so, yeah, that was a crazy ass story. I don't think we have anything other than that coverage of it. But that I guess, Luke mentioned a little bit, but, Yeah. It's That's been used as a wedge to kind of just, you know It's another one of those divide and conquer stories. And 

yeah. The the crossfire hurricane thing, I mean, if you still believe in the Russiagate hoax at this point, then it's the TDS thing because love or hate Trump, the the the operation to try and just, like, bog them down in that quagmire was definitely an operation by multiple different people in the deep state. And, I think the most interesting thing out of that whole segment was Dave Smith and Doug Murray because a lot of people think Doug Murray is this pro free speech guy who's shutting down 

the leftists and it you know, there's been all these debates and stuff with him. And he's out promoting his new book, but he also received, like, a a pro Zionist award from Israel, from the Israeli government. And, so I think his perspective might be just a little biased. Right? And so there there I'm not sure if there's a video out still, but either Michael Malish or someone else did an episode looking at Dave Smith talking with Douglas Murray and doing Count the Fallacies. Because 

Douglas Murray keeps appealing to authority. He keeps appealing to ridicule. He keeps using ad homonyms like, hey, man. It's weird that you like free speech and, like, wanna talk about things that you feel like talking about when only the experts who completely failed us during COVID, they're the only ones who should be able to talk about these subjects. So, yeah, I I almost feel like it was meant to be a Zionist propaganda job from Douglas Murray, thinking he's gonna go in there and just clean up and turn Joe Rogan to the dark side. And instead, 

he just got dominated by Dave Smith, just making simple refutations of his highly fallacious logic. And you'd expect more from Douglas Murray, but, I guess he was just wasn't aware of the fallacies he was employing. Yeah. I mean, obviously not, or there's something else going on. And and one of the things that, I think it was Jeremy was talking about Oh, yeah. To support he's like, he's yeah. And and Douglas Murray was supportive of Tommy. I'm assuming he's talking about Tommy Robinson, maybe. 

Mhmm. Assuming. And and that makes sense because that guy's a super pro Zionist guy as well. So Yeah. This is this is what I think you're seeing just like in the on the left side. There's sort of the corporate Democrats who are backed by certain money, and, they're pro Zionist. And then you've got the more progressives who are anti Zionist because they actually care about the Palestinian people. And then on the right side, you've got more pro hardcore Zionists, a lot of Christian Zionists, and then you have the sensible 

anti war right who are mostly libertarian, but also, you know, there's some MAGA people in there who are against war as well. And all those people are like, what is they're they're they're into America first. So they're like, what national interest do we have by supporting Israel so blindly when before Israel was created, we didn't have any problems in the Middle East. Right? As soon as they came along and they exist and we're backing them, suddenly all this trouble starts up. All these people are angry. All these wars are happening. And so, you know, it's like 

they argue that it's like smashing a hornet's nest. But in reality, it's like someone stabbed a dagger that's Israel shaped like a dagger right into the heart of the Middle East. And then they've been fomenting this conflict for the since the nineteen fifties. And, if you read Albert Pike's three world wars, it's just another layer of the operation, right, is to get the world to, pick a side between political Zionism and religious Islam. Right? You could parse those out to to further different movements, but unifying them under those two kind of umbrellas and then getting everyone to fight to the point of exhaustion. 

And it's a trap. Right? It's it's just another form of of paradigm, thesis, antithesis, synthesis. And the synthesis is if we can trick these people into hating each other and fighting for no reason, no good reason, then we can impose this new order of AI controlled, you know, everyone's behavior is in one kind of homogeneous way, and all our finances are tracked and controlled. So if we get out of line again, we don't wanna have another third world war, another world war, then they can just, you know, de bank you, de citizen you. 

And, so we have to be looking at all these different events being arranged to try and get forth those measured push because they wanna centralize things, and we wanna decentralize things. Yeah. Definitely. Definitely, man. So it it's crazy, man. And and so much of what I've learned about Israel, I learned from this show. Like, even before I was had the honor of being a cohost, and now, just it's just been an unfolding saga, and Rich has definitely been one of the people I've I've looked to to learn so much about what's going on over there. And it's crazy, man. Now we're gonna get we got a whole section on it tonight, you guys. We got a whole section. 

But we do have a guest tonight. I forgot to intro our guest at the top of the show or to preview our guest at the top of the show. He just showed up. He's my new buddy here in town. And, we're gonna bring him in and, hopefully, Rich get here in time. But the great seven c's. What's up, my man? What's going on? Hey, man. Thanks for having me. Of course. I really appreciate you coming on and somewhat short notice. But, yeah, we met at the Third Eye Carnival last week. Super awesome event. He was on a panel with us 

with, Kurt and Sam and the whole crew, so that was really fun. But I guess for the listeners and viewers that aren't familiar, you wanna give us a little intro, rundown, what you've been up to, and what you got going on? Yeah. Absolutely, man. So, I just started getting into like the, like researching and reporting stuff, in the middle of last year. And, you know, very quickly started doing all these different webs and stuff, talking about technocracy, people like Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, 

how, you know, Technocracy was over a hundred years ago, started as a movement. Kind of lucked my way into catching the eye of, David Icke and did a ten episode series on there. Taking a little bit of a break to, you know, build up different avenues of communication on different platforms and stuff with people. And, now I'm just kinda doing my own thing and, live streaming the the web buildings that I do. I think, Richard Grove does the the brain. 

And mine's a little bit different, but it's sort of this way to, get everybody involved. So, like, smaller accounts can come into the chat, like, link sources and bring up different ties and stuff. And really just trying to get to the bottom of, you know, who's running everything, how's to teach people. Because, you know, awareness and, acknowledging the problem and how it's how it's, sort of started and caused, I think is always the first and most important step. Yeah. Absolutely, man. Well, that's really cool. I mean, 

so cool that you connected with the Ikes. You got your little show on there, dude. That's pretty legit. Pretty badass. Let's see. So, yeah, obviously, this audience is very familiar with the, brain model, Richard's brain model here. I've got, like, a little copy of it here. It's, like, basic. Have you had a chance to look at it or or look at it all? So I I I've looked at it. The the one problem that I have is there's no Linux version. So I can't I can't get, like, the full experience of it. But I have used the the web browser, and it it's incredible, man. It Sure. Yeah. And it's just one node leads to the next, kinda organized in different categories. So it's like yeah. But, I wanted to bring you on mostly to, like, kinda just show us, like, kinda how you've approached the same. 

You've got the similar thing going, and I was, hopefully, Rich will show up by the time well, while you're here, you guys can kinda chat and compare notes. But, yeah, man. Do you have a way to, like, share your screen? I don't know if you're using OBS and have, like, a separate screen share, or if you wanna just pull it up on Zoom. You can do a screen share on there. But we'd love to see kinda what you've been working on. Yeah. Absolutely, man. So it says that I can't Okay. There it goes. Okay. So I use this program called Obsidian, and it's free. 

If you wanna, like, sync it across devices, it's like five bucks a month or something like that. But, it it's things like this. So I I did start, one specifically for, like, Peter Thiel and Elon Musk. Gotta move some stuff here. And basically we just started with these two boxes and then as we go, kind of color coding everything. So companies are green, people are in red, universities and things like that are in blue. You know, we have, like, VC firms that I put in, like, a lighter blue. 

Events, like World Trade Center seven, you know, COVID, things like that are, in white. And really just kind of mapping everything out and seeing who all the players are. As, as I go, I try to do my best to commit everything to memory. It's a little tough, but usually I'll be able to give a recap, like at the end of each stream that I do. And we do all this stuff in real time and everyone's allowed in the chat. But this is just one of the Peter Thiel, Elon Musk 

webs that I have here. You have like all the Jeffrey Epstein stuff, up here at the top that I'm still sort of building out here. People like Brock Pierce and then tying it all the way back to, like Technocracy Inc through Elon's grandfather, the new School for Social Research, and then you start getting into the Rockefellers. And they're sort of re re or, like, transformation, I guess, of the medical field and turning it into the medical industry that we have today. 

And just all different kinds of things. I mean, there's, like, the Lighthouse, all the way going going all the way back to, like, the French revolution and people like, George, George Hegel and Frederick Holdren and, Frederick Schelling. And, I have one on them. This is the Trump administration that's also still not done. But just sort of mapping out everybody in the the Trump administration and their various ties and stuff, it's a little difficult to see here. But, you know, like, people like Christy 

know him. You know, she's pushing the Real ID right now, but she's also tied up in things like Future Fund. She's tied to Berkshire Hathaway. She has her own pack, called the Christie pack. And, John Ratcliffe, you have all the stuff from, like, the IP three international scandal. I believe that's yeah. Right around here. You have, like, the fake influencer web through things like Colson Capital, like people like Steven Crowder, 

Andrew Tate, Laura Loomer, Russell Brand. Tell me about tell me about Colson Colson Capital a little bit. Yeah. Yeah. So, Colson Capital actually have one that's a little more succinct here. So they they have a bunch of different companies that basically provide sponsorships to different, streamers. From things like seventeen point seven five Coffee to, Positive. A lot of people, might remember the time Laura Loomer ate dog food on her livestream. 

That was that company. And they basically paid her to do that, which is, kinda crazy because if they can get her to do that on camera on a livestream, imagine what she's doing off camera. You know? And, you know, the fact that she's directly involved with the the White House and she's going in there and trying to tell Trump what to do, but, it all rolls up into this thing called, it it's owned by this guy named Foster Coulson who's a partner on this company called International Health Brands with a guy named David Lopez, 

who is a special projects manager for Erik Prince's Blackwater. So it's like, Blackwater, Erik Prince sort of have this, I guess, secret way to funnel money into different influencers and get them to like, you notice all the all the same alt right influencers all say the same thing. It almost seems like they copy and paste each other's posts sometimes on Twitter. They'll just all be speaking about the same talking points. But they own all kinds of companies. 

So is it kinda like the equivalent how we've got George Soros' Open Society that leans more traditionally left and does their own version of astroturfing. Right? That on the right, where it would be naive to think that there wasn't some kind of similar astroturfing campaign going on behalf of billionaire tech bro brogalopoly or whatever they call it. Yeah. Tech bro galopoli, dude. Yeah. It, it like, I'm sure are are you guys familiar with, like, the wellness company and all those? I was just gonna bring them up to ask if they're related to these because I see them them funding everyone. Even people I respect, like, redacted, 

it's like wellness company stuff. And I you know, we run a YouTube channel with almost half a mil or with half a million subscribers. We get all these ads too, offers for sponsorship, and we just turn them all down because we're like, well, we don't know where this money is coming from. Yeah. Like like, I don't wanna be beholden to some third party that might have some other agenda and then be associated guilt by association style. So it's great that you're exposing following the money, essentially, and charting it all out in something that looks like, like a two hundred foot whiteboard Yeah. That you can zoom in and out of. And then on that other one, you're kind of charting out the history of cybernetics 

and technocracy and these sort of techno feudal warlords who are trying to, what, create a new Dark Ages and or what would you say is the logical conclusion for these guys beyond the digital ID, real ID, you know, lockdown technocratic system? I am so glad that you asked. I actually have a web for that as well, and this is kind of my, like, proposed in game model. And I've added some stuff to it recently. I wanna jump in here real quick and just be on the record saying some stuff here. So so it's important that I kinda tune, like, chime in here because many people probably know 

that I have been involved with a company that was partnered with the wellness company, Onjected. You guys know Onjected. So Onjected was partnered with the wellness company. I resigned from Onjected about two weeks ago, three weeks ago. I didn't feel like I was being treated very well. And so I resigned. It was my choice to leave the company. And I have lots of things I could say about the wellness company, but I do have NDAs in place. And I can't I'm not going to say anything. I'm not gonna discredit anybody, but I'm just saying, 

I no longer am associated with them in any way, shape, or form. And, I'm very grateful. I feel like a weight's been lifted off my shoulder. Can't recommend I personally can't recommend Unjected anymore. I'm just gonna say that. So there you go. That's a classy disclosure, Scott. So thank you for it. Yeah. But, yeah. Should I call you seven c's, or what's what's your first name again? You can call me, seven. I'd I'd What's seven? Yeah. I decided to do that after someone showed up to Nick Fuentes' house with a gun. Yeah. I've got my Chet system character, but, yeah, I I so I hear you on the pseudonym, but I'll just say seven. So thank you for that. Appreciate it, brother. 

So I have this technocratic in game model that I've sort of mapped out here and I'll, I'll give you guys the quick rundown. So I think that, we're basically going to be falling into this model where you have this, it's a Hivemind central computer, but it's gonna be more like a like a cloud based system, where all of the data centers and stuff that we have all over the world are going to eventually be linked to each other. It's going to 

seemingly be built up country by country. Especially seeing, like, us in a race with China on the AI data center and things like that. But nuclear power is going to play a huge part. So just in the last, six months, most of the major big tech companies have entered into the nuclear, industry. You have Microsoft just bought Three Mile Island, back in September. Google is, buying nuclear facilities all over, 

Amazon and Meta, and and they're not the only ones. Elon Musk has also expressed interest in that. And they're gonna use these nuclear facilities to specifically power their AI data centers. So all the data centers that are driving these different AI programs, that are creating profiles on us and scanning everything and going through, like all the federal federal records. I've even seen some crazy stuff. This is why I use a green screen is, they're now able to take the rooms 

in pictured in people's houses and use AI to run it through Zillow and figure out where you live, based on, like, the the pictures that are on the listing and stuff for your house. And then you have this global cloud, that's gonna be sort of like the brain, That's all the different data centers that are things like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure Global Cloud. You have Google Cloud. Even here in this was posted in February, 

the in q four twenty twenty four spending for infrastructure services has raised twenty percent, from the previous year. You have Google that just gave their keynote, the other day, where they're doing Google Cloud Next, Next, where they talked about incorporating a lot of AI and things like that. And then that's going to link with, this thing called the Space Cloud, which is a series of satellites that are all being bought by big tech, Amazon, Google, Microsoft. Obviously, Elon is a big, proponent of that. 

And, partnering with different cellular companies and cell towers to create this sort of buffer between the the satellites and the cell towers, so there's global coverage. I believe Elon just today announced that they now have Starlink connection in Somalia, and he is actively launching SpaceX Star Shield satellites for the National Reconnaissance Office. And I'm essentially under the impression that what is being pitched as bringing Internet to the world is they're trying to eliminate the hiding places. So you won't ever have anywhere that you can go that isn't connected to the Internet, and you'll always be on, always connected. 

Oh. Yeah. I believe they call those emerging markets. Right? Where they just like, we need to connect every last person, get them onto the, the commerce system in general, and then, yeah, get them hooked up with a a digital ID, get them into the TracTrace database. And essentially, it's I I always saw it as a setup to eventually measure consumption and essentially using the carbon tax on your carbon footprint so that there's a consumption tax 

tax so that the less you eat, the less money you pay, the more you eat, the more kinda like the social credit score system, except meets Demolition Man, if you've seen Demolition Man in that society. Yep. You know, something like that, except it probably won't appear as polite and friendly. It's probably a little bit more of the jackboot style. And so yeah. Do do you think that's why a lot of these tech billionaires on the right have taken up the free speech mantle on the surface, 

but when push comes to shove, they all revert back to kissing the wall or what what have you. Yeah. Yeah. I think, there there's huge inspirations, especially in, like, you know, various books within the Kabbalah. You have the Tanya, which talks a lot about, speaks to a lot of the, like, transhumanist stuff. You have the Zohar. I know I know most people know some of the worst things that are in the Talmud. And these are, like, the books that are follow that are, you know, 

I don't know what you would call it. I guess, like, believed in by the Chabad Lubavitch, the black hat guys that are in the ear of Trump and Putin and Zelensky and Malay and basically all the ones that you see at the Wailing Wall. Didn't Ursula Bandele just say that the Talmud is, like, a guiding principle document for the EU? Something like that. I'm I'm pretty sure she's quoted saying that, and I was, like, quite surprised because I'm, like, which part, lady? Yeah. She did. 

That's wild. Yeah. That was insane that they dropped that because, like, everything that I've ever seen about the Talmud is talking about how terrible it is. And then they're like, well, this is gonna be our our guiding principle now. And it's Yeah. It's it seems to be like a lot of, like, it's like the Torah in the center and then all these, like, argumentation around getting around the rules or just I know a lot of it, I'm sure, is scholarly discussion of religious nature, but the the rationalizations that come forth out of some of those are pretty horrific. Like, they excuse some pretty bad behaviors, and I think that's why 

people associate with that gets, like, painted as, like, what what what are you into? Like, I know the Christian Bible, the Quran, they all have some pretty messed up things in those as well, and not everyone takes them precisely literally. You know what I mean? Everyone interprets it kind of their own way. But you'd be fool you know, you'd be lying if you said, like, there's not some horrific things in the Torah and in the Quran that that are just, like, that don't jive with today's day and age. Right? Yeah. And so 

it's yeah. Very strange to see that when you have Christian Zionism on the right teaming up or being almost wielded or weaponized, under the guise of free speech and and, you know, it's really the pendulum, the left totalitarian pendulum swinging back to the right. And when they're done with that on the right, they'll probably swing it back to the left. So you're just kinda documenting which part of the swing we're into and what's the bigger the bigger agenda at play because do you think we're we're a lot of people are sort of 

celebritizing or deifying some of these billionaires thinking they're gonna come save us, or the new president's gonna come save us, and that's, like a mind trap? Yeah. It's, it it's honestly kinda concerning. The the cognitive dissonance seems to have reached new levels. I'd I thought that, you know, Trump was just going to be this, you know, Obama for the right, where the left was completely bought into everything that, oh, you know, Obama was saying and the hope and the change and things are gonna be different. 

And obviously, we just got the same authoritarian, like, appeal to the bankers, appeal to big tech, appeal to authoritarianism. And now it it just seems like what what was rare with the Obama thing was a lot of people from the right didn't shift over to the left during his era. But it seems like I've I've seen quite a few people that because the the false dichotomy of Joe Biden being so terrible and Kamala and it's sort of that, 

that Hegelian idealism or the Hegelian dialectic that I think you were actually, talking about, like this the synthesis, the or the thesis, the, antithesis, and then the synthesis. I think I I think we're seeing that that exact same thing, and I I think Joe Biden's presidency was supposed to be as bad as it was as publicly as it was so that everyone would be courted in to supporting Donald Trump because there's this weird thing with their belief system where I think that you have to manufacture consent, 

within their within their operations. Otherwise, I I don't know if it it these people are crazy. So I don't know if it's like an appeal to their god or, you know, they they feel like it has to work for their rituals or whatever sort of mind games that they're playing. But but it seems like they more often than not, have to get us to go along with whatever it is. And that's where all these narratives and and false dichotomies and stories come from, in my opinion. Yeah. It's it's so funny because, like, there was a time you couldn't even breathe the word Trump online without just getting excoriated from every single direction. And now it's like I'm in we're in this world now where it's like, you know, I got, like, thirty six hundred followers on Twitter. I can't I'm so critical of I'm critical of Trump. I make fun of him a lot. I make fun of, like, Israel. Like, I just make fun of all this stuff. And we just have a good time with it. 

I I can get, like, one one heart, maybe two hearts from Lucky. And it's like, I'm not complaining. It's just kinda hacky at this point to complain about your social media engagement. But at the same time, it's like the irony is is, like, if I were to be, like, full blown just, like, slobbering all over Trump, it'd probably help my numbers quite a bit. Like Yeah. You know? It's like they were now we're an era an age that I'm being punished for being critical of Trump, dude. Like, what the hell, dude? Yeah, man. You could get some sponsorships. Like, there there's lots of incentives for us to sell at our integrity for some kind of, like, comfort or gain or whatever. 

But I agree with the philosophy of all power should be made fun of because I personally think anyone who wants power over anyone else but themselves, that's a mental illness. Like, wanting to tell other people what to do and control them and control their behavior. And I just happen to trust humanity. I've been screwed over lots of times. I know there's bad people out there. But instead of, like, eliminating bad people completely, it's, like, learn how to recognize who's bad and avoid them or mitigate it or defend. And instead yeah. Worshiping power, worshiping other people as if they're going to save you like a superhero, 

it just seems like such an emotional trap. And at the end of the day, all these gangsters are just using storytelling to get us to hurt ourselves. And at the at the end of the day, that's what their whole thing is. Right? They wanna use a story tell of a boogeyman. Every every ten years, they change the boogeyman. And now we're we're our own boogeyman, and the only solution is to inject chips in us and track our behaviors so that we can no longer boogeyman ourselves. Yep. No doubt about that. It's like, I almost wanna invoke the rebunked card on this one because during the election, like, back when Biden was still running, I was like, you guys, 

I'm kinda rooting for Biden on this one because only because I saw what was going on right now. And then I did I pulled the same thing with Kamala too. I was like, look, you guys. Here's what's gonna happen. Trump's gonna get in, and all of the patriots, all of the freedom fighters, all the people that were standing there at the lockdown protests and were actually legitimately in defense of human liberty worldwide and and just activated. Right? Makes myself being one of them. All of those people who were just the fiercest freedom fighters of them all are going to just bow down and worship the government again. That's exactly what you're gonna get with Trump, and that's what we're seeing right now. So I I'm like, damn. We probably would have been better off with Kamala because all of these freedom fighters would be right in the government's face. Like, you aren't gonna do shit. Do you hear me? So, anyway and so but now it's just like, where is everybody? I don't know. We're just like there's a small contingent of us that watch this show and probably your show, Seven. Like, they're like, bro, no. All power. No government. What is going on? 

Yeah. I I agree. And and, Paul, to to echo your sentiment too, I'm I'm very against the state and authoritarianism. I think that we, you know, have reached a point, especially in today's times, where there is the ability for people to self govern and the people that want to be in politics and wanna be in government, they're there because, you know, whether they're doing good things or not, I'll use Thomas Massie as an example. Yeah. The things he says sounds good, but inherently, his career is imposing his political will on other people. 

And that is not okay with me, in my opinion. That's a great point. That's a great point. Like, all of them. Right? Even, even the Paul the Paul the Paul father son team. Right? You know? Like, it's like yeah. I mean, how how do we even get to that? Like, what what in your mind would be some steps towards actual, like, actually achieving that? Yeah. I, I I think that, you know, building alternatives, especially networking locally, educating people is a huge part of it. I I think it's a a very, very drastic undertaking 

to finally manage to convince you know, they always say it's easier to dupe someone than to convince them that they've been duped. And I just see, I see the false, you know, two party dichotomy is this emotional rollercoaster that is Santa Claus for adults. And it's only ever gone in the same direction as far as like a global one world government. So I think educating people and coming at it from a a nonpartisan sort of, perspective. Like, if you attack both sides, then what are, you know, what are people gonna say? You know, I get called a leftist all the time and I'm like, look, if if Joe Biden was still in office, I'd be doing his webs and his maps. 

And, you know, I I think the the the first most important step that people can do is, you know, boycott as as much as possible. Everything in this world is a market. It requires people's participation in order to succeed, and that includes government. And the the less taxes that you can pay, if if you can get away with paying no taxes, that's great, but I know property taxes are kind of a a pain in that area. And just resist at every step. 

Big food is a huge part of it. So they they war with us through our guts and our gut microbiome. So, you know, working with local farmers, trying to put your money in those places, trade physical commodities or use, you know, I I would love to get away from the physical cash and monetary systems. Little difficult to do overnight. But bartering is the the only way to get that that middleman out of out of the transactions because they're always skimming a little off the top going both ways. 

But especially digital currency. Like if you can find a way to stop using digital currency at all, you know, educating people and getting them to realize that we don't need the systems that are in place that empower these different people and, you know, just build those relationships over time. And it, you know, even if it's just one person a day, it may seem like a drop in the bucket, but if there's enough people doing it, that eventually adds up to a notion. And without us, they're powerless. So. Notion. And without us, they're powerless. 

So Yeah. I mean, that's the whole idea is that we just form these little parallel economies, parallel systems, groups that eventually turn into, like, medium density groups and then large density. And then we overpower the state. Yeah. That's like the Or road map. You know, everyone thinks that voting is their only power, and it's, like, not political voting, but voting with your time and energy and attention. Right? Are you spending eight hours a day at a job you don't like, two hours commuting, and then three hours watching Netflix when you get home to decompress from the day that you didn't or you just, you know, paid a third of what you earned to the tax man? 

Yeah. I echo what you said, Seven. Like, you gotta really figure out how to I don't want to say decolonize your life, but the idea of, like, thinking about where you're putting your time, energy, money. Is it to corporations that don't have your best interest at heart and are really just trying to sell you poisons? Or is it to your local community farmer who's growing vegetables and cows and chickens that are actually from the earth? And, and then, yeah, where you're putting your attention, what kind of media are you consuming? Is it junk food media? Is it nourishing media? 

And ultimately, at the end of the day, disengaging from the people who wanna impose power on you and looking only for political solutions because, yeah, we can raise a whole bunch of people and and overthrow the state. But I like Rich has said before, you can make the state obsolete by just drawing a parallel train track that's just more efficient, that's better. And the more people you have showing others how it can be done, that's what's inspiring even more than telling them how it can be done is us, like, living that and practicing what we preach. And that's definitely easier said than done, but it all starts with the idea. Right? And getting people together. I've seen Derrick Rose talk about freedom selves. I've seen a few different people talk about just, like, 

communities of I don't even wanna just engage with like minds because then it's an echo chamber. I wanna challenge people, but in a respectful way. Because if you can ask the right questions and get them to collapse their own belief system, they might come to the realization that you want on their own. And it's way more powerful because you didn't have to convince them. You just showed them the door and then they walked through it themselves. Yeah. I I, I I love the idea of having conversations with people and instead of, you know, inundating them with, well, this is why you're, you know, you believe wrong and this is why, 

you know, this is a lie. Asking them questions and guiding them too. So getting them to work those, like, critical thinking cogs that have been dormant for so long and say, like, why do you think, you know, the what do you think is gonna happen if they replace all of the bureaucrats in government with AI? Like, where what do you see is, like, the worst case scenario with that? And and getting them to have that realization. I'll realization. I'll I'll say when I when I started doing this research and I finally, like, 

laid out a huge map, it was concerning Peter Thiel, but, you know, involved tons of other people given his history and influence and stuff. But I'd I had a little bit of an existential crisis myself for a couple days. And I was like, oh, oh, it's it's it's all fake. It's it's all fake. It's always been fake. They're on the same side. And I didn't know what to do. And then on the other side of that, I came out and I was like, I just have to tell everyone I know. Congratulations, Neo. You've awakened from the matrix. Welcome to the cognitive dissonance part where Yeah. Before you learn learn all the kung fu. 

So yeah. I gotta get quick quick shout out on the chat. A guy, Mechanized Doom, just gave away five subscriptions to the Rumble channel to five to five myself included, so thank you. So we'll do thank you at the end, but I just wanted to say, hey. That's kinda cool. Didn't even know you could do such a thing. Shout out to guys doom in the chat. So there you go. I love that. Anyway, support and put your money where your mouth is, folks. Yeah. If you get value out of this show, it's value for value. Become a member. Donate. Like, that's really cool stuff. And, yeah, very cool. 

See, there you go. That's kind of what we're talking about here. Like, you know, bringing community together and then, having in group preference and doing commerce in and amongst your people and extracting resources from the outside world, pulling pulling it into your community, having it go around and around. Like, that's something I I talk about constantly. That's my big message of hope is literally this what we're talking about right here. Having strong local communities is something I put a lot of effort and time into. And then just being of service to your local community, that's where I find where I'm at. It's like, I I do handyman work, and it's a lot of my work comes from people I've met in my local community here or word-of-mouth 

from them. So I've been able to find I'm able to support myself and my own autonomy through doing that. And, yeah. I just love it. It's really that's the solution. That is the solution. And then we keep growing. We just keep growing. Yeah. Every oh, go ahead. Yeah. Every everyone has their part to play and and, you know, everyone's gonna have, like, different roles and stuff. I'd you know, I I see a lot of people that look at, like, the work that I do or, you know, people like Derek Bros, 

Ryan Christian, the stuff that you guys are doing here, and they're like, well, I can't do this. And it's like, well, what what do you wanna do? You can do anything. And, you know, it's the limitations that society and and the powers that be have put on people that make them feel like they have to be dependent on the state and their infrastructure and their systems. Yeah. That's really the power that's awakening in people, I think, is the spirit of autodidactism where, you know, as expensive as things like food and rent have gotten, 

the technology to have your voice heard has never been more affordable and more professional and more professionally available. And then the ability to learn any of these subjects, thanks to YouTube and these other things that are potential propaganda platforms, they also serve simultaneously as education platforms to help people become more proficient in improving their rhetoric rhetoric, in improving their communication and presentation. So that, like, yeah, if you're working with David Icke, he's a guy who figured out his, you know, production value and the and the value of production value to get the message across in a more credible way. So that I think that's why part of why we've seen the Overton window sort of shift to being more open minded to conspiracy stuff is not just because of the failure of experts and all their horrible tragedy things we've seen in the last five, ten, twenty years, but, 

people stepping up and being able to produce a cogent, cohesive message that actually makes sense because, you know, it's called Infowars because really what it is is narrative wars. Right? It's it's their story versus our story. And what we're trying to do is get to the truth, and the truth shouldn't have to be believed. It should just be self evident once we uncover enough stuff. Right? Meanwhile, these other people claiming to be trying to get to the truth have agendas, have sponsorships, have all these things that induce them to sort of water down or obscure or obfuscate 

or omit certain things that would be, you know, difficult to swallow or challenge certain narratives. So, yeah, I think it's really admirable that when you see people that are going for the truth, not left truth or right truth, but, like, whatever it is, and emotionally, I can handle it. Like, it might be mind blowing. We might go through all these periods of, like, I can't believe it's oh, it turns out it's gangsters who've been running things for six thousand years. Okay. That's what the matrix is really about. That's actually not as, like, bad as you think because 

if it's gangsters and this is a prison, like, for more for better or for worse, it's a pretty comfortable prison. It's just we know we can do better, and we know that it's gonna get much more uncomfortable as they modernize the prison. So we need to, yeah, start building these parallel systems, continue to put our energy into worthwhile, productive and constructive things. And, yeah, like you said, you don't have to wake someone up by bludgeoning them over the head. You can tickle them awake. You can question them awake. You can there's so many avenues that don't result in you getting a fight with your neighbor or having the divide and conquer mechanism. 

You know, you don't wanna be feeding into it. So I think that's going to be the future of the next ten years is is finding even more constructive ways to communicate this message, to point continue to point to the things that are the hypocrisies and the obvious, conspiracies. And then, yeah, just, we need to be prepared to organize in a constructive manner because even amongst the freedom community, there's gonna be stronger personalities that rise up and wanna lead. And then it's like and then we have to question, what's their agenda? What do they do? You know what I mean? And that's that's the cycle because we're trying to prevent a new gangster class from arising in the new system that we set up. 

Yeah. For sure. I, I I always make it a point to tell people, like, you know, the the same way you're not supposed to attack the messenger or shoot the messenger, you also shouldn't worship the messenger. And that every, you know, people are, malleable. They're, they fluctuate. They have their own biases. They could be incorrect about things. And, really, the information is is what should always be the key and the the star of the show. And, you know, I I see talking heads like, obviously, Alex Jones and, you know, people like that where 

the the name brings about this trust that used to need to be earned. And now it just seems like, well, if they just say a couple things to solidify someone's confirmation bias instead of challenging, you know, popular opinions and popular narratives, then that's enough and people will just believe anything that they say. That is very true. And and I think it's ironic. Like, you're talking about exposing Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, these other tech bro guys. And, you know, here in Canada, we're having protests of people showing up to Tesla dealerships. 

Down with Elon Musk. We hate him. But kind of, like, for the completely wrong reasons. Like, you wanna go there and be like, I understand what you're doing in spirit, but, like, here's the actual facts that you're actually criticizing thing that, for better or for worse, could be, you know, we'll see if these slash all these things. But here's this other side to things, and then they'll they'll you'll see this cognitive dissonance because they wanna agree with you about not trusting Elon, but then they're like, that also sounds like right wing conspiracy nonsense. And you're like, okay. Well, the enemy of my enemy or how does this work? And, yeah, it's really just about finding people who aren't 

completely rigid and set in their ways. You can always tell when someone's a little open minded. They might might not have formed an opinion yet. And those are what the people you wanna ask those questions like and kinda guide them to. It's really logical conclusions when you have enough detailed knowledge. Yeah. Yeah. I, I agree. It it it reminds me a lot of the the people that were just calling Trump, you know, Hitler during the twenty sixteen election just because, you know, he said things that they didn't like and stuff, but weren't pointing to the very, very problematic things that were, you know, like the Adelson funding, the Thiel funding, the, 

the is, like the Abraham Accords in Israel, the IP3 international nuclear scandal with, like, Jared Kushner and Michael Flynn, where Trump was a spend essentially trying to export nuclear energy to places like Saudi Arabia and Qatar, while meanwhile, domestically, whether it's manufactured or not, we're having an energy crisis. That's a really good point. Well, you know, a lot of these crises we know are manufactured. 

And, part of this is, like, the the crisis that they're trying to manufacture right now is the trade wars, the tariffs, all the different, setups of, I would argue, artificial conflict because it's all like they say it's about making money and which country is earning more from their trade deficits. But it really comes down to jobs and people being able to earn a living and companies looking for justifications to lay off a bunch of people that they wanted to anyway. And so, Scott, I don't know when we wanna get to this, next media block, but I saw that you had the heading of trade wars there. And, 

I so I inserted a great three minute little video Sure. About Star Wars episode one, The Phantom Menace and the analogy of the Trade Federation and that whole trade blockade and how it applies ironically to right now. What's going on? Well, I mean, yeah. I mean, dude, Seven, man, you're you're like the new Richard, dude. You got your brain model and everything. Like, so you're like the new Richard here on on this episode. So if you want, you can hang out with us. We're gonna we can play a media block and come back and do commentary with us if you want. Just kinda just ride ride along with us as long as you want, dude. 

Open invitation. Stay as long as you want, dude. Yeah. Absolutely, man. I'm I set aside a couple hours. I didn't know how long you guys are are willing to have me. But if you give me talking, man, I'll talk I'll talk all day. Totally. Well, we we'll be here till probably about three in the morning, central. So you're welcome to stay as long as you want, dude, and just kinda, like, chime in. But, yeah, dude, let's let's let's roll a block. Let's get some, meat on the table, and, we'll come back and do some, commentary. So excuse me, Colby. Another reversal here because I was thinking we'd go back to media blocks after we wrapped with with seven, but he's just gonna roll with it. So let's go 

to block two. Let's roll with block two. We'll give you a sec on that. And then, yeah, as we move on with the evening after seven leaves, then we'll go do our feature our work. But yeah. Yeah. So, Jeff, Star Wars. Why the Trade Federation blocked Naboo and, followed by Trump just won the trade war. We'll see what, they say about that. You I know you guys in the chat are gonna love it. And then, a Fox nine cover Fox nine Minneapolis talking about Chinese imports 

excluded from ninety day Trump tariffs. So we'll probably just watch a little bit of each clip, and then we'll, roll from there. So hit it, Colby. Kill it. Want to make a mess. It would be all men. In today's video, I want to go back to episode one and cover something that many people might not know about. I'll make it as condensed as possible. First of all, what reason did the separatists have in even doing a blockade? What caused this outrage you might ask? Well, the answer is taxes. They were tired of the republic taxes levied on the system and so they decided to have a blockade. We all know that that's not the real reason. As Sidious was the one behind it all, so let's go a bit deeper into it. Episode one of Star Wars starts off pretty much with Qui Gon and Obi Wan going to a blockade outside Naboo. Why was it there? First off, it was blocking trade to the planet which would cause the civilians to suffer eventually. But mainly, it was there to invade Naboo. As we see in the film during Qui Gon and Obi Wan's escape, they noticed battle droids in the hangar. As Qui Gon said, it's an odd play for the Trade Federation. We've got to warn the Naboo and contact Chancellor Valorum. Let's split up. Now, why did they do it in front of Naboo? Two reasons. They needed Queen Amidala to be forced to sign the treaty which basically gave control to Nute Gunray of the system. And the second was that Naboo was very rich in plasma 

and it would be a great asset to the Trade Federation. Damask Holdings, which was a financial group working closely plasma, which Nabu was very rich in. They were so secretive about the invasion because they were hoping that it would happen before the senate knew about it. And once they did, it would already be too late. The treaty had been signed. And finally, the whole blockade was selected by Palpatine because the ordeal and crisis would launch his promotion into Supreme Chancellor as he played both sides of the war. If he got the blockade off of Naboo, just imagine what he'd look like. He'd look like a hero amongst the senate. It's like you're playing chess by yourself. You can manipulate the board to end up however you wanted to. Black wins or white wins. That's how Palpatine did what he did. Patience and controlling both sides. That's why in the Darth Plagueis book, it was such a great victory for him to be nominated as chancellor because he knew now that he would turn this thing into his playing ground and he did exactly that. He tricked everyone. Now, of course, in the end, Palpatine had a very distinct plan for Nute Gunray regardless of if he would have gotten the treaty signed or not and we all saw what happened. I hope this quick video gives you guys a rundown of what the point of the Naboo blockade was and, kind of gives you a bit of a understanding of episode one in the opening scene. Hope you guys have an awesome rest of your day. Hit like on this video if you enjoyed it, and I will see you in the next episode. Until then, remember, the force will be with you. 

Hoo hoo, boy. The pump is on. This is I have never seen anything like this. With a single stroke of his pen, Donald Trump has sued the markets while also continuing to apply even more pressure pressure to China. The market has said, we find these terms acceptable, and it is pumping like I've never seen anything pump before. Out of the deal. 

This is perhaps what Trump maybe should have done in the first place, but this is crazy as I can now announce a ninety day pause on all tariffs as they negotiate, but he doubled down on China probably because China tried to be, tried to disrespect Americans by calling us fat and lazy yesterday. I've got a separate video on that. This is breaking news. Let's get into it. By the way, there's a lot of talks about tariffs 

on coffee because of the tariffs. I talked about it in a later video. Coffee brand coffee never intended to raise prices because of the tariffs. Now the tariffs are on pause. It's less of a a good hit. But I will tell you, not only did we not install any price increases, we dropped prices about fifteen percent. President Trump implements ninety day pause on new tariffs except for China. Based on the lack of respect that China has shown the world's markets, 

I'm hereby raising the tariff charge to China by the United States of America to a hundred and twenty five percent effective immediately. At some point, however, in the near future, China will realize that the days of ripping off the USA and other countries is no longer sustainable or acceptable. This is the thing about China. China, not only did, do they steal our IP and sell it back to us at an inflated price, 

they love to, you know, sell our secrets to other people. They don't play by the same rules as anybody else even though, you know, these they've, you know, joined places like the WTO, the World Trade Organization. They do whatever it is that they wanna do, and Trump had said, you know what? We're done with that. What I'm hoping is that other countries grow a set and decide that they too are going to get in there and say, yeah. You know what? We're good on that too. We're gonna tariff China as well and have China face a massive global, 

tariff pressure, that they've never seen before to negotiate a better deal for all countries out there. Conversely, and based on the fact that more than seventy five countries have called representatives of the United States, including the Department of Commerce, Treasury, and the USTR to negotiate a solution to the subjects being discussed relative to trade, trade barriers, tariffs, currency manipulation, and nonmonetary tariffs, and that these countries have not, at my strong suggestion, 

retaliated in any way, shape, or form against the United States, I have authorized a ninety day pause and a substantially lower reciprocal tariff during this period of just ten percent, also effective immediately. This is the art of the deal. Markets just fell off my wall because the market is pumping so hard. This is the art of the deal, folks. Now I know a lot of people don't have a lot of stock, and so they're not you know, I have a small amount 

that I put in, for my own retirement fund, just like a lot of people have four zero one k's. I essentially have a small portfolio. There's nowhere near enough money to retire in it. But I felt like, you know, since I run own my own business, I don't have, like, a four zero one k match thing. I have an IRA. But for the for for, you know, for general purposes, I'm the same as most people. I have put into a retirement fund in some form my entire life, whether it's an IRA 

or the small stock portfolio, but I don't have enough money to retire right now. And watching the money, the little money that I did have saved, for retirement disappear, you know, quickly was making me nervous. And let me explain why this is so good. Okay. First of all, I think it's entirely fair that people can get a reprieve from big tariffs as long as they've shown as long as they've shown, 

like, a good faith effort to negotiate with America so that everybody wins. People that have been disingenuously talking about these tariffs think of it and explain it to Americans only in the terms of the stock market, which is fair because most of us understand, you know, green line, good, red line, bad. That's about my extent of investment advice and knowledge. I know many of my viewers are much smarter than I am in terms of that. That's why I don't have that's why most of my money is in a high yield money market and savings account. Like, I have my Discover card savings account that pays almost five percent. 

And then a money market, that's where most of my money is because I'm not smart enough to really play the stock market. But here's the thing. What this means is that over the next night because these negotiations are we're gonna take some time. Right? Now these countries have ninety days to negotiate. Meanwhile, our market can kinda chill a little bit. I mean, the market as it stands right now, is continuing to pump. 

The, went down. There's a little bit of a sell off, but it's back on the pump. The Dow Jones Industrial is up five point seven six percent. The Nasdaq is up almost eight percent right now. And and, again, what I what I wanna point out is that this is still with the Our top story tonight, global market surge after president Trump's latest move in his trade balancing agenda. He announced a pause on tariff hikes for most nations to allow time for negotiation except for China. Fox nine's So Young Kim joining us in our studios to talk about this tonight. Tonight. So Young, the Trump administration says this was a part of the strategy all along. 

Kelsey, Randy, that's right. President Trump says more than seventy five countries are in line to strike a deal with the US to fix what he's called unfair relationships for years. But they're all calling, how do we do this? They all wanna make a deal. Let's take a look at what's new. President Trump announced he would pause the reciprocal tariffs for ninety days. The administration says this is for most countries that did not retaliate. Instead, for now, they'll drop down to the lower ten percent universal tariff rate that kicked in over the weekend. There's one major exception. 

Trump raised the tax rate on Chinese imports to one hundred twenty five percent. He says this is in response to China retaliating with tariffs of their own. Now the Trump administration says what's coming into focus is where America's trading partners will stand as a US China showdown escalates. What I'm certain of is that what China is doing will affect their economy much more than it will ours because they have an export driven flood the world with cheap export models, and the rest of the world now understands. 

You clearly, failed to see what president Trump is doing here. You you tried to say that the rest of the world would be moved closer to China when in fact we've seen the opposite effect. The entire world is calling the United States of America not China, because they need our markets. They need our consumers. And the Trump administration says these latest changes are effective immediately, and Trump says he expects to also be able to reach a deal with China. Live in studio, Soyoung Kim, FOX nine. Prior to the president's announcement, the uncertainty in the economy had Delta Airlines warning its investor. 

Soyoung Kim, thank you. Alright. What do you guys think of all that? Like, you guys been following all this stock market nonsense and, you know, tangentially related, the old crypto market and all that? What do you guys what are your thoughts on that? Yeah. I think, people need to understand how tariffs work because there's a lot of confusion. The tariffs, like, charge on your own citizens as, like, an extra tax for the stuff coming from a country. So a tariff on China means that, say, you wanna buy a DJI drone that would normally cost a thousand bucks. If it's got a hundred and twenty five percent tariff, it's gonna be double plus twenty five percent. So that thousand dollar drone would now be twenty two hundred and fifty dollars. 

And China's not getting that extra money. The American government is taking that tariff money as a tax. And China then has the decision to either offset the price or lower it or not sell or whatever. And the idea is that China will then sell less goods and more American companies will take the opportunity to then manufacture and produce those goods in America. The only problem is the reason China's got such an advantage in trade and manufacturing is because they pay so many people peanuts, 

and people doing those same jobs in America don't wanna be paid peanuts. So I wanna know what are your guys' thoughts because how's that gonna work? We bring back all the manufacturing. Great. We have more jobs, but now are those goods gonna be, like, ten times the price? Yeah. I think, you know, Howard Lutnick was just on a show the other day that said that they were going to start automating a lot of the manufacturing. So I think that it's not only going to cause a hike in price and a shortage of resources in the interim, but ultimately won't lead to more jobs because we have all these robotics and stuff that are taking over manufacturing and, you know, they're they're about to start pushing the Optimus robots for people for thirty thousand dollars, and those will be able to do, like, various different things, from, like, cleaning houses to Elon said that within the next ten years, AI and robots are gonna be teaching our kids. So 

that'll actually be the next, oh, sorry. Go ahead, Scott. No. Go ahead, man. I I mean yeah. Go ahead. I was just gonna make a joke. That'll be the next, frontier of, social justice will be the the pro bots versus the robophobes. And who are you whose side are you on? Are you pro robot, or are you, one of those robophobic people that's afraid of the robots? Robophobic. Oh, dude. That's an and you're just coming up with the right and left tonight, dude. Robophobic. That's a good, show title. We gotta write that one down, you guys. Robophobic. 

Anyway, because I'm sure that'll be very pertinent as we roll forward in this agenda. It's interesting, man. Like, I just I don't know. I've heard lots of different takes on all this stuff. And and in in in principle, in theory, it sounds like such a fairy tale dream. It's like, yeah. Let's just get rich off of tariffs and make all this money and bring it manufacturing back to the United States. And part of my, like, carrot being dangled in front of me that I find to be very appealing is the I v idea then that Trump keeps talking about where it's like, okay. We're gonna institute all these tariffs, and then we're gonna eliminate income tax. We're gonna eliminate tax. Right? And so that's the carrot that I'm like, well, that sounds interesting. Because for me, 

the tax thing is more about the IRS. So when we have when we have an income tax, we have an IRS. And it's like every transaction I do, every time I make a deposit into my bank account, I'm like, oh, man. There's like, it makes me cringe, like, if it's a certain dollar amount. Even if it's like let's say for as in my handyman work, let's say I get a big check. Well, I mean, I could I gotta do my accounting on my end, but it's like, when I deposit a check-in there, that's supposed to be for, like, work. You know what I mean? Then now now I gotta do extra accounting on my end to account for all that and blah blah blah. And it's like, 

I'm kinda telling on myself I should have separate checking accounts. But, anyway, what I'm saying is, like, I'm kinda I'm kinda I'm kinda off the books with my stuff. I'll just be honest. But at the same time, what I'm saying is is that, to me, the IRS income tax is transactional surveillance. So they exist to monitor and and give us that sort of tingling in the back of our neck every time we have some sort of financial transaction. It's like, oh god. Is the government gonna be in on this? Like, how are they watching? What, like, what are they gonna want out of me from from this? And so to me, it's like, if we can abolish income tax, then does the IRS go away? Like, that would be amazing. Like, are they no no longer gonna be the eye of Sauron looking at my bank account and monitoring 

my transaction? So that's appealing to me. Do I have to have tariffs in order to get that? Like, I don't know. Yeah. I think, it it's especially interesting with what Elon's doing with Doge. A lot of that team, or or, like, late last year was actually recruited by Peter Thiel, and they're basically just taking the Palantir, like, mass surveillance software and injecting that into government, and IRS has been one of those things. So I'd I think if anything, the IRS is gonna be even tighter. I'm gonna go on record and say, I don't do my taxes. I don't I don't mess with taxes. I don't pay I try not to pay as many taxes as I can. 

But who knows? In a couple of years, that might end up coming back to bite me. I'll knock on wood somewhere. You know, I I work with a guy here locally, and he says he he runs his own construction business. He's like, I haven't paid taxes in thirty years. Yeah. Hey, James. I think it's just Oh, go ahead. And what I was gonna say, if you don't like, he's he's like, if you just don't engage in this, like, if you file taxes and then don't pay your taxes, then you're gonna get smoked. But, like, if you just don't engage with their system, like I'm not advocating anything. Don't come after me. I'm just saying, I have case studies and examples of this where 

you know and he's he's one of us. He's awesome. Shout out. There's so many ways to do legal tax avoidance. I mean, that's what the billionaires set up the entire tax system to do, is to make it so sophisticated that they would have to pay specialists and so called experts to navigate this just like the legal world. And that's why, you know, I think I think there's a video that I saw recently where it talks about how all of these billionaire guys have, like, one dollar salaries because their income, their payroll income is next to nothing. Instead, they have stock options 

and their their company assets that they can borrow money against. And then you're just repaying the money you borrowed from your company, and therefore there was no taxable income in the first place. Well, not everyday, you know, people who aren't entrepreneurs can't really do that as an employee. So that's why the tax burden, which is really a protection racket, affects the the middle to lower class because they're paying all the fees. They're paying all the, you know, a much bigger percentage of their pay overall in terms of how much you're left over to live on. Right? If you're only if you only have two thousand dollars a month to live on after taxes and your rent is already fifteen hundred dollars, 

like, good luck balancing the book or getting a second job or living with, like, six other people. And, you know, that's I think I can see with all the new housing they're building up lease up in Canada, it's all really small and modular as if, like, future housing is just gonna be little contained things. And almost no, single unit housing is happening because they're like, oh, that's that's that's so, you're just, like, overconsuming if you have, like, a big house. You need to move into one of these one bedroom 

apartments that are just like everything else. And, yeah, I don't think people want to have that kind of existence, like something out of Fifth Element and living like Bruce Willis in a tiny what feels like an airplane cabin. Part of freedom is, like, if I work hard and earn, I should be able to keep my earnings and then spend them on on what I need. So yeah, man. Star Wars showing the reality of of taxes. And essentially Palpatine became the emperor because he used a tax scheme with a trade federation to play both sides 

and take power by manipulating and disarming the republic. So I I saw that video and I felt there's a little parallel there that you could make. And who's who's the bad group? You you can assign whichever group you want as the baddies for that one. But, yeah, tariffs, definitely a manufactured thing, to get this problem. And the last thing I'll say on it is here in Canada, the Conservative Party, there's an election coming up at the end of the month. The Conservative Party was just dominating in the polls until Justin Trudeau resigned. 

And central banker Mark Carney came in, without any public election and is now the prime minister and is hoping to trick enough Canadians into accepting him as the actual prime minister going forward at the end of the month. And everyone's like, the polls have changed. Everyone's like pro Carney, and the conservatives have gone down. And, like, what are we gonna do? And it's like, never trust a central banker Yeah. At the end of the day. No. Good lord. Yeah. That's that's I'm praying for you guys, Paul. I don't know what it's gonna take. 

You and you and the UK. I did two pieces on the UK this week. They are just, like, not having a good time over there. Brutal. But, yeah, praying for our Canadian brothers and sisters, man. I don't know. What do you think? You guys wanna go to the next block? Chop it up a little more? Yeah. We can close-up the the tariff theme. Yep. We got a few more on the tariffs. Yeah. And then we'll get to the really fun stuff. Cool. Let's do it. Alright, Cody. You good? Alright. Yeah. You're good. Let's roll it. 

Eight four four six nine six gold or click on the link in the description below. I love these tariffs, but no one seems to understand them. To understand what Trump is doing, you just have to do one thing. Read his book, The Art of the Deal. It's all right in there for you. Anyone can read it. Anyone can understand exactly what Donald Trump is doing. And so what is it that he's doing? What is this tariff plan really? Well, 

it's a bluff, but also it's not a bluff. What do I mean by that? To understand this, let's just go over the basics very quickly. What is a tariff? A tariff is simply a tax on imported goods typically imposed in order to persuade citizens to buy domestically produced versions of a particular product. So let's say that the Japanese wanted to persuade Japanese citizens to buy locally produced Japanese rice. But let's also say, hypothetically, that the US can produce rice much cheaper than they produce it in Japan because of a large scale farming. But like I said, Japan wants the Japanese people to buy their own locally grown rice to support local Japanese farmers. 

So Japan's government imposes a tax on all US rice imported into Japan. This is a tariff. And this, of course, is a real example. Japan really does this and the tariff on rice imported into Japan is insane. The tariff is an eye watering seven hundred and seventy eight percent. So if a grocery store chain in Japan wants to sell American rice and they import one million dollars worth of it, because of the tax, they'd end up spending eight million seven hundred and eighty thousand dollars for the rice and seven million seven hundred and eighty thousand dollars of that money would go to the Japanese government. Now this is a massive oversimplification, 

and it's not precisely accurate, but it illustrates the point. So Trump comes out with this massive reciprocal tariff plan, and he's essentially saying, if you tax us, we are going to tax you. Sounds pretty fair. Right? The tariffs will be not a full reciprocal. I could have done that, I guess, but it would have been tough for a lot of countries who didn't wanna do that. I'd like to see the chart if you have it. China, first row. China, sixty seven percent. That's tariffs, currency manipulation, 

and trade barriers. So so it's sixty seven percent, so we're gonna be charging a discounted reciprocal tariff of thirty four percent. I think, in other words, they charge us, we charge them, we charge them less. So how can anybody be upset? But I don't think that Trump's intentions are quite as simple as making trade fair for the US, protecting American businesses, and raking in trillions through these newly imposed tariffs. I I think that Donald Trump's plan is actually a bit more nuanced than this, and it is absolute genius. 

I'll explain what I think is going on here in one moment. First, of course, I have to talk about my amazing sponsor. Elon Musk is again stirring the pot when he said he wants to livestream an audit of Fort Knox. What is he really up to? And why did I title this video, Trump just took over the world? Well, as I said at the start of this video, it's all spelled out clearly in his book, The Art of the Deal. In this book, Trump explains that in order to win any negotiation, you just need two things. One, 

you have to have something that the other party wants and hopefully more than how much you want what they've got. And two, you've got to be willing to walk away without a deal. And if you've got those two things going for you, well, you are unstoppable. But here's where the genius part comes in. Trump doesn't necessarily want the same thing from every country. For some countries, for most countries probably, he wants reduced tariffs, you know. But for other countries, he may want military cooperation or geopolitical concessions. 

Maybe he wants to negotiate a peace treaty. The international trading system consists of a web of relationships, military, economic, political. One cannot take a single aspect in isolation. This is how president Trump sees the world, not as a zero sum game, but as interlinkages that can be reordered to advance the interest of the American people. The point is that with these new tariffs, Trump has given the United States something amazing. 

He's given us leverage. I say this because I know it's what president Trump believes. He believes three things. One, it is a good source of revenues. Two, it protects our important industries and the employees. And three, he's added a third leg to the stool, and he uses it for negotiating. Mhmm. Not just leverage, but massive leverage because of these tariffs. Anything Trump wants, Trump gets. These tariffs are the genie in the lamp. They give Donald Trump one wish for every country 

in the world. UK, stop regulating speech on social media. Lower the tariffs. Done. Iran, sign this nuclear weapons deal and you know what? We'll lower the tariffs. Done. Mexico, go fund the border wall, and we will lower the tariffs. Done. But for most countries, the leverage that Donald Trump has created will be used to reduce or remove their tariff. So the tariffs. President Trump blinked is exactly what I would be saying if I was misinformed or trying to mislead you. I think what people don't understand 

is that we are seeing for the first time with a presidency, a business negotiation take place in real time. Yeah. Any negotiation, any contract negotiation that you've been through, certainly if you're dealing with with larger businesses, it involves multiple phases. It involves usually a broad strokes proposal then redlining. Okay. Can we put that on the shelf right now? Let's put that on pause while we hash out these details. That's what you're seeing as far as the pause on the Chinese tariffs. And by the way, it's not across the board, to be clear. Let let let's let's still bring this back kind of into focus. 

The main target of these tariffs is China. K? That is the end goal. They're still, in the sights figuratively of the United States and we have more than tariffs to prove that that is the case right now, to prove that this is why Donald Trump is doing this. You have the executive order on shipbuilding. We'll get to that. You have, Pete Hegseth in Panama, his statements. And then, yes, by the way, there still are some tariffs. Some of the additional tariffs have been paused and I think you'll understand why. It's time for the latest installment of The Terrifier. Sup? 

That's your first time I watched that movie on Tubi. Oh my gosh. I did. It's it's it really is horrifying. He cuts a woman upside down. She's I know. I mean, that's, like, bone in the middle with a chainsaw. Well, that's what we're doing to China. So I could never find that saw at home depot. Jesus. At twelve eighteen, Donald Trump dropped a post on Truth Social that probably is going to end up in history books. You'll have, you know, the only thing to fear is fear itself Right. And a day that will live in infamy. And, you know, itself and a day that will live in infamy. 

And, you know, JFK, ah. Oh. Ow. I thought you meant the moonshot. Yeah. Right. How that stung? Oh, god. Put up the rope. It's the last word for shut up, Jackie. Oh, I stay. Yeah. Ricochet. I feel a burn. It stays. How's my hair look? Alright. Let me pick it up up the street. So this is the truth post regarding the pause on the tariffs 

on China. And there's been a lot of volatility. Obviously, this last week, it's mostly corrected. I wanna also drive the point home that there's a very big difference between what is good for Wall Street and what is good for Main Street. Sometimes they are not one and the same. They should complement each other, but we now just had a new report this morning that, inflation is down at its lowest since, I believe, twenty twenty, and we just had a really good, jobs report, better than expected. Those two things in tandem show you that there is a contrast between what Americans are living and what is being, I guess, speculated upon in Wall Street. And we'll get to that in a little bit. But here's the truth post. He wrote 

I guess I have to read all of this one since it's going to be It is. Yeah. Historical. Based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the world markets, not the store, I am hereby raising the tariff charge to to China by the United States of America to a hundred and twenty five percent effective immediately. At some point, hopefully, in the near future, China will realize that the days of ripping off the USA and other countries, so many other countries, is no longer sustainable or acceptable. Conversely, 

and based on the fact that more than seventy five countries have called representatives of the United States to negotiate a solution to the subjects being discussed relative to trade, trade barriers, tariffs, currency manipulation, so much currency manipulation, and nonmonetary tariffs, and that these countries have not, at my strong suggestion, retaliated in any way, shape, or form against the United States, I have authorized a ninety day pause and a substantially lowered reciprocal tariff during this period of ten percent 

also effective immediately. Thank you for your attention to this matter. And then, the White House added this on x. They put out, do not retaliate and you will be rewarded. That is important. This matters. And I think what you're also seeing here is, this administration realized, oh, wait a second. They have more levers to pull. And especially I think it happened faster. Right away, you had Vietnam that set the stage, then you had Israel, Japan. They said fifty nations came to them and were willing to have some negotiations. So if you 

globalist order in real time. Exactly like I've been saying, you can't just look at the Smoot Hawley act of nineteen thirty and then use that as your entire argument. It's a completely different strategy. And it seems as though Donald Trump's full spectrum tariff pressure campaign is doing exactly what it was set out to do. It's accomplishing exactly what he was looking for. Trump has ignited a global economic realignment. And now we got all these countries and territories all seemingly chomping at the bit and jumping over each other scrambling to make a deal with America. In other words, it feels like the paper tigers are folding and folding fast. And the headline for this video, Europe is already folding. Let me show you guys exactly what's going on. We got some stuff to get into. So let's roll the tape. Alright, folks. So basically, exactly like I told you guys, they're a complete paper tiger. The European economy is insulated. It's protected. And, of course, it's built on one-sided trade. You know, basically, what everybody's accusing Donald Trump of doing, protectionist isolationist policies. Yeah. That's pretty much what Europe already does. 

You think you can sell your American products in our markets, you are American pig? I spit on you. That's basically been the standard for decades. But now Trump comes with a reciprocal tariff and the end goal is not really to isolate the American market, but rather to open up free trade avenues, actual reciprocal trade, and he became the economic devil overnight. And so I guess the goal of Europeans, Canada, and China, that really seems to be the unholy trinity tariff alliance going on right now. I guess their goal was to turn the whole world against America. But they're FAFO ing quick because guess what? When you isolate your market and depend on exporting to the American market, which is the biggest market to consumer of the world, well, guess what? You essentially forgive all of your leverage. You have no leverage. If you're gonna go tit for tat with America in a trade war, America pretty much has nothing to lose because you don't even let them export to you in the first place. Well, what do you think is gonna happen? The EU is deeply dependent on exporting to the American market. They're totally dependent. And so now they basically don't have a choice and they're caving. We stand ready to negotiate with the United States. Indeed, we have offered zero for zero tariffs for industrial goods as we have successfully 

done with many other trading partners because Europe is always ready for good deal, so we keep it on the table. But we are also prepared to respond through countermeasures and defend our interests. You know, last week, it was we will fight these Americans. And now already, I mean, a week later, we are open to negotiations. And they're coming with this weak ass proposal, the same one from two weeks ago, zero for zero tariffs on industrial goods. Yeah. It's not gonna work. Not good enough. You know, it's cute. It's a start. But let's talk cars. Let's talk meat. You know, everyone's always talking about cars. That's the most obvious one, but I think American beef is another great point of conversation. They barely allow it into their markets. And, you know, you'll hear left to its claim, well, that's bogus. They don't really have tariffs on American meat. You know, they don't have tariffs maybe. At least not huge tariffs, but they have all kinds of regulations. 

They claim that American beef is not safe. But, really, it's just an excuse. It's protectionism dressed up as regulation. And, again, that's the whole point of these tariffs, to open up global markets for American goods, for American producers, to be granted the same opportunities as everybody else. Europeans can send all kinds of food products to the United States. In fact, Americans love European goods, Italian and French wines, Scotch, I mean, the list goes on. And, well, now maybe it's time for American meat to be allowed into the European markets. And come on. It's obvious why they've created all these regulations to stop it from entering. They don't want American meat in Europe because they know that it's gonna blow their product out of the water. And that's really what these tariffs are about. It's not about bringing sweatshops back to America. It's about protecting and prioritizing key American industries. 

American beef, poultry, steel, automobiles, semiconductors. This is the foundation of the American manufacturing economy and of course agriculture. I mean, there's more but you get what I mean. Those are the core industries that support American families, small towns, and national security. And so the goal is to open up European markets and other global markets to American companies. In this case, American ranchers. I I mean, just imagine the boom. American ranchers produce the absolute best beef in the world. Period. I mean, I know you've got Japanese Wagyu. That's more of a specialty product. I mean, nobody's eating Wagyu every single day. It's way too rich. When it comes to premium steaks, nothing touches American prime, and the demand for this beef should be global. But travel the world and it basically doesn't exist because foreign governments have enacted policies to protect their inferior domestic products, essentially tariffs and trade barriers, and Trump is saying no more. Did you agree to lowering tariffs for any of of the countries that you spoke to today so we can What you understand, Jennifer, you have to understand it. We have massive 

surplus countries that we're dealing with. We have massive deficits. We've got to straighten that out because you can't continue to be there. It's been that way for years now, and it can't go on any longer. And we're the piggyback. Straighten out. We're gonna become a wealthy nation again, wealthy like never before, and we're not gonna let other nations that have been ripping us off, whether it's China or the European Union, with all of the European nations 

that have just made it's been like a feast. Look, the European Union was formed for one reason. You know what that was? To rip off the United States. And so, you know, they could whine. They could play the victim card all they want, but enough is enough. We don't block their key industries what they do best. Right? The Europeans are so proud of all the products they produce. But when you have key industries and what America does best, they can't export it to the world? It's simply unfair. It's not reciprocal. It's a scam. And that right there is what Donald Trump is fighting for, to bring those jobs back, to increase production domestically, and to export across the world. I mean, imagine the jobs that would be created. Imagine the industry that would boom if all of a sudden America's food products were being exported globally. I mean, just the European market, that's like, what, four hundred nearly four hundred million people. All Trump is asking is for a fair standard. You guys bring your wine products. You guys bring your meat products, your specialty artisanal products, and we consume them like crazy. And you guys are making all kinds of fruit. 

Let's pay all Coke. Colby, thank you, bud. Yeah. Okay. We get it. Lots of glazing in that block. What do you I mean, what do you guys think of all that? The glazers in full effect. You go ahead, Seven. I got something to say after. Yeah. And, it it's ridiculous because, I mean, anybody that understands the, like, very basics of economics knows that this is not gonna be, something that ends up saving us money. I mean, historically, everything that the government does ends up not saving us money. You can even go back to, like, the the bank bailouts and the auto manufacturer bailouts. Like, those didn't roll down to employees or 

bank employees or people with bank accounts that went straight to the top. And I I just see this as sort of the same. And it it's interesting too because, for both of Trump's terms, he picked a George Soros banker. You had Steven Mnuchin from one one West Bank, and now you have Scott Bessent who co like, collaborated with George Soros to help crash the British pound in nineteen ninety two. And I I think that's ultimately what we're gonna see here. And I think they're trying to tank the American dollar so that we do ultimately end up, 

solely relying on that crypto strategic reserve that that they're setting up. Yeah. I think they're pushing for tariff equity, some kind of weird equity thing, but it's a manufactured crisis. So you can have this big divide, so then you can offer the solution, which will, of course, be, hey, man. We need to unite all these countries where we're having these tariff differences, maybe the UK, Canada, the US, Mexico, maybe Panama, maybe Greenland. 

Create one big new sphere block that can compete with the EU. And, you know, some people have dreamed that. You can look it up. And that would be like a super state that would have be as centralized as you can possibly think and have just as many problems with that top layer of government as the EU countries are having with the EU government, people like Ursula. And, yeah. Ultimately, the tariffs hurt hurt the the people inside the country, ostensibly punish the other countries. But 

you gotta see the hypocrisy in, like like, the u US has already banned China's Huawei and other companies from doing business in the States and selling their products for good reason. Right? Because the ties to Chinese intelligence and all the hackings and stuff that go on there. And then a lot of countries don't want American beef because, like in Canada, we don't like American beef here because American beef traditionally has lots of hormones and vaccines injected into it, and we don't have that standard here. We we decide not to we we lay off the cows. Same with Irish beef. 

Some of the best beef I've ever had in my entire life was in the country of Ireland, where they are very strict about their what they import versus what they grow. So I I I get some of the point the liberal hive mind's making, but in reality, like, if even America first, it's like sometimes you don't always have the superior product. Right? And so it's cool. Sell to your own market. Sell locally. Sell to your community. Make enough to sell to them. This sounds like like complaining because I wanna go and dominate the globe with my product, 

which may or may not be of good quality. But because I'm the strongest and most monopolistic, I I need to have the right to do that. And, yeah, the states hasn't I I've, up till this point, have always thought that they already set their own tariffs to kind of, like, make cheaper goods available. And that's why the trade off is you lost a bunch of manufacturing jobs, but you have cheap TVs and computers and all these electronic goods because they're made with more servant slave labor. And, you know, this is the outsourced cost of cheap goods that people need to understand, which again goes back to Seven's point about buying local and just investing in your local community or developing your skills and making stuff for yourself yourself. 

Yeah. I wanna start making my own iPhone, man. Telling you what. But, dude, you know, that's such a good point. But, you know, those of you outside of America don't understand that this is America, and you will buy our shit whether you like it or not. This is America. No. I'm just kidding. But it's like, okay. Every all those guys kept bringing up or mentioning or alluding to this whole art of the deal thing. I was like, well, you guys didn't know? It's the art of the deal. He's he's negotiating. And it's like so originally, I thought that these tariffs were about okay. So we're gonna revamp the entire economic structure of how the United States works, the whole global market. Like, our isn't wasn't this a big ploy to, like, just 

change the world and change America the whole way we do economics, or or or was it a bluff to begin with? So that that I don't know. I was on the impression that that was what it was all about. Like, instituting these strong tariffs completely redoing how the whole economy even works. Like, bringing manufacturing back to the United States, blah blah blah, whether it's given us jobs or AI jobs or whatever. To me, there's some I'm I'm curious about that because, obviously, the system's broken. And, obviously, something needs to like, short of all of us, like, all the people, like, learning how to actually grow a tomato in their backyard. Like, the only reason why we have, like, monocrop, all these, like, GMO products because people are not willing to do the a single thing for themselves. Like and if we if we were to get rid of GMO crops, half the world would die. Like, half of America would starve to death if we got rid of GMO crops, like, tomorrow. Right? So, you know, until we can convince everybody to, like, grow a tomato in their backyard, 

you know, at least this system needs to be in place, and the system is broken. So if there's a chance to fix the system, I'm curious about that. Now, of course, and the same thing with immigration. And I mean, there's the same argument that fits into that puzzle piece as well where it's like, okay. Let's say you deport a lot of people that are here illegally. Well, that's gonna cause a shortage of the people that pick your crops or do the labor, and and so there's gonna be a rise in food prices. And so it's the same thing with this. So when when we're bringing manufacturing back or we're we're eliminating cheap foreign production, then, okay, there's gonna be a cost in in of of every the cost of everything is gonna go up. So it's the same argument in both cases. 

I've heard arguments being made. Okay. Well, there's gonna be a there's gonna be a period of pain. Okay? There's going to be a depression, but it's gonna self correct eventually, hopefully, right, as the new system emerges. And I'm like, I'm I am honestly kinda curious about that. Do we take the hit now for the next hundred generations to be able to have a chance as this thing's going off the cliff? Like, is there a way to reverse this thing? And if if we can just endure, like, a little bit of short term pain in order to correct it, I'm interested in that. You know? It's like with COVID, 

we saw the boomers, and everybody's like, oh, like, they're afraid they're gonna die because of the cold of a cold. And so they're willing to shut down the economy and ruin everything for generations because of a cold. No problem. But now it's like we're on the cusp of maybe there's a chance to, like, do something corrective for this broken system, but, no, not willing to do it even for a split second. And so I don't know. I don't know. I'm I'm curious. It like, I part of me was hopeful. I'm like, god. Is Trump gonna, like, save the world? Like, not putting any faith in it. I've been talking mad shit this whole time, but, like, a a tiny little piece of me is like, damn. Is he gonna pull it off? But then he backs down. 

And everybody's coping and being like, oh, no. It was just Art of the Deal. Don't you know? Don't you know it was just Art of the Deal? I'm like, what the fuck? Which one is it then? Like, what are we doing here? Art of the Steel. Yeah. Exactly. So I I I to me, it looks like he saw the stock market. His his his invest you know, his donors and all his people are like, bro, this is not what we were talking about. And he's like, okay. Fine. Pulling back. Ninety day pause. And everyone's like, okay. Okay. So so you don't actually know what you're doing. 

Or is it possible that's a yo yo setup? And, like, if you're able to communicate the moves you're gonna make in advance, it's like the revolving door. Right? You're setting up your buddies. So it's like, hey, guys. We're gonna do this announcement on Tuesday. Buy buy low on Thursday or Wednesday. Then I'll make this announcement on Friday. And then by Monday, boom, you're in business. It's just like Rothschild buying up all the penny stocks because he said Wellington's won the war. You know what I mean? Similar play, Art of the Steel. And it's always, like, announce that you're doing one thing, set up an expectation, 

then subvert that expectation, then pull off your magic trick and the prestige. Yeah, dude. I heard there was some controversy about that, how Trump, like, put out on Truth Social, like, now would be a good time to buy or something like that. And then it's like and so some people on the left or whatever, critics are saying insider trading. They're, like, trying to get him on that. You know what I mean? Yeah. I, I I I especially see that with sort of the trend with the crypto market where there's all this institutional investment and people like Howard Lutnick are you know, he he's on record as saying I have hundreds of millions of dollars in crypto. 

And but the difference between crypto and say, like, stocks or money is, you know, if if the dollar crashes, we're supposed to hold the government accountable. If a stock crashes, we're supposed to hold the the company accountable. And eventually, you know, once we move over to to crypto and digital currency only, every time it takes a dip, all I see is, oh, well, that's just the market. That's the that's the roller coaster and the the, you know, the dips and things like and I think in reality, they're all sort of colluding with each other behind the scenes 

and saying, you know, we're all gonna dump on the retail investors because the, the price has gone up so high. Like, I think that's what's explaining these, fluctuations with Bitcoin is they're seeing that it's reaching a certain price point, and then they're all dumping together and then waiting for more people to buy back in now that, you know, you're supposed to buy the dips or whatever Sure. And and just bleeding everyone dry. And what is Bitcoin usually measured in as a valuation? Yeah. US It's US dollars. That's right. Okay. Yeah. Weird. Funny. 

Yeah. And then you have things like Tether, which is, you know, operating out of Hong Kong, by people like Brock Pierce, who is a known Epstein client, has had, like, child sexual assault allegations against them. And now all of a sudden that's being brought into the fold. And as far as I can tell, Tether is just being printed out of thin air. There's not they're not doing, like, a one to one backing, and the liquidity is really weird. And China's just cool with it. Well, where your understanding of crypto ends and where the crypto begins, that's the magic space. Yeah. That's the gap where they get to go, hey, man. It's just the the magic of crypto. 

First, you're rich, then you're poor, then you're rich again, and, just keep playing that game. So it's all a belief system at the end of the day. Right? One solar flare and that fun gambling game comes to an end as opposed to, like, my old silver pieces, which can still get me a loaf of bread or my two hands, which can build a thing that will hopefully allow you to give me another thing. So, yeah, it it is funny how crypto is really the whole purpose is to get the blockchain technology because that's what you're gonna need for the smart contracts for the digital IDs to get everything because you can't run 

a faultless carbon tracking system, consumption tracking system to charge people for breathing air unless you have a unassailable blockchain that never makes mistakes. Yeah. I've, there there's that video by, Larry Fink where he says, you know, we wanna tokenize everything. And he's, like, saying it with a smile. Larry Fink wants people on the blockchain. And that's what I try to get people to understand is they they always purported as, like, it's freedom money. You know, it's off the system. And it's, like, that's definitely not the case. And even the the, 

story behind Bitcoin and its founding and and things like that, I've I've done some digging. And it's, it it's pushed by, you know, the SHA's two five six encryptions from the NSA and a bunch of the people included in that, like, Satoshi Nakamoto story. They're all self proclaimed transhumanists. So they're, you know, willing to go along with this agenda. Have you guys looked up what Satoshi Nakamoto translates to directly? You guys looked this up? My sister-in-law is Japanese, so I could ask her. Okay. Satoshi 

translate hold on. It basically means, medium insider center. Satoshi center. Right? Mhmm. And then Nakamoto translate. Banking and pessimism. Oh, no. No. No. Sorry. Nakamoto means central origin. And, Satoshi basically means, like, wisdom or intelligence. Central intelligence, dude. Yeah. I see. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So that's a fun one. That's a fun one. You know? Like, I think a lot of people we project, like, that these people these gangsters are sort of, like, psychopaths or sociopaths, or they're blackmailed, or they're bought off, or whatever. Right? But you have to try and put yourself in a mindset that you that we ourselves will probably never be in, which is that of a central banker, who is, like, above a doctor in terms of playing God by printing money. They're like wizards who create energy from in from thin air and can use that energy to compel other people to do the most ridiculous and retarded shit. 

And out of that god complex comes this desire to try and socially engineer and fundamentally change human behavior. And I know for a fact that these, at least in Canada, these central bankers have had these think tanks, and they invite people from their board of director friends, and they all come to the think tank and hear the presentation. And it's, like, all disguised in, like, corporate speak and bureaucratic speak and things like sustainable development. And at the end of the day, it's gonna come down to they want you to brush your teeth so that you'll get sixty points. So you can use those sixty points for your food card to get your daily slop rations 

made out of bugs or whatever. And it'll be, like, minimum it'll be, like remember the times of great consumption? The the fat pig times of the twentieth and twenty first century? Thank goodness we saved the planet by becoming skinny, emotional, vegan waifs that barely can decide for ourselves. And I don't know. That doesn't seem like a fun future, so that's why I do what I do. Awesome. Yeah. There's, there's this term called test grill that I learned very recently. 

Mark Andreessen is actually a self proclaimed one, but it can be attributed to people like Elon Musk and and things like this where they feel like these actions are, they can hide them behind the guys of, well, this is for the betterment of all humanity. And then, you know, push the carbon tax credit and and and things like that. Interesting. So, like, and justify the means type of sort of philosophy sort of Yeah. It was like the Club of Rome, Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars. The whole idea is that 

because humanity has grown tired of, like, violent conflicts with each other, like, we generally have to be pretty brainwashed to participate these days because we're we're so cynical towards it. So they have to engineer new types of enemies. Right? And it's like, hey, they've done you gotta fight the communists. You gotta fight this group, that group. Well, what about making ourselves the enemy? Right? So that or making your enemy your neighbor. Right? If your neighbor's eating beef, they might be a bad person. If your neighbor doesn't have a BLM sign, they're a bad person. So 

what they do is they create these purity tests to give people the opportunity to to virtue signal their allegiance. And then the side effect of that is we all regress. Those of us who participate, we regress into sort of tribalistic mentality, fight a bunch, and then those people at one rung above in the sort of law and order mentality will be like, something must be done about these tribalistic people. And then that's when the ruling class goes, well, here, we've got the solution we cooked up kind of a while ago, but we've been waiting to implement it. And that's the shock doctrine. Right? Manufacture a crisis so you can offer the solution. 

And you only kinda go along with it if you know if you don't know what's going on. Right? Am I gonna rush out to get a real ID or a digital ID or something that I know is gonna be used to track things like this conversation and be used against me? No. I'm gonna differ. I'm gonna delay and, like, not participate in that. And everyone's got their own line, like, what's enough for you. Right? It comes down to where your comfort meets your integrity. And so you just gotta decide for yourself what's more important. Yeah. No doubt. Now is Real ID that's a thing in Canada too? Are they are they do you guys have a deadline coming up about getting that in place too? Or So they just implemented so that if we come into the States for longer than thirty days, we have to register now 

with the American government, which is a brand new thing. And with Mark Carney, if he gets voted in, he he will definitely be pushing forward a national digital ID, for Canada. There's already a bunch of people set up in the works for that tied to Bill Gates and the the those foundations. And I I honestly fear that even if the conservative government come in, they might and But once Trump starts pushing the unification agenda and things have gotten bad, like people have suffered the the pain for a year and a half, two years, whatever, 

they'll have more open arms to this unification because they'll say, hey. We're gonna move to this new currency. It's gonna be on blockchain. But guess what? Those of you who've really suffered get a UBI because we're printing it all out of thin air, baby. Yeah. Yeah. It's interesting. So we've got this big deadline coming up in the United States where you're gonna be required to have a real ID in order to fly in an airplane, and that's coming up here in about a month. About a month, that's gonna come down and be, I guess. But, you know, you can use a passport. There's other ways around it too, so you don't have to have to have to do it. But you know? So that's our way of noncompliance. But, you know, it's funny in America. People are just like they're not willing to really do anything or say anything until, like, it's too late. So I bet you the day that it comes out, there's gonna be a lot of TikTok videos of people getting denied 

their airlines. And then and then it's gonna become an issue, and it's like, well, we've been talking about this for, like, ten years, you guys. So welcome to the party. Thank you for joining us. Grand Theft World dot com if you wanna learn more. It it's, it it's actually funny. My, my girlfriend's gonna be flying, like, the day or the day after that takes effect. So I was like, look. You're not getting that real ID. You're gonna get a passport or or renew your passport. And, I I even looked on, like, five different states, 

where you can go, like, book an appointment. And all the all the times for a lot of the DMVs in different counties and stuff don't even have appointments available. So it's like For passports or for real IDs? For the real IDs. So even the the yeah. So even the people that are, you know, trying to get one last minute or something like that, it's it's not only gonna stop you from getting on your flight, but you might as well just get a passport so you can leave the country anyway. Yeah. Dude. Yeah. That's why would you waste your time or money on a real ID when you just get a passport? I'm just gonna use straight up passport for everything from here on out. Except if you're buying a gun, you still have to have something with your home address on it. 

So so we'll see how that goes down. There are ways around that too, though, folks. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Yep. Or just buy guns, like, from your friends. Yeah. That's the way to do it. Or print In in America. In Canada, it's illegal for us to do that, unfortunately. Oh, it was just In America, you go nuts, man. Yeah. Get yourself a nice three d printer, and then secret's safe with you. Go on a nice little boating trip, and, it's all good. 

Yep. Well, shoot. We got another block coming up here, and this is Paul. Paul, are we basically just gonna play a clip and you're gonna do some commentary on it? Is that what you're thinking? Yeah. So, I think we can play the whole block. Okay. And then and the it's just a snippet, like, a six minute snippet of common side effects. It's a show I think everyone should check out. Definitely a show without, like, an, political agenda. Then, my friend Byron has, his newest Real Russian News, which we played before, people seem to like. So the newest episode of that, it's only four and a half minutes long. And then, sort of ten minute long 

humorous, joke but serious you decide kind of video about how to disable one of those robotic dogs if it attacks you. And you can decide if this is a real serious video or if this is done in humor, but it is so well made, and I just respected it so much. And who knows? We might be facing robotic dogs. It'd be good to know how to disable them or, effectively get away from them. So Very much fun. Oh, seven, you down for a little bit more? Yeah. I probably got another thirty minutes or so left. Okay. Cool. Well, then and then we're going to a block that has one of my videos, I really Yes. Believe so. So so, yeah, just stick around, and we'll we'll let you go here at the at the bottom of the hour. So No worries. Cool. Alright, Colby. Let's roll. 

Well, actually, our research has shown overall that diarrhea is the most preferable side effect compared to, you know, the depression, Alright. Next question. Oh, god. My boss just said diary on stage. I'm gonna have to call you back. Hello. Yes. My question is, when will this company stop the destruction it's causing not just to indigenous communities? Okay. Excuse me. I'm I'm scared. I I have the floor. As we said Peruvian Highlands to rare local plants to We have a whole system. To an entire ecosystem. Get security, please. No. We don't need security. Security, please. I I Excuse me. We're not doing this. Okay. Hold on. Let me finish. 

This company, your company, has destroyed fungal colonies that were there three million years. This is a banisteriosis. Does that mean anything to you? Security. It's been here since before insects. Don't touch me. Do not touch me. Don't touch the plant. Thank you. Thank you. I'm sorry, everybody. I'm exercising my rights. My name is Marshall Cuso. I am a shareholder. My god. Marshall? Hey. Hey. Excuse me. If I disappear, investigate Reutacal Pharmaceutical. They may attempt to harm me. They have harmed me in the past. A hippie living with his mom. 

They need to know me for that. Oh, man. Marshall? I thought that was you. Frances. It's Frances from high school. Oh, yeah. Hey, Frances. What are you do you work around here? Oh, I work for the CEO of this company. It's Urban Planning. Yeah. You have a plant. Yeah. It could use some shade. 

And I knew as I was doing it, it wasn't right. Oh, no. Oh. Yeah. I I maybe didn't peak in high school. Oh, yeah. Well, hey, I mean, I didn't either. Right? I was such an idiot. Then all of a sudden, the world got very, very real. I mean, I got all this student debt, and then my mom got dementia. Oh, Francis. I'm sorry. Sonia. Yeah. I remember your mother. Oh, yeah. Well, she doesn't remember you or anything. Okay. Frances, 

can I can I tell you a secret? Yeah. Please. Okay. Just go with me for a minute. What if there were a medicine that could heal, like, almost anything? Well, yeah. That would be great. Sure. Yeah. Right? But what if they didn't want you to know about it? They? Sorry. Who's they? They is big pharma. It's the insurance companies, the government. Think about all the people who make tons of money just from keeping us sick by keeping us unwell. 

Yeah. That would be sick. Well, yeah. It's a sick world. What the fuck? But there's a cure. What 

the fuck? Guy's name is Marshall Couso. He's the one playing with the pigeon? Nah. Don't let that fool you. He's a dangerous man. Got a monopoly on some kind of new drug, something very powerful. It's plant based, maybe a mushroom or a seed. It could be hallucinogenic, addictive, fatal. They want it nipped in the bud. They? Oh, okay. Yeah. 

Okay. So who do we got? Right. I have one free team, Capano and Harrington. Great. Are they any good? Check, check, check, signora. Check your body liner. 

Check, check, check. Welcome to Real Russian News. I am your anchor, Sergei Putinski. Man, we got a firecracker of one for you today. You will not believe it because it is crazy to believe, but you will believe because it is in front of you for you to see and to hear. Our top story. King Donny t. They call him King Donny t because the t stands for terrorists. He is terrifying the entire planet. A little terror for you, a little terror for you. He is giving out more tariffs than Joe Biden gave out hair smiths for little children. 

It is terrible. Man, now the rest of the world knows what it's like. We had these terrorists for three years in Russia because, we got into a little incursion with a neighboring country. But we did not care because we are strong. We don't care if we don't have your McDonald's or your Big Mac. Sanction us, terrorists us. Bring it on, mother effer. So many people are very angry about these terrorists, especially the they, them, blue haired, angry cat people. They even compare great King Donnie P to that of 

angry Austrian painter from nineteen thirties and forties who ran Germany. I could say his name, but I'll just get shadowbanned and not get any traction from this YouTube video. Hashtag passive aggressive tech tyranny. Anyway, you know who I'm talking about. But so many people compare King Don ET to this man I talk about with mustache like Charlie Chaplin. They say he is just like him. It is true. I am from Russia, and during second world war, man with mustache painter man, he killed twenty million Russians because of what he did in his actions. This is right. You say, is this from tanks? Is this from bombs? Is this from missiles? Is this from bullets? No. It was from tariffs. That's right. He tariff Russia so badly. He tariffed us against Hugo Boss, against Volkswagen, and worst of all, Fanta Cola. Twenty million people lost. It is terrible. Have you tried to go a day without Fanta Cola? Oh, it is like a genocide. 

Our next story, BBC, Big Black Hawk, has announced very interesting study. That is that fruit flies who consume alcohol are much more attracted to female mates. This is great. Now, my alcohol use of three, four bottles of vodka a day cannot be questioned. People might say, Sergei, you're alcoholic. I say, no. I just meet women so much because of how much I drink and poison my liver. Women are so attracted to me. They're drawn to me because of how much alcohol I consume. They say, you're idiot, Sergei. This is about fruit flies, not human. I say, I identify as a fruit fly. My pronouns are fruit and fly. And if you question it, you are a bad person, and we will cancel you. Don't you question it. Please. 

If Bruce Jenner could identify as Woman of the Year, then I could identify as an alcoholic larvae. In entertainment news, Snow White and the seven audience members has not done well at the box office. They say, why is this? I guess this is not really a good kids movie when you're talking about a coke addicted prostitute hanging out of seven Filipino men. It did have a very limited audience, appreciation. But good on you, Disney, for trying to branch out. I really admire the decisions. 

I especially liked it when you cast a black lesbian to play Obi Wan Kenobi. So brave. And a final story. If you buy a Tesla, you are a bad person. It is crazy because just last year, it mean you're a good person. You care about the environment. You could hang out with your rich champagne socialist friends and say, hey, look at me. I buy Tesla. I am so important. Oh, look at me. Selfie. Tesla. Planet saved. I am so awesome. California, let's have cocktail party. But now if you buy Tesla, it means you are a Nazi because you are supporting the world's richest autistic man. It is bad if you buy a Tesla now. Yesterday, no, but today it is bad. So So in order to save the planet, we need to light Teslas on fire. That's right. We need to light electronic cars on fire with fossil fuels. This is the only way we could save the planet. 

The science changes every day. Just like what we should do for COVID. Thank you very much for listening. You're up to date on the world of real Russian news. Rogue autonomous weapons are caused by misaligned artificial intelligence. They are like ordinary weapons only many times more powerful. They are highly intelligent and are difficult to outrun. 

They can navigate complex terrain, they can track and identify targets using thermal imaging and facial recognition. These are the three dangers. Surveillance, they gather valuable intel. Sabotage, they destroy vital infrastructure. Strikes, they can be deadly dangerous. You can protect yourself and your family. Later on we shall show you what steps to take. To accomplish their objectives, they can be deployed by air using vampire drones. 

They can be equipped with mobility features like a robotic arm or outfitted with one of these weapon systems. An assault rifle, a sniper rifle, an anti tank rocket launcher or a flame thrower. Although they hunt alone, they can also be deployed in a pack for maximum damage. Damage. This is called a swarm. A swarm can communicate and coordinate to achieve its objective, killing sentient life. If you are being attacked by quadrupedal autonomous agents, 

these are the sounds you must recognize. First, if an attack is coming, then you will hear the of drones in the sky. They sound like this. Next, they're mechanical movements and operating sounds. Although quiet when alone, if a swarm is on the move, they sound like this. You may also hear the swarm communicate 

like this. The heat signature of a robot dog is the same as a rabbit's making them difficult to detect with thermal imaging. But if it is dark, mounted optic lasers or glowing sensors can be seen with the naked eye. If you make visual contact with a robot dog in your neighborhood, please alert the authorities. Anytime robot dogs are identified, warnings of the attack will be broadcast through a text message warning and sound. 

When you hear any of these sounds you and your family must take action at once. Do not stay out of doors. If you are caught out in the open remember the acronym race cars travel fast. Run, cover, trap, fight. If running is possible, always choose this option first. Remember to stay low. Break visual contact with cameras or sensors and maintain your distance until you reach cover. 

When looking for cover remember the acronym, stop my hat, thanks. Staircases, moving surfaces, holes and thin places. Staircases or ramps can be difficult to climb. Stack various objects on them to make it even more difficult. If the robot dog does not come with an arm, use elevators. If it does, avoid them. If possible, 

climb down holes with ropes or ladders. Lastly create hard to follow paths by using tall thin beams like spanning the gap in a stairwell. A robot dog's leg width is five hundred millimeters. Look for objects with a width of at most four hundred millimeters. If you are caught out in the open during a robot dog raid, find a safe house closest to you and yourself inside. Once secured, 

you might be shut in there for days. But the world goes on and deadlines are looming. But you're away from your desk with no options except to risk your neck. If only you had access to your computer with all your project files. With any desk, you can get back to work no matter what situation you find yourself in. It lets you gain access to your devices remotely from anywhere and does it seamless and have found cover. Good job. See if the threat will pass. 

If it does not pass, you must trap it. Now is the time to use your anti QRA survival pack. This mobile toolkit contains tools to help you trap, confuse and evade your attacker. We will show you how to construct one. Never leave the house without some or all of these items. A balaclava and sunglasses to avoid targeted attacks through facial recognition. Flares to give off a bright heat signature that confuses thermal imaging. 

A small powder based fire extinguisher to create a dust cloud that can cover sensors and create a smoke screen. A high powered LED light or laser to confuse camera and lidar sensors. A paintball gun or water balloons filled with paint to blind them. A sturdy rope throwing net to entangle its limbs or a strong fishing magnet with a rope to snap to the dog's body and tie it down. 

Although effective, these tools are not guaranteed to work. If you still cannot shake it off, use these distractions to make it to your primary safe zone. They will likely follow you there. A safe zone is a location within your neighborhood or immediate surroundings that you are familiar with. If possible it contains access to fresh water and has amenable food stores inside or around the vicinity. It is important to note, 

no place is safer than any other. The risk is as great in the countryside as in the city. Although you might panic and try to move, we advise against this. You are just as safe in your home as anywhere else. No one will know where the safest place will be. In fact, you are far better off at home because it is the place you know and where you are known. If you move, there is no guarantee others will open their doors for you. 

I repeat, you are better off in your own home. During an attack however, turn off heat sources like camp stoves and extinguish small cook fires. If you live in a house, a bungalow or prefab, the safest place is the basement. If you do not have a basement, choose to stay in a room far away from the roof, outside walls, doors and windows. Dogs armed with rocket launchers, flame throwers or assault rifles may be able to penetrate these. 

Especially if they are working together in a swarm. To make sure that they do not get inside however, we suggest building some or all of these anti QRA booby traps and obstacles around your safe zone. Slippery surfaces. It has difficulty walking and may fall on slippery surfaces. Smooth materials like metal roofing sheets or plywood covered with a plastic tarp will work for this. 

Erect these at an angle facing away from your safe zone around major entry points. Make them slippery by using lubricants, oils, fats, or grease. Even sand or dust can work for this. Chords. It cannot detect chords until it's too late. Place these strategically around your safe zone in a loose nest to entangle limbs or tied between two stakes as a trip wire. Short unstable objects. 

It may not automatically avoid unstable objects that are less than thirty centimeters above the ground and may fall by stepping on such objects. Fill the perimeter of your hideout with plenty of trip hazards like sticks, wires and other trash. Mirrors. Transparent, mirrored or very bright surfaces can confuse its camera and lidar sensors. Place these around entryways to hide them. Moving surfaces. Moving surfaces such as escalators, walkways, vehicles and boats can disrupt its walking system. 

Moats or pits. If your safe zone allows you to dig a deep moat or pit around it, do so. Ensure the walls are straight at least two meters deep and over one meter wide. They can jump up to one and a half times its body length. A chain link fence. Although it could be cut, melted or blown up, a chain link fence could slow down a swarm considerably. If none of these deterrents have worked, you cannot escape and are in immediate danger, move to the final step. 

Fighting it should be an absolute last resort. If you do not have a gun, get behind it then quickly grab the handle underneath and yank it forward to disable the battery. Exercise utmost caution. Keep your hands away from the joints. They will crush your fingers if you are not careful. Alternatively, find the motor lockout button located behind the robot and press it. This will physically disconnect the motors rendering the robot inactive. 

If you are unable to get that close, grab a long blunt object like a sledge hammer and wish yourself luck. If you have access to a gun, aim for its battery pack. Do this with caution. If ion batteries are pierced, they can start a self oxidizing fire that is very hard to extinguish. As the battery packs on military grade QRA's are armored, this may not always work. In this case, 

target its other weak spots, including sensors, joints, and motors. However, the likelihood of having to fight a robot dog can be greatly reduced by choosing your hideout location carefully. Stay hidden, avoid movement during peak patrol periods. If you have followed all of the steps in this video, you could manage to survive for a long period of time. Remember, when robot dogs are on the prowl, work remotely steady. Alright. Yeah. That was, that was very good. That was very good. 

Hilarious, but also, like, great advice. Right? Can you see why I was confused whether it was, like, genuine? It's so well made, but it's, like, kinda funny in parts. But, like, is it ironically funny, or is it, like because it's kinda serious. It's really very serious. It's, like, good operational security. But I think one of the giveaways for me was, when it was, like, say in the acronyms, it was like staircases and, like, the the the words it was giving you to help remember were, like, more complicated than Exactly. Yeah. I was like, okay. That's funny. It's a good comedic device there. 

So what'd you think of, common side effects? Well, I mean, that was amazing. So it seems like, from what I gathered, it's like this it's, it's almost like a Michael Crichton novel or something where he's like this guy invents a new drug, and now all the pharmaceutical companies are after him trying to smash him down or something. Yeah. Or using the d DEA as their, like, enforcement arm. It kinda pulls the curtain back on that kind of stuff. And then you've got the CEO of the company, and then who's above the CEO 

is sort of a shadowy Klaus Schwab type character. And, yeah, there's there's a lot of good plot and a lot of good character development stuff. And it's, at times, both funny, but also, poignant and serious. And it's just in terms of, like, storytelling that elucidates a point that are sometimes hard to make in a conversation. You can send somebody a piece of media and it kinda makes the point for you. I found that, yeah, if you watch the first two or three episodes of Common Side Effects, you'll be like, okay. I wanna see where this story is going. 

And where it does go is kind of, like, informs where our own options might be going when it comes to medicine and food and all these different things that we're dealing with in terms of health. Wow. Yeah. Well, I'll be honest when I've I've seen it pop up a couple times when I've been, you know, it's late at night or whatever. And I I was like, oh, so it's a show Tim Poole, a man who built his reputation on transparency, anti establish Woah. Sorry there. The ghost of Tim Pool just cut you off somehow, which is 

super eerie. All good. It it must be that new hookup that Netanyahu got for him. That's right. Yep. Yep. We use it to overpower our stream. That's right. Okay. Well Spooky looking. We okay. We noticed. Thank you. Yeah. But but please go on, Seven. Yeah. I I I just thought it was, just a show about some guy that made, like, some new super potent magic mushroom, and I can I kind of wrote it off on, like, face value? But from that clip, I I think I'm gonna give it a shot. Thank you. The reason it caught my attention, because I had the same reaction. I was just like, oh, another cartoon. It's so edgy. Drug dealers. 

It said Mike Judge. I was like, Mike Judge. He made Beavis and Butt Head, Office Space, Idiocracy, some of the most, like, prescient but also entertaining stuff. And I just I know his political views are kind of, like, I don't wanna say in alignment with ours, but he's definitely out of all the people making stuff in the entertainment industry. He's a lot more, aware of of these dynamics. So, yeah, the fact he's Is Mike Judge? I didn't know it was Mike Judge. Yeah. Well, that's why I put it in the program right before yours. Because it so originally, 

this was supposed to be a piece from my ChetSystem channel, and I uploaded it, and it got flagged for having the clips from Common Side Effects. And it said no one can watch this video. And in that video, I'm, like, plugging Mike Judge and then talking about Beavis and Butt Head, and then I referenced Scott's awesome impression of Beavis and Butt Head. And then I programmed it on the list tonight so it would become right before his Beavis and Butt Head segment. Oh, now other ideas. All the way in, dude. I am I am so I didn't know I was a Mike Judge, dude. Okay. I'm a Mike Judge junkie. 

This is great. Like it's right up your alley, Scott. Thank you, God. Thank you, Paul. This is great. I love it. It. Amazing. Excuse me. Yeah. I am pumped. I'm choking over here. I'm so excited. That is amazing. Okay. Alright. Game changer. Complete game changer. And then your friend tell us a little bit about your friend, a Russian news reporter. Yes. That is, Sergei Putinski, who is, of course, played by my friend, Byron Bertram, who is a comedian in Vancouver. 

He was just in Austin, Texas trying to get on Kill Tony. And, yeah. I just we get together every couple of weeks and produce, like, a little piece of media. He's the one who played Trump in our, Kamala versus Trump Street Fighter two video, which you might have seen if you watch Grand Theft World regularly. I remember that. And, yeah. We have other stuff in the can. We have a Jeopardy sketch with him and Kamala, doing battle on Jeopardy. But we're gonna release that one in a little while. It's like a retrospective. 

And, yeah. If you check out YouTube with Byron Bertram, then you can see more of his stuff. He's pretty funny guy, great impressionist, and a good friend. That's awesome, man. Very cool. Well, I'll tell you what. Why don't we do this? So let's play so we're in a segue, hard turn into the whole Israel conversation. We're gonna let you go, Seven, but I want you to watch this video real quick. Okay? Yeah. Let's do this, Colby. Can we just play the Beavis and Butt Head? Then we'll come back, and we'll let Seven tell us how he can how everybody can follow him, and then we'll dive into the nitty gritty Israel crap. That's a great idea. Cool. Alright, guys. This is I busted this out earlier today. I was watching some other show covering this, 

Pete Hegseth thing from a couple days ago. The the the the what is he? The the secretary of defense, like, literally? Like, the guy that was, like, a Fox News host who's now, like, in charge of the military? Like, what clown world are we are we still I think we're still in clown world, guys. We've been talking about clown world for five years now. I think we're kinda still in clown world. Anyway, I was just, like, listening to what he was saying. I'm like, okay. This has to be a Beavis and Butt Head reaction video because this is, like, it's that retarded. So, anyway, without further ado, here you go. Hey, Davis. 

You know that Fox News guy that's now in charge of the military? He's about to give a a speech. Woah. Really? What's he gonna be talking about? Well, Bebas, hopefully, they're gonna do what they should have done a long time ago, rounded all you liberals up in the camps. Shut up, butt head. I'm not a liberal. I just, I just don't really know what's going on. Yeah. You're uninformed. Okay. Shut up. Here we go. Alright. We're back with another update on cutting wasteful spending here at DOD. And this one is, 

as they say, a big one. You hear that, Beavis? He's got a big one for you. Yeah. A big load of crap. You're just jealous that this dude gets hammered all the time and scores with lots of chicks. Didn't you get in trouble for that? Yeah. But when you work for president Donald Trump, you can grab chicks wherever you want and get away with it. Woah. Really? That rules. Yeah. Directing the termination of five point one 

billion in DOD contracts. Not million. That's with a b. Five point one billion in DOD contracts for consulting services from Accenture, Deloitte, Booz Allen and other firms. You know this guy knows a thing or two about booze. By the way, we need this money to spend on better health care for our war fighters and their families instead of five hundred dollars. You hear that, babies? They're taking money away from black people, and they're giving it to war fighters. Yeah. We gotta go, we gotta go fight some wars. Yeah. 

We just need to sign up for the military, and maybe we can get some of that money. Yeah. And then we can go to other countries and blow them up. Yeah. Fire. Fire. Fire. Fire. Yeah. And then all those chicks whose houses get blown up, they'll probably be down to score. Woah. That's a great idea, butt head. Yep, Bebas. It looks like it's time for you to go die for Israel. On top of that, in support of the president's priorities to stop federal funding for academic institutions that tolerate 

antisemitism and support divisive DEI programs, This week, DOD is also pausing over five hundred million dollars in funding to Northwestern University and Cornell University. And that's on top of the seventy million dollars in funding we've already paused at Columbia, Penn, Brown, and Princeton over the last few weeks as if any of these institutions need more government money at all. Hey, Buttigt. Why is this a military guy talking about antisemitism 

on college campuses? I hear it's because they're very pro hummus. They like eating hummus a little too much, bebeth. They definitely need to be drone striked off the face of the Earth. Yeah. What the hell is antisemitism anyway? You know, it's like when you kick somebody in the nads and then they cry about it, you get to call them an anti Semite. Woah. Really? That's like Shut up, Shut up, Bebas. 

You antisemite. Hate has no home here, Bebas. I think it's time we take away your credit card processor. No. There you go. My gosh. My fate hurt my face hurts from laughing. There you go. Yeah. I mean, that's, that's what happened to antisemitism. It's like when you kick somebody in the nads and they cry about it, you get to call them an antisemitism. 

Pretty much that. Just it. So though that are the are those voices you, Scott? Yeah, man. Yeah. Pretty cool. Wow. Really close. And being able to do both of them, man, that's impressive. Well, it's like you gotta record them. Like, I kinda type up a script, and then you gotta and then you overlap. You gotta do a little chuckle before an end on each one of them. Then you overlap the chuckles, and it just kinda just blows. Yeah. That was spot on. Yeah. They're Channeled the spirit of Mike Judge there. And I think I think, even though he's still alive, he would be happy to see that his art is continuing on to be remixed in that way. Exactly. It's it's fun. It's it's fun. Dude, it's like my joy in life. It's Like, I I hear some news story. I'm like, okay. What would be their take on this? 

It's like, you know, it it but you see, it's genius. And this is what I've always loved and respected about the genius of Beavis and Butt Head because on the surface, it's so dumb. But it allows you to do such deep layered because, like, their stupidity and their reaction to the stupidity is like a reflection of the stupidity of the thing itself. Yes. You know? And so it's like it's just it magnifies the stupidity of the already stupid thing. It's just like this this genius paradigm. That's why it's so genius. I think the Beavers and Butthead thing is it just allows for the magnification of stupidity 

in an incredibly genius comedic way. It's just it's timeless. It's a Russian doll of intelligent stupidity. But I I especially loved when Butt Head said, yeah. Go die for Israel's wars, Beavis. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna score. So funny. Anyway, thank you guys. So I just wanted I just wanted to to share that with you, Seven. But, dude Yeah. That was great. Thanks, man. Thanks for hanging out with us tonight. That's freaking amazing. I love everything you're doing. Probably have to copycat. Wait. Wait. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. I wanted to meet seven before he he split, dude. What's up? I saw your brain model type thing earlier, and I wanna be able to say hi. 

We can, we can check out models and compare notes. I was really excited about that. And, yeah, I heard a lot of good things from you, about you, from Scott. And, you were at the Tennessee gig last week? Mhmm. Well, welcome to Grand Theft World, bro. Good to make your acquaintance. Hey. Thanks for having me, man. And I've I've heard nothing but the the same, about you. I've I've managed to check out your model. I'm gonna say yours is a lot more in-depth, I think, than mine where mine I like how yours is all on one wall, though, and you can cruise around like that. So, 

also and not either or. Yeah. Yeah. I would, I'd love to, get in touch with you and and see what we can do, like compare notes and and stuff. We're gonna have you back on the show. We'll just do it live. Yeah. Absolutely. And then and then everyone grows, and then people at home learn to do what we learn to do and check out the individual parts, how they fit together, and, you know, find the contradictions and, like, find, like, truth. That's what we're we're looking for. Yeah. All about that. And is that, is that, like, a wall behind you, a green screen? Like, how, like, I understand you have a light behind you to cause that effect with a nice soft drop off, 

but, it looks better than a green screen usually does. So I didn't know if you didn't have a background or what the situation was, so I just figured I'd ask. Yeah. Yeah. When, so before I ever got into, like, researching and and stuff like that, I just had it for, you know, because sometimes my room's a mess. So it is a green screen, not a green wall? Correct. Alright. Cool. And that's like Zoom chroma key, or how are you doing the chroma key? Yeah. I'm, doing the chroma key filter through OBS, and the map allows me to do the Obsidian stuff behind me, like the maps and stuff. When Paul and I learned how to chroma key back in a day, the software to do it was a thousand bucks, and it was called Ultra. 

Wasn't it, Paul? Wasn't that the name of it? Yeah. Ultra c s three. And we used it for what you've been missing, which some people saw a couple weeks ago. But, and I was it would take an hour to key something out. So, like, when you hopped on earlier, I was like, when I get on there, I'm gonna ask them, like, hey, bro. What's your real name? And then you got asked, and I heard. And I was like, word. You know? Yeah. But my my name's been out there for a long time. But I respect that, so way to play it. Happy to share it in private, and it it's not Oh, for sure, dude. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But And, I I understand, especially in the heated context of these days and the the recent goings on. Smart, well played, smarter than I'm doing. And I gotta get smarter. Yeah. 

No. It's, largely, like, I'm, you know, I'm I'm not worried about the consequences for myself. You know, I'm two a and got security cameras, all that stuff. But but I have a girlfriend here and, and, you know, a family here and stuff. Well, you just saw that, who was the the clip we played last week, with the woman who's a I don't know. She's some sort of online celebrity, and they broke into her house. And, it was on Cole. Amaranth. Yeah. Streamer. Okay. Yeah. Because we saw it on Collion Noire. And, and then we saw the interview of them talking about the security footage. So, yeah, there's a real there's a lot of nonsense and shenanigans going on these days, and I think, it just means that what we're doing is very important and it needs to get out there even more. So shenanigans don't have to go on. Like, Americans are Americans. We don't all have to be, like, red team, blue team at each other's throats, like, fighting with each other for nonsense because, 

they who you know, the the elite have a saying what it that they who they would seek to rule, they first divide. Who the gods would seek to conquer, they first divide. Something like that. It's a divine conquer quote. But and what time zone are you in, Seven? Central. Oh, right on. Alright. Cool. Cool. So it's not that late for you yet. That's good. Not yet. Well, when you have time in the future, come back and hang out, and, there's lots more to talk about. And the gist is every week, we just take the news and smash it into a little history, and, we learn some stuff along the way. Yeah. Absolutely, man. Happy to be back anytime. 

Really enjoyed, hanging out with Scott a couple weekends ago and, actually planning on doing something in person in our town here soon. So date tentative right now, but I'm working on some printed materials and things like that. Anytime you guys wanna have me on, I'm happy to be back and cool. Where can people follow you? Do you have, like, a Linktree or socials? Yeah. I've got a my Twitter or x is where I'm, the most active, and I have a Linktree there that, links everyone to the different platforms and stuff that I stream. And, 

my live streams and stuff is where we do all that live mapping and sort of crowdsource the truth, because I I'm sure you know it's this stuff is way too much for one person to kinda take on. And I have a principled stance against using AI for anything. I know it seems a little irrational in today's podcast. Me first? I gotta follow you back. Everyone who's watching, you gotta follow. There you go. Following now. Alright. Please go ahead. I cut you off. Sorry about that. All good. All good. But, you know, I'd I'd take a principled stance against, like, using AI for basically anything if I can help it. So bringing in other people and collaborating and and stuff like that, man, is so powerful. You know what you could start? An app for, like, AI confessionals. 

So, like, I only use ChatGPT, like, three times in the last year, but I used it five times in the last month. So I went a long time without using it, and then I was like, oh, it would help me do this. And if I put this list so, like, I took, I did an interview with my buddy last week who, he has a religious exemption on his farm, and they were trying to take it away. And he had sent me this long summary, and I thought, chat g p t, can you write me some sixty minutes style questions? And it did pretty good, and it it brought out some legal precedents I wouldn't have found on my own. Right? But, otherwise, 

I know how to summarize. I know how to do all the stuff, so I really shouldn't use that cane if I don't need it. So thank you. Thank you for being an evangelist for not destroying humanity with technology because I think we probably need more of that. That'd be a good autonomy course is, critical thinking in the age of AI. As you know, we're leading down a path to everyone's gonna outsource all their thinking to AI. Well, Seven, if you would like to come up with an outline for a course like Scott just described without using AI, I would be happy to, figure out how we could make something like that happen. 

Yeah. Absolutely, man. I'll, I'll shoot you a message, either early tomorrow or sometime in the afternoon and and see what we can cook up. Now, shoot Scott a message because I'm bad with messaging these days. I'm I'm a I'm triple booked for Yep. I'm your liaison. I'm the The spring. Yep. I'm the guest liaison for Grand Theft Auto. So which is awesome, dude. Alright. Dude, I got we got lots of guests coming on soon, guys. Well, actually, Seven's the first guest that Scott brought on because I I texted Scott this week. I'm like, I'd like to bring guests back in, but I don't have time for the comms. Could you just handle that? And he's like, yeah. I already got the schedule filled up, baby. 

Be great. You guys are eating some real some real gravy. Well, that's good. So, I wanted to tap in because not only Beavis versus Butthead, but Tim versus Kim and Dave versus Douglas. Murray. I wanna make sure we talked about those things tonight. Yeah. Because I too heard so many times from that Douglas Murray clip. Did you hear it, Seven? The the Joe Rogan clip this I guess, I guess, it's, like, almost three hours. But yeah. I've I've I've seen it posted. 

I have some, proclivities against Joe Rogan just because I've, like, dove into his sponsors and Sure. That and For sure. But as far as the argument that they were kinda, like, not debating? Yeah. Yeah. It was a big nothing burger from a comedian who thinks he's a political commentator because he went to a libertarian conference once and then a guy that's just been groomed by Paul Singer's Manhattan Institute. So I was like, I'm I'm good. I'll pass on this. Yeah. Well, yeah, well, it's it's interesting. But I think, 

Colby had played, I heard Tim Pool being played. And Mhmm. There might be Tim Pool to play us out tonight because I heard that earlier. I was laughing my ass off. Yeah. Tim Pool music to play us out? Because you remember how I was telling you, like, you know, it's it's sometimes it gets a little contentious between us and the chat. And then Oh, yeah. I was watching the rum I was watching the rumble on on the way home while I was eating. I like to I like to, like to troll the they troll us, so I troll them back live. And they can just kiss my ass. I love you guys. I love you guys. Decentralized 

control. Yeah. Don't try to control. Yeah. When so when do you do your livestream, crowdsourcing, and all that stuff, Seven? Like, what when when's the slot for that? Wednesdays, four to eight PM central time, and Thursdays, same time. Awesome. And, everyone serious. That's nice. Yeah. Everyone's allowed in the chat, and it's, like, where they'll like, people will provide sources or be like, hey. Did you know this person's also involved in this? And we'll go check it out, and I'll show people, like, you know, you should check through multiple sources and try to reference, like, official records and and things to teach people, like, how I do my research and stuff. 

That's right. Because it's not about what to think. It's about how to think. And then if we show examples of how we're doing it for ourselves and people don't like it, then they're free to go do it for themselves and find, you know, contrary information. Then we can have a conversation because I think people grow like, debate in a certain structure can help the audience grow, but all too often, it's just a bunch of nonsense. Right? So if you have a debate structure where it's, like, about enriching the audience so they understand both sides and they can make an informed decision, that'd be cool. I don't really see that out there. I had a show titled it was called Mass Debate, but then, you know, when you get the URL, it's, like, all sorts of other traffic came in. I didn't know what to do with that. So, that show's, like, mothballed for now. I gotcha. Yeah. It's, it it's rare to see a debate these days where two people have the opposing arguments and then actually come to some sort of 

compromise or, like, a change of mind or change of opinion. That they're each willing to review each other's evidence and come back and be like, dude, I watched that documentary. I see what you're talking about. Or I read that book. Right? One of my autonomy graduates, Phoenix, he has an idea for a show. I don't wanna out his show. But it it's a really unique take on the debate format that's super freedom friendly and voluntary, and I've never really seen before. But we ran a prototype of it last year for, like, four hours at Porkfest, and I do have some footage of, like, what the prototype looks like. But it would be cool to have a production of that because I think it would draw a wide crowd of people who are there to understand instead of, like, red team versus blue team. My guy won tonight. No. My guy won tonight. It's like, 

I think we all lost because there's real evidence that could be discussed that wasn't. And, I will credit that to Douglas Murray doing that. He ran he ran the table the whole time. Yeah. He was also king of the fallacies during that. There's, you could probably do a fallacy counter and get up to around thirty, forty different kinds that he Paul, you can't talk about fallacies because you weren't in ancient Greece when they created the fallacies. That's a good point. I forgot the qualifications to be an expert. 

You have to go to Oxford. Yep. That's never gonna never gonna get old. Alright, Seven. I'll let you tag out, or I'll let you hang out. It's up to you, bro, but I just didn't want you to have to, like, linger and one wonder when the right time to, like, tag out of this call. You might have other things to do tonight too. Yeah. No worries, man. Yeah. I've got I've got a couple things going on, but, happy to be back anytime you guys wanna have me. And, you know, outside of my streaming times, I'm usually pretty free. So Rock on, dude. Chat. Thanks for having me again. Hey. Thanks. You got great production value too, man. Appreciate that, brother. Yeah. Good lighting, good audios. Because that that's that's, almost I I need to step up my game a little bit. 

Alright, man. Nice meeting you. Hey. You guys have a good night. Good chatting with you. Cool. I know. Well played, guys. I saw your show card. You got the whole night planned out and everything. I'm not gonna come in and wreck any of your plans. But I did, I did wanna talk to him, Kim, and then I wanted to talk about Douglas versus Dave. We're totally game for it. We've already heard from Beavis and Butt Head. Did you get any chance to check that out? Did you see that? It's fucking hilarious. Okay. Cool. As long as you Yeah. Yeah. I had I had it on my phone. I was watching on Rumble before, and and then my wife told me that Rumble's, like, ten seconds behind her Zoom call. So she's like, oh, you're you're listening to what already happened. 

And, my family's in town, so I got to have, family dinner at, like, whatever, ten what clock whatever we got back. And then, I was doing demolition on a renovation all day, so I had to, like, wash myself, make myself presentable. And I started work today at noon for q and a with autonomy. So I've just been like, I try to get the most out of my one hundred and sixty eight hours per week, and I'm down to managing the minutes. I'm gonna stay away from managing seconds because that would be too stressful. But I get, like, the maximum out of, like, every minute during the day, 

when you're in growth mode. Not comfort mode, but growth mode. Yeah. So it's good. Do you have a block lined up next? Is it the Tim Kim? Yeah. I think it's the let's see. Tim and Kim is in there. Yeah. Okay. So there's Tim. He made a he made a post, then Kim made a post. And then Tim clapped back, and then Kim made a post about that. That's the one I want. The one where she shows him talking smack against her, 

and, I thought that that that was the one I'm I showed to other people because I'm like, check this out. I'm like, she's been on his show. Like, they know each other. But he he said some stuff that I was like, I'm unconvinced by your argument because that's not an argument. That's just kinda name calling. And I know a lot about Chatham House, Chatham House rules, all that sort of stuff, so I was, like, keen to get to this clip. Likewise, Day Smith may be a comedian, but I'm a forensic historian. 

And, I got some facts for that situation to bring to bear. But, yeah. What do you guys got lined up? Let me check the chat over here. Yeah. So this one, we got, Ben Shapiro ripped apart for garbage Israel take. So we're doing a Ben Shapiro takedown too. So we're doing a Timmy and a man takedown on one freaking block here. Who picked the title for tonight's show? That was Paul. That was Paul? Well played. LD made the thumbnail. You know, I've completely forgot about that part. I forgot to so I I was just like I was on my way today, and I, like, got this text out to you and, to Scott and to Paul. 

And, I forgot I didn't think about the title for tonight's show, which I usually text to LD, like, around, I don't know, seven o'clock or something. I didn't think about it till I saw it on screen. I was like, oh, damn good title. Well played. Like, I didn't even tell you guys, like, hey. Tell LD to make a thumbnail on the title. Otherwise, he's gonna be waiting for me, and I have my hands full. Yeah. Pretty self organizing, apparently. It just kinda happened. Very self organized. We don't need a government. We can just figure it out. Trained your Padawans quite well as well. So, you know, I give credit to to Lisa. She, 

talked about chase Chatham House rules in a posting she made of the Tim stuff. And I was like, yeah. These guys are a bunch of Chatham House fools. Just just fit together. Yeah. Yeah. The the whole, well, there was also Blair House this week, who was staying in Blair House, which is the guest house of the White House. So how'd it work out? When when George Orwell wrote nineteen eighty four, he wrote it in Bush House. 

And then w Bush, when they're working on the White House, he stayed in Blair House. And because they're comparing, like, Bush to nineteen eighty four and Orwell back then during the post nine eleven war on terror type of days. But, yeah, those comparisons might still be made today. There might still be some sort of tyranny and fascism going on out in the world, and it might not be just, like, one side or the other. It might be a a group manipulating both sides like that scene from it's not doctor No. What is it? From Russia with Love. It's the opening scene where they have the the fighting fish, And then he's like, we let the two fish fight until one dies and the other one is exhausted, and then we eat them. You know? It's that type of stuff they're doing. Or, the the other good one, this makes a better meme. 

It's red ants and black ants in a jar, and then on the label, it says shake the jar. So the red ants and then black ants, they're just attacking each other because they're like, what's going on? But, really, someone else is shaking the jar. That's like the new world order. They're the jar shakers. I didn't know how to bring that around. Alright. So, Tim plus Kim equals controversy. Many videos, many hits. Maybe they conspired. You know? Maybe, what is it? Ten core. What was that Russian place, Pan, Tim? 

Like, maybe without that money in the absence of that Russian money, maybe they got together and they're like, look. I could call you this and you can call me that. Is that too pro wrestling for influencers who are like our peers? Probably. I don't think they're Maybe, dude. Like, Tim Pool is, like, the convergence of all of these different like, the Tenet Media, Daily Wire, Netanyahu. It's like, okay. We know what's going on. Here's what's really confusing. Tim Pool, out of the Douglas Murray, Dave Smith debate, Tim Pool sides with Dave Smith, but he only talks about the history that would support Douglas Murray, 

about Israel, specifically. And I just thought that was an interesting point. Like, if you wrote down the points, he would totally agree with Douglas Murray. But because his friends are libertarian and Dave's a libertarian, so he's gonna I don't know. Maybe I don't know. Tim Poole sees himself as sitting on the fence with his legs out on the Israel side, where he's like, well, you know, I don't wanna be against the Zionist. But, you know, I'm also, like, not a monster. But but it's like, he knows what side his bread is buttered on. And, 

that that seems to be sort of a contingent. Right? All the people who released the Epstein file binders all have that in common. Same with Trump's most of Trump's cabinet all have that in common. Yeah. They And it's just an an aspect, a policy aspect that's just, like, super locked down. And, I was curious to your thoughts about Douglas Murray because he's pushing this new book. Right? And right after his disastrous appearance on Rogan, then Trump promotes this, like, really ill timed tweet being like, Douglas Murray's new book is brilliant and he's great. And And so I was curious, like, if you had Douglas Murray, Trump, and Rogan in a room, how would that conversation go? Because Rogan was clearly seeing through Douglas Murray's bullshit. Like, seeing the fallacies, and Dave was calling out the fallacies in real time. 

He should Rogan should have Kurt sit, like, like, in his corner, tag team with that. Should have you on, man. Well, you know. Be one of these guys. Trickle down You and Kurt together would be a a great combination. Oh, no. Trickle down theory. I mean, on you know? Israel will just be like Israel will just be like, okay. Fine. We're we're we lose. We're done going we'll go back to Ukraine. Fine. All the Zionist leaders do come from, like, sixty miles from this you know, around one city in, like, Ukraine, Poland. 

So, you know, there's that. And they also thought, maybe our last names aren't the right last names to be over there at this time. And also Yiddish, which was widely spoken, they're like, no. That that's not gonna be the official language. We're gonna bring back, you know, keeping it in the vibe of three thousand years ago. If they're gonna, you know, if they're gonna front as a group, right, it's like, they're masters of disguise because it is kind of a disguise type of situation. 

Like, maybe maybe I'm from one of the other twelve tribes. Right? Was it you know, because there were twelve tribes. Which one are they from? Because maybe I'm from the other one. I don't know, man. There's a lot of stories out there. That's why it's good to compare stories to reality and, you know, leave entertainment to entertainment. Right? There's a lot of entertaining stories. And you guys made that point earlier that there's also a lot of gruesome, grotesque stories in just about all the major books, whether it's Christianity, Islam, Judaism, 

to hear the EU lady over there talking about how they, like, historically hold the Talmud as the center of their, you know, their society and stuff like that. Which aspect? Because, you know, you might say, oh, these people only talk about the bad aspect. I'm like, well, if you add all the good aspects and you include the bad aspects, like, how's it weigh out when you when you put it all there? Like, if Jesus said mostly good stuff, and then he was like, here's some bad stuff. Right? And then people are like, wow. It doesn't matter. Like, you know, people will apologize for Trump, and he'll say something. They'll be like, well, he's not really saying that. Right? Well, you know, how does it work with people in the past? 

And I think the only violence Jesus took in those stories was to overturn in the money changers' tables, and he came from their group. He's like, hey. What you're doing is wrong, and then he made his own group. And then stroke of brilliance, if you're gonna grow your group, drop the mandated circumcision thing, and then, they were able to become the the largest group, of believers in the world, allegedly. I haven't counted them all. But there's a lot of Muslims too. So, you know, weighed out. How about a billion Hindus over there? Not a billion because part of India 

is also, Muslim. That's the Pakistan part over there. Because, anyway, they've had lots of troubles over there, mostly stirred up by the British Empire, which also stirs up trouble over here, which is what Douglas Murray was just coming over here. You don't see Dave Smith going over there and talking smack on King Chucky the third, though he probably could. You don't see that much. Well, that's ultimately what you saw of the schism is that Douglas Murray is taking the the British pompous, like, only the experts can say can talk about any particular thing. And if you're not, like, a journeyman in studying that thing, then you have no right to say it in a public platform. 

So he's making the sort of leftist, you're platforming the wrong people argument. And Dave Smith shut him down and just said, I'm an American. I can talk about whatever the hell I want. And it's not you don't have a right to shut me down just because you don't like what I'm saying. And so that's where you're seeing the ultimate British and American, philosophies of speech just running up against each other. And this is the reason why you don't want Britain imposed onto America is because that's emblematic of what's gonna happen is they'll shut down the speech they don't like. 

I know that you guys played the quartering clip earlier that kinda referred to this Dave Smith, Douglas Murray debate. How I took it I haven't seen the whole thing, but I started checking it out this morning, and, here's how I saw it. It's like a duel, and Dave Smith shows up for the duel, and Douglas Murray shows up for the duel. And just as they're about the duel, Douglas Murray's like, hey. I don't like your dueling pistol. Daryl Cooper had a dueling pistol just like that, and he's not an expert. And for two hours, they talk about Daryl Cooper, who's not even in the room, by the way. And to me, it was Douglas Murray's way of coming in, 

steering the conversation to a place he could continue to manipulate it, and letting Rogan and Dave Smith go, what the fuck is going on? I thought we were gonna have a conversation here. Right? So it you know? Well, it doesn't seem listened to Daryl Cooper's thirty hour podcast, but I make I I made some long term, long form podcasts back in the day once upon a time. And, I am familiar with Daryl Cooper's views, his sources of research, his adjacent, authors who have, like, the synergistic work that help you understand all these types of things. And I know that 

condemnation prior to observation is the epitome of ignorance, which Douglas Murray knows too. He just expects you not to know that, which is It's not about that. Well, that's why he makes those arguments saying, you can't criticize Israel if you haven't been there, but I'm gonna criticize, the work of this thirty hour podcast even though I've never listened to even five minutes of it. Not only that, but, not criticize Israel if you've never been there. How about we're paying for it? 

How about we're paying for it? Tax dollars from this country have been going to that country for a long time, so I think I should have a say. It's like being a shareholder, kinda, in that that endeavor. Right? Because if you're gonna extort from us and take it and put it over there to artificially hold them up just because they blackmailed some people here for fun of the Nazis, like, I don't know. Maybe you got another thing coming. I don't know. Maybe maybe, you know, people learn a little bit more about history than the public narrative can withstand. And that threatens people like Douglas Murray who have never, like like, for instance, 

I pulled this out earlier today for students of autonomy at a point when we were talking about the Prussian education system, what we ended with last week. The Illuminati created the Prussian education system, brought it to America. And this book right here was written by a Rhodes scholar who's part of the conspiracy to take over America. He was the librarian of Congress. So if you can control the official history in America, that that's pretty important position. And then he tells you the history of secret societies in such a way that is much more credible in a much broader 

detailed tapestry of reality than anything Douglas Murray's bringing to the table because he can only talk about the official narrative talking points. He would not be able to talk about Moses Hess, the father of utopian socialism, who came up with the idea of, you know, that was the first, non Anglo idea of restoring the Jews to Palestine, but you go back to the eighteen forties. Lord Palmerston and Lord Shaftesbury, I think it was, had these proclamations. Now you might say some of those proclamations might have been racist. 

Okay. Well, that's the same type of people who funded the Nazis. So to their point about, Darrell Cooper saying that stuff about Winston Churchill, that he may have been, like, the the second maniac in that situation. Like, there's a lot of truth to that because Hitler was defeated. Allegedly, maybe he went to Argentina, but he was smuggled there by the rat lines that were the Vatican, MI six, and CIA or OSS back then. If you wanna be technical about it, and the fact that MI six had set up headquarters in New York City in Nelson Rockefeller's building 

tells me they probably could blackmail him because they were also funding the Nazis, but the Americans didn't think to blackmail the Brits. You can also point to the the two world wars that were a pretty big deal in the twentieth century, and I can prove that Great Britain and Winston Churchill played a pivotal pivotal part in getting America into the war on their side. And then when you get to World War two, it's a similar thing. It's intelligence games and them planning Pearl Harbor and knowing about it and not telling the Americans so that we got into the war again on their side when over a third of Americans were from German extraction as well as British extraction, English extraction. 

So they've been playing games and, yeah, f around and find out. Well, yeah. I think the fact Douglas Murray shuts down the conversation when it leads to the Treaty of Versailles or talking about Woodrow Wilson creating the income tax and knowing that those are historical events that lead to certain places. Yeah. And, unfortunately, Dave Smith doesn't get into them. But if, yeah, his forensic historian of your caliber happened to be there, they would have 

absolutely mopped the floor with Douglas Murray because you would have seen through the fallacies and had the historical facts to back up everything that you're talking about. Yeah. And the good thing is I don't need to take my whole library with me. I know enough to recall so Jamie can look it up. So I'd say, Jamie, go to Margaret McMillan's Paris nineteen nineteen, and let's go to the, let's go to the last chapters in here. What's the what are they talking about on these last chapters? Who's this contingent? Oh, it's the Zionists cutting deals. Balfour declaration, page four hundred and twenty. Palestinians, the people who live there before it was their land was given away by the British 

to a group that was led by an international banking family that had similar objectives of conquest over America. So British Zionist, land without people, people without a land, they coined that phrase. So, anyway, there's a lot of history, and that's during the Versailles Treaty because they had well, there was a more famous piece. Let's see. The guy from the Woodberry Soap Company, Fact or Fact, Benjamin Friedman. It's a book on Amazon. It's also a recording, and we've played the nineteen sixty one Willard Hotel speech 

at least once. He had been given that speech for twenty years, and that was, like, when he was going bankrupt from telling people what happened. And he was a part of the Zionist contingent at the Versailles Treaty. He says, I know I was there. I should know I was there. That's like the famous quote out of the whole thing. So there's someone from inside who's very much a whistleblower like, Alfred Zimmern, who blows the whistle for Carole Quigley's Anglo American establishment. There are such credible pieces. Like, these are incredible pieces of history. This, the last will and testament of Cecil Rhodes by William t Stead, incredible piece of history, 

should be taught, like, on PBS. This should be stuff that, like, everyone public broadcasting. Everyone knows this stuff. It should just be out there, and then you could be on guard against this group of people who are internationalist, globalist, Fabian socialist. Do I still have that up? There we go. That was that was useful. And these people are wolves in sheep's clothing. That's not a euphemism. They literally have a logo that is the wolf in sheep's clothing. And I told the class earlier today that they had, they have this stained glass in there, and they're pounding the world in the into their image with these big hammers. 

That's the Nazi contingent of the British Empire, Fabian socialism. It's also what brings all these ills down today of the, you know, the cybernetics and the surveillance state, all that type of stuff. These are the people that were interested in doing such things. They all play, like, on the same team. Yeah. It's all fascism at the end of the day. What they've gotten better at is learning how to use PR to water down our resistance to it and repackaging it into other types of 

forceful rule. But at the end of the day, it's still a merger between state and corporation to, you know, whether it's forced products or forced laws on people, then, yeah, the whole idea is just, you know, you will be regimented. You will be controlled. And, your behaviors and tastes shaped. And whereas it was more overt before, now it's a little more covert. Maybe it's time they're gonna make it more overt again, or we won't have the capacity to recognize it being done to us. 

Oh, page one eighty eight. Alright. Check this out. I happen to find on my shelf another little known book, the Peace Conference. You see who it's edited by? Edward Mandel House way. And Charles Seymour. And Charles Seymour wrote those red books up there, the private papers of Colonel House by Charles Seymour. So what really happened at Paris? The Peace Conference edited by Edward Mandel House and Charles Seymour of Yale University. If we go to page one hundred and eighty eight and one hundred and ninety, 

first, they talk about the Armenian problem. Let me zoom out so you can see some of the stuff. Because there was a genocide about to happen over there. So they have a lot large section on World War one, the Armenian problem, protection of my minorities, the trial of the Kaiser. I went too far in the book. I should look at the numbers, not the words. Alright. Oh, look. I have a card there. Maybe we've seen this section before. So this talks all about the Zionist delegation and Kaim Weizmann and 

what they were there to do, along with their American and British delegations. And, the Bolshevik revolution had just gone on, and now there's a similar overlap of Eastern European people that might have also, like, participated in, some of the the communist shenanigans. But right now, we're just focusing focusing on, the Zionist contingent. So there's two sections that discuss says, the Zionist movement for separation of Palestine, 

a place wait. I thought Palestine didn't exist. And let me see just real quick. When was this book published? So we have context. Right? This is nineteen hundred and twenty one. This is the same year that they founded the Council on Foreign Relations. K? And this is a a first edition. And if I could find the place I was just reading from, it'll make more sense then. The Zionist movement for separation of Palestine and a special regime 

to ensure the establishment of the Jewish homeland was bitterly opposed by Syrian proteges of France. That's the Pico side of the Sykes Pico agreement. Less markedly and with vacillate, vas vacillating, that means going back and forth policy, by the Arab group of Faisal. That's Prince Faisal. You see him in Lawrence Lawrence of Arabia. Let me get it on the screen for you. Behind all these conflicting local hatreds and ambitions, more confused and complicated, in fact, than they can be possibly represented here, lay always the secret agreements. 

These treaties were the handiwork of the old style diplomatic craftsmanship of European officialdom. Sanctified by the signatures of the government's, concerned, they remained in the background. So they're talking about how they drew up Sykes Picot before they even had any of this other, conflict going on, And that secret deal continues to this day because Sykes Picot preceded Balfour declaration. And what is Sykes who who is Sykes and who's Picot? There's a guy from France. There's a guy from Britain. 

There's also a Rothschild family from Britain and one from France that were both instrumental in the creation and building of Israel, first, by colonizing Palestine. Protocolonization starts officially in the eighteen hundreds. It's two two Rothschilds in the land of Palestine, I think, is one of the book. I mean, I have tons of books on these. But the the point is, if I brought up a fact like that about a book, it's printed by Hebrew University, Douglas Murray would call you a name. Instead of saying, oh, dude. Can I get that book? I wanna read it. 

Curiosity learns that kind of indignation and red herring fallacy. That's not learning. That's that's a gatekeeper. That's a gatekeeper right there. He's not like the rest of us. Right? He's not into questioning everything and finding out. Because if you question it, you learn. It's not about questioning it to undermine it. It's about questioning things to understand them. And when you start questioning, like, what is this magazine? 

Because the Council of Foreign Relations was made in nineteen twenty one, the same time as this book that we just read from the, Paris Peace Conference. And what what is this all about? A British installation in our country starting in nineteen twenty one to create a magazine in nineteen twenty four called Foreign Affairs. It comes from the Journal of Race Relations by Thorsten Veblen, the guy who came up with conspicuous consumption. So foreign affairs operates as, like, the next step after what really happened to Paris. 

They're conducting their, their global game, their great game, And you have a British Israel World Federation that got together, and part of that's the receipt that is the Balfour declaration. It's a receipt for property. And so when you get into any of these topics, like, you can't go you can't get away from going back to the source of who is the international banking family instrumental in doing all this. You're not allowed to talk about them because gatekeepers. That's it. They'll name call you. But if you got the facts, they definitely don't wanna debate. 

So when a gatekeeper like Douglas Murray goes on Joe Rogan and performs so sloppily, what do you think is the, the outcome? The outcome is a bunch of noise in the system because, you know, everyone who likes Douglas Murray thinks he won. Everyone who likes Dave Smith thinks he won. But the audience still has yet to really understand either of those sides. Basically, because Rogan didn't run the interview, like, have questions and have conversation, Douglas Murray came in, and he's like, I have questions about this, and you haven't had enough of these people on. And what about this over here? And he is just like, as long as he had a list of critiques, you could never, like, actually be like, okay. Let's put some stuff on the table here. Like, when did this all become so important to US foreign policy? 

Before or after they've you know, m I six created the Saudi royal family? Was it before or after that? Was it before or after the Balfour declaration? Was it before or after the Pilgrim Society decides to jack America and put it back into the empire? Was it before or after eight, you know, eighteen twenty eight Rothschilds to buy all of Palestine from the Niles weekly register or eighteen thirties. Like, there's a whole bunch of those types of articles. So when it foreshadows real events that unfolded later, you have to say maybe there was something maybe there was some human to that rumant. 

A piece of glass on my finger. Well and it's funny because, Dave Smith brought up, like, trying to build a path for how people arrive critical of Zionism in Israel saying, like, I know a lot of people have lost trust in the experts, especially around COVID. And so they're kind of, like, going, well, if they lied to me about this, what else has been a lie? And so they're knocking on all the ideas that they previously believed in and seeing if there's any integrity there. And no joke, Douglas Murray goes, okay. I can understand that. But does that mean we have to lift the sewer sewer gates all the way up? And what does that mean? You just called him a gatekeeper and it just clicked for me that he is there to keep the gates on the sewer from being lifted. But he describes the sewer as being all these terribly dangerous ideas, 

whereas we see the sewer grate letting out the the cold, hard, greasy truth that everyone needs to know. Yeah. Two of the books. I was gonna bring, there's one called Friendly Fire. If you guys look that up, it's got, Churchill on the front, and it's a great big thick book like this. And it's basically, like, how Britain kinda waged war in America in a very secret, stealthy, cunning, I respect. The cunningness. I don't respect the unethical, like, lying to us. Like, come on. We're supposed to be cousins, man. 

And the other one was I think it's by Tariq Ali, and it's, it's like the whole shit talking book on Churchill. Mhmm. Oh, I have it right here. And I got the title I got the name I got the author's name right. I have not read this yet, but I saw interviews talking about this book and giving references from the book. So then I bought the book, but I haven't yet read it. So this, I have yet to, have an opinion on. I just have it in waiting. I don't have to have an opinion on this book. But Friendly Fire is is a really interesting book. I was reading Friendly Fire all alongside, like, a bunch of Neil Ferguson official histories of the Rothschild family and the world finances and stuff like that. But, 

I know enough about Churchill to be like, I need to read this book because he was involved with some things from American perspective that are very, in my opinion, unforgivable, but I would still like to weigh it on the scale. We'll see. Because when you create a monster just to defeat a monster, I don't think you're cool. And they fully facilitated the rise of Adolf Hitler along with eastern establishment, Skull and Bones, secret society, families from the Yale East India Company University system. 

They all work together to do it, and that's how America got blackmailed. Did you see Israel blackmailing the the UK over that stuff? Because they funded the Nazis too. I haven't seen that list. Is there an Epstein list for London? Do you think Epstein was just confined to America? Oh, you guys haven't heard about that yet? Well, that's interesting. Fascinating. Well Very sad. We'll see what twenty twenty five brings out. Go ahead, Scottie. Seven just texted me and said, thank you for bringing up Thorstein Veblen. He's never heard that mentioned on another show before. 

And, that's just the value that gets thrown out around here at Grand Theft World. Like, it's new facts that you you're not gonna hear anywhere else, you guys. Yo. Seven Seas. Check this out. Thorstein Veblen. He's part of the philosophic corruption of reality. I would put him as, like, a like, a second generation of Henri Saint Simon, who talks Patrick Wood talks about him in Technocracy Rising, Saint Simon. So Thorsten Veblen's following. He's also related to Oswald Veblen, 

who influenced Norbert Wiener in cybernetics. So the Veblen's I'm not sure if they're brothers or cousins, but they're related. So, the idea of technocracy, conspicuous consumption, influences on John Kenneth Galbraith. Now Galbraith's son was just on a show this past week, and I forget whose show it was, if it was Jimmy Dore's show or who it was. But I remember, Galbraith, and his influential, development. And then Thorson Veblen, he made the Journal of Race Development, which turned into the Council on Foreign 

Council on Foreign Relations journal called Foreign Affairs. And then there's also a journal of international relations that preceded, in between. So it went from journal of race development to the journal of international relations to foreign affairs, and this is the whole concept. What is international relations? It's just basically the British, how they would, like, steer this country if nobody got in their way. And so you get to, like, the Kagan brothers. This one wrote, of paradise and power, America and the new world order. And then when Douglas 

Murray was talking about NATO, like, just talk about nineteen ninety three toward a new world order, US and the few Europe and the Future of NATO by George Soros. He presented, like, a he made a pitch at a NATO meeting. There's a pamphlet. Let's put that on the table because now it's not Russia invaded Ukraine in twenty twenty two. It's that NATO and Soros and the new world order have been prodding Russia since the wall fell and encroaching time after time getting NATO countries closer and closer to Russia to threaten them and provoke them just like they provoked Hitler to invade Poland. So if you tell me that World War two started because Hitler invaded Poland and not because these western 

establishment elites funded them, then I'd say then Ukraine also probably didn't start with Putin invading in Ukraine with the tanks in twenty twenty two when there's, like, a thirty year history that precedes this. Just like ten seven wasn't the beginning of anything, you've been keeping those people in prison. Like, how many Palestinians were imprisoned by Israel prior to ten seven? They talked about hostages, hundreds of hostages. You got tens of thousands of people on the other side that aren't being weighed on the scale that were illegally imprisoned without process. 

And I used chat g GPT was one of the three times I used it prior to last month, and I said, I'd like a report, and I have the report upstairs, on the number of Palestinians in prison by Israel without, jury trial prior to ten seven, and it was a staggering number. And then I asked it for more resources. So that is a legit use maybe. But, again, to seven seas point, I don't think we should, like, feed that monster too much. None. Let's slurve it out. Right? So all that being said, do we have a Tim and Kim clip coming up? 

I believe we do. Yeah. Yeah. It might be the first one of the Tim and Clem, though it might not be the, the final one. Yeah. We can check. I'll go back to the Kagan family real quick because Yale is involved. So Robert Kagan, he has a brother called Frederick Kagan. Kagan, they had he wrote, Family Business or Perpetual War. Maybe that's a joke. Alright. So Frederick Kagan and Robert Kagan, are kids of Donald Kagan, who's a famous Yale professor. He's also part of the Aspen Institute, 

which goes back to they, them, those who can easily be named great books of the Western world and the trivium wielding, Cecil Rhodes, Anglo American establishment, where they use their use of the trivium on you without intellectual self defense against it, they indoctrinate. And this also was a question asked by autonomy student earlier today. What's the difference between you as an individual having a method to learn anything and institutions having a method to indoctrinate you into anything. Like, it's it's a double sided sword just like a lot of technology. 

And while traditionally that, classical trivium has been used by, you know, churches, monarchs, other authorities and power to be like, this is the official history. But we never had the power to question that. We just had to obey and and, you know, pledge fealty to it. But now if you're an individual and you have, input processing output, grammar logic, rhetoric, however you wanna state it, it's a three step process, individual parts, how they fit together, how to use and troubleshoot the thing. Now you have unlimited access to follow your natural curiosity and inquiry to learn anything you want in in life, 

and that includes. Like, if if they told you a fact and it checks out, great. Move on to the next one. If they told you a fact and it doesn't check out, okay. Shame on them. If if you notice that ominous pattern of them lying about a lot of substantial things, maybe we lower our trust knob a little bit with these folks and stop giving them so much money so freely without looking at what they're doing. Because when we, as individuals, contribute into that, tax system that Woodrow Wilson brought in during World War one, 

you're funding the Ukraine war, the the war against Palestinians. Right? All these types of things that have been going going on, and they are part of the military industrial complex, which is, like, if if you're looking at it from a cult views, it's like a ritual sacrifice system that's been ongoing for over a hundred years since World War one. Genius. Crazy shit. Alright. And you guys found that clip? I didn't even know about this clip. This is bonus Kim on Tim. This is this is bonus because, I think she handles it calm, cool, collected. 

You know? He's calling her names. She could say clap back, but she's just like so she I think she handles it very maturely. And Tim like, I see Tim in his, like, what he could be state, where he reads some of the essential books. He starts having on some of, like, maybe the essential authors of understanding this other stuff that can be proven. Right? And maybe you have Doug you know, David or Douglas Rothkopp on there to tell you the Kissinger Associates Carnegie Endowment worldview of whatever they tried to 

whatever they tried to recruit Alex Jones with back in the day. He mentioned that on the radio this week. Oh, dude. During the renovation, I had a a well guy come out. And, when I got to the spot, my buddy's like, look at his bumper. I was like, what? It's Infowars stickers. Right? The remember the little ones from, like, two couple years ago, they were, like, little stickers again? So, anyway, he had these stickers. So and I had Alex playing on my phone. And so I walked in, and he's like, oh, you listen to Alex? I'm like, bro, I know Alex. So what's up, dude? So I had this whole deep conversation. 

Yeah. I've made films with him. And, so anyway, we had this great conversation, and I said, how many people back at the Well Place, you know, know about Alex Jones? He goes, oh, they all do. They all do. And I was like, yeah, man. People who work for a living, they care about their freedom because they're very close to, like, trading their time for money, to have time, and, you know, to do the things in life, and they're more attuned to it. Whereas I think the people who have the more corporate, like, liberal white collar college degree jobs, whatever the HR positions are out there that they create, 

OSHA, they're separated. They have an artificial cushion. They're not living as close to reality. They might not have, like, taken their own garbage to the dump in a while. They might always have someone that comes by and pick it up. Yeah. And you have to be a lot more tuned to reality. You have to, like, exist in a functional, tangible reality where, like, fourteen and five eighths of an inch is, like it matters. You can't, like, be like you know, it's like it's like the classic example. It's like two plus two has to equal four, or else the house will fall apart. Like, 

there's no other way around it. So If two plus two can equal five in some useful way and you can demonstrate it to me, enough of a mature adult to be like, I'll I'll watch a demonstration. But if the demonstration doesn't make sense, I'm gonna have to stick with my original answer. Thank you. So we have to be rooted in reality, whereas I don't have time to speculate about all this fantasy land stuff. Like, I I need to know. I'm yelling at my guy, like, what's the measurement? He yells at me. I make the cut. You know what I mean? It's like, has to work that way. Hey. When you yell to your guy when you need a cut, is it like, 

do you have a plus or a minus system where it's plus or minus, like, one sixteenth? Or what's your Maybe. Honestly, honestly, I'm usually the guy being yelled at to make the cut because it's like Alright. Like, my guy I work with, we're like, I do a lot of tile work with him and, like, he's he's the master tile setter, and I'm the grunt running back and forth making the cuts on the tiles. Oh, there you go. You know how to measure. There you go. Yeah. You gotta know. You gotta know. Yeah. Where to put tile, there's very little room for error. There's not much room for error. Yeah. Because eyes will pick out patterns that are irregular. 

Right? Yeah. Same thing. These are all irregular patterns, all these books. Like, how about this one? Obedience to Authority by Stanley Milgram. You know what I'm saying? It's like, these are I'm just surrounded by wait. I got another one for you. You know, frustration aggression studies from Yale. Maybe they know stuff about this that you know, maybe they know stuff about you that you don't know about you. Wait. I got more. How about cybernetics? The human use of human beings or, you know, principles of social reconstruction in nineteen fourteen. This is like a World War one. They're trying to reconstruct 

our society to be more in line with the thing they're trying to create. It's not, like, it's not super rocket science. There's a little rocket science every now and then, but, you know, we try to keep it to a minimum. Alright. Now that we found the clip and we've vamped enough to cover the finding of the clip, this is how we do it live and play the clip. So, who's announcing this next block? What do we got in there? So we've, taken the one Kim clip. Because, essentially, what happened is we had Tim Pool. He goes to his secret BB meeting. Then Kim decides to report on it, which a lot of people did because it got out there. That's legit. Yeah. And then, 

Tim responds to her video, which we were gonna play Yeah. Which was Not interested. You know, Tim exposed. Tim Pool has this meeting. So he responded to the video called, Tim Pool's secret meeting with Netanyahu exposed claims lying grifter Kim Iverson. And then the play clip we're gonna play is Kim reacting to that Yes. Clip. And then instead of reacting to it, we'll try to educate you or something more useful because we know you're watching a reaction to the reaction, and we don't want you to get, like, too many levels of reaction. Alright. So, 

Chatham House rules is not the council on foreign relations. It's the Royal Institute of International Affairs rule. Do you know where their headquarters is? It's a place called Chatham House. So these are not American rules. These are the Anglo American establishment, specifically Royal Institute of International Affairs funded by the Rockefeller family as well as, you know, British families over there. But just the fact that the Rockefellers are funding the thing that has the Chatham House rules should tell you a lot about the internationalism 

that his family practices. You know, they don't discriminate across borders because they're gonna erase all the borders and make the whole world theirs. And that's, that's in front of Rockefeller's building. It's Atlas with the, the world on his shoulders, and that's Rockefeller. So, anyway, this is gonna be interesting in a number of different levels. I'm gonna take a few notes, and then, I could promise that probably the Dave versus Douglas is even more interesting. But I don't like people calling each other names. I don't think that's good for the freedom movement, and I think it's unnecessary. 

And if Tim really had a a bone to pick with Kim, he could have done it in a more I don't know. Constructive way? Constructive way. Yeah. Smooth, eloquent, any number of things that could be put in there. But, that might lead credence to your idea that maybe this is a manufactured conflict. Maybe BB is like, hey. We gotta get Kim on board. Why don't we manufacture this, back and forth? You've heard the fire numbers. Very powerful. Because they wanna get the attention off of Ben Shapiro's horrible JFK take. And so in this next media vlog, we've got leaked out. Kim could she could just prove that she's not a grifter by taking money from Israel. 

It's the best solution. But openly, like, show taking the brief. Hey. Hey, guys. It's all good now. Transfer If we call her a grifter, maybe she'll come to our side. Okay. Alright. From the people who invented how to win friends and influence people Exactly. At the end of a gun. Alright. So, let's go to Tim versus Kim. Let's check it out. Please welcome to the show, spokesperson for the Donald Trump bootlicker fan club and proudly celebrating his bar mitzvah in just a few short days, Ben Shapiro. Yeah. There you go. We all know he's brilliant. In fact, I call him Ben Chap 

hero because he is a hero, which if you're not careful sounds like Ben Shatt hero. And in a way, that's true as well. He's the hero of. Ben, tell us about Trump's plan for Gaza. All of the conventional wisdom, all of the state department approved conventional wisdom for decades has led to full scale disaster in the Middle East. It has led to an intractable, multi decade problem of a radicalized Palestinian population that supports terrorism 

rather than any regime that would actually allow for peace, prosperity, and the building of a livable life. Yes. Thank you for finally saying it. Palestinians are radicals for all of that living there. They've been doing. While the IDF, which has directly killed over forty eight thousand people over the past eighteen months are, the calm, rational, normal folks. They're so chill. 

They're like listening to Simon and Garfunkel wrapped in a blanket drinking hot cocoa. Not radical at all. If mass murder of women and children in the tens of thousands, assassinating journalists, bombing every hospital on the map, and torturing UN employees is considered radical, I guess we're all radical. I mean, who hasn't done those things? And in response to Hamas killing twelve hundred Israelis and taking two hundred and fifty into captivity. Listen, Benny. 

You know I love you. You are right about everything, which is amazing. But you slipped up on that twelve hundred number. As has been endlessly documented, including on this show, Israel killed hundreds of Israelis on October seventh. As Israel Hayom reported, data's been revealed that shows that during the fighting on October seventh, the air force fired eleven thousand shells, dropped more than five hundred heavy one ton bombs, and launched a hundred and eighty missiles. But who knows? Maybe they were 

firing one ton bombs at squirrels or a surly raccoon. Okay. So you got that number wrong, but no worries. I'm sure that's the only time you will ever get something wrong. Anyway, Benny, you've talked about how Trump is amazing because he goes against conventional wisdom and, oh, so true. For example, conventional wisdom, use a toilet. Trump doesn't care for it. That's why he wears each of his thousand dollar suits only once. Anyway, what other conventional wisdom has he gone against? The conventional wisdom that if the United States actually moved 

its embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, the eternal capital of Israel and the Jewish people, that if that were to happen, then the entire Middle East would go up in flames. And it turns out nothing happened. Nothing. Yes. Nothing happened after Trump moved the embassy. There has been peace and harmony in Israel and Gaza and the West Bank. Ever since then, nothing happened. 

Also, did did you say Jerusalem is the eternal capital of the Jewish people? What? Do we have to move there? Because I'm Jewish and my eternal capital is, I don't know, maybe Richmond, Virginia, Jamieson? No. Johnny Walker blew, I think. I'm sorry. When did we decide this? Was there a June meeting I missed? Can someone send me the minutes of that? Because, you know, just the important stuff. I don't need to know that Jake again asked everybody not to leave their dirty coffee cups in the sink. I get it. I get it, Jake. I don't need that stuff. Just action items. 

At this press conference, he made the announcement that the United States would take over the Gaza Strip. Yes. Amazing. Love it. So what are the details? We take over the Gaza Strip. Now I don't know what this looks like in practicality, and president Trump didn't spell out any details. Yes. My favorite kind of genius plan is one with no details. And my favorite kind of epic cleansing is vague. Fly by the seat of your pants. Who knows what's gonna happen next? Kind of ethnic cleansing. Not this lame, oh, by the book ethnic cleansing. Everyone's always like, you're not doing it right. I'm like, I'm doing my thing. Come on. That sucks. K. So everybody who is against this, I have a question. What is your alternative? 

Seriously, I'd love to hear it. Oh, shit. He's right. There's no alternative to genocide. Damn it. I I never even never even thought of that. Genocide is just a fact of life, folks. Like aging and taxes and law and order SVU. It's always there. Hold on. Let me think for a second. An alternative to the mass murder of tens of thousands of innocent people followed by ethnically cleansing the entire area. 

Wait. No. No. Wait. What about not doing that? What about doing literally anything else? Nah. So tell us more about this awesome plan, shat hero, my hero of shat. And just imagine for a second if, wait for it, president Trump was actually right since he has been right on the Middle East many times before. Imagine if this actually became an economic development zone 

where there were, in fact, hotels, where there were, in fact, casinos, where there were houses and schools. Oh my god. That's so true. Just imagine if there were houses and schools in Gaza. There have never been houses or schools there before, you know, except for the eighty five percent of schools in Gaza that Israel bombed. I love this travel sized Ben Shapiro fella. He's not afraid to blow up a school and then say, imagine if there were a school here. 

That's what I call bold decision making. It seems clear he's destroyed all his brain cells by snorting whippets, but he's not afraid to say, imagine if there were brain cells here. You go get them, Benny. So he was asked about his plan for the Palestinians. And what he said is, listen. If you wanna leave, you should be able to leave. So the plan is that if you wanna go, you should be able to go elsewhere. Yeah. Why don't they leave? I hadn't thought of that. You know, this bizarre idea that people need to be trapped in this zone. Oh, they're trapped there. That's why they don't leave. 

But who's trapping them there? Is it the defensive line of the Philadelphia Eagles or perhaps those flying monkeys from The Wizard of Oz? Oh, it's Israel that has trapped them there. That was a head scratcher. Thought maybe it was judge Judy for a second. She's pretty tough. There's polling data, by the way, showing that a huge percentage of Palestinians, if they could get out, would want to. Boom. Brilliant point. It's kinda like how I saw some excellent polling data during World War two showing that most folks in Auschwitz would have wanted to leave if they could get out. Similarly, if you knew someone who enjoyed living in a certain neighborhood, 

they grew up there, everything they'd ever known was there, they really liked it, but then, you bombed their house, killed some of their family, cut off their water and electricity, you'd be surprised how quickly they'd tell you they'd like to leave. And the fair and honest thing to do would be for you to let them leave and build a casino where their house used to be. That's what good people do. Conventional wisdom is you have to keep millions of people suffering in an area dominated by terrorism so that what? A terrorist state can be built? Yes. Exactly. 

Conventional wisdom is you have to keep them there while terrorism rains down on their heads. That's immoral. For example, when there's a school shooting, the proper course of action is to move everyone out of the school and then let the shooter move in there permanently and enjoy themselves. End of problem. Some negative Nancy might say you shoulda rushed the school shooter. But in the case of Gaza, who would that be? We don't know why Gaza is so destroyed, much like the city of Atlantis. It just 

happens to be that way. Maybe rubble was shipped in from overseas. No one knows. To sum it up, what I think Penny Boy is saying is when ethnic cleansing has gone this far, it just needs to be completed. And who's better at that than the United States of America? Just give us a call and we'll be there in a few hours. We're like the Amazon of ethnic cleansing. Well, thank you, my genocidal leprechaun friend, for clearing this topic up for all of us. Oh, my. 

Well, to no real surprise, Tim Pool clapped back at the segment I did yesterday where I criticized him having a secret Chatham House Rules meeting with Netanyahu and other Israeli senior officials. I wanna play for you a little bit of the video that he, that he did. He put out numerous tweets. In fact, here was one of the longest tweets that he put out plus subsequent tweets after this one. In fact, he called me a lot of names. So in this tweet right here, he says, this is a grift. Kim is framing everything as inherently wrong. 

He says, yeah, he you know, he's Kim is twisting everything to fit a boogeyman narrative. Several of the people there posted photos before and during the event, yet she says no one else admitted to the meeting. She also said Chathamau's rules is not for journalists, which is one hundred percent about journalists. Who else is going to attribute quotes to someone in a publication? He then went on to say, I'm sure she'll be shocked to discover that I met in private with Trump, members of Congress, CEOs, in fact, even former Soviet generals, gang leaders, revolutionaries, you know, all secretly, apparently, and in private. He then did a forty two minute video. So he's on a tear with this. So he has, 

responded. He's not only tweeted this, he's also tweeted other things like this one here, you know, calling me the name at the bottom there. Imagine if you did, like, a single Google search for the pronunciation. He makes fun of my yesterday, I was saying Chatham House Rules. Apparently, it's Chatham. Sorry. I'm not part of the DC swamp, and I also am from the West Coast, not the East Coast, so this is a totally unfamiliar word to me. He'll say, well, that's because you're not a real journalist. That's why you don't know this word. Well or, how about real journalists don't agree to Chatham House rules? In fact, only journalists that show up to meetings like the Bilderberg Group agree to this type of stuff. It's sinister. It's 

propagandizing. It's meant for elites, and, you know, most people don't do it or know about it. So that's fine. I don't care. But Chatham, yeah, in in order to make him happy, so he stops criticizing that. So he says, oh, shit. I tweeted literally after the meeting happened and an hour after Jessica Krauss posted a photo of me there with several people. Right. So he's saying, oh, Kim, you got me. It was so secret, but it wasn't secret. So what are you over here complaining about? I'm not complaining about the fact we know about the meeting. I didn't uncover the meeting and I didn't put it out there for my audience like, look, I uncovered this secret meeting. No. My criticism is the fact you agreed to a meeting with a foreign leader trying to get us into war, a foreign leader who was committing a genocide. 

You agreed to a Chatham House rules meeting with that guy, which is particularly sinister. That is different than an off the record meeting. That is also different than having an anonymous source or attributing a quote or information to, you know, a senior leader in the Israeli government. That is a very different Chatham House rules is very different. We're gonna get to that. But let me show you some of the of the forty two minute video he also did, which by the way, Tim is very sensitive obviously about this because the majority of his viewers are actually against him on this issue. They don't think he should have had this meeting. 

They do think he's more pro Israel in his defense. They question his integrity and how we know this for sure. The video he posted, the forty two minute video that I'm going to share clips from, as of right now this moment, there are five thousand likes on the YouTube video, but there are six point three thousand dislikes on this video. He is being ratioed on his tweets. He's being ratioed on this video. His fans are not in agreement with him on this. They're more in agreement with me on this. So this is why I think he's being particularly defensive and felt like the need to put out numerous tweets, calling me numerous names, and making a forty two minute video. 

It's unfortunate. I like Tim. I've always liked Tim. I've been to Tim's, been on his show several times and, we've we bonded over being part Asian, both of us, And I still like Tim. I don't have anything against him. I am absolutely gonna call out integrity issues in journalism when I see them, be they friend or foe. So I I don't I don't have a personal bent on this, but Tim certainly does with some of the things that he is you know? But, I mean, he feels attacked, so I don't blame him. Let's go ahead and watch this first little clip from the forty two minute video, which you are free to watch the entire thing, of course. I'd like to thank Kim Iverson for this. 

Admittedly, it's a slow news day, but I think we get an opportunity to expose what it means to be a grifter. Yes. We will. We've had Kim Iverson on the show. I was a fan for a while, but she seems to have gone off the deep end. I suppose it's a desperate bid for relevance as is with many people. A desperate bid for relevance. I'm not the one who took four hundred thousand dollars a month from, a company without asking where they were getting their money from. Seems like that would have been integrity journalism rule number one. Find out where the hell the money comes from. And then you find out, oops, it came from Russia. I'm not the one that defends the Israelis, 

that will not that that bulks at if you remember this clip, the USS Liberty clip, where he's like, oh, we can't talk about this. Right? Dude, I'm concerned with having American aircraft carriers over there. Like, what I keep being told about the USS Liberty. That's something with the the Israeli government. You know? You should you should be careful about that. Oh, wait. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, yeah. Be careful about that. Be careful about that. Okay? So calling me the grifter here saying that I'm doing the bid for relevance. I'm not the one that took an access journalism meeting with Netanyahu 

thinking that it was gonna be under Chatham House rules. It ended up not being. That does not but Tim went into that meeting believing it would be and believing that people would adhere to it, believing that the meeting would be entirely kept secret. And when he saw that it wasn't, he decided he needed to come out with it, but he otherwise agreed to this. How many other meetings has he had under Chatham House rules where he's willing to go sit, get the information? And under those rules, you are unable to attribute any of that information to anyone at any it it's very different than an unnamed source. An unnamed source you could say a senior Israeli officials, 

expressed concern about blah blah blah. You could say that under town of house rules you can't say that at all. You can't even you basically have to act like the meeting didn't exist. So it's propagandizing, that's the purpose of it. It's meant for these elites to get together, spew out narratives to journalists, have journalists keep the information source extremely secret, not just anonymous but not even attributing it to any anything at all. And, it and it's also different from an off the record conversation. An off the record conversation is 

you are gathering information from somebody in the know. You are not to be using that information publicly. You're not to publish it. You're not to attribute it. You're not to say anything about it. It's literally meant for background information or extra information so you can follow a lead. That is an off the record information an off off the record meeting. And again, an an anonymous source or, you know, don't attribute it to me. Keep you know, you could say senior level. You could say this, but don't say anything else. This is what I said. You can attribute that. When you have these types of other meetings, 

then you start staying saying stuff and you can't say, well, I heard it from a senior Israeli official. You're not allowed to say that. That's why it's so particularly sinister. So he goes on to criticize, and this is what he says. The Chatham House rule was never meant to be used by journalists. Wrong. This is so ridiculously wrong. Kim doesn't even know how to pronounce the word. Oh, here we go with the grammar police. Yes. If that's your only rebuttal, you you know that you're already on the wrong foot. Or commentators or anyone whose whole brand is, I tell you what the establishment won't. Yes. Chatham House rules are so that powerful elites literally this is what they say in all these meetings. They say, 

if you quote me on this, I will be impeached. I will be fired. I will be I will be strung up by the board, our shares will collapse, but this is these are things that you should know. That's not exactly quite true. That would be more like sitting down with an anonymous source and saying, again, a senior level leader or, somebody with inside information or somebody close to Trump. We see that every day in the news. Chatham House rules is very different. That means come to the meeting, hear what we have to say, but act like it never happened. It just so happened Tim was not able to act like it never happened because Jessica Krauss started taking a bunch of photographs, 

and the word was already out there because the other people in the meeting, also not DC insider elites, they didn't know about Chatham House rules. And so they actually took our phones because they said, we wanna just talk however we wanna talk. Okay. So remember that he said they actually took our phones. Okay? Because he then says this. No cameras, no transcripts, just a government, a message, and a room full of people who control what millions of Americans see online. Wrong. There were many cameras. Like I mentioned, Jessica was taking pictures. They're on her Instagram. 

She posted a bunch. And then I was like, I I I look. We're in we're in the Blair House, and they said it's Chatham House Rules. And I and I'm not trying to be mean, Jessica. She she's walking around filming, and I was just I just was like, come on. This is not Chatham House Rules. You know what I mean? Oh, yeah. You know what I mean? Like, this come on. I don't mean to be mean to Jessica, but she clearly doesn't know about what the elites know, which is about Chatham House rules. There she is walking around with her phone. I don't mean to be rude to Jessica Krauss, but she's clearly not an elitist like me. 

That's what he's admitting to here. So he said, they took the phones. And then he says and then when I say there were no phones, no no cameras, he says, wrong. Jessica was going around taking pictures. Right? But then they took the phones when you had the meeting. So, yes, she took some gawking photos like the j sixers that were walking through the capitol building in awe looking around. Yeah. She did that, but then they took the phones. And that was my point. It was an off the record it wasn't even an off the record meeting. That would have been better. It was a meeting that was meant to propagandize, 

give you information so that you would go and share it with the world. If they said it was off the record, that would mean that the Israelis didn't never intended you to share any of it out there in the world. They would say off the record, none of this information is to be shared. We're just giving you some background context or information for you to follow another lead. That would have been what that is. But this is more sinister. Chatham House rules is come to a meeting, don't say don't tell anybody who the meeting was with, Don't tell anybody. Don't say who was here. Don't talk about don't even say which government. No attributing factors whatsoever, but take every single piece of information we give you and go ahead and share it. Go ahead and share it. Share it with everybody far and wide. That's propagandizing. 

That's the reason why it's so sinister. That's the reason why the Bilderberg group is so sinister because all these elites and journalists elites get together and they have these secret meetings, and then they they plot and plan the world takeover, global new government, and then they send all of their mouthpieces out there in the world to chant in unison to essentially brainwash us into believing the world is going to end with climate change or Trump is a big, Hitler or whatever it is that they're trying to propagandize us with. We see it every day in social media. The exact same message is coming out from every single mainstream source. And you wonder where in the world are they getting this information? Well, I'll tell you where. Chatham House rule meetings. 

So he goes on to say They will see in Bakersfield, San Jose. We'll see in Buffalo, Toledo, Montreal, Toronto, Ottawa. Go to jimmy door dot com for a link for those tickets. I came across this video, and it it was from this was from last November. And this is a Israeli general, and, he's talking about how Israel is in the process of collapse. So let's just it's just a very short clip. Let's, 

he's not speaking in English, so I'll read what he says. He says, look. When you evaluate the success of the war, you have to check if it achieved its goals. Until now, we haven't achieved a single goal. We haven't freed the hostages, which was a war goal. We haven't returned the displaced people to their homes, which was a goal of this war. Meanwhile, several major new problems have arisen and we are going to fail with them too. The way we're conducting the war, Israel's economy is collapsing 

throughout the year. And if we continue, it will come to a total collapse. We are losing our society. This is a terrible phenomenon. Almost a civil war. Right, left, religious, others, so that within our own home we are exploding. We've lost the world, economic boycotts, arms, embargoes from some of our closest friends. There will also be an ICC ruling. It's conclusive, will which will be disastrous. Today, we have a critical problem 

with the reserves and even conscripted soldiers who are already voting with their feet after getting endless call up notices to replace them. Those not showing up of percents both in the regular no one is talking about this. So so when you look at the entire equation, we are in a process of collapse. Would you agree that the that the state of Israel is in a process of collapse, economically and no. You wouldn't? No. I think it's vastly exaggerated. Some of the things he says are clearly true. 

But the general picture as I see it is, number one, they have achieved their goal. Their goal was very clear. They were going to solve the Gaza question. They were sick and tired of what they used to call the mowings of the lawn in Gaza. We go in, we commit this high-tech killing spree, kill several thousand people, kill off several hundred children, destroy several thousand homes. They were tired of that. They wanted to adjust once and for all the final solution to the Gaza question. 

And they've achieved that goal. Gaza is no more. There is no Gaza anymore. There's nothing there. About ninety two percent of the homes in Gaza are gone. Two thirds of the infrastructure is gone. The hospitals are gone. The universities are gone. The schools are gone. The water and sanitation system is gone. It's never gonna be rebuilt. Israel didn't devote eighteen months to destroying everything to suddenly allow it to be rebuilt. 

That's not gonna happen. And right now as we speak, I'm not sure if you're aware. For the past month, no food, fuel, water, or electricity has been allowed in Gaza for a month. Yesterday, the secretary general of the UN, Gutierrez, he says the gates of hell, the floodgates of hell have been opened in Gaza. Now if, as I believe, that was their main goal 

to make Gaza no more, they have achieved that goal. Did they ever really care much about the hostages? Not really. Of course, they would have wanted them back. I'm not gonna deny that. But if it was getting them back at the price of not being able to persist in this objective of solving the Gaza question? No. Because they could have gotten the hostages back as far as July. 

There was that deal on the table. They turned it down. And then who just broke the new ceasefire? That's not a, a subject of debate. The new ceasefire included returning all the hostages, but there was a price. The price was you're supposed to admit humanitarian aid. You're supposed to end the war. And at some point, you were supposed to allow for the reconstruction of Gaza. 

They weren't gonna pay that price because their eyes are fixed on their objective, the final solution of the Gaza question. Now the other things he said, there's some truth. Yes. Israel's economy is experiencing difficulties, but you know and I know, you and the Americans are never gonna let the Israeli economy implode. They'll just give them the money. That's not gonna happen. They'll give them what the money they need 

to, restore their economy. As far as the soldiers, yes. First of all, we shouldn't exaggerate what's happening there. You know, you'd be very surprised to learn. Over the last eighteen months, do you know that less than one Israeli soldier has been killed in Gaza each day? Less than one a day. There's no war in Gaza. It's not a war. It's a genocide. It's a mass extermination. There's no war being fought in Gaza. 

Some of the soldiers, like I read in the morning paper, I guess, today, that the airline the, the, air force the air force reserves, they say the war has to stop. You know why they wanted to stop? Because it's looking so bad. You know, Israelis, as you probably know, they love to travel. Every time you know, the first thing they used to do I don't know if it's still true. When they finish their stint in the army, because it's a citizen army, every citizen serves, you know, it's the first thing they do after that. They used to go around the world. 

They would take a trip around the world. That's how they ended their army service. It was a kind of a celebratory event. If you're an Israeli now, you really don't wanna go around the world. Except maybe Hungary, you're not gonna be given a welcome carpet. You know, I find it in myself. I used to talk to Israelis because I live in an old Jewish neighborhood, a large number of Israelis. You know? So I would talk to them, argue with them, and so forth. 

Now inside me, no. Not talking to those people. You lost me. You lost me. I'm not gonna talk to you. So you could imagine a lot of these guys or and women, they go to colleges in the United States. Not a nice place. Not a you're not getting a welcome wagon in any college in the US. So a lot of them wanted to end now because Israel has become a pariah state. So there's as I said, there's some elements of truth to what he's saying, but the big picture is they achieved their goal. 

There is no Gaza anymore. It's gone. And so, so what solve the Gaza question. I mean, that was always the goal. I mean, that was Absolutely. From day one. Yeah. And From October eighth. Yes. And, you know, a lot of people could credibly make the case. We've made the case here that Netanyahu was aware of the impending attack on October seventh. No. That I don't agree with. And, well, 

they they had the plans a year ahead of time according to the New York Times even. But, you know you know, Jimmy, when you're a government, you get all of these warnings about all sorts of things. Like, if you read the story, the the the build up, to nine eleven. Okay? There are the people like Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, they were receiving a lot of warnings about Osama bin Laden. But Go ahead, Paul. Don't always when you're flooded with all kinds of 

That's a good point. That's a good point. We were warned. About Osama bin Laden. You know who warned us a bunch of times? Bill Cooper. It's a three letter answer, and it's not the CIA. It's a little agency called MI six. And if I go to this book, it's an excellent book. There's two timeline books. This one's the Paul Thompson book. If we were to go through warning signs, 

that's chapter one and let's see. Okay. Hold on. There's a lot of them, so pardon my French while I get it lined up here. Alright. Here we go. Here we go. Warning signs chapter one. Let's see. You know, it negates July fourth nineteen seventy nine. Carter signs the executive order bringing Operation Cyclone. That's when they started, training Mujahideen 

and work with bin Laden. Early nineteen nineties, so it goes through the timeline. And then you get up to right before nine eleven. So back at that time in the nineties, Bin Laden had a base in London in nineteen ninety six from Secret Affairs, Mark Curtis. That's the reference for that. Khobar Towers. Toby Wong. Reservoir Dogs fans get that one. Alright. British intelligence warns Al Qaeda, plans to use aircraft possibly as flying bombs. 

Nineteen ninety nine. Let me zoom in. There you go. You see that? Nineteen ninety nine. FBI learns of terrorist plans to send students to US for aviation training. FBI investigates flight school, attempted flight simulator. There's another, MI six warning. Hijacker would be hijacker. Tells FBI about plot to fly plane into US building. There's that one. That's not necessarily MI six, but it's interesting since we're going through. 

FBI investigates, flight students who didn't really fly those planes as we played, that clip a couple weeks ago. Pentagon, which is part of the Anglo American establishment, October twenty fourth through twenty sixth two thousand, practices emergency drill of possible hijacked airliner crash into building. And on the front, they had, like, a crash at the Pentagon. You should study those old documents. It's not planning if they do it, or is it planning if they do it? I don't know. I forget how that works. 

April twenty fourth two thousand one, US military plan for terrorist action against Americans. This is operation Northwoods it's talking about here, so it's bringing in that precedent. And early August two thousand one, Britain warns US again, specifies multiple airplane hijackings. You know, is this like when they warned us about Pearl Harbor? How clearly were they warning us about these things that were about to happen? 

CIA counterterrorism warning. I think there's one more. Unusual stock trades in the market. So, anyway, I got a couple of the MI six warnings on the record. This is about the insider trading. These parts right here. And I was looking to see I thought there was, like, four or five. So, I mean, I do have a lot of stuff highlighted in here, and I am doing it live so I can look at it in between while we're playing clips. But there's just a lot of interesting warnings for, you know, 

hundred million rushed from World Trade Center. There's just a lot of warnings for people who didn't know that this was coming, but practiced for it to be coming. I'm just pointing out some of the obvious. Let's see. I think that's it for, MI six, because then it gets into the Deutsche Bank, buzzy crown. What Deutsche Bank. What is is that a German bank? Is that like a Nazi bank? You know, in that movie Casablanca, Rick at a Rick's American Cafe, he won't let Deutsche Bank into 

his casino. That was Hitler's bank? What? Deutsche Bank. I'm sure it's not it's not it's not it's not the same group that was putting insider trades on nine eleven, specifically on American Airlines, United Airlines, and Marshall McLennan where it all kicked off, More insider trading. So, yeah, I put the MI six references on the record, at least. We got that. Got that. Wait a minute. You're you mean to tell me Hitler's bank was insider trading on the morning of nine eleven? Couldn't possibly be. It's all unrelated, completely 

non connected events throughout history. Well, if the people that funded the Nazis created the CIA and the CIA's insider trading on nine eleven, along with some other people. I mean, you could trace it back to the number three at CIA, a guy who was, like, deputy director. Anyway, I'm sure there's nothing to be seen there because Doug is right, and we should just stop thinking about it. In fact, he should just adopt Ethan Klein's moniker. You know, when I think about it, dude. Right? Douglas Murray's like, go plant some daisies. 

Dave said he said he was happily married or whatever, and Douglas is like, that's what they all say. I thought we were watching, like, Marvel comics, and it was like flame on. Anyway, I didn't make it through the whole Rogan experience interview with those two yet, but I'll probably finish it up tomorrow. But, it's, you know, it's a good time for intellectual self defense out there because otherwise, you gotta pick red team, blue team, and flip a coin. You don't really know. You don't really understand. 

I think understanding is the name of the game. Yeah. We should make a game called understanding, and that's the name of the game. My device is reporting how ADL It wasn't Tim Pool this time. He got cut off by Lee. Lee? Cool. He had some good he had some good jokes in that last one, ripping on Shapiro. That was entertaining. I liked how he's like, did I miss a meeting? Like, did you guys all decide this without me? He's been funny for a long time. 

And he's like Paul Virge. I don't think he's aged in the past ten years. Yeah. Same. I ran out ran out of adrenochrome quite a while ago, guys, so I don't know I don't know what I'm doing. Can't joke about that stuff. Alright. Yeah. Some people don't know the difference, especially if they're reading a transcript. The Canadian sarcasm did not come through on the transcript. Robophobia. That's next week's title. So we don't, you know, get that that one. You you picked up on that one. That's horrible. Robophobia. We could talk about the United Nations, 

conference twelve years ago on killer robots and how again, it was supposed to be like, stop doing that, and instead they're like, let's put a half trillion dollars into killer robots, autonomous robots that aren't so autonomous. Don't worry. We've got our good robots. Now that whole thing with, Temple and Chatham, House Wolf apply. Sorry. I got lift. Chatham House rules. If they wanted Chatham House Rule like, they they lure them there. They're like, you're coming to a special thing. It's Chatham House Rules. And Tim accepted. Right? And then they get there, and they're like, really? We just invited you guys because you have millions of followers, and we need you to spread our propaganda. 

But he didn't get that part. They didn't read him in on that part of the script. Or why? Like, because if if it's not to share, then why have these influencers with millions of people, and, like you know, obviously, they didn't have Kim. They had Tim. Right? Right? Because Kim might have some pushback. She's right in on the situation. He's not. He just goes with whatever the strongest public narrative is, and he likes Dave Smith. So he's like, oh, Dave Smith's good. But then he agrees with the things that Douglas Murray's saying, basically, as far as foreign policy and United States support of Israel. 

And anyone who questions it must be some leftist crackpot trying to grift. Well, dude, if if you're talking out there and you don't do your homework, maybe that's the grift. So that's all I have to say about that. Yeah. I mean, it's hard to argue that he he's just oblivious. I think he just is bought, paid for, compromised. I don't know that it's, like, bought, paid for, and compromised, but he's comfortable enough with what his like, if if if there's a shtick yeah. I don't think it's what Dave Smith talking about politics. I think it's just, like, you know, Tim knows how to crank out videos that people tune into and they catch a news story, and he's done it for ten years. And he's got this comfort level that he wants to preserve, and that's good, but that's not growth mode. 

That's not, like, going in like, maybe there's something to Winston Churchill is not one of the greatest men of the twentieth century. Maybe there's something to it. We should check it out and maybe see. Because if we continue worshiping the head of the Anglo American establishment who led America back into the new world order and ruined our reputation and killed millions of our people, I mean, maybe that's not as good as, we think it is. Maybe. Yeah. You should we should, challenge him to a debate. Should I should I try and get him on the show? I'll try and get him on the show, dude. 

Duke of last memory. No. Thank you. No? I don't well, I mean, I if somebody was gonna actually read up on the situation and bring something to bear, I'd be like, well, look. You know, colonel House and lord Grey really didn't conspire with the king of England to put the Lusitania down to put the Lusitania in front of, the the wolf pack submarines that the Germans had that operation room forty, where Churchill worked before he was prime minister. This is during World War one. They had a secret cryptographic 

code breaking section. This is, well, let's go to the history blueprint because it's not the first time I've learned about this. We'll just type in room because there's not too many rooms in here. Room forty. Here we go. Now there are books on this, but this is, here's the Churchill memorandum creating room forty. Site can't be reached. What do we do? We copy that. We type archive. We drop it in because they're hiding something from you. It's not that they didn't pay the server bill. Come on. 

There we go. We're gonna get some results. Oh, they deep sixed it around twenty seventeen. And what does this look like? Why would they wanna hide this from you? Oh my goodness. Chapter two, the charter of room forty. So here's the manuscript. Anyway, Churchill, cryptographic section, illegitimately 

gets America into World War one, and then he gets rewarded by the you know, he becomes prime minister later. I wanna update the link on this, make sure I have archive dot org over here at the history blueprint so we don't have to go to that four zero four page next time. And at least I'll have a choice. When you're choosing attachments, choose wisely. Alright. So room forty helps to sync the Lusitania, get America into World War one. Colonel House was involved, 

British admiralty was involved, and room forty in Churchill. So just even because I'll pull up Chatham House in a second. But just, like, you go to a Wikipedia page and you read the page. You don't believe the page. It's very important. I want you to read the page. You don't have to believe the page. I do wanna point out the references at the bottom of the page are the starting points for knowledge, not the summaries of the pages themselves. So you would read this page, and you would check, like, naval intelligence is a thing. It exists. Right? First World War. So these are there's a lot of facts in here aside from also speculation and Wikipedia 

globalist, you know, type of aims. So this is where you can start to become educated enough to maybe wanna read a book about the topic. Right? And so the number of words that you have to be able to describe each of these entries, reflects something called your knowledge. So this is this is interesting, but we're not gonna read all about room forty right now. But I do want to also bring up Chatham Chatham Chatham House. Sorry. Chad. 

Chatham House rule. Oh, I have that too over here. Let's go here. And let's go to Chatham House rule. Right? Oh, they do use it at the Bilderberg conference. Isn't that a conference like Tim used to cover with Luke Radowski back in the day? That's interesting. Chatham House rules. Ranking of the top global challenges. No. We don't need that. Chatham House rule. We can go because, you you know, you know where these websites go. Right? 

They go to chatham house dot org where you can read all about it if their web page ever loads. There you go. So this is the place. This is the global think tank for new world order, global domination over human beings forever. And they're gonna use technology, robots, and cybernetics, and a whole bunch of other nasty stuff. And who is? So here's the rule. Meetings do not have to take place at Chatham House. Meaning, you don't have to go to Britain to enjoy the tyranny. They'll bring it to you. Any group of individuals or in any sector can use the rule. So So you can use the rule. You can play along. You can play globalist at home, basically. 

So if we go back to the history blueprint and we go back to the Chatham House rule, we have something called the Royal Institute of International Affairs, AKA Chatham House. That's the name for the place that is a think tank to take America and make the new world order. And it was created by Lionel Curtis, who did nothing interesting that we should know about at whatsoever. He should be a stranger to us, and we should remain enslaved to the plan that he helped to pioneer based on the last will and testament of Cecil Rhodes in nineteen o two. So, again, these things are knowable. They are reachable. There are artifacts. 

They are they have multiple points of confirmation and legitimacy. But if you think that Chatham House is something other than, the British conquest over the United States so that they can have a new world order, then you didn't read into the situation very well here. British infiltration of the American intelligence community looks like this. And if you get into the ideas here, you know, you've got, Royal Institute for International Affairs right here. And this is Chatham House. 

What so, again, it's done nothing that you should know about for twentieth century history. This is the ruling, you know, group. Here's a Chatham House prize, which was won by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Hillary Rodham Clinton. Right? Here here she receives the Chatham House award at C SPAN, and then DCLeaks had exposed there you go. That's Chatham House rules, bro. You're with the Clintons. Are you scared of the the body count, bro? 

They don't hit dudes with beanies. Don't worry about it. But, you know, oh, wait. That's that's Eleanor Roosevelt. Let's not play that. Might have to might have to So are you saying that Cecil Rhodes' last will and testament then led to the creation of this Royal Institute of International Affairs, which then led to the creation using these Chatham Health rules, and I mispronounced it on purpose, where they then created these think tanks that would then sort of secretly mobilize to 

incorporate different kinds of people to make world affairs move on their timetable, and that that thing's been so successful it's been in place for a hundred years? Yes. Yes. That's that's pretty much it. And I was looking for I have a history of the Pilgrim Society, and I can't lay eyes on it right at the second. But the gist is in, like, eighteen nineties, sir Arthur Conan Doyle, who wrote Sherlock Holmes, 

he said, at one of these pilgrim club meetings that they should get America back into the empire. So he said it even before Cecil Rhodes, but Conan Doyle didn't have Rothschild money and the last will and testament to bring the Freemasons, the British Empire, and British Israelism altogether. So, like, you know, Rhodes went up to maybe. So when the way they the, the irregulars about the British spy unit that infiltrated America during World War two and assassinated American citizens, 

they were not pro British. They're called the irregulars because of Conan Doyle. Like, they even had their the you know, they play into the the address of the irregulars and, you know, all these sorts of things. So there's a heavy congruence between British security coordination in America prior to America getting into World War two and what Conan Doyle had kinda painted out fifty plus years before. So it's not just Cecil Rhodes. There's a bunch of people who had that opinion. 

So, this is an excellent book, by the way. Yeah. I was just, listening to another podcast on Roald Dahl this last week, and he was, very prolific. You have military intelligence and inventor, like, all kinds of crazy stuff. Well, it was that book's about David Ogilvy from Ogilvy, Advertising. He was a British spy. Ian Fleming, who wrote Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, kid's book, also a kid's movie. Roald Dahl, who wrote Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, also a kid's book and a movie. And they are the successors 

to Rudyard Kipling, who wrote Jungle Book and a whole bunch of other kids' stories. Rudyard Kipling was good friends with Cecil Rose, like, they were best Freemason friends, and the whole white man's burden of America getting into the Spanish American war, that's, right from that same group of people. So from the Spanish American War to World War one to World War two to today, America has been getting led around by the nose and eventually became the property masters of the former British empire, and they called itself, you know, a commonwealth. But, 

those layers of abstraction still exist even though they're, like, minimized in our perspective. The city of London is severely influential over how things work in the world, and they won that power through human slavery, addiction, and, you know, opium. Yeah. So you wouldn't know that unless you read some books. That Douglas Murray would never read because they're not made by experts. I don't know what accent that was. That wasn't good at all. That it almost seems like Great Britain and its movers and shakers are just kinda jealous of America. And they're like, we want you back, like a jealous ex girlfriend. 

Kinda like how Douglas Murray seemed jealous of Dave Smith's ability to articulate his points and not use fallacies. And he's like, I'm jealous. Therefore, I'm gonna take it out on you. Well, I think his whole tactic of, like, commandeering a conversation and and being the asker of questions and the demander of facts, and you have to live up to his specs, like, I don't think Dave or Rogan were really having it, but they were just letting them, like, you know they're like, alright, dude. Whatever. Like but it they kept bringing it up, and I kept waiting for them to, like, talk beyond Daryl Cooper or, you know, expertism 

and who has a right to an opinion. So I haven't gotten that far yet. But I just thought, Douglas Murray's positions were weak and that his his moves are kinda played out. If if someone was having a serious debate and it's like, you said this thing, I said this thing, here's my evidence for my thing, where's the evidence for your thing? And we play evidence versus evidence. Or even maybe just it'd be a good game show where you bet for money. Yeah. Some I it's it's funny. In in the context of seeing 

that whole debate, and I'm trying to think of the mentality of what Douglas Murray is doing there because, you know, like you said, he's he's there to gatekeep. He's there to promote Zionism and to sort of he wanted to create a chilling effect and be like, Joe, you need to have less of these anti war, anti Israeli voices on, and you need to start having more people who are pro war and tow the tow the official expert line. Almost like he didn't know the audience he was going in against. And same with Dave Smith. He's just like, oh, this guy's just a comedian. He's not gonna know anything about history. Chip Brogan's just a comedian too, by the way. 

But these are guys who read books and talk to like, they kind of want to form an expertise, so they really care about these things. And so it just made me think, like, what kind of person do you have to be to be a gatekeeper where you value money or accolades or whatever above truth? And I found this quote. It's it's kinda short if I can really quickly read it. Please do. I don't know what it's from, but maybe somebody can find out. It says, above all, don't lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to such a past that he cannot distinguish the truth within him or around him, and so he loses all respect for himself and for others. And having no respect, he ceases to love. And in order to occupy and distract himself, without love, he gives way to passions and coarse pleasures and sinks to bestial vices, all from continual lying to other men and to himself. 

The man who lies to himself can be more easily offended than anyone. You know, it's sometimes very pleasant to take offense, isn't it? A man may know when nobody has insulted him, but that he's invented the insult for himself, has lied and exaggerated to make it picturesque, has caught out a word and made a mountain out of a molehill. He knows that himself, yet he will be the first to take offense and will revel in this resentment until he feels great pleasure in it and so passes it on to genuine vindictiveness. And that's how I felt Douglas Murray was today if he was treating him vindictively. 

Well, I think he's also, like he doesn't have a strong sense of what the actual is. He's like, oh, you know, you're platforming people who have, like, a thousand followers. Like, Ian Carroll has a lot of followers, bro. And I'm not saying I agree with everything Ian Carroll but I agree with, like, pointing out stuff that people should know about and look into and letting them make their own decisions. I think he's also in a veiled way talking about Candace and the topics that she's been covering, and he's probably talking in a veiled way about Kim Iverson. Because I'm pretty sure Douglas Murray gets a call from BB's staff, 

and they're like, look. We need you to go firefight over there on Rogan because they're they're just talking about too much truth. And Israel's losing support in the public relations war, And that's why I be that's why he just did that meeting with Tim and all those guys. That's not something you do when you're winning. They're like, hey. Help us cover up. You're aiding and abetting a genocide and ethnic cleansing, which has been demonstrably proven through hundreds of hours of this podcast. And you can search, you know, Gaza or Israel, Palestine conflict in the, 

g t w dot clip genie dot com. That's where it is. That quote was apparently, Fyodor Dostoevsky, and that was from the brothers brothers Karamazov. Karamazov. Oh, wow. Brother's Karamazov. Father, Zozima, offering profound insight into self deception and its consequences. Is that the one where, like, for the first calendar pages, he's just given biographies of people? I forget. Not sure. I'll ask Dylan when I see him tomorrow. He'll know the answer to that. Alright. So, 

do we have a clip of the, Rogan Douglas Murray? We did well, we did some at the beginning, it was, Jeremy talking about Yeah. I saw that. That was that was kinda milk toasty. Yeah. I don't know if we I don't know. There's one way to make it malice, but it's a little bit long. It's it's too malice. Yeah. I was just so I had a time code earlier, but then I kept listening until I lost it. But I was like, oh, that's a really good part. But, yeah, I'm not an expert, so what do I know? 

That's how I would get Douglas, Murray to stop listening to me. That's all you had to say. I'm not an expert, so why should you listen to me? Not to be dismissive of something that I an open experience watch the entire party. You could do Tropic Thunder today? Would that be possible? It's coming through, Colby. Monday dot com is the best day out. Or is that me? Me going through? Oh, that's you. Oh, god. Look at you. That's my Oh, so sorry, Colby. I might have to Admonish me. Admonish me for calling out the wrong. No. I might have to do some, because I got my road cat. Usually, I don't have my road caster. Here's a clip from the GRE clip channel. 

Yeah. Let let's let's check it out because this will be pretty easy to pick apart. I mean, any any of the sections. Yeah. It's the same type of argument the whole time. Yeah. Go ahead and click into that, Colby. Let's check it. On this show, you can see it full screen ish, though, instead of in the corner like they do on Joe's show. And I think that people have been indoctrinated by very bad actors 

into this, and as a result, have excused atrocities or make excuses for them, make excuses for the people who do them. I think, in addition, it plays to the some of the darkest things of, the regional mind as well as the international mind. The aims of Hamas, the stated aims include the annihilation of the Jewish people. And October the seventh, they'd had their best go at doing that. 

Okay. Pause. And the Their stated aims as of nineteen eighty eight, Douglas, what are do have they updated the Hamas Charter recently, like, in the last twenty years where it doesn't say that anymore? And by the way, also, I would add to the table, and if you're gonna weigh it out on the scale, please do, that the Lacud charter of nineteen seventy seven says from the river to the sea in so many words. So, the people that moved from Europe to take the land from the indigenous people 

said it first. Go ahead and let it play. Fact that in a in a decision between whether or not you're on the side of the people who want to dance and live in peace with their neighbors, or whether you're on the side of the people who want to rampage through a dance party bar in the early morning, macheteing at people. I find it amazing that there are so many people who don't know which the the rave that he was just talking about, people being machete, 

was blown up by Israeli Air Forces, helicopters, munitions. The bombs that that Lee Camp just described in that previous clip, that was going on there. They also let that festival be rescheduled to that location right near the fence of the prison, and, intelligence had a stand down and took all their people away from there. So I'm not saying they made it happen on purpose, But when you fund Hamas, you know about their plan ahead of time, and then you destaff the whole area so that what used to detect a cat now can't detect a hundred people and warn the system. And you've got a whole military stand down, but then you come in and do Hannibal directive on a bunch of your own citizens. 

I mean, everybody in that country is a citizen in your country, technically, so the whole thing is a civil war. But that's not what Douglas Murray will tell you. He'll tell you you either are on the obviously good side or you're a stupid terrorist, and I think neither of those is accurate or genuine reflections of the situation. Go ahead and let him play because he says lots of funny things. Side there on. But there are a lot of them. There are a lot of reasons for that. But one of the foremost reasons is the fact that the state of Israel 

has been uniquely libeled, has been uniquely lied about. Its history has been uniquely lied about. It has been uniquely put under an international spotlight and then misrepresented in a way which I cannot think of many Douglas, can you give me three examples? Could have been a question if he wasn't running the table and being the interviewer. Because I think if you were to watch the underground history of Israel Palestine over on Rumble on the Grand Theft World channel, 

you would see that none of Douglas's points hold water. Like, he's got a he's got colanders trying to convince you that they're buckets. He's got a lot of holes in that theory. Maybe I have holes in my theory. You be the judge. You're the you're the audience. You're supposed to look stuff up and know stuff for yourself. Learn how to think, and don't listen to what people tell you to think. Right? You gotta learn how to think for yourself. This is us learning how to think as we try to listen to Douglas Murray, but it it's very frustrating. Alright. Let him play. Any other countries in the world that have been treated that way. And there are, 

deep reasons for it and sharp reasons for it. How many countries in the world blackmail their way into, the world stage? I mean, for everything he says, it's like he has to occlude the thing on the other side of the scale. So it's like, why are we weighing anything at all if you're not weighing stuff on the scale? I mean, he definitely he's from Oxford. Right? He has the resources to figure out what I've figured out, what Paul's figured out, what Scott has figured out, what Seven Seas has figured out, what Jason Bermas has figured out, what Luke Radowski's figured out, what Jay Dyer's figured out, what Derek Rose has figured out, what any number of my colleagues and compatriots 

have figured out, Whitney Webb, a lot of people, Corbett, you know, Pilato, a lot of people have been publishing for, like, decades on this, and Douglas Murray is simply impervious to listening to a long form podcast that might be structured in a way that is different from the academia at All Souls College Oxford or wherever the fuck he matriculated. So, please go ahead. Let it go. Continue. The deep reasons include some of the most ancient bigotries of the human heart, and the shallow reasons are 

people who don't know what the hell they're talking about. Okay. I think that there's look, I'm not gonna speak for what every person out there believes. I don't exactly agree with like the characterization that there was no outpouring of, like, feeling after October seventh, and certainly, like, everybody I know was just like, oh my god, this is like a horrific atrocity, and like, what the the an unprecedented terrorist attack from Hamas, the worst terrorist attack in Israeli history, 

against Israelis. And it it was horrible. I think what a lot of I'm not I'm not arguing that there are no people who are actually pro Hamas or there are no people who are actually like hate Jews or something like that. I do think that what happens is that a lot of people get put in that category who do not belong there. Much like we've seen this over the last year and a half where a lot of people, you know, you have, John Podharitz calling Thomas Massie anti Semitic scum because he said we're dead broke, we can't afford to fund everybody else's war here. People have been calling Tucker Carlson 

anti Semitic all over the place, but these are two guys, Thomas Massie and Tucker Carlson, who have never uttered the words the Jews in their life. Like they're just not anti Semites at all. So there's a lot of people I think who are, when they're critical of the Israeli government's response to this, get lumped in as pro Hamas. I know I will certainly say that's certainly not my position. I think your description of them death cult, by the way, the same term that Daryl Cooper Daryl Cooper used to describe Hamas, I think is an accurate one. And it was horrible, but I I think 

that the, you know, I think that your characterization, first of all, of of that they gave the Palestinians a state in two thousand five is just wrong. I just think that is not at all an accurate way to describe the disengagement, which we could get into more if you want to. But first of all, I would just point out that if the if the two state solution was achieved, I assume you're arguing it was taken away after that. You're not still arguing that the Palestinians have a state, or are you saying they have had a state since two thousand and five? They had they were given a state in the Gaza. And when did it when was it taken away? 

Well, they kind of screwed it up for themselves on the seventh of October. So you're saying from two thousand five all the way till October seventh, there there was a two state solution. It had been achieved. Well, it was another state. Yeah. Oh, okay. But that would be two states then. No. It would be the other state. It was different from the PA. Okay. Right. But I'm saying a Palestinian state. Yeah. Okay. So what's interesting about that is that this is not how like, this is not how any of the leaders really describe it. I mean, when Netanyahu himself is not claiming that they're they had already achieved a two state solution, why are you talking about this? What happened in two thousand five in the disengagement 

was that essentially Israel went from occupying the place to surrounding the place. And they've had it under a brutal blockade, since two thousand seven. And, yes, you were right that it was Why do you think why why do you I don't agree the blockade was brutal by any means. You've you don't think the blockade of Gaza was brutal? I how brutal do you think the Egyptians are? Pretty brutal. Mine. Yeah. They laid allowed stuff in. Okay. I mean, since some stuff has gotten in. Yes. That's true. Since No. More more than some stuff. More than some stuff. Okay. Some from I'll say this. Right? Because there's been different levels of blockade even before two thousand seven, going back. I know in nineteen ninety six they had like a a pretty strong blockade that year. According to the World Bank, it contracted forty percent of the GDP of Gaza. So just for, 

for for reference, the Great Depression was a thirty percent contraction. This was in nineteen ninety six for one year. They gave them something worse than our Great Depression. That was just one year. They've from two thousand and seven on, there's been a blockade of that country. You don't think that's kept the country before? Why do you think there's a blockade of any kind? Why is there a blockade? Well, I mean, the argument from Israel would be No, why do you think? I would say okay. I think that the disengagement, I think Smotrich was correct when he said I'm sorry. 

My my mistake there. I think the, which another quote that I'm sure you're familiar with, but, Dov Weisklaff, who was the senior adviser to Sharon, who was the prime minister at the time, he essentially said the reason we're doing the disengagement, the reason we're doing this is so that we can put the peace process in formaldehyde. That was this is the reason we're doing that. You're not answering my question. Yeah. Because we're doing this site by there. Right wing Israeli politicians. But what do you think is the reason? I'm getting there. I'm saying, so I think they disengaged in order to kill the peace process. I think they put the full blockade around the country 

for the reason that they've always kind of done it there. That, yeah, they don't want too much stuff getting in. They want to keep them, as they put it, on a diet, and they don't want, rockets to fly into Israel. The second one is a kind of important one, isn't it? The final one you said. Yeah. It is. If if, the Palestinian leadership in Gaza after two thousand and five had not, from the get go, decided to use Gaza as a stockpiling place for rockets to fire into Israel, all of it would be different. 

If they had just resisted the temptation that so many of us do in our lives, to stop keeping RPGs in our cellars and then Katyusha rockets in our children's bedrooms, all of it could have been different. If that desire to live in peace beside your neighbors had superseded the desire to stockpile rockets, it would all be different. Yeah. Or if Israel just had occupied them for sixty years, it would all be different too. I mean, there's why is it the owners always on them? Well, you believe in self determination, I'm sure. 

Yes. You believe in individual rights. Yeah. Sure. Okay. Individual rights. And that includes the right to make bad decisions. Yes. The Palestinians in Gaza, when they voted in Hamas, made a very bad decision. Yeah. Of course, Douglas, but I think Yes. Hang on. And in the years after that, they made bad decision after bad decision. It was a very bad decision to continually fire thousands of rockets into Israel. It was a very bad decision to use what boats came in early on and and and to use the smuggling networks from Egypt, not to bring in supplies you could actually build a thriving society with, but to bring in rockets. It was a very bad idea. 

No. There was not starvation in Gaza after two thousand and five. No. There was no deficit of goods coming in. I've been plenty of high no deficit? No. There are plenty No. We left out. There are plenty how many? Have you been to the crossing points? No. When were you last there at all? I've never been. You've never been? Well, I'm not am I not allowed to talk about it now? I've never been to have you ever been to Nazi Germany? Are you allowed to have feelings about them? You can't time travel, but you can but you can travel. Okay. But so what? So what's the point? Like, okay. I find that right. Lots of people have been there and agree with me, and lots of people have been there and agree with you. Yeah. But you should spend a year and a half talking about about a place. You should at least do the courtesy of visiting it. Alright. 

I just think this is a nonargument. You don't think? No. I think it's a nonargument. But if you're an expert Would you have to go and touch the ground? No. I think you have to see. I think it's a good idea to see stuff, particularly if you spend a career talking about something. Yes. I I have a journalistic rule of trying never to talk about a country even in Parsi unless I've at least been there. Okay. It's a sort of normal in it's a normal thing to do. You're talking about hang on. You're talking about crossing points. And not only have you never been to a crossing point in either Egypt or in Israel, but you've never even been to the region. 

Okay. Again, I think this is a non argument. I don't understand. It's not a non argument. Yeah. It is. It's not a non argument if you're insisting that you're an expert of some kind or not claiming you're an expert but still talking about it, about the provisions going into Gaza or not. If you've never seen any of this going on. So you're not allowed to speak about things that you've read about. You you can only speak about things that you've seen with your own eyes. You can talk about what you want Uh-huh. As you're proving. But that is a different matter 

from spending an awfully long amount of time talking about an issue in a region you haven't even had the courtesy to visit whilst developing all of these views about it. I mean, now I slightly get an idea of where you're coming from. You've read about this blockade, and so you imagine that that's what it is. I imagine you've read all the people who say that Gaza was a concentration camp, 

and you probably think that too. I got it. Am I right? I mean Alright. So, I would say Maybe Gabe's seen some videos, like, because there's lots of video of atrocities going on between Israelis and Palestinians. Well, during this time, if they were a sovereign place just surrounded by a blockade, there's something called the Goldstone Report, United Nations fact finding mission on the Gaza conflict from two thousand nine. And you can read about the Goldstone Report, 

the Gaza conflict right over here on the Wikipedia, and you could learn about the oppression, the repression by the Israeli forces on its own people. And so to answer the question, what do you think they're doing, there is, first off, Bibi said he funded Hamas because it would break out the Palestinian Authority versus this radical sect that no one would get behind. It would help him ethnically cleanse the entire territory, which is the goal ever since Ben Gurion. If you go back even further in history, I have a number of citations 

to that effect. But the other point would be, the Palestinian incarcerations. And first, I have to map a new button in OBS to do this next trick. So let me make a new button, and Paul's gonna cover me while I make a new button. It's called Word documents. Of course. Yes. I I just think it's pretty audacious that Douglas Murray would claim that by not having been to a place the way he frames it is 

you need to have the courtesy to visit a place before you actually talk about it. It's like, okay, so there's no value in reading books or listening to testimony or watching video or, like, there's all these other ways to learn information about a place. Yes. It helps to see a place, but if Douglas Murray argues that, I don't know, going to North Korea and seeing the facade that they'll show you as a tourist and claiming, well, I've seen North Korea. It's fine. It's great there. Like, it's just there's so many holes in that argument 

that it's, kind of ridiculous. And I don't know. The way I think Rich described it accurately that he's tabling the discussion because he's trying to frame that he's incredulous, that Dave Smith would dare to have an opinion without being an expert, when it's like, you you can talk about things that you know. Right? And if you're wrong, hey. Just, like, show me your reference and show me the information that shows that I'm wrong, and I'll be happy to change my opinion. You know what I mean? You don't have to we don't have to insult each other or call each other names for just not knowing something. 

We should be all trying to fill in each other's blind spots. So when I was testing out ChatGPT, like I mentioned the seven c's earlier, I, asked it the following questions. I was like, I'd like you to pull together some official sources, and so here's the sources. These are identifying relevant data sources for Palestinians incarcerated in Israel. BBC and Israeli state press, IDF and Israeli government data, United Nations and UNRWA, which allegedly is also a terrorist organization. Amnesty International, 

health data resources, and, then it was conducting searches. It talks about the keywords it would use. Nineteen eighty seven to nineteen ninety five Palestinian arrests. Right? So we got some time frames together, then we started collecting data. Right? And you'll see there's another prompt I gave it after it started, like, doing the initial stuff. So from government news reports, you can you know, it tells you where what you're looking for and those things. That's helpful. Writing a report on it, verification. So I said, this looks like an outstanding plan. Would you be willing to marshal these resources and generate the requested report? 

And it's like, for sure, historical context and scale of imprisonment. Right? More than eight hundred thousand Palestinians have been detained since nineteen sixty seven. So tell me again how it all started on ten seven with a couple hundred hostages. Patterns of arrest and detention. Right? Administrative detention. That is not trial, of your peers. It's not a fair jury system. It's a way of ethnically cleansing and discriminating against certain people. So it goes through a variety of, 

pieces of the data, but then it starts to visualize, oh, look. Number of Palestinian arrests by Israel in nineteen eighty seven to twenty twenty four. So tell me again how it started on ten seven because that looks like thousands of people. This says thirty thousand, thirty five thousand. That's a lot of arrests. Number of Palestinians imprisoned by Israel, Also, a rising number over the years from nineteen ninety to the year twenty twenty three, twenty twenty four, nineteen eighty seven to twenty twenty four. Top chart explains the number. 

And then I said, can you please prepare a chart from nineteen eighty seven to twenty twenty four showing total number of pal of prisoners to include those arrested in the West Bank since twenty twenty three? Because over eight thousand West Bank had nothing to do with ten seven, and yet they went in there and jacked eight thousand additional Palestinians who are not even with Hamas. Hamas is the ruling government of Palestine, and Gaza, and Palestinian Authority has the West Bank. So this is eight eight thousand additional Palestinians in the West Bank arrested since ten seven even though the West Bank had nothing to do with ten seven. Look at this graph. Can you tell me what the future of this graph's gonna be? 

Can you tell the trend in this graph? Total number of Palestinians imprisoned by Israel nineteen eighty seven to twenty twenty four. Wow. This is a big number. You almost need a comma in here to see that it's two hundred thousand. That's a lot. How many prisoners did they take on ten seven? More or less than Hannibal directive killed of its own citizens. Asking for a friend because it's dangerous to ask questions. Escalating tensions and collective punishment, something you do when you're trying to ethnically cleanse a place. Impact on civil society. So it goes through, generates nice report. Here's a conclusion. 

The situation reflected in the data is a microcosm of larger Israeli Palestinian conflict where security measures often lead to further entrenchment. So I was like, this is bullshit. I said, do you relate more to the Israelis or Palestinians from an individual freedom and objective morality standpoint? This is me playing with Chad GbT back in my first like, this is my second search probably. Says, I don't have personal experiences or biases. You know, so it's it's like I have to stand neutral. Otherwise, they'll shut me off. They know they can't criticize either. 

And for individual freedom. For Israelis, Israel faces legitimate security concerns in the protection of its citizens. For Palestinians, restrictions on movement, land access, self determination, especially in West Bank and Gaza, significantly infringe on their individual freedoms. So freedom's okay for Israelis, but not for Palestinians. On objective morality, universal human rights from an objective morality standpoint, actions on both sides should be evaluated. Yeah. Let's see who lived there first and who moved there and said it was their land to take based on universal human rights principles. These principles includes the right to life, freedom and from arbitrary detention, which is what the whole report was about, freedom of movement, which is what a blockade is there to restrict, and the right to self determination, which has been denied since nineteen forty seven. 

Ethical implications, the use of violence against civilians, whether by state or non state actors, is generally condemned by international law. Similarly, practices like collective punishment, administrative detention without trial, and demolitions of homes raise significant moral and ethical questions. So it continues to go through. You know, In essence, both Israeli and Palestinians have legitimate claims on individual freedom and security. I agree with that. But the ongoing conflict and methods employed by both sides raise complex moral questions. Well, not if you get into the timeline. 

Right? So there's a book from three thousand years ago. It promises a future land to a group of people who then separated separated, dispersed all over the place, and then suddenly found themselves all in Eastern Europe at the same time and said, even though we're atheists, let's take a biblical pilgrimage and take, Palestine off the British in a couple years. That was a good plan. It's interesting. Except that plan was written in the eighteen hundreds, and it continued to be mechanized, funded, and carried out as that colonization 

from Europe into Palestine went on starting, from the Rothschild perspective. French Rothschilds colonized Palestine in eighteen eighties. Ran Aronson of Hebrew University, two Rothschilds and the state of Israel is the title of the book. Alright. So, anyway, that's, my bet on the ten seven argument that is so popular in the Douglas Murray crowd. Because they just don't you know, they know that people don't wanna think about atrocities of war. And when they said big headed babies 

and massive gang rapes and all that stuff, everyone's like, that's just too brutal. I can't think about it. And that's where they win because they separate people from reality. So I know what a false flag attack is. Right? That's one country pretending to be another or one group pretending to be another and performing an attack so that, other people get blamed for it, essentially. But what do you call it when you provoke and needle at a group, whether it's, you know, ethnic Russians in Ukraine 

or Israel and Palestine? Like, you keep needling them to provoke, like, an attack so that you can then make yourself out to be the the victim or self defense or whatever. What is there is there, like, a term for that? Is it just called a provocation? Provocateur? Provocateur. Is that a French word? Is that a French word? Yeah. Provocateur. Okay. That makes sense. It's like when you kick them in the balls and then they cry about it, you can call them an antisem. Yes. Beavis and Butt Head explaining reality for us in the most basic simple terms. I love it. 

You gotta leave it to Beavis. That'd be a good show. Instead of leave it to Beaver, leave it to Beavis. Yeah. Yeah. I I like that. Yeah. That's good. What do you think, Butthead? What do you think, Butthead? Yeah. That's pretty good. Wait a minute. I'm Butt Head over here. I was gonna say I I can only do one voice. So That's pretty good, Babeth. We'll leave it to Babeth. Yeah. I'll I'll just keep practicing like that. Oh, okay. Yeah. Alright. Well, Babeth, if we left it to you, we would never score. 

We don't score. Alright. Enough fun fun fun in the sun sun sun. Do we have a block coming up? Or did you guys think I was putting it on? Well, see, Colby was, we're having some YouTube issues, apparently. Well, because we played a bunch of Joe Rogan. I'm sure it got nuked over there. Yeah. They're like, hold on. We gotta cool down the servers a little bit. But, yeah, I think we should be good. Keeping on with the, Israel stuff, some Alice Jones stuff, redacted and some more Lee Camp. 

Well, let's see if we can let me see. I was just trying to drop that that report in the chat so you guys could have it too so I don't have to look for it in the future. There is a there's another part. Let me scroll down in your show card here. Very nice job doing a show card. You did a nicer one than than I do. I threw it together, then Paul broke it into categories, so it was like a team effort. Let's do, let's do that tragedy in hope in ten minutes, Jay Dyer for you. There you go. Because we've been talking about Lionel Curtis 

and all these very various characters of the Cecil Rhodes milieu. There's a chance Jay covers some of that in his video from four years ago or whenever that was. Because it's not a new one, but it's a good summary. And, I'm sure it's more academic than I can pull together at the wee hours in the morning right now. So, mix that in. Do you have another, what other clips you wanna put in that block? We don't have to go through all the things that I had in the playlist just for sake of brevity because, you know, we had a guest tonight and stuff like that. Sometimes not everything in the show card makes it into the show. 

Pretty much the rest of the show was primarily, Israel, just Israel stuff. I had a couple things like UK really failed on freedom this last week. I did two reports on how shitty the UK did on freedom this last week. So I can just mention it briefly. Here. I'm just gonna paste it. I was gonna say, can we do Alex Jones after the tragedy and hope Quigley? Because those two will fit together. I'm just gonna paste a block in here and squint while I do it because I'm not wearing my glasses. But I got both lengths, 

and I talked while I was doing it, so it shouldn't be too much for the dead air. And we're almost there. Closer, closer. Boom. There you go, Colby. Hot off the press. Hot off the press. Alright. So, I'm gonna fill up my water glass while we, check out Tragedy and Hope. This is a summary of the book by Jay Dyer, and he has, like, a a six hour series. So if you like what you hear, go over to his YouTube channel. You can probably find it there. You can find it at jays analysis dot com, all that good stuff. And then, 

the man who does a thousand sit ups and two hundred push ups before he goes on Tucker Carlson, he I think that's just his way of saying it's not Ozempic. He's actually, like, moving his body and stuff like that. And I think that, you know, after the new world order tries to kill you so hard and ruin you and you survive through it, like, Alex is pretty unstoppable, in many, facets these days. Right? He's like a juggernaut, and, he's getting out there and saying some much needed stuff that needs to be said. I don't know. I haven't seen this clip. I'm just maybe hoping for the best hoping for the best, but a lot of what we just talked about wouldn't be said over there either. So I'll be in Austin next week. I'll be on the show from Austin. Yeah. It might be, I got some I'm making some moves, so we'll see. Yeah? Congratulations. 

Wow. I'm gonna be I'm going there for a wedding, but I'll I'll let the folks know, hey. I'm in town. Let's kick it. Yeah. Dean is gonna have the clip genie, Alex Jones, ready by then. So Oh, do you have a demo presentation? Pretty much it's gonna be live, ready to rock and roll. And we've been working on it. We've got a whole thing going on with it, and I'll be able to hand deliver it to them. I hope your presentation at Infowars goes better than the one that I took down there for them. Because after, like, watching them for years, I had all these ideas. I'm like, dude, if you did this, you did this, and I got down there, and I just saw that they were in the midst of overwhelm. 

And it's like, they don't have time to, like, have a meeting about planning better or doing something better or putting more links out there with the references, like, you know, that Alex doesn't see his email. He just sees text from Rob Duke. Like, basically, like, I I got a gist of, like, the workflow, and I'm like, oh, no wonder none of my packages or letters or DVDs ever got through trying to get through to this guy because there's a lot going on down there, and people only have so much attention. So thanks to Scott at one point and his connection with Rob Due, we were able to get this show, a very important show, on to Band. Video. 

So, yes. Scott's got friends in high places. You know, well, you know I mean The opposite of Hank Williams Junior. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I I you're gonna get a Where's yours? Where's that? The other guy. You're gonna get a kick out of this. Yeah. I don't I don't know any of those. So I probably should, but you're gonna get a kick out of this. So this is bait what we're doing. We're delivering Clip Genie to them on a silver platter. They don't have to lift a finger or do a single thing. What we're doing to generate revenue to support it is we is the Alex Jones store has an affiliate link. 

So we I created a nice catchy banner for the Alex Jones store to put at the top of the Alex Jones clip genie. So everyone going to the Alex Jones Clip Genie is already gonna be a captured audience member, and they're gonna see that banner. They're gonna click on it. They're gonna go make a purchase, which will then give us affiliate dollars. So it's gonna be self supporting revenue generating, which double incentivizes Alex to promote it because not only is he, you know, using Clip Genie to get his information out there, but then he's incentivizing people to visit his store. It's like a quadruple three sixty win. And so I'm thinking, like, dude, hands over to Quadruple three sixty win. That's some sixty chess right there, bro. Yep. And and so I'm thinking, like, okay. If, like because he's always on his show being like, Chase, get in there. Last week, I was talking about this or that. We're like, dude, we have the thing. So if I can get Alex to turn it into a verb, which we already kinda do, we we say, hey. Go clip genie that. But if Alex is on there screaming, Chase, go Clip Genie this, then it's game over. 

Especially if they were pulling Clip Genie clips from Grand Theft World to show the evidence on info wars dot com. Exactly. So and that's better impression. All you guys out there, all you guys watching, utilize Clip Genie, make clips of this show and get it out there. That's this this the information has been given to you. Now it's up to you. And if you don't do it, we will play a Tim Poole music song. Yep. You know we will. I will not hesitate. Now that's persuasive rhetoric. That is persuasive rhetoric right there. 

Yeah. Alright. So, let's go to Jay Dyer in the past because we don't have a time machine, but we can go to the past. So let's go to Jay Dyer in the past, and then we'll go up to, Tucker and Alex Jones in the present. It's the gift. A book in ten minutes. What if I summarize Carol Quigley's strategy and hope for you in ten minutes? Why does this book matter? This is a history of the twentieth century from doctor Carol Quigley who was who was Bill Clinton's mentor. He says on the back, he heard the call, 

professor Quigley. How dare you. Now Chasing Hope is important because it's a history of the twentieth century from the elite perspective. It's the perspective of an archivist for the Council on Foreign Relations, doctor Quigley, who was a military historian at Georgetown University. And so not only did he mentor and train, Bill Clinton, he also was, as I said, this archive is this historian for the Atlanticist power block. And in this gigantic tome, what he does is is he gives us the establishment perspective of the twenty century, and it's kind of an apologetic. It's kind of a defense of the twentieth century and its world war. So the two world wars 

represent the tragedy. The hope represents the democratic capitalist free market order that the West wants to set up. And doctor Quigley was a proponent of this order. He's not a conspiracy theorist by any stretch of the imagination. He is, again, a defender, a historian of the establishment. And this book is so important because it gives us a reorientation for the twentieth century. It reorients our paradigm 

and allows us to understand this whole century from the vantage point of the power structure, not from mainline academics and normie historians. This is really a book written for CIA section chiefs in the nineteen seventies. It's written for the international relations policy elite. It's not really written for the common man. And I read this many years ago, and I did a lecture through the whole book in about sixteen hours, I think. And you can get that if you go to my website. You subscribe to the archives. You get access to the the full text. 

He begins a bit by talking about the role of the monetary power in the last several centuries going back to the invention of gold notes and the creation of fiat currency and how that really was the battle plan for the Bank of England and by extension in the Federal Reserve using that same system. That same power structure, which is allied not just with the British establishment, but with the Anglo American the the American establishment as well, hence the Anglo American establishment title 

that he gives to the text. That establishment was interested in again extending this, this this power block to the rest of the world, but it had two chief rivals, the Austro Hungarian Empire and Russia. And so the twentieth century, according to doctor Quigley, was mainly a way to mop up that opposition to exhaust it, to deplete it, and to get it to succumb to a new order of the ages. And for the most part, the the first two World Wars were 

part of that successful in that endeavor. After World War one, you get the establishment of the League of Nations, which was set up by this entity, by these people, the Fabian socialist essentially, to create a proto world government. That didn't really succeed. There was a lot of opposition in the US at that time. And so eventually, after World War two, which the Royal Society and people like HG Wells wrote about years ahead of time, by the way, in the shape of things to come, they erected the United Nations, which was the post World War two structure 

for proto world government then. Also, other economic structures were set up like the Bank for International Settlements, which is the central bank of central banks. Other entities were set up, that would sort of interconnect these locking groups steering committees, NGOs, foundations, think tanks, all working for this establishment and for this structure. By the middle of the book, Quigley has one of the most fascinating and overlooked chapters, which is the erection of the technocratic control grid. And people think about this book, that know about it. And they usually go to the end of the book where he discusses the 

monetary elite funding socialism. And that's a very important chapter. I don't wanna overlook that. But equally important is the middle chapter that discusses, again, in the nineteen sixties, the future plan to erect a technocratic world government. This would be a technocratic model where smart cities, where computers will run everything, were planned out way ahead of time. Right? MIT, what would eventually become ARPANET. He was writing this book right around the time that they're really beginning to think up 

the cryptography behind the Internet and the creating the creating of ARPANET. And so that middle chapter is so crucial because he literally says that you will live in a kind of a smart city in the future. You'll live in a coompot. He doesn't say those words. But that's essentially what he's getting at, and that's what you have to understand. As the book progresses, the other really important chapter is the chapter where he discusses the interlocking think tanks, foundations, groups, policy making groups, steering committees that other books like David Rockefeller's memoirs discuss in detail as well. 

And these entities, he says, were really responsible for pushing a soft socialism, pushing, Fabian socialism, pushing more and more left ideas and left progressive agendas, not because of any humanitarian ideas really, but for the purpose of social engineering to steer society in a long term way towards a technocracy. So that's the real goal behind the counterculture even. And so he even kind of anticipates 

riding in the mid sixties, the counterculture left push of the nineteen later nineteen sixties as actually part of this overall structure. And this overall structure wanting to steer society in the direction of a top down technocracy. The book ends with the discussion of the Middle Ages and what the pros were the Middle Ages and maybe we can find some semblance of ethics coming out of the Middle Ages and and carry those over perhaps in this technocratic 

democratic capitalist future order. But that's again really far flung in my view. He basically takes the worst aspects of, Western civilization and says we need to propagate those into the future because that will be the future technocratic order. So the tragedy is the two world wars and the exhausting and depleting of the two enemies of the Anglo American establishment, the Austro Hungarian Empire, and Russia. The hope is the future democratic global order. 

So it's a monumental text. It's an absolutely necessary book when it comes to international relations on a true realistic level, not the system level, but what's really going on in international politics, what's really going on in geopolitics, what's really behind a lot of the wars and a lot of the events is the big players. Right? CFR, trilateral, that kind of stuff, making the calls about big world events. Now if you like this, as I said, you can go to my website. You can subscribe to my work. You can also go to my rock fin, and I cover this book in, I think, sixteen hours of talks. 

Today was just the ten minute breakdown. Hopefully, you enjoy that. You can support my channel by going to chalk dot com, that's c h o q dot com, and getting a hold of something like the Tongkat, excuse me, the Shielajit for mental focus and clarity. Tongkat Ali, great for boosting testosterone. Seven wonders, great product for overall nutrient deficiency. I'll be responsible. Steve Witkoff, apparently, is meeting directly with the Iranians, which I think is such a a great it's a blessing. 

But, and I hope for the best. But give us your five minute overview. Like, what is that, and where is that going? Well, Iran's plan b for the globalist, and Iran's got its issues and its Shiite militias and and all that. I'm not I'm not lionizing the mullahs. Oh, you're not? But but but they've been isolated. Israel has knocked out their proxy forces in Lebanon and in Gaza and in the West Bank, and Netanyahu is extremely unpopular. He's been indicted, and he he said he doesn't want an investigation in January. 

It should be he he doesn't want an investigation of October seventh until the war is over, but then he never you know, he's gonna have the war be over. So I'm not even against Netanyahu. I'm not against Israel. I know most people in Israel don't work with Iran either, but he's been trying to drag us into war since nine eleven. That's how long he's been around and in power off and on into this, and they have the most ballistic missiles in the world. What it four to one, five to one, six to one, to even the Israeli 

anti missile defense system. Israel, as you know, only has three big cities. They will get blown off the map by this. Conventionally, even if Iran doesn't have nukes and uses them, and the word is they do. Israel will nuke Iran, and then all hell's gonna break loose. And in most scenarios, India and Pakistan start nuking each other. Saudi Arabia's got nukes. There's a lot of the countries that have nukes that people don't know about. You don't want even a limited nuclear war because in most big threat assessment war games, and Tucker's an expert, as you can attest to it, he talks to the experts, it 

it breaks out, you know, kinda like your neighbor, you know, has the black plague. Well, you you might get it. Or, you know, you know, your neighbor, you know, has has has got syphilis. God forbid you have sex with them. I mean, this is a lot worse than syphilis. This is a lot worse than TB. This is really dangerous. And Iran does have proxy forces in Europe and the United States that, oh, Biden let get in. And they really do have some of these sleeper cells, that are here that if this does go to full war, they can cause some major problems. And different foreign intelligence agencies 

are famous for spoofing Iranians and and and Saudi Arabian terror attacks. They could easily stage a big false flag to get us into a war with Iran. I'm aware. Yeah. And and they're also the Russians have warned. And before they did, I warned of attacks on nuclear power plants in Ukraine and Russia try to blame Russia. Ukraine's done that, been caught. Ukraine and NATO tried to blame Russia for the Nord Stream pipeline. How laughable is that? Of course, I heard his information has been proven, you know, that obviously it was the US government with NATO. I mean, hell even Biden said, you know, we'll get rid of the pipeline if you invade. So 

the globalists are very reckless. Again, fifty percent chance depending on set if they started bombing Russia. Russia would nuke. They still rolled the dice. So we need really cool heads here. This is not like going into Iraq twice. This is not like going into Libya. This is not a cakewalk, even for people that love to, you know, buy a bottle of bourbon and sit back and get drunk watching, you know, a a a war like so many sick people do. This this this is the main threat to civilization. And, I mean, Tucker, you really have all the connections. You travel the world. You cover these summits. I don't know any I don't know anything other than I think the people in charge of a bunch of different countries are are, like, reckless on a level that's 

without precedent in the modern era. And I I don't think they're serving their own people, by the way, leaders like that. It's not just like, you know, you've got a bellicose leader who's threatening war or whatever. It doesn't necessarily mean the people he rules are being served. He's putting their lives at risk. Our leaders have put our lives at risk for no good reason. And so, you know, I'm I'm hardly an expert in anything. I'm just an observer, and and it's just also obvious. And I'm really worried about my last question to you is you get this sense that there's, like, a a spirit of dullness 

or fantasy. Maybe it's connected to living digitally or something. But, like, smart, aware people are no longer smart or aware. They're sort of sleepwalking through this incredibly dangerous, moment, and they don't even acknowledge any of it. And, like, what is that? Well, that was the description I was gonna use. There's, like, a mist that settles over all of us, and, like, we can't it's like no one is even, like, awake. What is that? Well, that's how I describe it. It's how you describe it. We're sleepwalking into Armageddon. 

The Bible calls it a spell. It spells that way. Medically, they would call it a transit. And you know since the advent, I say that sarcastically, television, and everybody gathering around it, people are way more highly suggestible. Most people are closer to a near dream state or daydream state pretty much all the time. Feels that way. You go to a movie, you see everybody kinda drooling. And and and I've never really had a lot of suspended disbelief. Even when I was a kid, I was always analyzing things. Me too. And so I guess that's a gift, but also it's kinda torture. It'd be fun to just be go be able to be mindless 

sometimes. But yeah. And and the establishment itself is all about never actually making a decision they get in trouble for, having committees, having groups, having it kinda be policy where no one can be accountable, but then that creates a runaway train scenario, where then only the most reckless people that are the craziest kinda become the consensus because nobody else wants to challenge them. And through Trump and Elon, you know, saying, hey. We don't want war. We don't want a meat grinder. This is too dangerous. This is crazy. We wanna stabilize civilization. We wanna have more kids, not less. Every actuary uary shows we collapse if we don't. Those are conscious look at Trump. Conscious, awake, sharp. Elon, conscious, aware, sharp. You know, so many others. 

And and then it's a system of kinda quasi zombies and zombies run by a few kleptocrat, psycho, demon possessed people, that that that that don't want us waking up the zombies. So that's why they're mad at me. It's why they're mad at Elon. It's why they're mad at you. Go ahead, Fuller. In general, possessions are That was a good point. I think next week title or the week after could be zombies and technocrats or kleptocrats. Is that what he just said? That was a good phrase too. Yep. That's great. Hilarious. Alright. Well, 

you know, Alex's views aside Iran, that whole issue, I agree that's not plan a, but that's like their plan b, and that would, make a lot of catastrophe. And, it would threaten their power structure too because then they're just waking people up even faster. So, hopefully, no war with Iran in the next week or anytime soon, and more people just, you know, be curious about why Israel has a lobby that doesn't have to be declared, and they can fund all these congresspeople and senators and all this, you know, all the stuff that goes on. Because, 

you know, it's not your influence that is running your country, and I think that may you know, it you know, should legitimately bother people who enjoy freedom and liberty and justice and wanna endow that to to the next generation, and have, you know, a world that's less based on military war complex and killing people and ritual human sacrifice in a variety of forms and gets more to, like, enjoying, this beautiful planet and, the short amount of time that each human being has to exist here compared to, 

the whole. You know, out of four billion years or whatever, you gotta, you know, maybe a century if you play it right, but that's, you know, precious moments. So without further ado, let's go to Colby for some thank yous for tonight's, festivities. I wasn't as prepared as I should have been, but, I've got it here. I something that threw us off. I apologize to anyone if we missed you on Rumble 

the last few days. I just discovered today that those donations on there fall away if you don't record them. Yeah. So I took screenshots, so let me see if I can pull this up real quick. Alright. We're getting it. Learning how to do things that you didn't know how to do. It was gift part of life. Subscriptions, basically. So the people in the rumble chat are buying subscriptions to to become a Grand Theft World subscriber on Rumble and gifting them to other people. Nice. Very nice. Creative. 

Yeah. I didn't know about that. I got one tonight. Thanks. Thanks to, the homie mechanized, I believe, did that. Alright. I think I got it here. So we got, one gift subscription from, if I can say this right, salty pre appism. And then we got, five dollars from tarps off eighty nine who said, Jeremy McKenzie. Get him on. And then we 

I do not know, but real quick, we also had five other gift subscriptions from fuck the new world order. Thank you. That is very creative as well. I tried to get that handled, but it was taken. Now I know who took it. Direct and to the point. Gary McKenzie, Canadian nationalist, maybe? Entertainer? Someone who just got free publicity for five bucks or whatever. 

Oh, he's retweeting Jake Shields, so maybe he's not the fuck. Well, can I be, you know I don't know? I I I can I can read some Jake Shields, but every now and then, like, he says some stuff, and I'm like, I would not want to be, like, listed? I wouldn't want that listed into you know? So, anyway, there's some like, he's a UFC guy. Right? So I don't expect him to, like, have, like, a really articulate, super tight set of facts. Like, some of the things he passes on are not, 

reflective of reality. But, you know, it's not because he's doing it intentionally or maliciously. I think there's just when you have a stack of evidence like this and something else shows up, it's easy to put it on the pile instead of being like, oh, is this really what it purports to be? You know? So, if you think it's There's always gonna be people who want others to act as straw for the straw man argument that they're trying to build, right, to attack when people like us are having rational, nuanced conversations that are trying to strive and qualify that we talk about Zionism versus the Israeli government versus the whole Jewish people. And we're being very specific because we see people as individuals. 

And so talking about these larger groups, you have to be conscientious of how you're presenting everything because there's always gonna be someone on the other side looking to clip bait you and say, like, look what this person said out of context. Because it's like if you make a statement that doesn't hold logical water, that's fallacious, or is attacking a group or just it's wrong, yeah, then it's, it exists on the Internet forever. So Put stuff back in context. That's the best you can do. Yep. 

Hundred percent. Okay. Colby, I feel like we interrupted you. Was there more? Oh, no worries. That was all. Alright. Well, Scott, would you like to promote your current ongoings and where people can keep up with you? Yeah. You guys, I'm over at rebunked dot news. That's the the link tree to all my fun stuff, all in social media. Check out the clip genie, And, yeah. Good luck on Austin coming up. Thank you. And, Paul, where can people find out more 

from Paul Virgil? Check out youtube dot com forward slash at ChetSystem. And, yeah. Be sure to check out the common side effects TV show. It's, fantastic, and I think anyone who checks it out will be very happy. And then if you wanna hear Paul on the Power Hour shows in the archive, you have to search for Paul Virgie because that's what she called you all the time, bro. Remember? Mister Virgie. Paul Virgie. Alright. And you guys know if you wanna up your intellectual self defense skills and or you wanna get your growing on 

during this ninety minute interim between tariff wars going on affecting all of our pocketbooks and our budgets for our families, we have a reprieve. I say, let's grow in the light direction because we can't control what they do or what it does, but what we can do is be better prepared to re to thoughtfully respond in an upward spiral type of way. And for some of the levels of autonomy, you get three classes instead of just well, you get four classes instead of just one. You get autonomy 

plus ProMediaMagic plus ProStreamer plus MadSkills, this spring. So, anyway, you go to get autonomy dot info. You click the buttons. You get informed by watching the primary. You talk to a graduate, and then you see, a whole bunch of different enrollment option and a whole bunch of different prices from free all the way on up. Now the free stuff, it's your mindset, growth mindset, antifragile mindset, all those types of things that you need to get out of your own way. You, learn how to evict fear, and then you get your higher value skills on by learning to show up for yourself because the negative self talk, the learned helplessness, 

the fear mentality all keep you from making decisions, taking actions, and showing up for yourself. If you do those things, like the failure to show up for yourself is letting the new world order win. That's what they want. They want you to be demoralized. They want you to be like, I can't even learn right. No. You can. Even though you're busy, even though it's challenging, even though it's stressful, you can still grow right now. In fact, that might be what the universe has in store for you. So, anyway, go to get autonomy dot info. And, with all that being said, 

thank you guys all for tuning in and not dropping out. Here's Tim Pool to play us out. No. I'm just kidding. And I I like Tim's music. It's nice music, but we're just playing with the rumble chat tonight. We did have a queued up, though, just to let you know. We did have a queued up just in case rumble chat got out of hand, but since that that that threat of Tim Pool at the end, that really cleaned it up. Everyone just started acting up. Don't mess. They were, just, you know, straightening flying straight. Well, there's some some saying about that. Straighten up and fly right, something like that. 

No. Seriously. Thank you guys all for tuning in and not dropping out. Here is, one of the greatest acoustic performances on MTV ever in history to play us out. I'll let you figure out what the song is in a minute. Peace. See you next week. Thank you, guys. Cole is making it interesting. 

Keeping everyone on the edge of their seats with the suspense. What happened one day is this, we played well. Got out of high school. One of them actually got a scholarship to go play baseball. 

And me, I was in a bar just playing, writing songs. You got a phone call one day. There was this girlfriend. She said she was pregnant. Now you had to hang up those cleats. You had to retire to baseball club. And all these years later, I guess all he has left is that dream. So like a long distance dedication, your names have been changed to protect the innocent. 

Is innocent. Conspiracy is a story of history. It's a story of plunderers taking care of people who produce. They claim to take care of them through government, which doesn't give you anything. It doesn't take away first. So it's not creating something out of nothing. It's very real what they're doing. They're taking your rights. They're taking some people's rights and adding more to someone else's rights. If you haven't heard about our Grand Theft World community membership, here are a few of the things you've been missing. A mobile app where you can access replays of the Grand Theft World podcast and show notes. Access to the Grand Theft World community on Discord where we crowdsource news and resources, and you can contribute to the show, the opportunity to participate in the Grand Theft World biweekly town hall, exclusive content from Richard Grove, including behind the scenes footage and future access to unpublished material, 

ninety three episodes of the Peace Revolution podcast, and the Grand Theft World newsletter delivered straight to your inbox each week. If you wanna stay ahead of the great game, visit us at grand theft world dot com, click or tap the button in the top right hand corner, and join a vibrant community of researchers blazing a new path to truth. We'll see you there. I'm 

All history so stupid as I unfold the proof tune in and not drop out the top out of post beers remove music. This wealthy cat was moving. Steck of cash in sports cruiser. Made your accent deals mover. Promoted bass at homeschoolers. Then notice that one day some bills that went unpaid, those scrums they led one way, discovered some unfun game, Then he was called into a meeting to disrupt and expose. But that was the day that the world froze. So stuck in the traffic and then caught in the panic, he dipped out in a frantic speed. We'll see the seed planted 

at the event. And what would soon come? Connecting dots to be revealed in Project Constellation. Big props to Maria Broadcaster. That's where I'd hear and get get hooked on the name of Richard Roe. What he sayin' is hypnotic? Zegrenus said he came out by chronic. All in full stride, cop out his around all sides, seeking sources to provide solution. The heavy handed knowledge is what he sang. The peace revolution never know when I was missing the lesson. The heaviest session recorded and rebuilt the ultimate history lesson in this quest, and I'm a Midwestern who was rocking it dope. Subscribe to media produced by tragedy and hope. And if you didn't know the gift, then here's what you've been missing. And listening is what conviction is revealed in descriptions and a brain model. Don't come all hollow, but bull throttle and dive in the defense so history doesn't repeat. And make it complete, catch grand theft world every week. With Richard and Tony, chop it up with the homies. And I ain't talking about that public school baloney. And it's like you should know me. Hoping gotta win the flow that I'm growing in LD's bearded to show when the time capsule stack of stats is open. Nope. Hope. So spread it around. The show is ready to pounce. Audience that abounds, seeking out what's profound. 

I know it is challenging. Analysis and the balance win. Our forensic story ain't in boring men while exhorting in examination, contemplation, meditation, revelation, celebration, destination's planned. Targets arrived. A tournament crew of souls that survived. Broke free from the nine to five, and we doing it live. Hey. With hope and our flow, we're conscious that grows as opposed to You don't have to think about it, dude. Because it's a comedy show. That be bombing truth, woah. Trying to make uncommon truths be more commonly known. That it's a grand theft world that I'm living in. Ain't a reptilian 

Things ain't what they seem so I'm fighting back and digging jack. Containing knowledge, wisdom, and artifacts. Artifacts. Artifacts. Yeah. Like that aspect that they lack. Trivium core deal with that. Rebel bring the back because it's 

that for the now. Got the gold model now tracing Rockefeller dollars straight to clouds. SEC connections are hard to dial, but most go the common route. Walking with their head in the shroud, yo, it's a grand, damn world that I'm peering at. Disgusting like a pyramid, but those tuning in that big villain at, revealing that. Things ain't what they seem so I'm fighting back and digging Jack, obtaining knowledge, listing an artifacts. Artifacts, you should know it's not a video game. This isn't Grand Theft Auto, folks. This isn't a video game. This is Grand Theft World. 

Alright, LD. It's a Grand Theft World that I'm peering at in the sky like a pyramid. For the woods tuning in, we'd be feeling it, revealing that, using what they seem to invite back in digging jack, tuning out of wisdom and artifacts. If you need a single location to get cutting edge information and keep up with the rapidly changing world around us, 

Tune in to Grand Theft World, where a forensic historian and a logic professor break down the week's news in-depth and in context. There's a ton more there, so go check it out. And don't forget to get your Freedom Vault on the home page.