Oh, 

look at that. We're gonna have to do it this way. Welcome to the Grand Theft World podcast hosted and sponsored by the members of grandtheftworld dot com. It's January first twenty twenty three. This is episode one hundred and thirteen. We got a lot of news to cover this week. You guys had a slow week because it's like a holiday week, but the news didn't stop getting weirder and weirder. So we're gonna start off with stories, it's just a sample of what we'll cover for the next six or seven hours as we take the news, and we juxtapose it with the facts, the evidence that which exists and get a clearer understanding so we can make better understand better decisions in life. 

So, we'll cover stories like, you may have heard of Peter Hotez. He's the one of the authority, you know, obey the authority type of people on vaccines. He's made several appearances on the Joe Rogan show over the years. And then the recent appearance that he made in the past week, we got to have some further insight into the the depth of knowledge and breadth of wisdom that Peter Hotez is bringing to the table. Turns out, we can also start taking nutritional guidance and advice from him because for him, nutrition has no connection to health, and vaccines are the solution to everything even though he's got some situations that 

might bring about questioning of that. But the juxtaposition, the doublethink is not a problem for him, and that was made clear this week. I saw the clip on, The Last American Vagabond, Ryan Christian and, Allison Morrow. I think we're we're discussing this clip. So we'll take take a look at that, tonight. But also alongside of that, we found out that United States United States government, Fauci especially, Fauci especially, ordered, people not to do autopsies on the COVID death victims. And this includes people of a younger nature that were adversely affected. Although very few young people were adversely affected by the pandemic, 

many, many, many have been adversely affected by what people are pointing toward as maybe the vaccine. I know we just probably got the YouTube stream banned. That's right. It's a pirate stream. Sorry about that. We're gonna talk about people being damaged most likely according to coroners and morticians and other people who are more and more coming out because now there's autopsies recently, and they're starting to find things. And they're getting together and talking. This doesn't have anything to do with, died suddenly or that movie the other week. This has to do with first off, there's a German parliamentary 

inquiry, and they've got a very, interesting clip that we've seen. It's it's in German. Well, subtitles will will get you some English, overlay for that this week. But they're actually accusing these deaths, excess mortality rate rising in all these countries. They're accusing it on the vaccines, on the jabs. So is that true? Is that gonna be fleshed out by science? Is that a spurious, argumentation made by some parliamentarian with a grudge? We don't know. We're gonna have to get into the news later and see about that. Now there's also news 

alongside that that Fauci was saying, you know, not to do these autopsies. That is alongside it's a separate issue from the sudden rise in excess mortality across all these countries in the, you know, fifteen to twenty five percent range. So they're trying to make these connections, what's causing all these deaths, but there's also the guy who said don't study the deaths. And I'm not saying those two things are connected, though history might show they might be connected. There's also a good story this week. What George Soros doesn't want you to know about the Hunter Biden laptop, and there might be some overlap between those activities in Ukraine 

by Soros and the activities in Ukraine by NATO and the activities in Ukraine by Hunter Biden and, MetaBioData is, you know, the the group that was funding those labs over there that were doing things like testing COVID and testing COVID vaccines and bio labs that aren't supposed to be there, but Victoria Nuland who works with Jeffrey Pyatt and George Soros to start the war in Ukraine in the first place says there's nothing to see there. So There's a lot to get into with just a little story like that. Also, this past week, we got the news 

that a man named Andrew Tate was arrested, was arrested. You find out later he's detained and you find out later it's him and his brother. And this is someone who was not on anyone's radar really last year, but through successful marketing campaigns and these sort of things became the most searched man on Google. So before you go searching who is Andrew Tate, know that you're not the first person to do that or ask that question this week, this month, this year, and that suddenly his outspoken nature started during COVID, escalated through Elon Musk putting him back on Twitter, 

and kind of climaxed with him saying a whole bunch of things to Greta Thunberg the other day, which then coincidentally resulted in his arrest, the raiding of his, palatial home in Romania, and the incarceration of him and his brother for who knows how long. I don't think they're free yet. So, the connection between Greta's tweets and tweet back and the the pizza boxes, there's a bunch of speculation on all these things this week. You got to ask yourself, is that a distraction? Is the whole thing a distraction? Or is is Tate, you know, quasi 

businessman out there giving advice and then also maybe speaking truth to power in ways that somebody picked up the phone and said take this guy off the streets, give him a hard time. They've already tried to cancel, and Tate has been on the record in the past of saying they they cancel you, then they arrest you, then they kill you. So he's like, it's it's step two. So we'll look at stories like that tonight. Even if if it's a distraction, then what are they distracting us from? What should we be looking at? These sort of things we can also look at throughout the evening. But we got other stories like the World Economic Forum has come up with this the evening. But we got other stories like the World Economic Forum has come up with this idea of fifteen minute cities. 

Why does the city have a time length? Oh, because the city is as big as you can walk from, you know, fifteen minutes. Everything you need for the rest of your life is going to be within fifteen minute walk. And you might say, well, what about my car? Well, you don't need a car because they're you're gonna own nothing and you're gonna like it. And part of their plan is creating these new type of camps where, you know, a city where everything you need is within fifteen minutes just like, olden days Nazi times. They're trying to recreate that and bring that style back. Klaus already speaks like somebody who could wear an SS uniform, and now you're starting to see their plan is not that different from national socialism. They just put the world 

the word world in front of it. World socialism, the great reset, is their plan. So we might also have the opportunity later tonight to check-in with someone who's, in charge of a counter plan to the grit reset. You got the greater reset over here. We might get to talk to John Bush later tonight and, speak some truth to power in a way that doesn't lead to, you know, all of us getting raided during the conversation. Let's hope for the best. Alright. Other stories we gotta get to tonight. The German, I mentioned the German inquest. Alright. So we're all done with the the the top of the the show clips. Let's go to Luke Radowsky of we are change dot org and the best political shirts dot com to get his Sunday broadcast 

on world events. And, the first one that starts out, it's it's gonna take a minute for it to develop. Let's just watch it together and see. Over a hundred countries are in some stage of developing a central Totalitarian 

top down system, definitely trustworthy. History tells us this all the time. Welcome back, beautiful and amazing human beings. My name is Zukorowski here of we are change dot org. And happy freaking New Year. We got a lot of craziness to get into in twenty twenty three as, of course, the lunacy, the insanity, the instability does not stop here, and it only gets crazier as in this video. We're gonna be going over all the latest news happening right now, especially domestically with a larger perspective 

and focus on the pope, the Rothschilds coming together, and reenvisioning capitalism. This has one of the major banks and institutions calling for it is in a very sticky situation. We're gonna be talking about that plus a lot more. If you like the shirt that I'm wearing, you could get it on the best political shirts dot com. And the clip that we played in the beginning of this broadcast was just kind of randomly shared on Twitter by at WallStreetSliv, but it looks like it was a video made specifically by at Parabanfana. 

We're We're gonna put that down in the description below especially if she has a YouTube channel. Here's her clip describing central bank digital currencies hit the nail on the head when it comes to describing the larger dangers our society faces, especially when it comes to more people getting more power, more control over everyone else. You ever heard about the creature from Jekyll Island, the US Federal Reserve? Yeah. A lot lots of things to talk about. We're gonna be talking about the banking situation in just a little bit. All of this as there is a clear mental health crisis unfolding here in the United States that is becoming worse and worse by the year. This says there's even some new studies showing how there's an increase of anxiety and depression, especially when it comes to picking the lesser of two evil puppets controlled by sinister dark forces who don't give a damn about you. And and and gee, I I wonder why. All of this after psyop after psyop, people had had enough. And, hey, this could be why independent media is doing better than, 

ever as, of course, we even had our own advertisements in Times Square. Yes. You heard that correctly. My Mean Mug along with the graphene crystal merchant and, of course, the Beanie Man were prominently highlighted in yesterday's Time Square during New Year's Eve promoting. Of course, the podcast, Timcast IRL that I co host for. And with purchasing advertisements in Times Square. You also got a party with that, which, me and the beanie crew actually attended last night. And then, we'd noticed during the party that there was a more significant tense NYPD presence, which we now know was because of a radical 

Islamist attack. According now to the many news sources reporting of this, of a young nineteen year old extremist using a machete on two rookie NYPD police officers. This has dozens of people were caught running away from the madness. This has, of course, the perp was shot in the shoulder and was rushed to a local hospital later to be identified and surprise surprise was also known to the FBI. We've heard that statement, many times, but now we're getting official confirmation from the Daily Mail that he was on an FBI watch list and was an individual that even publicly talked about how he wanted to go fight in Afghanistan, 

showing you just how fast, just how crazy things could change in a matter of moment. In related crazy people news, in Switzerland, there's a proposal that's going to be on a referendum that will call for very strict immigration controls in that country in order to limit the population of that country to ten million people, all, of course, to, quote, save the environment. This says, of course, Switzerland is a semi direct democracy where people get to vote on popular referendums, and if enough people vote for them, they become law. Will this become the latest law of Switzerland? Well, 

only time will tell. In other related crazy people news, in the United Kingdom, The Telegraph is reporting that women now in prison will face extra criminal charges and a longer jail time if they, of course, misgender a fellow inmate, calling them, quote, he or him. Yes. You heard that correctly. This is rules that are being explained under the equity rules where women are told specifically, 

when we put in inmates with male genitalia into your cell, you better not use the wrong pronouns or you're going to be staying longer with that person with male genitalia inside of that prison cell. Yeah. Yeah. That that definitely seems fair there. In other absolute crazy news, left wing crazy lady, Cher, has a major case of the flu, which she's blaming somehow on, people not taking a procedure against another sickness. All of this has very interestingly, a lot of mainline 

doctors and scientists that are usually regurgitated on the corporate media are reporting that in New York City, there is a very new dangerous variant coming out of here and here only. This says it's it's important to note here that there have been more procedures giving out, more medical intervention in New York City than almost any other place on the face of this earth. And now we're hearing that in this place of compliance, in this place where people did almost everything that they were told to do, the nanny state that is New York that willingly obeyed with every procedure, every mandate, every action action that the government told them to do. The government told them to jump. They said, how high? And now according to some of these mainline medical professionals, 

there's a new variant, X BB dot one dot five that is, quote, rapidly spreading predominantly out of the place that did everything that they were told to do. Gee. What a coincidence. And, of course, we kind of explained on our own website, lucan sensor dot com, what really is kind of going on here, what the other scientific discussions and understanding of this is. But I have to stop it here and save that for topic of discussion for tomorrow. As of today, we wanted to remind you about the best political shirts dot com. In December of twenty twenty, there was a very interesting article released by courts detailing how there was a 

new Rothschild coalition coming together that involved the Vatican, the Pope, major banks like Bank of America, major corporations like BP, Estee Lauder, Johnson and Johnson, financial institutions like Mastercard, Big Pharma organizations like Merck, and many others like Salesforce, Visa, and of course, let's not forget the Rockefeller Foundation that were all teaming up under a new coalition being organized by Lynn Foster D. Rothschild Rothschild that was, quote, going to reenvision 

capitalism and create a new world financial order. Now why am I saying this? Why am I bringing this up now? As of course, this was two plus years ago. Well, after this kind of larger announcement, there have been a lot of crazy things that have been happening with our financial institutions. There's been a larger promotion about the ideas of the ESG, a corporate social credit score that has been promoting woke ideologies all in the name of equity, when in reality, they're they're pushing larger woke ideologies that destroy the family unit and promotes more kind of behavior that makes people better consumers. All of this while, of course, also 

de banking a whole bunch of individuals. As we have seen since this announcement, that many high profile individuals, whether it was Ye, whether it was the pillow guy, whether it was Canadian truckers daring to, of course, peacefully protest. All of these individuals along with many other political pundits, YouTubers, commentators, people in the political sphere have been debanked and had their bank accounts shut down, frozen, and have been unable to financially transact out of some of the biggest financial institutions 

in this world. All of this is, of course, everyone recently now is talking about Andrew Tate and his recent arrest. Before this, they were all talking about yay and Kanye West all of this as we have to understand these larger financial institutions have a long history and record of doing some extremely awful things. So for them to to sit on the high chair here and declare their larger involvement in our society, programming it to to their liking, promoting wokeness, promoting degeneracy, 

promoting the destruction of our social order, we have to remember that these people have a very long history of doing some absolutely awful, horrible things as now the US Virgin Islands is officially going after JPMorgan and Chase filing a lawsuit against them on December twenty seventh of last year saying that JPMorgan Chase, quote knowingly facilitated, sustained, and concealed mister Epstein's human trafficking 

operation that they financially benefited from now of course if you know we've been reporting on this for a very long time specifically bringing up hey why didn't Deutsche Bank write in the Brown Brothers and Herriman? Why didn't JPMorgan Chase actually do something here? As of course, there was huge amounts of money being moved back and forth illegally in many ways, breaking rules, breaking regulations, breaking reporting guidelines. How is it possible that a man that no one knows where his money came from was able to move such huge sums of money without any kind of larger accounting or transparency behind it. Why was he able to continue to, of course, take small children, put them on an island, and then invite his very powerful friends to do whatever they wanted to. Why was he able to do that? Well, he had a lot of money. Why did he have a lot of money? He had a lot of access to money. Why did he have a lot of access to money? Why was he able to move money around like no one else was without any kind of reporting or a regulation? Well, those are questions I think everyone should be asking themselves as this lawsuit is is is a major lawsuit. This lawsuit 

is accusing the financial institutions of playing a major key role in this, the same institutions that are trying to tell you how morally you should be living your life. This, as of course, also other people who were abused by Jeffrey Epstein are coming forward and are suing JP Morgan and Chase and Deutsche Bank in two actual separate lawsuits saying that they also participated and assisted in the larger trafficking operation that was happening here. And they wouldn't be the only major institution 

in our society that, of course, played a major significant role here. As of course, many local police departments, many judges, many prosecutors, many politicians, all in one way or another were playing a very key active role here in this larger operation that was run by this front man, mister Epstein. This is the Daily Mail is even calling it the Bank of Epstein, detailing a long history of controversies with the bank as they, of course, just paid off Harry and Meghan Markle in order to give a speech to them. This says, of course, their practices have been blamed on triggering financial crises. They worked with other scam artists like Bernie Madoff before. And holy cow, what's what's really happening with JPMorgan and Chase? What's happening behind the scenes? How involved are they? Well, I think we're going to be finding out with some disclosures from these two major bombshell 

legal court proceedings that are going to be moving forward in twenty twenty three that we, of course, are going to be keeping a very close eye on. All of this as, of course, the big banks are trying to squash these lawsuits. And, hey, for us, at least, that's something to look forward to in twenty twenty three. And, hopefully, the victims here and the people coming forward trying to get some actual justice for this larger travesty, for this larger controversy, for, of course, these major institutions playing some kind of role here is, I think, one reason more than ever why we should not go along 

with them tracking, watching, and keeping even more control of us through central bank digital currencies, which, of course, they plan to institute and roll out with their full participation, which essentially will mean the full enslavement of humanity. But, hey, that's just my own personal opinion. That's my take on it. What do you think? Let me know down in the comment section below. Alright. Welcome to the show. Happy New Year, everybody. A lot has happened since last week. We did the the show on Monday night. It was right after Christmas time, so not everybody was able to see the livestream last Monday, but I hope you had a nice holiday off. And now that we're in twenty twenty three, we had a late late takeoff tonight because, some tech issues, 

our streamer. We rent some streaming from one of the autonomy graduates, Cody. He had put a new hard drive in the machine. We had to adjust some audio settings. We won't bore you with that, but I will say that unlike Southwest, we relate but at least we took off. So, with that, let's touch on some of the things that Luke talked about during his video. He mentioned, the Rothschild Coalition having this partnership with the Vatican. Now, I would like to point you over here to the history blueprint because we could dig in to, this other part about JPMorgan and where did JPMorgan get their money from in the first place. And Junius Spencer Morgan, did he work in the British, 

street you know, City of London banking establishment? We're not gonna ask those questions. Let's go straight to the source. Twenty fourteen, there was a conference on inclusive capitalism sponsored by Rothschild and Company involving the Rockefeller Foundation and, sir Evelyn Rothschild's bank And along with his wife, lady Lynn Forrester to Rothschild, who's, like, best friends with Hillary Clinton and found throughout the WikiLeaks. If you were to search the DNC leaks or Clinton leaks, you'd find a lot of interesting emails on the topic. But the point is, 

Lynn Forster or Rauthchild got up, and they had this conference. And I think maybe the conference was in France, May twenty fourteen. And Christine Lagarde of the IMF, International Monetary Fund, she gets up at the podium and she basically says, One third of the world's investable wealth is in this room. And we have the responsibility as the wealthiest people in the world to eradicate poverty. And we're going to use our wealth and yada yada yada. They called it the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism 

and the website is still up. They have the power to build dynamic. We can go to the web page here in a second. Let me see if I can just, by trigger this and press this button. Let's see. Does it work? It's coming up. There it is. Capitalism done right has the power to build a fair, more dynamic and sustainable world. Got all the keywords in here, got all the hallmarks, right? These sort of things. And if you were to go about our work and about us, contact us, these sort of things, they've cleaned it up. But if you go back in twenty fourteen, they were showing openly who their partners were 

and what big banks and world funds and these sort of things they're working with. Now, of course, it's grown because it didn't really take off back in the day. But because of the pandemic and because this runs parallel to the World Economic Forum and the Club of Rome, their agenda for the great reset, it reignited. It was like a fire that was almost out and reignited during the pandemic. And all of a sudden, now the pope's on board. All these other big banks are willing to sign on because they saw the other end of the tunnel. See, when these guys pitched it, when Forrester or Rochow pitched it in twenty fourteen, 

they they didn't have they didn't have the vision in the audience to really take it to market. Like, the rich people had the vision, but the poor people that they're trying to get to buy into the vision didn't have that. They needed, a vehicle just like the pandemic. And sure enough, almost made to order, like, the vehicle showed up during the pandemic. And then these groups get in in in behind two things. You got the the commons pass, the idea of a digital passport. It's gonna have you not just your medical records, but all these other things that they need for the Track Trace database. So they can also run that through social credit score and limit your access to technologies, thus leading to you'll be, you'll own nothing and be happy. You'll be in your little fifteen minute hamster city doing your little hamster activities, 

and the few free people who live a rural lifestyle will continue to be under attack, not protected by people who can't protect themselves anymore. So, you know, they're looking to disarm the entire planet to have everybody at the the back end call of a not local authority. So you have no local accountability. If you have no checks and balances, if you don't have representative government, if you don't have the ability to protect your own rights and property, you are somebody else's property. And they have more slavery today than ever in history. 

And, it it that's that's been a problem. So it was, it was good for Luke to bring some of those ideas back to, the front because they are covering it more openly these days that the Rothschilds and the Vatican have this partnership together. Are they together forever? We'll see. Maybe they have common agendas. You know, if we have, freedom on our minds, maybe there's a common agenda on the other side to eradicate freedom. And I think over the years, we've started to see some of these groups start to work 

very close knit with each other, whether it's inclusive capitalism or the World Economic Forum or CDC or WHO. It seems to just be a few players involved in all these places making all this mischief. Okay. Inclusive capitalism is just a euphemism for stakeholder capitalism that the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab in particular, promotes all the time. So these are just various euphemisms, sometimes with medications depending on the definition because it's just about really eradicating 

the fundamentals of capitalism itself in the name of diversity, inclusion, equity, all these sort of buzzwords that they're using throughout the, culture. And we know politics and economics is downstream from culture, so they can influence people's perceptions culturally. They're gonna be able to influence the way people then buy and sell within a market and produce capital. Robert Leonard (zero fifty seven:forty seven): And one of the ways that you can instantly corrupt capitalism is let's put another word in front of it, like inclusive or stakeholder. Right. So any of these other things because it basically says he who he who makes the rules or owns the gold makes the rules. 

That's what stakeholder means. It means IBM and the Fortune one hundred companies that all participate in eugenics and globalism. They're gonna set the tone, and the United States, constitution is gonna go bye bye. And the bill of rights is gonna seem like a myth told in the camps in the future. How did people ever have that much freedom? It must have been dangerous. Oh, look. And they'll select little things out of the news. Like, oh, look at this guy, machete tech in in New York City. That was was dangerous back then for people to have long knives or to be access, like, to that many other people at once or whatever they make up in the future because they're totalitarian and despotic 

unless we learn our way out of these things. So Yeah. Yeah. They're definitely sending a trend, and they're letting us know. Yeah. I mean, it's whether or not you'll be included in their quote, unquote, capitalist system of the future, which is really a version of technocracy. So Yeah. Well, a way out, we need to look at solutions at the same time. Because it's twenty twenty three, and we need to get a good strong start. So, coming up, not next weekend, but I think the weekend after, January fifteenth, we're hosting a a mindset 

seminar, and then we're gonna have a a goal setting workshop. So the seminar is on the mindset you need to get progress so you'd actually formulate a goal for yourself. The workshop is one on one, tutorial. Like, we're gonna give you some structure, and then you're gonna work out with another person and some guidance who's been there and done that like a Sherpa. They're gonna help guide you toward these goals, and you're gonna be able to have a plan when you walk out of that meeting of what you'd like to do now in this first quarter, second quarter, third quarter, fourth quarter. And at least you'll have a first draft of your goals, and then it's your job to attach those goals to your schedule and your calendar and build up the internal fortitude and the discipline 

to be able to show up for yourself consistently and provide value into the market if you're looking to extract value from the market in the form of payment and and having money to do things in life. And money doesn't buy you happiness, but it does buy you peace of mind and mobility these days. And as they crunch down with all these rules and regulations, they're gonna squeeze people who can't afford it first. So doing yourself a favor, the mindset seminar is free access. If you'd like the workshop, what we're gonna do one on one for a couple hours with the help and, tutelage of some leadership, 

that's forty seven bucks. It's easy. If you're interested, it's a easy price for you to say yes to. LD, what's the URL for that? I'm sharing it out, to university of reason dot my kajabi dot com forward slash richard dash Grove Yeah. So click the link in the description. It sounds like Dash workshop. Yeah. I used the Bitly when I tweeted it out earlier. If you wanna go to my Twitter, it's also in my last couple tweets today. Prior to the show, I'll have more tweets probably throughout the show 

because now I can do such things during clips. Alright. So, the mindset, workshop, what does it include, LD? What do you got? A list over there? Well, I just have the information that it's, Sunday, January fifteenth from, twelve to one PM eastern time. It's a two part two part event and the mindset and goal setting workshop. As you said, it's forty seven dollars, and that goes from one until three PM eastern time, January fifteenth. 

Yeah. So if you want the mindset part to show up from one to two, and then if you get into the workshop, you go through the mindset part for free. You go into the workshop from two to three or one to three. Sorry. One to three PM eastern on the fifteenth. Those who want accurate numbers, just go to the website. And I'll mention at this point early on in the show, I've already done a live stream for six hours today working out with autonomy students in q and a and other exercises as they prepare to graduate. So I'm here with a smile on my face, but I still might be a little mentally fogged 

and fatigued. But, yeah, let's move forward. So without further ado, let's go to Christy Lee with this weekend media malfeasance. We'll get her summary, and then we'll start breaking open individual stories and see what they have hidden inside. Just real quick. Yeah. She has, I don't know if she's doing the media malfeasance anymore, but she has these daily briefs that she's been doing. So, LD, I would just say play the two. She released some, I think, two days ago back to back. They pretty much cover a meet well, a medium off season to cover. So they're, like, five minutes each. Yep. Okay. 

Tony Mize bridging the gap. So that could be his segment. Just bridging the gap. Something like that. Alright. Former president Donald Trump's tax returns are officially released. Coming up on Christie Lee's daily brief, hear what the tax returns reveal. Plus, the Kevin McCarthy compromise, how some establishment 

Republicans are trying to push through McCarthy to become the next speaker of the house. The funding of false belief banning and how Chase Bank has allegedly protected pedos. Starting today with Trump's tax returns, the house committee has released them this after years of blocks and appeals. The democratic led committee had been working to gain access to the unredacted twenty fifteen to twenty twenty returns to investigate whether Trump violated the constitution by accepting payments from foreign governments while in office, according to daily 

caller. Congressional Democrats first subpoenaed the documents in twenty nineteen. After his former attorney, Michael Cohen, testified that he misrepresented his net worth. CNN reports Trump paid seven hundred and fifty dollars in income tax in twenty seventeen and none in twenty twenty. Yet one point one million in federal income taxes in twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen. A twenty twenty one business insider article notes most former US presidents including Barack Obama, George Bush, and Bill Clinton make bank after leaving the White House, but not Trump. His net worth actually went down during the course of his presidency. 

Trump has referred to the obsession to gain access to his tax returns as a deranged political witch hunt. And he warns, quote, this precedent must now be applied to the corrupt Democrats themselves. The new Republican house should immediately obtain the financial records of Joe Biden and his entire political enterprise because that's exactly what it is. Freedom Caucus considers keeping Kevin and Pelosi's house rules according to the national file. It says some members are negotiating away the house rules established by Thomas Jefferson. 

They kept the lower house accountable to voters. A compromise is being considered to make Kevin McCarthy the next speaker of the house and involves keeping Nancy Pelosi's rules while adding a watered down version of the crucial motion to vacate the chair. Rep Lauren Bobart shared some thoughts on this move earlier this month. Chair. We have to have a an accountability mechanism on the speaker of the house. This is third in command for the presidency of the United States of America, and we are going to strip away the one check and balance the members of congress have on the speaker of the house. And by the way, this was a precedent that Nancy Pelosi 

started. Nancy Pelosi changed the rules with motion to vacate, and she stripped that individual authority away from each member of congress. The deal to install McCarthy as speaker comes on the heels of the omnibus betrayal. Senate Republicans took away the house's budgetary capability by joining Democrats to sign a one year budget just before Republicans are set to retake the purse strings and Pelosi's gavel. McCarthy is already calling himself speaker elect, but the number of votes he needs is not secure. Rep Andy Biggs is challenging him for the rule. Another way to control and impede our freedom of speech. The US government is funding research on correcting 

false beliefs according to Reclaim the Net. The funding is in partnership with those always reliable fact checkers. In July of last year, the National Science Foundation funded a project titled, how false beliefs form and how to correct them. Since then, more than five hundred thousand has been allocated to a grant to address, quote, the urgent need to understand the real world effects of misinformation on people's beliefs and how to best correct false beliefs. You've heard multiple stories now of conservatives or wrong think culprits getting their bank accounts shut down. But if you're a pedophile, 

don't worry about it. Breitbart reports the US Virgin Islands is claiming JPMorgan Chase turned a blind eye to Jeffrey Epstein's trafficking ring. The AG of the US Virgin Islands has filed a federal lawsuit that alleges that JPMorgan Chase benefited from Epstein's sex trafficking operation and helped conceal activities that occurred on his property. It says the bank did this by failing to properly comply with federal regulations on records and reporting that might have tipped off Epstein's activities to US officials before 

they eventually came to light. The AG argues that JPMorgan Chase should have thought twice before allowing Epstein to become a client, given that he pleaded guilty to a sex related charge involving a minor in Florida in two thousand eight. Epstein banked with JPMorgan Chase for about fifteen years before the bank dropped him as a client in twenty thirteen. So to sum up, former president Trump's tax returns are out. The precedent is set. Who's next? Any hope of the GOP actually taking an aggressive approach to turn the fate of our country around is fading 

as more deals and compromises are being made, including keeping Kevin and sticking with Pelosi rules. More money is going toward ways to combat misinformation, a word we rarely ever even heard three years ago, and leave it to our financial institutions to shut down freedom fighters while protecting pedos. To learn more, be sure to go to American faith dot com and subscribe to our daily newsletter. For American Faith, news you can trust, I'm Christy Lee. Funny how they protect us. 

It's just like a unceasing, almost like the government ordered Epstein to be protected type of thing. You know? Because when the government came out during COVID and said to do certain things, everyone obeys. And so it's almost like none of these news channels I mean, when Amy Robach had the, you know, the leaked footage of her talking about, maybe we can even find that footage. She's she's on stage, but she thinks the camera's off, and she was talking about the Epstein story. And this had to be July 

twenty nineteen. And she said, we had that story in twenty sixteen, and then we got a call from Buckingham Palace, and they told us to not to run it if we ever wanted to interview the royals again for the network. Right? So it was a threat to the network from Buckingham Palace that was protecting Epstein, because we know prince Andrew, who hasn't been seen recently. You know, he had a lot to do with Epstein, and that Ghislaine was Epstein's contact to the royal family modern days, but he did have direct contact with the royal family starting in the nineteen seventies 

before he was involved in Iran Contra and arms dealing on behalf of the Anglo American establishment. So there's a lot too just like the apps Epstein story, but that's not the point of the show tonight, Epstein. Yeah. I remember the Amy Robach. Yeah. That was, very fascinating at the time, and it was abhorrent in a way because she seemed to be more upset that her story got squashed Right. The allegations. Right. That's the problem. About her ego. Yeah. Children being abused, It wasn't, you know, but she was trying to take it to market, but she it was like it was like it hurt her career. And then and I think it did hurt her career because that got leaked. 

Yeah. That did actually. That's a good point. Yeah. Yeah. So she said the quiet part out loud on tape, and they leaked it. No more career for you for a while. People have to learn to forget. Well, we're not gonna forget Fauci anytime soon. And the next clip we're gonna play comes from, Clayton Morris over at redacted. And there's there's a couple interesting clips that he's gonna showcase on what you're about to see. The first, you're gonna see, I think the inquiry from Germany is in there, but also 

the accusations about, from Robert Malone in the corner in there. So we've heard in that movie, Died Suddenly, you saw morticians in that movie, not coroners. And when now when in comparison to that, not saying that movie is true or false, I'm just saying it exists. Now over here, we have a guy who's a coroner who says the government told all the coroners not to, perform autopsies on people with the, the COVID. So let's check out the clip. Let's weigh the evidence and see what what I think we're also gonna need to go to the John Campbell clip that's also probably referred at the end of this. There's a couple of things we'll have to dig into to see what's the substance and what can we take away, but this is new interesting information that is relevant and substantive 

so far. So let's consider it and, do some thinking afterwards. So we've been tracking the sudden spike of excess deaths, this year around the world. We've been covering this story for a long time now. Why are country after country experiencing sudden unexpected deaths? Question. I'll I'll throw it out to you. You let me know your thoughts on this. Well, now we can add Germany to this list. Germany Should we define excess deaths? 

Okay. Good. Because we we're not talking about deaths that are happening given you know, related to any given thing. The government sort of tracks normal death rates, birth and death rates around normal events, such as normally you get babies born in September because people conceive those babies around the holidays, that kind of thing. You get more drunk driving, accidents around certain times of the month, for instance. And so the algorithm will give you a national average. And in most countries, we are seeing that average spike, 

in recent months. Yeah. Recent months. So it's all across the board right now. So now we can add Germany to this list. Germany, excess deaths up nineteen percent according to the most recent data. The vice president, parliament parliamentary vice president calling for an investigation now into deaths and damages after the pathologists who examined these bodies at autopsy all said, hey, thirty percent of them all had one thing in common. 

He's saying that. He's a doctor. He's a pathologist in Germany. They're calling for a parliamentary investigation. Watch this German news report. So that's what the pathologist is saying. He's a doctor. And he's 

he's saying this based on observation and asking for examinations. He's seeing this in the autopsies. And asking for investigations. So we're seeing this across the board now. We should probably maybe look into this and have an actual investigation allow be Censorship, baby. Not allowed to talk about it. Do a Google search. Go to Yahoo News. Try to do searches. You can't find it. It's suppressed. That's why. German badass, Christine Anderson, wants answers 

for her country and Europe and the world. She's a member of European Parliament from Germany. She asks this question. When these vaccines became available, we were promised it would prevent contraction and transmission of COVID nineteen. All governments around the world, EU commission, everyone, basically repeated that, began harassing and intimidating people so they would take that promised game changer. Well, turns out it was fake news, wasn't it? Somebody lied, and I want to know who 

lied. Well, why are we just hearing about this? Why are we just hearing about this? Can I say really quick that I wanna I I just wanna give kudos to Twitter because I'm seeing this information now on Twitter, and they have, like, released all the the guidelines on, COVID? So it's like now I'm getting information that I had to go elsewhere to try to find Yeah. On Twitter. So kudos to that, at least, the conversation is happening there. And things are being allowed to trend, which weren't allowed before. Hashtags around questioning 

the vaccination program. So, yes, this is I mean, it's very interesting to see certain trends that were obviously suppressed before. Yeah. And certain trends that were being amplified, like we learned this afternoon, you, war in Ukraine, Ukraine war was being amplified because of the pro Ukrainian Twitter army, working at Twitter. So certain things were being amplified, and, yes, we know what certain things were being suppressed. So why, you know, again, why are we just hearing about this? Well, it's been suppressed, specifically on YouTube. 

Watch Doctor John Campbell get all tongue tied, not being able to talk about this. And he shows us over the past few days YouTube's guidelines, and I love that he wrote them in Comic Sans font. Watch this. So serious under reporting. Now, Google YouTube guidelines, just so you know, a reminder of what's going on here. Now these haven't changed. And, the YouTube guideline here written in comic sans script, 

claims that an approved COVID nineteen vaccine will cause death, infertility, miscarriage, autism, or, contraction of another infectious disease. I'm not allowed to say any of those, so I'm going to stop reporting on that particular paper at this point because I want to follow I have to follow YouTube guidelines. So isn't that amazing? Like, what I love is that he does that. He puts up Comic Sans, you know, to make a point. It's like, I'm not gonna talk about it, but 

you know what's going on. So now is a peer reviewed paper, and I have to stop talking about Yeah. Academics. Here's a peer reviewed scientific paper that he's keep reporting on, and I can't talk about it because their guidelines won't let us talk about it. And he's not just a YouTuber. This guy is a guy that has the the credentials to be able to talk about it. He is a medical professional. Yes. Yes. Right. And so I would love to know, like, who on YouTube staff is a medical professional? Like, do you have, like, a team of doctors? 

No. YouTube has always just sort of deferred to the CDC. Whatever the CDC says, you can't violate you can't speak against. Or the WHO. Yeah. So you can't go again. Oh, so that means that means we should be able to talk about the the thing on that died suddenly documentary then now. Right? I don't know. No. No. No. Because because they haven't updated. So, yes, even though the CDC and the WHO have now pointed out things on their websites, YouTube's still not caught up. So you just gotta get you know, it's like a it's like a slow they're, like, really slow on this, unfortunately. It's like waiting for iOS sixteen. It's like they're still in beta or whatever. Yeah. Waiting for the actual release. So Germany is not, alone in these huge spikes in f excess deaths. Why are we just hearing about this? I'll ask that question again. 

Well, according to news reports from US doctors, we're also learning that doctor Fauci told coroners in the United States not to carry out autopsies. This is doctor Ryan Cole who admitted that Fauci was telling doctors, sorry. Not necessary. Don't do autopsies. Watch. So what's happened to the autopsy, Ryan? Well, Anthony Fauci told our government to tell people don't do autopsies 

on COVID patients. You cannot find that for which you do not look. I have a post vaccine. So Wow. Yeah. And I uploaded a separate video that I had beeped. I don't know why that's, not there. I made specific, specifically, I even added beeps and everything today on it. But, dude. Oh, that that was the one. Remember I told you at the last minute I grabbed one and because it was all squashed and weird looking. Oh. That much so. It must not have carried through the beep. Okay. 

What? Well, he didn't say No. I cut him off. Yeah. So I beeped out. So anyway but I wish I had that video now. Do you have it that you can play it even though it's squished? We can fix it later in post. Give me a second. Because I specifically spent, like, a half an hour adding in beeps because to take out key moments of this. But this is a key moment here. So doctor Cole I'll give a kind of a little rundown here. I he's explaining the people that he's now seeing in his practice. He's a coroner. So these are people who are not talking anymore, who he's talking to, or he's he's he's dealing with. 

These people all had something in common. And he's saying we were told not to be able to talk about this and not even perform this. Have any proof of that? Does he talk about Proof of what? The autopsies? No. How Fauci sent this mandate to not I'm sure he does. Yeah. I haven't asked him specifically. I've invited him to the show. Okay. But, I'd love to know specifically how all these corners because there's I've heard this now from multiple different sources on corners who have not been performing. We have other sources here we're gonna show you in just a second. But so we have the squished version of this now. And I was just gonna say real quick. I don't think, like, a guy like that, you have to understand, like, if you're speaking to power that can destroy your reputation, you better have your your ducks in a row. And I'm sure he knew that, and so he wouldn't be saying that. I I don't think otherwise unless he had proof, in my opinion. 

Yeah. Okay. You know, I just that that's a big claim, and it's a it's an important part of this, and I would like to to see. Yeah. So here is doctor Ryan Cole again saying this. And we by the way, we've also heard the same in Canada. We've also heard the same in Canada from from medical professionals in Canada who have been saying that they've been asked not to. So this carries this is not just Fauci, or it goes it's bigger than that. But listen to doctor Cole beeped out this time with little squished video here. We apologize. 

So what's happened to the autopsy, Ryan? Well, Anthony Fauci told our government to tell people don't do autopsies on COVID patients. You cannot find that for which you do not look. I have a post nine year old on my desk dead. I don't wanna see one more child 

pose ever on my desk. Are the autopsies starting to happen? You bet. They are. Finally, because people are saying, why wouldn't we do them? And in that same town from which this nine year old died, a healthy twenty two year twenty two year old wrestler after his third is now also coming to be on my desk, so I can determine the cause of death there. We were told don't do autopsies, don't look, 

and that's what your government is giving you for data. Don't don't ask, don't tell, don't look. And it's so interesting the type of data that we are allowed to talk about and the type of data that the media picks up on because I'm watching headlines all all day. So these two studies that the CDC put out this week that showed some kind of statistical advantage of vaccination was very slight, and it was more like it was about statistics. It was not about trials. 

So the actual data, they don't want. But if they can manipulate statistics Yeah. They want it Oh, yes. In order to feed into a preexisting narrative. Just like the New York Times piece from a few weeks ago that came out that it was total it was it's been debunked now. They literally read the study wrong and wrote an article in reverse. It's been debunked now by multiple doctors. Like, no. No. You literally read the study wrong. What the study is telling you is the exact opposite of what the story you wrote, and then that went out to millions of people. That happens more than you think. You know? Because I spend my time watching headlines, 

clicking through to the source, and saying That's the opposite. At all what what this says. So good luck getting autopsies. County coroners have been refusing to carry out autopsies on these sudden death sudden deaths among children. If you're a parent whose seven year old just dropped dead, and the only thing out of the ordinary is that they went and got something done recently, You'd wanna know what's going on. Like in Vegas, this family child's unexplained death and the refusal for an autopsy. 

This father who, you know, his seven year old daughter, Brianna, suddenly died in Las Vegas, and the county coroner refused to do an autopsy. Listen to this father, heartbreaking, standing on her grave. And she just was amazing little girl. She was full of life. She smiled all the time. I dropped her off to school on February sixteenth, I believe. She had a stomachache, and two days later, she passed away in the hospital. 

Clark County coroner's office, they refused to do an autopsy on her, so we don't know what's going on. It's been two years. I don't see how they wouldn't have wanted to know what happened to a seven year old little girl. It's heartbreaking. Yeah. Heartbreaking. We don't wanna know. We don't wanna know. Alright. Well, another study out of the Cleveland Clinic shows that, some risk of contracting 

COVID. It does not tell us much about hospitalization or death or even severe COVID. The reason for that is because in this study of fifty one thousand people, no one had severe COVID, even the people who contracted it. So this this study, again, it's a statistical analysis of actual people who had COVID or who had the vaccine. It's not a human trial, but it's an interesting one. It says, and I'm quoting from the Cleveland 

Clinic. That doesn't come out so easily. The higher the number of vaccines previously received, the higher the risk of contracting COVID nineteen. Further, the study found that the current bivalent vaccines were about thirty percent effective overall in protecting against infection of COVID when the omicron b a four b a five lineages were the predominant circulating strains. Now take a look at their chart. So what you see here I'm gonna explain these lines, 

is that, people who had no dose are black, the black line. The people who had one dose, this is the red line here. People who had two is the green. People who had three is blue, and then more than three doses is orange. Well, that's in order, you guys. If you look at, and this is a timeline, days since since the study started, and then the, axis on the left is your who got COVID. Well, you can see that it's the orange line that is more likely to actually contract 

COVID than the people who are who have had no vaccinations at all, which is not what researchers expected to find. The researchers concede that this is not at all the only one to indicate that risk of infection may actually go up with more vaccinations. Now we've had doctors warn us, you can just deplete your immune system if you keep going with this vaccine, but now we have the data to prove it. This has also been observed. 

I don't wanna use the word prove, but we have observed this now. The this has also been observed in studies in Germany, Israel, and the UK. Now one explanation that the authors say is that, maybe those who received more doses were more likely to be individuals at higher risk for COVID. So that's possible. But a small portion of individuals may have fit this description, they said, but when they actually dug into the data, they saw the majority of subjects in this study were generally young individuals. 

All were eligible to have received at least three doses of the vaccine by the study start date. Now, again, they could not infer anything about the vaccine preventing severe COVID because in this study of fifty one thousand people, there were too few severe illnesses for the study to be able to determine if the vaccine decreased severity of illness, which, you know, contradicts what we are being told that you should get this vaccine to prevent severe COVID or hospitalization. But if those cases are so rare, 

how do we know this? So, you know, the the authors are saying we clearly need more studies about this because it does seem to show, what we've been warned about increasing numbers of vaccinations. Again, it seems to be crickets about this on the mainstream media, though. Yeah. And the latest data on excess deaths if, Phil, if you wanna take my, laptop screen here. So these are the latest data points for countries around the world. So New Zealand, Norway, Poland are here at the top. You can see all the different countries along the on the list here, 

that provide these data points. And on the left hand column is the week. Right? The week of the year. So we're approaching, so, you know, getting the and by the way, we only have data up until the fortieth week. So we're still waiting on data from the last few weeks, but it's all trending upward from a number of these countries. I mean, all across the board. So you can see twelve percent increase here. And this is the column you wanna look at, excess death percentage, which is a change from the average. So let's just take a look. Go down the line here at Belgium. Twelve percent increase. Right? Twenty three percent increase here for Austria. Twenty three percent increase. Look at these last few weeks here 

of the of the of the of these particular months here through November. Right? Denmark, up from average, seventeen percent increase excess deaths. Just go here. All the United States all the way here at the end, thirteen percent increase. United Kingdom, seventeen percent increase. The list is goes on and on for these increases across the board for a lot of these countries. Slovenia, Portugal, eleven percent increase in Portugal from ten, twelve, sixteen, fifteen, two point five, and eleven percent. So, you know, you can seek this data out yourself, and you can look at these and wait for the, you know, specific country data points for these excess deaths. But 

why are we not investigating this? Why why is why is there not a international outcry? And only a few voices in the European Parliament and the, United Kingdom in in front of their parliament and a few voices in the United States holding senate hearings. That's it. Nothing. No outrage. No discussion about it. And Any of them that that do stand up in their parliament or in these other countries, they're marginalized. They're like, oh, listen to crazy old Claire, Claire, 

oh, now I can't remember her daily going on again about this crazy conspiracy stuff, and they're just, like, laughing at him and everything. So it's like, you know, they they do run the risk of of damaging their careers, but these people don't care. And the thing is, if you go back and listen to them and lay it on the timeline and lay it on the actual So we don't know exactly what to think of all that yet, but it seems like there's patterns emerging. And, but it seems like there's patterns emerging. We went from 

talking about Borla ninety five percent effective down to what? They said thirty percent effective, something like that. Hundred percent effective according to Borla in South Africa. So that was the beginning of the vaccine rollout, then it went down to ninety five, Then it went down Seems like the more data we get. Right, Tony? The the worse it gets. And also scenes where we get the data matters as well, whether it's comes from Pfizer or the CDC or the WHO or if it actually comes from independent researchers and journals and, you know, what am I supposed to think of this Ryan this Ryan Cole guy? Is he trustworthy? 

He's been a part of essentially the, Robert Malone, Peter McCullough, you know, Ryan Cole's been a part of it. He is part of the senate hearings. People actually do five. Okay. Exactly. The pathologist. Yeah. Alright. So he's, someone who has especially, he has an intimate understanding of the immune system, if I remember correctly. I forget. Specifically, his credentials. It's been a long time. Yeah. He's watching but that's the first time I've seen him on screen. I've watched him many times, and he was, going on 

his particular interest was in pseudouridine and the blood clotting issue, which then he was featured on that, died suddenly. But then there's a much better follow-up with that from both Chris Martinson Okay. So Brett Weinstein and then Del Bigtree actually interviewed Ryan Cole and did a little segment where he looked at blood samples and what the vaccine was doing to blood and petri dishes and so forth and so on. So Yeah. There was there was someone we played a clip, and they said something favorable about Ryan Cole. They're like, don't throw the baby out the bathwater with that movie because there are valuable people. Oh, I think Robert Malone was in as well. There's a number of individuals that have are well credentialed and have expertise in that those fields 

or areas, of knowledge. But the way that movie was edited and presented was a bit hyperbolic. And Yeah. It's a stupid Peter's version of those interviews. You got it. Right. So With a lot of, like, non sequiturs embedded within it that may or may not connect to the overall global agenda. It just sort of was a mishmash of too many things and didn't stay as highly focused as it could have. And I think Chris Mortensen, Bert Weinstein, and then later on, Del Big Tree did a much more sat down and actually talked to these individuals in a non sort of fear based environment 

and was able to really extricate what is going on in regards to what they're seeing as pathologists and experts in these areas of inquiry. Tony Robbins (3five thirty three): That's a good lesson on filmmaking too. When you have an idea and you want to go out and make a film on that thing, it's like creating a goal when you don't need to have a goal. You might end up taking steps to force things into that goal. So it's good to know when you just take steps with interviews. So the script is taken from what the actual interview like, the people we interviewed said 

and then, you know, put the script around that instead of Stu Peter sound like because he's made another documentary about the cobra venom almost a year about a year ago. Right. Right? The cobra venom's a COVID type thing. That was a rumor last year. We covered it, and we were right. We we stand by our coverage on that. We haven't had to correct our our coverage so far. No. No. It was heavily debunked by so many varying personalities, and it's it was shown to be false from so many different angles. But, you know, it was a specialist argument built up based on a straw man, and it was torn down quite easily by those who had, 

much greater knowledge in that field of study. Plus, I think it was doctor Artis, who's the one who is necessarily promoting it. And he wasn't really an ex expert in those, But it was an interesting hypothesis. And if they didn't act so certain about it, it would have been fine. It would have been fine as a hypothesis. But when they act of a certainty, that was where it went downhill. I mean, doctor Ardis did great work sort of exposing remdesivir. He wasn't the only one, but he's the one who I know we had him we showed clips of him on the show talking about Yeah. He was right. Remdesivir. He was right about that. But, unfortunately, with this hypothesis, he wasn't right. But if he would've just presented it as a hypothesis, 

it would've been fine. And it would've been could've also been well, Stu, you know, framed the production, though. So, like, you know, he could've been hyperbolized through the production too. So there's a case of Malone, Cole, McCullough being interviewed and they might have had good intentions in the interview, but by the time they got the final movie out, it was a little hyperbolized. So, you know, take it with grains of salt. But now compare it to what Ryan Cole was also saying about from a corner perspective, and I don't think he was in, died suddenly 

that Fauci said corners don't do autopsies. That was news to me when I saw that clip, earlier today. It's news to me as well. It wouldn't surprise me, knowing the way in which let's just go back and look at COVID historically when this is all going down before the vaccines are even rolling it rolling out. The the CDC, and the NIH and the NIAID, which thought she headed the NIAID, promoted, paying out hospitals for, for those that supposedly died with COVID. So hospitals lost one of their key sources of revenue, which is outpatient surgery because they weren't allowed to perform outpatient surgeries. 

And instead were incentivized to up the death rate, especially for those who died with COVID. And then they had, you know, thirty, thirty five cycle thresholds in regards to the PCR tests and the rapid testing that was going on. We know about the issues with that that we covered. So there's a lot of sort of, sort of massaging the data going on very early. So it wouldn't surprise so we have circumstantial sort of analogous evidence of the way in which these institutions that are supposed to be overseeing public health help to incentivize 

aspects that had nothing to do with helping public health. And and Del Bigtree showed, you know, a very interesting video, that I think it was trending, if not on Twitter, on other social media platforms at the time before it got taken down, of hospital marketing staff, a major hospital around the nation, actually saying we need to up the fear, up the death rate, up, up, up because that's where they're making their money. So at least we have one example of where they were already doing this. And so it wouldn't surprise me, as a hypothesis that Anthony Fauci did indeed. If it wasn't Fauci himself, 

then it was other members of this, NIH or perhaps, you know, sort of sister organization, so to speak, was the CDC. And it's within the high ranking members within those organizations telling the federal government and also telling them, private coroners not to go ahead and do autopsies. Now we don't have direct evidence of that, but it's a reasonable hypothesis. We need to go out and search for evidence in support of that as a potential. Well, if you think back to how the pandemic kicked off, right, China, the big obscurity, like, there's something going on, but they're not telling us. And then they had those mass graves in Iran, 

and you saw, like so from the from the coverage of it, there's mass graves. They can't touch these things. The the the families are six hundred yards away and in hazmat suits, it's so dangerous. So at that time, when Fauci makes an order, let's say he did in this case, no autopsies. It's probably, like, under safety. Like, yeah, you'll get infected. If you're working on a dead body, you don't have the precautions. It's not BSL four. Which they're gonna come out later with the antidote after they hold the world hostage for a while and get their way. 

Also goes against germ theory, though, which they support insofar as, like, once the bodily host has died, the virus will have no way to live at least under a certain amount of time. Unless it's a lab thing that stays post mortem. It's all a lot of contradictions here. It wouldn't surprise me as a hypothesis that indeed Fauci or other high ranking members of various health institutions around the nation by the CDC or, the NIH went ahead and told, coroners and the federal government as well. And they'll relay that the coroners around the country do not perform autopsies perhaps to your point. I think that's a good qualifier 

as a as a public health measure early on just like they were. Who was it Deborah Birx, scarf herself, miss Scarf, missus Scarf, who essentially said no one told Bill Gates. She should have to wear, like, a logo. Like, the That's from Penn State apparently as well. That's just ironic. Yeah. She She knows Graham Spanier. Oh, I remember Graham Spanier. The, she went on to say, I think, very early on when, president Trump had his, like, COVID panel that he was hosting early on in the pandemic stating that, well, you know, we're including anyone in death certificates that has died with COVID, 

this you know, essentially, that had COVID, meaning they died from COVID. So they are in other words, they are associating COVID deaths with those that had been infected by use of PCR with high cycle threshold, as being COVID deaths, and that would include I've heard murders, homicides, bike accidents. No more accidents. Those. Just let it be assumed. And that was before the vaccine rollout. So there's certainly circumstantial evidence, at least as an analogy to them already doing something very shady and dubious to begin with. So it wouldn't at all surprise me if, again, under the guise of public health, they also suggest, as you pointed out, to not perform autopsies as a measure of public safety. But now we have a you know, again, that goes against the the basic ideas of germ theory and how germs and viruses in particular work. And, also, we now have much more data about the virus. They're scared, so they're not being reasonable 

necessarily. They'll just obey orders because they're super dependent. Look. Something's going on. You work right under the authority managing it. They're lying to you. They're keeping you in the dark. They tell you to do some it's not unlike what the Nazis did to people with. Oh, sure. Official bureaucrat letter saying not to do something. I mean, they did it on everything, like, governments and governors banned ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, all these things that they've never done before. They're all up in your pharmacist business and what's going on and denying people early treatment because 

is it, almost almost three years now into the pandemic, supposedly. Yeah. And it's almost three years now. We're January first twenty twenty three. Happy New Years, everyone. At this point, there's no real excuse for not performing an autopsy. We know enough about the virus. It seems like autopsies are beginning to move forward because they're because, we see now evidence, 

that there are these, you know, elongated, very strange, fibrous blood clots that have yet to be fully identified. We've just identified the fact they exist. We don't, you know, we only have an idea of what they're made up of. They're not a traditional blood clot. Yes. They exist, and they're kinda new. They're just now coming on the radar. So it's very murky as to what they are, when they're caused, how they're caused. Yeah. It's a little bit about what they're made up of. There's some sort of fibrous thing. Fibrin. Yeah. Fibrin. Usually, you have red blood cells, some white blood cells, 

you know, sort of attacking it, and then you usually have fibrin. But in this case, and so blood clots typically have a very red or darkish, complexion when they get pulled out. But to have one that doesn't have that that's so many without that seems to suggest that, was the amyloid protein, I believe, as well as fibrin. In in absence of, you know, the red blood cells, it's it's a very strange mechanism of action that's going on to creating these. And it wouldn't surprise me at all if in some way is, associated with 

vaccines and or just COVID itself. The spike is part of it. So that's one of the big questions Chris Martinson asks. You know, how much of it is related to possibly it might not be an either or. It might be also an, but also might be an incidence where the people who've been vaccinated, especially three, four, five times, are experiences at greater rates. We don't know. Again, we just identified on a very basic level that something new has being pulled out of individuals, especially postmortem, particularly postmortem, seem to be developed postmortem. It has to do with, both the weight and volume. Wouldn't be able to actually produce these things while you're alive. There would have to be something that fully structure or I'm sorry. But got that backwards. 

The weight and structure would have to be produced, I think, when one individual is alive. And so it wouldn't be produced postmortem. There wouldn't be enough, cellular activity and, protein left to be able to produce them postmortem. And Chris Martinson does a great breakdown of both the mass and volume, sort of measurements that would that sort of weigh out the issue of being at only postmortem, which I had first thought it was all just possibly postmortem, sort of amyloid protein and fiber and sort of getting too caught up. Yield. You can yield essentially. But now I'd have to based on weight and volume, apps 

or some mass and volume. In other words, it has to be produced cause you need all these extra cells. You need all this extra protein. You need all this extra material like fibrin. This is another style of protein, that kinda helps with Plus in that movie, you see him pull out out of somebody who's alive. Exactly. Well, that's another thing. There's a lot of circumstantial evidence of individuals. You can read this on message boards and forums. It's kinda crazy. The people who are alive that have had multiple since they've had the COVID vaccine have had multiple surgeries for blood clots and not just one, but many, some of which look eerily similar to what is being pulled out of, you know, what has been exhibited by these coroners. So there's so many questions, 

and all we have is essentially the beginning of something being identified, but, with a Yeah. Simple sort of protein structure, but it's very different from your standard blood clot, thrombocytopenia. It's Delbigtree and Jeffrey Jackson. I heard it first heard about And Macaula. Macaula. Macaula. Now that's being recognized, I think, by the CDC, other health organizations around the world as a potential side effect. You know? Now the year and a half, two years after it was first recognized So if you're waiting for the CDC or the WHO, you could be dead by the time they come around to what's going on? Exactly. And then here's the deadly. I can't say that it's deadly to listen to them because in many cases, it's not. But in this particular case where there's a global shutdown and this whole pandemic and great reset thing going on, it seems like they're deep captured, and they haven't given us good health information. 

Deep captured by big pharma, which is powerful enough to pretty much hire standing armies at this point. More power than the economy. That's for sure. Brought to you by Pfizer. It also should be of note. I think, Harrison Smith is we don't have to play it, but I do have it on the show card for those that are interested. And a a new meta analysis has come out about ivermectin's, use, safety, and effectiveness in COVID nineteen. Again, this goes to what you're talking about earlier when they immediately Horse based bad? Yeah. Horse based or who was, it's part of Sanofi. The first hydroxychloroquine 

I forgot his name. It's on the tip of my tongue. I can remember. I made a long car. He's a French doctor. Oh, did yeah. Didier, Roud. And Didier Rau. Yeah. Who also used to work with remdesivir back during the two thousand three SARS, and then he was tweeting about that as possible treatment. And then he moved on past that because he knew about the side effects. It was too it was too toxic, especially to the renal system. So your kidneys, in other words, weren't able to flush your mouth. By March of twenty twenty, and the rest of the world's parents and grandparents all got treated with standard of care as remdesivir 

at the hospitals. So we didn't even have Grand Theft World back then. You would have had to have been following me on Twitter to get that life saving information or any of that type of stuff Exactly. Like the like, when it was going on, not even two months later when they started banning it. Go back to my tweets in March eleventh to nineteenth of twenty twenty and check for yourself. And I'm obviously not a doctor, but I can state for certain that, I'm on the lower third, so I'm sure I will fix that later. But, 

I can say for certain that at least within my family and myself, we've used ivermectin, things like vitamin d, n a c, vitamin c. This is what we just did for ourselves, and it worked quite effectively, even for those of you, like myself, who are not vaccinated and for those in my family who were, there's a mixture of people who were and weren't. And we found it to be very safe, effective, and, worthwhile as well as alongside nutraceuticals and rest and recovery, all the standard things you would do for a flu for the most part. You know, so it's not unsurprising. 

Also, I mean, I have on the show card here, Jimmy Dore. I don't know when it necessarily need to play this, but he he had a clip here, what I learned by being targeted and banned on Twitter. And it's talking about he had a interview again with Stanford professor Jay Bhattacharya, who's one of the coauthors of the Great Barrington Declaration. And he, you know, has a very enlightening interview as to, like, what his experience was being a Stanford epidemiologist, very well respected, including one of the ones as well as at Oxford and that others, major epidemiologist who was shut down. I think it was a Ron Johnson or another senate Senate president. DeSantis. Yeah. They both did things Oh, DeSantis. I was at DeSantis. Yes. Yeah. Yeah. So DeSantis did the one with the Stanford, Yale, and and And Oxford. And Oxford or Harvard or somebody. Yeah. They got banned. And, 

Johnson did the ones with, Pierre Kory and the other ivermectin hydroxychloroquine. First front frontline Oh, that one. That was that. Then he had another one with Ryan Cole and and, Robert Malone and people So by censoring Johnson and DeSantis in those cases, people died because they didn't get in touch with that life saving information and be able to weigh an informed choice. Instead, they were unwitting participants, uninformed participants in either a biological weapons release and or the antidote being offered after, the, the antibodies, I think, was pretty legit. They can use that in other areas. But they took that away. As soon as it started being effective, they took it away from everywhere 

to push people back toward a Pfizer or J and J or AstraZeneca. And I remember last year when, Bill Bill Gates had a, I don't see. Moderna. Moderna. Yeah. Yeah. I remember Bill Gates had a sort of list for twenty twenty two, his sort of, like, nears sort of reflection on what the upcoming year was. Germ team. It was like a it was a blog or something. Tracker. And I forget it was twenty twenty two or twenty twenty one, but I remember reading through it. And we actually got it on the show, so you can go back and review that episode. It's so long ago now. But and then he'd stated how, you know, at the beginning of the pandemic, we thought monoclonal antibodies would be useful, but we figured it would be difficult to manufacture them and distribution all this stuff. Yet, it seemed as though that wasn't really an issue and that the government was creating an artificial sort of scarcity. There was enough, but they weren't allowing it 

to go to places that were using them, particularly Florida and other places that didn't abide by the political script, that, is being written in America right now. So it didn't seem like that was completely truthful by Bill Gates. And they had considered that as an option and possibility and something they invested in. But, you know, he talked about logistics, all these other nonsensical issues that weren't an actual issue as, you know, government created artificial scarcity, by not allowing it to be distributed. And so, yeah, that was also very useful and much more, obviously, by many orders of magnitude safer and effective than the vaccine. And and arguably, ivermectin is much much safer than, 

than even that. So yeah. It's yeah. And that brings us full circle back around to Trump. And the the more dependent you are on authority, the more scared into obedience you're gonna be. Trump was one of those people. He was funded by the pharma companies. Oh, yeah. Fauci said he would face a pandemic. He didn't know what that meant. They put a bill in front of him in, September seventeenth twenty nineteen, like the the vaccine refurbishment, they're gonna bring in mRNA. They had made all these decisions. He they got him to sign off on it. They got a bunch of orders. He just signs off. He doesn't know what he's doing. 

No. Come on. Let's be honest here. Nobody's cluing him into what they planned for him. They made him a character on their game show for Christ's sake. Do not see what's been going on. Don't misinterpret that translator. I didn't say the other word. I said not dash s e e. That's what I said. Jeez. Gotta watch yourself these days with these algorithms and YouTube translations and whatever is going on in the back end over on that pirate channel. That's true. I mean, the vaccine modernization act with twenty nineteen. 

Right. There you go. Yeah. Vaccines in twenty nineteen. I I forget November. It was late, I believe, in twenty nineteen. People who do those get paid by the letter, so they use a longer title than I did. But it was them. It's like a modernization type of thing. Mhmm. And, they wanted to go as they said in, I think it was the same year that Michael Milken. Right? Michael Milken thing was the next month. Yes. So they got they Fauci et al, BARDA, Rick from BARDA, all these people. They got Trump to sign that executive order in September, and then they were like right over to Peter Daszak, and they're they're doing the milk inform, and they're saying, well, if only we had an emergency where we could speed, you know, these mRNA things into the public. 

And they're like, well, what if? Can't we just do it? They're pretty brazen if I might speak clearly about it. I don't know if we have that clip easily referenceable, but we played it many times on the show. But I also know sending people to the web page to find a clip like that can be arduous for them. So if we have it laying around, what's his name? Rick? Rick Bright. From BARDA? Rick. Rick Bright from from BARDA. I'm sorry. Which is like BARDA's bright. A government, biological research, DARPA type agency, 

and they're sitting on stage with the New York Times reporter. You can probably find that. I mean, that's on Rumble probably almost immediately. I got get a quick clip of that. The fingers are dancing over there. And the chest fixing the lower So the relevance is it these guys are sitting on stage, and they're like, our Santa dream list would be this. And at the same time, they're sitting on stage, event two zero one's going on. And at the same time, they're sitting on stage, not identical days, but during the same month. The pandemic is breaking out from a lab in Wuhan, 

and security measures are being taken at the lab in Wuhan because it broke they knew this. But they weren't worried about where it came from because they lied to the public at every every step of the way from the end of January when Dazsak wrote the false paper for The Lancet to, Collins and and Fauci covering up and running, running at, all the doctors that were asking questions and getting people like doctor Christian Andersen to reverse their positions in four days without any new evidence. Oh, here it is, by the way. Oh, here you go. Trump for White House archives. So I found the clip as well, but just so people They weren't caught by surprises, my point. That should tell you something. There's this executive order on modernizing 

influenza vaccines in the United States to promote national security and public health. This was September, not November. So September did such a good job. Alright. They did such a good job that the the flu then disappeared for two years. Believe that. Yeah. That's another I had a that on the show card, actually. I think it was John Bound did that really good video. I had him last week's show card about, how the flu disappeared and getting into the numbers. He also did get one on miscarriages as well. Oh, right on. Well, I haven't seen that, so we could play that next. We could play we could play those then. No. There's the executive order signed by Trump who also promoted the vaccines, and everyone who promotes the vaccines ever since said they wouldn't take the vaccine when Trump said it. But now it's a good idea, but nothing changed. And to look here, we can highlight a couple things here. 

Let's see. Can you search mRNA? Do they say miss miss or not? So for the first thing is, a, further implement vaccine production process improvements to reduce the time required for vaccine production, for example, to the use of novel technologies for vaccine seed virus development and through implementation of pro potency and sterility ass assays. There's another one here. Further So they're not saying okay. So this is the gist. This is what Tony's showing you. They're not gonna say m r we're not they're not gonna say we're gonna go from egg based vaccines to mRNA based vaccines, and we're gonna circumvent twenty or thirty years of development and testing that we should do, we're gonna go straight through that. So they don't use that exact language in the executive order. But when you couple this executive order with the clip we're about to see from, the Milken Institute, 

you're able to put two and two together and verify one one one one. Oh, that's cool. Clip of the program. I got it. I don't know. Bigger. Yeah. Okay. Awesome. And then before we go to that real quick, here on point c, further support the conduct and collaboration with the DOD, BARDA, and CDC of applied scientific research regarding developing cell lines and expression systems that markedly increase the yield of cell based cell lines and expression systems that markedly increase the yield of cell based and recombinant influence of vaccine manufacturing processes. And so I misheard you. You said DOD, not DOE. Right? 

Or does it say DOE? We do have a lot of those on here in Pennsylvania. Department of Energy, I thought they might have straight up just been referring to us as batteries. I mean, like, our power source management system. But it's a DOD, Department of Defense. Alright. That makes sense. Of Defense. DARPA. Yeah. Yeah. DOD alongside BARDA, and then the CDC of applied scientific research using cell based recombinant influenza vaccine. Recombinant is sort of a euphemism for sort of gain of function. Yeah. We looked up 

gain of function style. Recombinant's a type of chimeric, gain of function technology that's utilized in cell lines where they introduce many different viruses, the different types of cell lines, and that through a process of recombination, we'll develop novel mutations that may or may not make that particular influenza strain or spike protein or whatever more infectious. And that's that's the way in which people and Anthony Thalassian is does it would go sophistry, was able to sort of weasel his way out of the questioning by, Rand Paul in regards to see, well, gain of function specifically, it's it's about, you know, the, 

it it happens when you specifically make it more infectious, but sometimes it it got less infectious. So that means it's not gain a function by definition. And I'm like, oh, man. This got Yeah. Because Fauci's speaking in, like, the law of averages. If only two of the resolves were gain of function and the other were loss of function, then he would say, on average, it's it's not gain of function because he could speak in between zero and one like he's Zeno without seeing the paradox. Oh, and that's and that's Tony, your science is so big. 

Oh, that's a new one. That's pretty funny. I mean, that and then that they might just have to take it. You know? Take it. Down boys are gonna get working harder, Tony. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. So Well, you don't even have to think about it. That's a good thing because we'll just go on. We don't have to think about it, dude. There we go. Yeah. Hell yeah. Is always a little slow on the uptake. So And then the last, 

part part here, let me just read this and we go on to the clip. D, assessing coordination with BARDA and relevant vaccine manufacturers to use some potential effects of using advanced manufacturing platforms for influential vaccines to the director of the CDC. So the idea is, like, they're gonna use recombinant processes in cell lines, basically gain a function to create a new technology using mRNA and, you know, viral vector technology like, J and J Janssen vaccine and also the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine. 

And these will essentially tell your cells what to do, what genetic technology produce the spike, the synthetic form of the spike, and so forth and so on. And it's a BARDA DOD. It's in collaboration with DOD, BARDA, and the c o CDC. And in coordination with BARDA, they're gonna work with BARDA and vaccine manufacturers. Wait a minute, dude. Hold on. Hold on. Hold on. It almost sounds like they had cut a deal in September for something that they then talked about in October as if it hadn't had a deal cut already for it, which is fascinating 

Mhmm. Because it tells me those dudes on stage were putting on a show and not so much free thinking and hypothesizing at that time. They were speaking toward what they just got the power to do in that executive order, which is why they were speaking the quiet part out loud. No. They were certainly speaking the quiet part out loud. Did the New York Times cover that? I don't I don't think they did. No. You heard it here on Grand Theft World. Let's play that clip. Alright. Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine we haven't given to anyone yet. But there must be some way that we grow vaccines mostly in eggs the way we did in nineteen forty seven. In order to make the transition 

from getting out of the tried and true egg growing, which we know gives us results that can be, you know, beneficial, I mean, we've done well with that, to something that has to be much better. You have to prove that this works, and then you've gotta go through all of the clinical trials, phase ones, phase twos, phase three, and then show that this particular product is gonna be good over a period of years. That alone, 

if it works perfectly, is gonna take a decade. There might be a need or even an urgent call for, an entity Right. Of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and and and processes. So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza, and it's gonna be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is. We're gonna address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way because you do need both. But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of an, novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere. 

We could get the RNA sequence from that, beam it to a number of regional centers, if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch and self administer. That reminds me when Anthony Fauci is sitting there saying it would take too long, all these phase one, two, three trial blah blah blah. That's reminds me of, Maddie Bannon, who's now represented on the, on T Lab, for her work in the COVID collaborative, 

her essay on, doctor Robert Caleb from Duke University. Because he's the one who innovated the whole real world data, real world evidence model where you skip all those trials and where you jump right to, what Nazis called applied biology, but now what they call precision medicine. So I just see a little bit of a continuity there. Ominous one. That's neo semanticism. Thank you. They're neo semantics. Yeah. More like rebranding. They're assigning new meaning towards. 

Right? So I'm not trying to be anti semantic by saying that. But I'm saying, let's get fact up by just taking what we know and laying it on you know, let's just lay it out on the table here. You got that executive order. Well, let me just start here. You got the closure of Fort Detrick, America's Bioweapons Laboratory in August of twenty nineteen. The following month, not saying these are all related, the following month in the timeline, September, executive order for the restructuring of how they make and produce and distribute vaccines. 

Then in October, you've got Event two zero one, you've got the release of the pandemic, and you've got Fauci and Rick Bright from BARDA talking at the Milken Institute, all talking about the same thing. And then from there, they had eco health and Peter Dazsak running, interference on the medical journals. They had Fauci and his boss, Francis Collins, run an interference in America censoring and censoring dissent, and then they censored any alternative treatments. 

Right? So dissent and treatments were all censored. And from there, they had a clean getaway, and they knew people would catch on. But by then, the damage is done. You can't get it out of your bodies from what we know today, but we can always discover stuff that maybe does it in the future. I don't know. First, we would have to understand a problem. Now Fauci called that a problem. What do they do with problems? They look to solve problems, right? That's what they're getting those big budgets for. And their way of solving it was a disruptive inside job based on ideology to take control of the constitutional 

republic process and your representative democracy, run it into the ground, and they can run it into the end zone for the great reset, yay, globalism, end freedom forever, and they can back it up with biological and nuclear weapons. And let's not forget, you know, just to circle back a little bit, Saki style to what what Clayton and Natalie are mentioning on redacted is that these this spike in all cause mortality has been recognized for months and months now. Insurance companies are the ones that came out that act actuaries. Exactly. And you look at the actuarial tables and you juxtapose it to the rise in death amongst, like, eighteen to forty year olds, something like that. It was the younger reigns where you should be They weren't at risk from the COVID itself. Correct. 

A little patch So they know and the the other thing to consider there is, I think Del Bigtree did probably one of the best segments on this, maybe through a Jeffrey Jackson report where they're both going back and forth about this. But they did a breakdown of not just, a couple of different insurance carriers, but most of the major insurance carriers and you saw at least the fifteen, twenty, twenty five percent. I think the highest was around forty percent for some insurance carriers. But even the biggest one still had twenty, twenty five percent increase in all cause. Now that portends, 

as sort of it's sort of it's a portends circumstantial evidence that we should look towards and use as a hypothesis and epidemiology to then study what's going on. Then from epidemiology, we should take it and actually get into actual bodies and see what's going on that might cause this. Is it vaccine related? Is it COVID related? Is it something totally different? Depression, maybe. I mean, it could be anything. I'm just saying, like, that's how science is supposed to be conducted. And instead, it was not allowed to move forward is what we're now finding out. And what a surprise with all the other, sort of data points you brought up earlier about what they did during the pandemic 

that was really anti science, but can't question the science. So I think, their actions prove over and over. They weren't curious as to what is this thing and how do we solve it. They at every avenue blocked off pursuit from them in their getaway with Grand Theft World. That's exactly right. And what the all this does as well as, like, the Ukraine Russia conflict and all the other con and sort of the the wokifying of the world through postmodern rhetoric and and philosophy and all this sort of nonsense we're seeing in the culture is perpetuate 

and speed up to their agenda twenty thirty program that the WEF is essentially the front man for and the front organization, in other words, for The UN handles nations. The WEF handles corporations. And none of these things are being representative of the people's will. And they don't need informed consent because we're not seen as people anymore. Exactly. And that it's it's moving, with great haste to the CBDC technocratic model model that, you know, Quigley, that is really the inspiration behind your research and the the development of all of what you've done as a forensic historian, 

mentioned that they want total financial control. But now they can have total biological control and financial control. So they can get both. That's what they're moving towards. And that's all these did was ramp that up, move that forward at a great greater speed, and now we have what the what was that new pandemic planning sort of a seminar or The Sears. The Sears program is going for, that new new virus. It also starts in their simulation. Just like event two zero one, it also starts out Brazil. And what did Bill Gates say? It was so interesting. He's like, the next one's going to be much worse. 

You wanna sound more like Terence McKenna, but you get the point. So Culture is not your friend. Yeah. Terence McKenna teach you a lot more than Bill Gates. Oh, that's for damn sure. Yeah. What I don't get is why Trump listened to Gates when Gates is like, you don't wanna look into that stuff. That all that that Robert f Kennedy stuff, stay away from him. Right? Or it's even he's even in that clip saying, some guy named Robert f Kennedy. Like, he he I don't know. Do you not know who he is or you're playing like you don't know who he is? You know, some guy, you don't know who Bobby Kennedy Junior is? Okay. And then Trump actually didn't have better people around him to but what do you expect, man? He's a talk show host. Oh, that You know what? It was a game game show game show kinda comedy thing that he did. Well and there's a lot of very strange connections. We're reading through volumes. The last book club was phenomenal. Friday, Matty Bann's hosting, 

for the GTW community. So if you wanna become a subscriber, Grand Theft World dot com, top right hand corner. Every other Friday, Maddie Bandon hosts a, One Nation Under Blackmail Book Club. And last week went, like, an hour and a half, and there's a lot of very interesting connections even with Trump. And Assad keeps popping up Probably closer. Than you could ever, man. Oh, yeah. We're we covered Wexner last week in particular, and that was quite fascinating, especially his connections with mafia and some very spurious and very strange, hit jobs that were done and very and professional. It reminded me so much of Paul Fiction. What was the guy in Paul Fiction, Rich the Wolf? Winston Wolf. Yeah. Winston Wolf who comes in. There's almost that exact scenario that happens in regards to the Shapiro murder. And that Wexner seems circumstantially very oddly enough connected to. And so you can see, you know, the The gist is there's a there's a couple layers to that. Right? There's the Epstein layer. But as far as the Wexner layer, there's, 

So it's this connection with the mafia potentially if that's the There's a yeah. The way I was gonna explain it, because I grew up in Western Pennsylvania, and and I've been to Ohio and Youngstown. So, there is a a semi well known mafia family, organized crime, that operates out of that area. And, that family might have owned professional sports teams like the San Francisco forty niners. It might still own it. I don't know. Yeah. Dave Bartolo. Was the denovese crime. No. He's saying that he still lives in Pennsylvania, dude. I'm I'm out of state. I'm not talking. Oh, shit. Yeah. Actually, yeah. Good point. I mean, now I appreciate the forty niners. They're playing The point. Chris and McAffrey is having a hell of a year. Okay. Good good segue. The point is, the mafia controls, 

the mall. So they buy big piece of land. They have the money to develop malls. And Wexner is somebody who had stores that went in malls, the limited brand of stores which are the limited express Yeah. Victoria's Secret, stuff like that. Right? Yeah. So now he's got spaces in there and they started working together. And then Epstein goes and he starts working with Wexner and he brings in this Israeli Mossad blackmail British royal family angle to the whole thing. And, yeah, the second the second volume of her book is definitely super spicy, but you need the first volume to understand 

One Nation Under Black Male, the history behind it because it's really interesting going back a hundred years almost. But then the second volume teaches you, like, what's happened in the last couple years? Why is Epstein in the client list the thing, and where does it connect into? What doesn't it connect to? So the same people that persecute, an a Julian Assange, an Elon Musk, an Andrew Tate, these types of care like, it's the same group of people that's on that client list or protecting that client list at the very least. Yeah. Exactly. And we covered, there is Fisher who's connected with deep state Mossad, 

and Hugh and Talvin. But Fisher, in particular, had a hand in essentially the Aliyah's, you know, force essentially pseudo force migrations of North African Jews to Israel as well as arms dealing with between the Reagan administration. He had direct connection with H. W. Bush. She's he he's also mentioned, I think, in the third chapter, we chapter twelve or something because she just continues from volume one to volume two numbering of the chapters. We did cover some of volume one as well, particularly the BCCI scandal chapter seven and eight. C seven in particular because that I don't know how many times he's already referenced in the first three chapters, the second volume, chapter seven. 

BCCI is sort of a linchpin of so much of what's happened in regards to the continuity of big government and mafia being one in the same thing as rich state. They're they're really two sides. And then Tony said a word there. No. We're not talking about the the r and b singer who died in a plane crash, Aaliyah. We're talking about the first Aaliyah, the second Aaliyah. Mhmm. These, moves to colonize Israel. I'm sorry, Palestine before it was Israel almost a hundred years later or sixty, seventy years later after that. Right. And it starts with persecution in the eighteen hundreds and a seek to move to, a place where they're not being persecuted anymore, which is very reasonable. 

And it was a a timeline that had a a philosophical and political underpinning before the persecution even happened. So those two things, eventually start the colonization and the Aliyah movement all the way up through, the the creation of Israel in nineteen And and and after that because operation Moses, operation Solomon, which are Aliyah's, they also happen in, like, the nineteen seventies and eighties. And Fisher, who's connected intimately with Wexner and then Epstein, essentially is one of the sort of, what what did I say? The one of the ones sort of orchestrating 

this this continuing of mass migrations. Now the question that was posed in the book club is, like, why would why would they need to get more Jews to Israel? It's, like, was there a diverse group of people already in what was not called Israel before nineteen forty eight? I don't know. It's a speculation. Just, you know, Coptic Christians, you had Securus, you had Islamist, you had a whole bunch of different people that seemingly lived at least some basic piece. And And then all of a sudden, there's this UN ratification in nineteen forty eight for the state of Israel, and everything just kinda gets kinda weird from there. You know? Well, there are definitely 

black Jews from Ethiopia and The m I and m MI six set up Mossad. Right? Or was it was it the CIA through the MI six that set up Mossad? CIA did not. Negative on that goes right around. So MI six created both, CIA and Mossad. And they had Reinhard Galen help to create, certain policies and procedures because he ran in Mossad and CIA. I was really let me just show you in the history blueprint because I was really incredulous when I when I was I was like, wait. This guy's a top Nazi, and they they let him work with paperclip, and then they had him over, with Mossad. So let's go to Galen, 

g h l e n. Let's see. There's doctor Franz Six who worked with the Galen org, but here's Reinhard himself, and he helped to bring in other Nazis into paperclip like Otto Scorsese, Klaus Barbie, all these people we talked about last week in the, the, the Odessa, the stay behind Nazis That it's kept being Nazis after the war ended. So, Reinhardt Galen is used to train, some OSS. 

There first off, CIA didn't exist until after World War II. Right? So during World War II, OSS is running spies. They pick him up early. And then you have he's part of the, like, the the the, the people that Kissinger and these guys pick. So Kissinger was early on working with Nelson Rockefeller and the United States military in sifting these Nazis, and there was operation let's see, we call it, 

there's ash can and dust bin. There's two different operations. I could go to those after this. So anyway, Galen helps to create, what becomes Mossad, you know, Israeli, secret, special forces, secret service type activities over the past few years. Connecting glue between CIA and Mossad as far as the creation of both in a way. And then the next guy who becomes the connecting tissue of CIA and Mossad is, Angleton. James Heeses Angleton. Okay. Yes. Hesus is how you pronounce his middle name. Yeah. We're not making fun of him. That's that's how he pronounced his middle name. That's all. It's not Jesus or Jesus. My Jesus. 

But Galen was running the Arab Nazis. So the Islamic fascism I see. Okay. Was groomed by those Nazis. So he set up the counternarrative then between, like, what is modern day Hezbollah or Hamas? Right. And then given to MI6, and then, what's his name? Philby at MI6 sells it to Dulles, and then it becomes Operation Cyclone in America and Mujahideen and Osama bin Laden. And it was the individual individual that wasn't Loftus. Who's the individual you interviewed that, was an expert on this? We showed it a number of times on the show, but he's the one who specifically was a Loft 

John Loftis. John Loftis. John Loftis. John, of course. Quick. Here here's camps Ash these are camps. Ashcan and Dustbin. The American protection of Nazis, and then the British had so British had let's see. We call it an ash can. I don't know. There's one's a British name and one's an American name. I forget which is which. This is an Anglo American Bush dynasty kind of approved. Right? The people who funded the Nazis put this together to sift out work where they can get some more Nazis for the Odessa network and the Nazis post World War two. You get guys like George de Moreschilt 

whose name is in, let's see. He's connected to Austin. Isn't it h w books? Or h w's, like, little black book he had when what his name was murdered? I mean, it's a weird yeah. Yeah. So the Demore and Shelt real quick. He's got a brother, Dimitri. So now you can, like, check into to both these characters. But DeMaurin Shelt, when he's found dead, he has an address book, and in there is George h w Bush's book. That's it. But he also has a very important connection to Lee Harvey Oswald during the whole Kennedy assassination. And there's some he also has connections to Abraham Zaputa. 

So There's a connection to Purich through our Gordon Wasson. So it's like an operation Gladio it's like an operation Gladio frontage that's, able to be put into motion there during that event. Anyway, the American and British protection of Nazis and then the things that came out of that, commando groups, Navy SEALs. Does Navy SEALs exist before this exists right here? Well, it doesn't Because they took a lot of these German guys, like, not Skorzeny. Where's the other guys that they used for these types of things? They used a bunch of these German guys to start training special forces in Britain, America, and Israel at the same time. Doesn't that come out of the, what we went over a couple weeks ago with the train murders, like, the trained assassins, 

out of the the British group? Yeah. Yeah. Camp X. Camp X. Yes. Other camps. And then you get special groups like, yeah, Navy SEALs or the the army version, which is army rangers, so so forth and so on. So Yeah. So there there's a lot to all that. Yeah. But pretty good. The point is most people need to get their learning on before it's not gonna matter anymore, and you just need to do what you told. That was the reason why I brought that up is because there's been more mentioned about Mossad than even the CIA, at least in the second volume. So it's just been something that has been tickling the back of my mind. And we're I'm talking about in Whitney Webb spoke One Nation of Black Male volume two. That's come up more often than not, Lasad 

and the connection with Jewish royalty and elite, sort of secular Zionists, if you will, that, have you know, are connected to Wexner, connected to Epstein and have Yeah. They're part of a secular humanist conspiracy. That's right. That's right. It's not yeah. They're not religious Jews. This is not It's not like Kanye said. So we're talking we're talking about something way different over here. Correct. Correct. Yeah. But, anyways, it comes up all the time, and it got me thinking, like, what's the connect? Was it CIA the one that or the like, m I six train you know, like, sort of trained us to OSS that then became CIA in nineteen forty seven or forty eight. But then when Assad because it wasn't till nineteen forty eight that Israel became, quote, unquote, a nation 

that then, when were they trained? Where they trained by our CIA? What was trained by MSIX, but it seems like that's not the truth. That was actually Richard Galen or, excuse me, Reinhardt Galen That was sort of the connecting glue, if you will, the middle term and a syllogism for those who is nerdy about logic as I am. That would be the and here's with the Whitman. And this is a fictional book. Right, Rish? That has an honest or a truthful tale. It. We can unpack it because not everything's as it appears. 

So it appears as a novel that you could find on the shelf at a bookstore. Right? It's just a novel. They don't they don't keep such an eye out for novels. Right? As they do, like, here's factual whistleblowing books. So I would go to Not a narrative structure is a little bit more digestible. People might read it more. You know? Okay. Let's let's try it like this. Oh, we gotta get rid of this other screen so I can see my book. 

Seconds. It only takes a second. Alright. So this book is called let's zoom out. The weight industry. It's a novel. It's very important. It's a novel by Brendan Howley, who writes novels, and John Loftus, who doesn't regularly write novels. He's a researcher. He's an author. He has impeccable books on the United States and the Nazis and the Vatican and the rat lines and Operation Paperclip and United States, America's Nazi secret and unholy trinity 

and a whole bunch of books that he wrote based on really good research. He had a top secret cosmic clearance I think it was cosmic clearance, at United States National Security. He had access to the the acres and acres of underground vaults of secret national security information at Suitlands, Maryland. And I've interviewed him, over a weekend, so this is not somebody who's just writing a novel. This is somebody who came across real documents and then needed a way to get that narrative to the public. So he goes and partners with somebody who knows how to write a novel, 

and he writes this this book called The Witness Tree. Now the woman on the steps, one of the main characters in this book is, the sister of John Foster and Allen Dulles. And she ends up marrying somebody who was pro Zionist and then he ends up dead very suspiciously, almost as if the Dulles brothers whacked him so that he didn't get any further down the road with his sister, which would, you know, be a little point of good so anyway, there's there's the novel part of it and that part of the story. 

That is not why you read a book like this. So in the post script, before I show you anything from the novel, let me show you why it's a novel and why you might wanna check out the book. This is a novel, but much of what you have read throughout it is based on known fact, Although the most intriguing elements are still classified, some isn't. There were there were no Neemans, for instance, So he made up that family, renamed another family to to so he didn't get, you know, busted for talking about them. 

But Baron von Schroeder knew Foster Dulles and Sullivan Cromwell record of involvement in cloaking the Nazi assets, and that's clear. And then, Reuven Shiloh did in fact mastermind the Mossad from the networks we recount. Eleanor did work with the Quakers in France in nineteen seventeen and had a particular a peculiar habit of turning up in Allen's life at critical points just as we suggest, not the least in Trieste in nineteen forty six, but that's for another book. And then he he goes through that aside from how they dealt with the Nazis, 

the part that I'm going to read from is right here. So we're going to we're going to hear a story of how Nelson Rockefeller was blackmailed by a proto Mossad participant, who was a Hagenau agent back then. And this had to do with the blackmailing of Nelson Rockefeller in order to get, Nelson Rockefeller's Latin American UN votes for the state of Israel to become a country accepted by the United Nations. So this is from 

I don't see if there was page number on here. It's just in a postscript of this book. It's from the second page. John John Loftus personally interviewed the Hagenau agent who had firsthand knowledge of the blackmail of Nelson Rockefeller. This guy right here, Nelson Rockefeller, you'll see it in a second. Prescott Bush was indeed up to his eyeballs in the Union Bank affair with Nelson Rockefeller. And some believe, as John does, Brendan not so sure, he's a novelist, that the Bush family fortune stemmed from his 

single union banking corporation share. Certainly, the Bern Berlin wiretapping story is true. John has never seen the intercept, that opens the novel in a slightly different form at Fort Meade. So he did see the the the intercept at Fort Meade, the National Security Agency's massive archive when his NATO level security clearances allowed him to roam the vaults at will. Eleanor Lansing Dulles died at the age of one zero one in ninety six. 

There's another character, Misha, but you don't need to know about that right now. So now let's go to the recounting of the blackmail of Nellie Rockefeller, and that is in the later parts of the book. And surprise, surprise, it happens on a date familiar in history. Most people think of this date as a nineteen sixty three date, but you see there's a very important precedent prior to that date on November twenty second. And let me just move the microphone over a second. We just longer passage. 

And if you hang in here for how many pages, Do we have to read all these pages? No. So let's just give you the gist. Let me catch you up. These guys are sent from Jerusalem to blackmail, Nelson Rockefeller. They go to Rockefeller Center, they go up the elevator to his offices. They go in and they throw down a dossier on his table to blackmail him. And on page four hundred and twenty six, reads as follows. 

The effect on Rockefeller was palpable. Even his eyes, even his eyes went from the dossier to Elam and then to Misha who constantly slowed his, consciously slowed his heart rate to something that didn't register on his temple with each pulse. So these guys were nervous because they're blackmailing one of the most powerful men in the world in order to get a nation state started, And the nation state is depending on them to get it done, and they're waiting for a callback in Jerusalem that this is done and that he's kept. Let's see how it goes. Now I'm just mentioning this because it does tie in with One Nation Under Blackmail, 

a book that, the book club in Grand Theft World Community has been studying for weeks and weeks. Let's let's get to these points. Rockefeller's eyes hit the first page. The current account records from nineteen forty three. Oh, is that a year he's funding the Nazis? Supposed to make him nervous. Let's see. You know, the the one guy goes and pours a scotch. Not a big deal. Rockefeller turns the page. Incredibly, Rockefeller did so. The next was a share structure of a very well known Swiss bank courtesy of files 

no one next to God in Switzerland had ever seen except a sweet young thing at the Zurich Public Registry Office who happened to know Israel Kifferman's son. The next page is very informative. I think even a journalist might follow its implications, Elon said. So they're just building up the blackmail. Rockefeller's hairline was suddenly shiny. Rivets of perspiration gathering there. He turned the page and moved his glasses back with a finger. Page three was a record of a nineteen forty four share transfer, 

a transfer tantamount to treason in any us jurisdiction. That's problem. Let's see. I lost my page one. Oh, jurisdiction complete with us treasury department letterhead. Well, they're powerful. They're connected to the Treasury Department in the United States. Rockefeller studied that one for a very long time. He looked up ignoring the scotch that one of these guys had poured for him, right? Because he's going to read the blackmail file. They poured him a scotch out of his own supply in his office. 

He looked up, ignoring the scotch. What's Ben Gurion want? Elon was already reaching for the files. Votes. He said simply Latin America votes for partition. We need all fifteen. You get us your votes. You say goodbye to this embarrassment. You can put the dossier right inside your safe. Rockefeller said nothing turning page after page, some faster, some slower. The US government documents giving him the most pause, 

right? Because the government in the United States already knew this stuff that's in their documents, but it's the other countries and other people in the world they're threatening to tell with the blackmail. Misha expected a rant or a confession, but there was only silence and the dim sounds of the city beyond the plate glass. Because they're in Rockefeller Center. You know the place where they light the Christmas tree every every season for Christmas? Rockefeller Center. Thirty nine. The home of British the home of formerly or prior to this blackmail, it was the home of British security coordination at Rockefeller Center. 

There is no trace of stress in the man now. His hand raised and when he spoke, his voice was flat and slow, almost a recitation, not a reaction. Think you can walk in here and waltz off with the whole damn store? Rockefeller rolled up the dossier, turned it into a cylinder, began tapping his desktop with it. Condition one, what I've read never sees a light of today. Clear? Well, that's understood. 

You got that right. If a word of this leaks out, you can tell Ben Gurion he'll be drilling for oil in his own backyard. Well, that's interesting because later in nineteen sixty seven, the whole USS Liberty is sunk so they can take over, I think, the Golan Heights, and now they drill oil in the Golan Heights. That's interesting. I'll personally guarantee that's the only place on the planet you'll you'll find it. Understand that. So he's threatening, like, you'll drill. You're not gonna find much. But now they did find some. That's good. Condition two, you want your country? 

You get your country. But only if you give up your pound of flesh at Nuremberg, meaning you can't prosecute Nelson Rockefeller and all those bankers that helped him fund the Nazis, which means the Nazis remained in control and the Nazi in chief was vice president of these United States in nineteen seventy four. Right? People don't get it. All right. So, not a single German banker goes on trial, not one. Oh, there was no banker's trial. Oh, that's funny. That's interesting, right? Cause there wasn't. 

Rockefeller stopped tapping the cylinder that he had made from the file and pointed it at Elam, but you don't get both. You can have vengeance or a homeland. That's a deal. That's the deal. I'll have to consult Jerusalem about that, Elam said with his voice flat. Consult all you like. Ben Gurion has one card, Rockwell. That's the science of leverage right there. Right. That this is an Yeah. Exposition in the science of leverage, everyone. Yeah. Oh, man. He waited for Ben Gurion to play his card. But, you know, Ben Gurion, he's good at playing cards, so this didn't end here. 

Consult all you like. Ben Gurion has one card, Rockefeller said easily, and you've just played it. Condition three, the Nazis we use as intelligence assets, they stay secret too. Total immunity. You don't touch them. You don't leak a word to the press. Oh, like they have influence in the press. They've vanished lock, stock, and barrel clear. Now all Elam could do was nod. Right? He's not even replaced. It's like, okay. The room had gone silent except for the ticking clock on the big Oak sideboard. 

You seem a sensible sort of fellow. Good. Condition four, you'll have your votes, but not a single American businessman or banker gets tarred with this. He means the Nazi funding stuff. Not me, not anyone. We didn't win the goddamn war to put half of wall street on trial. Rockefeller raised the scotch to his, his two guests. Thanks for coming. And then they said they need to make a call, and then they made a call, and then they cut a deal. 

And November twenty ninth nineteen forty seven, they get into voting for, becoming state recognized by the United Nations. Right. So Right. We were talking about Reinhardt Galen and his training, the Mossad and the blackmail networks of Whitney Webb mentioned in heavily in volume two, all these sort of things. So if you're reading and you get done with Whitney's book, you might wanna read the witness tree for a variety of reasons. I honestly would say it's the only novel I've read in the past fifteen years or so, 

but I read it because I knew there was source material upon which it was based. And, yeah, that's that's good firsthand source. Someone who was there blackmailing Nelson Rockefeller told that story and lived to tell that story is probably still alive today. Oh, so Nelson Rockefeller died pretty young with his head between the legs of a young secretary. Allegedly. Kinda like, what was that? Golden eye? I forget the one, 

the chick who is a hired assassin would go around and kill powerful people by having sex with them anyways. Just thinking of good old Ian Fleming stories, you know, double Or Zoolander. Either one. The Zoolander. Yes. Oh, boy. But So there's a long history of the Odessa network post World War II and the fact that, you're not allowed to talk about it anymore, because the people who's funded the Nazis, they're still here. They're they're still they're around. They're in control of things. They have goals. They're in with the great reset. They're into internationalism. 

I mean, Nellie Rock's brother, David Rockefeller, tells you he's a proud internationalist. And what they're accusing him and his family are doing, they're up to it. What are you gonna do about it? They're gangster. Exactly. And it's something it's a repeating theme so far, not only in volume one, but in volume two. When it comes even in volume one with chapter seven, Mossad pops up just as much as the CIA in regards to they're almost like the Middle Eastern branch of what was going on with the Arab constructed BCCI, which is basically a drug laundering child or a sex trafficking laundering, 

you know, money bank, if you will, that even when it fell, obviously, Gary Webb's book shows that there is still a continuity of this these actions taking place in the inner cities of America in regards to the cocaine smuggling. And, you know, BCCI was just but one of many different financial institutes. They had so many different holding companies, so many different, subsidiaries that were hiding the transactions. It's it's almost dizzying, when you read chapter seven. And that's in volume one, which we read as a sort of precursor to know what we jumped into. We're reading chapter by chapter of volume two. 

So Yeah. You almost need something to, like, organize all the that data right there. Now the Bank of Commerce and Credit International, it went on for a while, but then, like, the evidence of such things still going on were the Panama Papers just a couple years ago. Yeah. Twenty sixteen. And so there's, there's a lot going on with those Panama Papers because Mossack Fonseca there's a movie made called The Laundromat that takes this story, fictionalizes or not, two people who ran that, Mossack and Fonseca, 

and they tell you the story and it's many, many, many, many, many, many layers of you know, shell companies and all these, you know, nasty things they do to people. Yeah. The shell company layer. It's it's so many. It's yeah. It's literally dizzying. And, you know, with arms trading, especially in drug trading, those are the two main sort of assets they played with, but there is also implications of sex trafficking as well. But the arms trading was mass, especially in nuclear armaments back in the eighties and advanced weaponry 

and that sort of stuff. So it was, into India, into the Middle East with Pakistan and Iran. It's just goes on and on. So it's, Yeah. So you can Arrowwing and A movie like The Laundromat or you can go to Corbett Report eleven fifty six, New World next week with Pilato talking about the Panama Papers. You'd get the gist of why, you know, listen to a fifteen minute episode and then go find that movie, The Laundromat, and it's an hour and a half. And now you get another gist. And as you get more and more layers of of context, you get closer and closer to understanding, 

and then you don't have to put your head in the sand anymore. Because I think that suggests it might feel like, oh, it's disempowering to learn about how the world really works. How do you think it is? Do you think it's disempowering with your head in the sand and your ass in the air, knowing how these people roll? Take it. I don't think you should do that to yourself. So it's easier to look around and say, Okay, The world is not as tidy and cleaned up as I thought it was. But until we recognize how it really is, we can't make any effective changes to ourselves or to it that are going to be very long lasting. 

So start with yourself, move forward. Learn about Mossack Fonseca. The Panama Papers. That's the easier way to say it. See? They had good branding on that one. Panama Papers. They use that alliteration. TPP? TPP. You download TPP? You download the Trans Pacific Partnership? That's another one. Yeah. I can't play the acronym game all night long. You down with you down with MPX? Then stop hanging out with Paul Pelosi. Come on. 

Come on, man. Thought that stuff was circling that. Robert Leonard (3one thirty seven): How about that new, Alexander Pelosi documentary on the January sixth? Lawrence Lepard (3one thirty seven): Oh, sure. I have a video about that. Lawrence Lepard (3one thirty seven): Now, first, the thing that shocked me most about seeing the clip about this was that the Pelosi daughter has twenty five documentaries on HBO so far. It's like her fourteenth or twenty fifth. It was some ludicrously high, your mom must be the speaker of the house and we're cutting deals type of number. 

For a single filmmaker to have that, I mean, I don't think, you know, Ken Burns doesn't have that much stuff on a a premium channel network like that. What is going on? And then all of a sudden, in her prescient nature nature of of seeing the future, she knew to be there that day on January sixth to catch the crescendo of her mom's career. Did you see the transcript as well? You know, it's sort of a Yeah. Yeah. I did tweet that. Let's cover that story first because we have talked about who is Ray Epps. We don't know, but it seems like that would be somebody you'd have like suspect number one. And 

it turns out he might be suspect number one, and they still haven't looked at him like he's Hunter Biden's laptop or something. I don't know what's going on. Is he an informant? I don't know. But we might have to learn more. Yeah. I have an Alex Alex Jones clip talking about it. Or or do you want do you have any other No. Let's go to band dot video. Band dot video. Band dot video. We're not live there right now, but we are on the replay. So it's at the bottom of technology, economics, and politics. I'll highlight it there for you. Yeah. We have a jukebox of three hundred stories for tonight's episode. So Do have a lot. I was supposed to those John down down about the miscarriages and where did the flu go if we wanna get back in the flu vaccine. Oh, yeah. I do wanna cover that because I didn't see that last week at all. Alright. Let's get fact up with Alex Jones. 

Edition, December thirtieth twenty twenty two. Friday bombshell broadcast. You know, I have a blind spot. It's something weird that happens to me. When something is so massive and so huge, I learned about it this morning. I went and checked the congressional record and the j six committee record for myself, and I have a copy of it here in my hand. This was so big that I should have started the broadcast to mediate with us, and I meant to, but then I didn't. 

So I'm gonna hit the other news now, but when we come back, I'm gonna hit this. Please put the live show headline back up on screen. This makes me actually gasp for breath a little bit here. This is so insane. We're gonna play the clips. Ray Epps confessed under oath to orchestrating January sixth, And then they defended him in the New York Times, and the j six committee said he was a good person. We have him ramming signs into police. We have him telling people go into the breach. We have him saying attack the Capitol. 

And in the j six transcripts when he was interviewed remember we kept saying release those, release the fourteen thousand hours of footage they have from the thousands of cameras in the capital. They've declared national security on those and said they're not releasing them for at least twenty years, maybe like the JFK files and maybe here in sixty years. And Ray Epps told him he, quote, orchestrated it under oath. Now you know why he did that? 

The FBI did their job and subpoenaed his records. Remember, he was on the wanted list for the first few days, but that's the low level FBI. They were shut down, ladies and gentlemen. But under oath, they had his text messages where he was bragging to a family member that he orchestrated the break in. Well, we don't need Ray Epps to tell us that. We have him running around like a chicken with his head cut off, telling 

everybody to attack the Capitol days before and that day and ramming signs and tell people help him ram giant Trump signs into the police. And then it goes on from there. They ordered half the Capitol Police away to do crowd control at the Ellipse, a mile away, mile and a half away. And they said no to Trump, and Milley threatened to resign if Trump overrode him and tried to put National Guard there. 

Turns out general Flynn's brother who was in command put a direct request in and was overruled by the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff Anne Pelosi got involved and and had her film crew there with her daughter and for Netflix and to make a whole movie that day. And here came Ray Epps and their operatives to create a mob psychology where a few oath keepers and a few Proud Boys got involved once the police got manipulated into a fight. They couldn't win, 

and it's just like a bar fight. And if you ever seen a bar fight, I've been unfortunate enough to be dumb enough to be in a few of them. It looks just like an old western movie with John Wayne where one guy punches one guy, that guy punches the other guy, he falls over the table, people get mad, attack that guy, his buddies jump in, Their buddies jump in, and pretty soon, there's tables and stools and chairs flying around and and whiskey bottles hitting people upside the head. And that's exactly what they did. They had a million plus people march to that capital. We'd had Trump rallies everywhere that were peaceful, including two in DC right before it. We were there to show them that we weren't buying the fraudulent election and call for a legal ten day investigation by the senate that Democrats have called for before themselves in in previous elections. 

And I walked right into a damn trap, and I tried to stop people going in that building. So that's what happened, ladies and gentlemen, and they manipulated us into a bar fight with the police. The police were victims of being set up. The citizens were victims, and it was all deep state coordinated, ladies and gentlemen. And I showed up in the middle of the bar fight, got up on a big stack of chairs, and told people, stop. Don't go in. You're gonna get Kent stated. People are gonna get killed, and it happened 

thirty minutes after I gave that speech. Ashley Bennett got executed. So, see, I said I'm gonna cover it next segment, but I'm gonna I'm gonna cover it properly. Next segment, this is so big. And can you imagine why they sealed their investigation for twenty years at least? It's now sealed for twenty years, two decades. Absolutely 

criminal, while they ran around subpoenaing my records and harassing my crew and charging two of our crew that were peaceful there. And Owen Shroyer also told people not go in the building, and he's still facing years in prison. And the FBI, the justice department filed charges on him, and you read those charges. They say he went in the capital. They say he led an attack. They say he attacked police. He didn't go in the damn capital. They said in a federal filing to the judge that he committed perjury 

and that he does not work at Infowars. We've read the we've read the arrest filing and pre and and and later court filings, they still go to a federal judge and say, Owen Shroyer went in the building. Owen Shroyer attacked police. Owen Shroyer told people to attack. Owen Shroyer did the opposite. Owen Shroyer did not go in the building. Owen Shroyer did not attack police. Owen Shroyer tried to stop people. But Owen Schroyer is charged. 

And Sam Montoya I really like Sam. I said, Sam, you gotta stay here. We gotta have you and Harrison Smith stay. When we take the crew up there, you can't go. To show how lenient I am, I learned Sam was there when I learned he got footage of Ashley Babbitt being executed. And I chewed his ass out. And I like Sam, but it didn't matter. They tried to then charge me for ordering him to go in there. Then, obviously, they leaned on him, but he hasn't lied. 

But that's where all this is. That's that's what's going on with these people, and it's disgusting. Just like they set up the attack on governor Whitmer. Okay. I said I'd get to it next segment. I will. I told you that they provocateur it. I told you they had operatives that broke in. I told you they were gonna suppress the video inside the Capitol. They've suppressed fourteen thousand hours of it. And we looked at Ray Epps with his classic cutout of an intelligence operative running around for two days before and that day, saying attack the capital, go into the capital, him with big signs, helping it ram it into the police. 

And I wondered how he'd get away with it and what he'd say under oath. So under oath, the January sixth committee now has released thousands of transcripts of these depositions. And it turns out and I didn't just believe this when I saw it on Twitter, overhead shot, please. I went to the January sixth committee site, and I pulled up the page, and I've got it right here. We're writing an article right now for info wars dot com. This is not broken yet except on Twitter. On the afternoon of January sixth, Ray Epps texted his nephew 

about the events at the Capitol. I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it. And we wonder why he was never charged and why he's the only person whom Kinzinger and Cheney defend in the New York Times defense. So here's the actual section of it in his deposition, page sixty and sixty one. Question. So it looks like around nine AM, your nephew text you. 

You and Jim be safe. And then at two twelve on January sixth, that's everything broke in the capital, you text back. I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it. You know, the orchestra has an conductor who orchestrates the symphony. So let me read the actual quote instead of adding what I said. This is a pure quote. Question. So it looks like around nine AM, your nephew text you. You and Jim be safe. And then at two twelve PM on January sixth, you text back. I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it. 

And then they go on about what does orchestrate mean? Well, I I let it. This is the exact same time on the video that I just played. Help us understand this text. What did you mean by orchestrate? Why did you orchestrate? What did you orchestrate? Answer. I just meant that I got, you have to understand our relationship, uncle nephew. We hunt together. We fun with each other. We do that kind of stuff. What I meant my orchestrate was I help get people there. 

He goes on to say, at that point, I didn't know they were breaking the Capitol. He says on the video, go into the Capitol. I didn't windows had been broken. I didn't know anybody was in the Capitol. If I answer him, that means it was at two twelve. I was on my way back to the hotel. Yeah. Mission complete. So there you go. Running around, telling everybody to go in for days. They're doing it, helping Ram. 

It's him on the video, the big sign. I noticed you guys were playing it from the ground level. There's a shot above of Rahab's. They're directing people to grab the sign and then ramming it into the police. Yeah. Yeah. That's that's the shot from the ground. We have one from above. So if you don't find it for some reason, I wanted to add it in post, we archive this demand on video. Please put a note. But, yeah, that's him up close. There's a shot from above with him on the corner helping. So everybody else that they caught doing that went to jail, but not Ray Epps, ladies and gentlemen. 

Not Ray Epps. So that is a big big deal, ladies and gentlemen. Yeah. There's there's the actual footage of him with the sign, directing it, and getting others to push the sign over the police. So there he is, ramming over police in barricades, laughing and smiling, the job crew finding that. And there's Ray Epps 

on the video helping do it, but he's okay because he just orchestrated it. Isn't he a good person? Isn't he a wonderful person? He orchestrated it. I've said probably three hundred times, Ray Epps helped orchestrate the breach at the Capitol, and there he is ramming the sign over the police and directing others to help him ram police 

and run over them with a crowd and stomp on them. But he's their little darling because you know if it actually came out, you know who he works for. I would bet my last dollar that he's an FBI or CIA operative or informant. Just like it turned out, half the people in the Michigan group that went to supposedly try to kidnap the governor but never actually did it, it turned out the entire leadership were FBI agents and informants. Incredible 

information. Totally disgusting. And now they've sealed the rest of their report and all their data for twenty years. Why would you seal the investigation for twenty years? And now the article's gone live by Kellen McBreeney. He's gonna go super viral. It's on info wars dot com. You have trouble sharing info wars dot com? Copy it to your website or get somebody else to share it. I don't care. Just get the article out. 

Epps confessed in January sixth to many that he orchestrated attack on the Capitol, that he got the people there, that he grabbed a sign, a huge metal sign that he led people to ram it over the police and break the barriers. And then as soon as they got to the Capitol, he turned and left because it was mission complete. The article is on info wars dot com. You wanna fight the deep state? You wanna expose what they've done? 

This is bigger than the Hunter Biden laptop. Yeah. We know he's a Chinese spy. We know his dad's a spy. It's all in there. The pedophilia is the tip of the iceberg. But this, ladies and gentlemen, shows the committee knows that he said he orchestrated the attack, and he's there ramming signs into police and saying go into the capital, and we'll come back and play some clips of that. And he has not been arrested, but Owen Shroyer has and Sam Montoya has. And Stuart Rhodes has been convicted 

fraudulently, totally innocent. And now the Oath Keepers are on trial in a kangaroo court in Washington DC. Let's, finish up with, Ray Epps. And there's just so much huge breaking news right now. Idaho murder suspect, Brian Christopher. Kobager arrested in killings of four university students. Totally brutal. Non student reportedly alleged. We're gonna be covering that. I've got the inside baseball and the Andrew Tate situation, 

and we've got huge new government documents that just came out on COVID nineteen that are stunning. I I mean, we don't overuse the words epic, stunning, over the top, incredible bombshell. It's just all bombshell. And, of course, you're not gonna see hardly any of this on mainstream news because it'd be over for the New World Order if this stuff came out. But here here's rehab. You've seen the clips a hundred times, but I I don't wanna say something and not show it to you. I don't wanna say, hey. Here he is directing folks with a big sign to overrun the police. I don't wanna say it's in a transcript that he told in a deposition to the j six committee that he orchestrated the attack on the Capitol, 

and I'll show it to you. I don't wanna say here he is running around saying go to the capital tomorrow, go into the capital, and then the that day. We're gonna always show it to you. It's what we do. Here it is. Tomorrow, we need to go into the capital. Hang on. Into the capital. What? Tomorrow? I don't even like to say it because I'll be arrested. Well, let's not say it. We need we need to go I'll say it. Alright. We need to go in Shut the fuck up, Boomer. To the capital. The president is not speaking. 

We are going to the capital where our problems are. It's that direction. Please spread the word. Alright. No, Dave. But one more thing. Yeah. So can we go out there? No. When we go in Are we gonna get arrested if we go out there? Yeah. We don't need to get shot. Arrest us all. Yeah. He orchestrated it alright. 

And who cut the Capitol Police to half their normal number? You'd think with a big event like this happening, they double or triple the number. No. No. They cut the normal number. You'd have on a Monday or Tuesday afternoon when there's school kids there getting terrorist. They cut the normal number to half instead of tripling the number. Blocked Trump's call for ten thousand national guard. Blocked general Flynn's brother's call for that. And that big old disgusting New World Order maggot, general Milley, 

threatened to resign if Trump put trips on the streets. And they were gonna try to deliver Trump to the Capitol to set him up that day right as the breach happened, but the Secret Service said it's too dangerous. And then they said Trump grabbed the wheel and attacked the Secret Service. None of that happened. All lies all the time out of these people. And then Andrew Tate got gets in a big fight with Greta Thunberg. He was uncancelable, 

and so they set him up with fake charges he's already beaten once that the police found were not true. And let me tell you, when you're a public figure, ladies and gentlemen, that's what goes on. That's what happens, especially if you're a populist or conservative. Is Andrew Tate racy? Yes. Do you have a criminal record? No. But they're trying to give him one now as a message to anybody that is able to reach two hundred, three hundred, four hundred million young men in the West and other parts of the world. That's who he influences to be men and to be strong and to not be victims and to be masculine. 

They don't want masculine role models. And so it's for that sin that they're coming after him. Do I think his brand of masculinity, is mine? No. But I'm also not three time world champion kickboxer. I'm just, all time champion new world order fighter. Thanks to your support. Remember, I always give you the credit. We'll be right back. Alright. So, we'll we'll address that Tate Tate situation in a in a in a minute. But first, there's big numbers. 

Twenty years. They want to cover this up for twenty years, but you want to hold people, like, don't we have a right to speedy trial? There's been people held without trial for two plus years and they want to hide the evidence for twenty years. I smell something rotten there. Seems like they might be political prisoners being held and not criminal prisoners. And basically solitary confinement like conditions from my understanding. We summon them. So, like, very extreme holding conditions, in other words. 

Yeah. And I'm not too sure about, you know, Ray Epps. Let's consider him innocent until proven guilty, but he should definitely be a suspect. At this point, I would think that there's something going on. And, they've never been able to identify the alleged capital bomber, the pipe bomber, whatever down there even though they got this obscenely slow frame footage that allegedly you know, it has them, but it doesn't have them. You know? Because their tech down there just doesn't capture the megapixels and the frame rate enough to identify him for some reason in this case 

only. But I'm sure there's nothing corrupt going on behind any of those types of things, and we should probably, you know, ignore it. When the technocratic apparatus in place doesn't work for some individuals, but works for others. I don't know. It's just just noticing a weird They have enough footage of the event that you could watch an hour of footage and spend your twelve years in school again just on the capital footage. There's fourteen thousand hours of footage. There's fifteen thousand hours you spent in public compulsory indoctrination camp land. 

So that's a long time. That's a lot of footage. But they wanna hide that for twenty years for what reason? What could we learn between now and the twenty years that they're gonna get away with? You know, it's interesting that this seems to be repeating from, you know, reinforcing the election people brought to you by the same group of people. You know? Whether it's Pfizer, forever and how many years they tried was it sixty, seventy five, something obscene number. Obviously, JFK assassination records, you know, they continue to just leak out stuff that isn't quite meaningful, but, you know, then then extend it long You're right. It is. It's like the JFK documents, 

extremely long national security. And then the Pfizer forever may not be as long as it used to be. Right. I mean, that's one that that one is challenged by Aaron Siri, ICANN lawyer. And, that's not all I'm saying. Stuff for twenty years? Wouldn't you, if they're the government and you wanna rebuild trust, show the evidence, and then prosecute people. I have a hypothesis that maybe it's really not about rebuilding trust at this point. Maybe they don't need our trust anymore. Is that where they're at with robots and cybernetics, they think? 

Saw a picture of some Chinese firm with all these robot dogs reminiscent of the Black Mirror episode. Well, of course. All these crazy things. So, yeah, you know, getting ready to roll out the, I heard real dogs are bad for the planet, Tony. Yeah. I guess mammals are generally spayed and neutered because that that used to be the daily advertisement on The Price is Right. Bob Barker will tell you you have your. I didn't even know what spayed and neutered meant at that age. You gotta have it done to your dog or cat. I gotta you gotta tell my parents, get get a spayed and neutered. You know? So they've been carrying these messages for a long time for the robot dogs to take place. 

Sounds like a type of eugenics to me, regardless of the species. They call it breeding. Good breeding. Good breeding. Sure. Indeed. Oh, boy. So we go to the I have a Russell Brand on the, HBO documentary that was released live. That's that's I caught a couple minutes of that. So I too had those questions about, Alexandria Pelosi. Very strange. Just right above a little bit. Jay Gould (3one thirty four): Very, prescient. 

Maybe she has a magic ball. What do they call it? Crystal ball? No. She's with soccer over Like the way Kyle Dunnigan, you know, a little a little birdie toe. Whenever I I have a feeling and I write a law, and then I make lots of money in the stock market. So that's Nancy Pelosi with, the GIMP or the hammer rather. I keep using the analogy to pulp fiction because that seems to be ever too relevant. They're living the dream out there in California, Tony. They're living the dream. 

Yeah. It has to be it must be a dream for you to believe it. What was the quote that, what's his name said? You have to be asleep to believe it or something like that. It's called the American dream for a reason because you have to be asleep to believe it. George Carlin. George Carlin. Yeah. Alright. Bring out not the camp. This guy's Rusty Rockets on Twitter. His name is Russell Brand. He's gonna tell you about the the opportunistic filmmakers just like the Naudae brothers that were just there on nine eleven to capture that one event in history. Let's check it out. 

Oh, no. Nancy Pelosi isn't speaker of the house anymore, and she's a uncomplicated, brilliant, just, fair, lovely politician. That's why someone should make a documentary about her from a completely unbiased perspective because it would just show how great she is. Probably best to get her daughter to make it actually. Hello there. Thanks for joining me on this voyage to truth in this corrupt and crazy world that was to fill your mind with senseless propaganda, like this HBO documentary about Nancy Pelosi, who I'm sure is not actually evil, but does seem to be participating in a lot of congressional grandstanding and moral posturing, 

hagiography? Hagiography, or is it another case of Washington whitewashing? And, of course, we're doing this because of the new HBO documentary about Nancy Pelosi made by her daughter. In her fourteenth about Nancy Pelosi made by her daughter. In her fourteenth documentary film for HBO, acclaimed documentarian, Alexandra Pelosi, offers a candid behind the scenes chronicle of the life of her mother and speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi. How candid is it? My candid documentary go, what stocks are shared that you and dad own? And do you ever sit on regulatory boards of those same companies? And why did you elbow that little girl? For the children. So this documentary takes you through Pelosi's career milestones leading up to the inauguration of president Joe Biden in twenty twenty one. Filmed in a cinema verite style. Yeah. That's the only thing that's verite. Over the course of three decades, Pelosi in the house provides a unique longitudinal window into the life of a long standing democratic politician and history in the making. So what will it be? Filthy propaganda or what it claims to be, a verite or truthful look into the career of a politician? And the truth is I believe that there's nothing uniquely bad or cruel or wicked about Nancy Pelosi. It's just that if you are in that role, you likely have sets of interests, receive money from, and have affiliations with organizations that are ultimately at odds with the requirements, needs, and rights of American people. That's the only claim I'm making. She's not like Cruella De Vil or something. Although For the children. 

Hey, mom. Why did you choose this life? Greed. I didn't really choose this life. No. Not it chose me. Don't say it chose me. Don't use a cliche. Don't use a cliche right at the beginning of your trailer, and then expect us to come along with you and sort of go, oh, that this is about, like, one woman challenges in a male dominated world, as if the actual issue here is about gender and sex, which is admittedly obviously an issue in the world and in society. But when that issue is framed within a corrupt political system that ultimately exists to support the interest of You know already. Military industrial complex, big pharma, big food, mainstream media, don't pretend that it's a victory that someone's not got a dick. It shows me. Oh, no. It is that. Yeah. Politics was the life that we met. I have the high privilege as the first president to begin the State of the Union message with these words, 

madam speaker. Yes. Yes. Wow. Now let's go at war with Iraq. They've definitely got weapons of mass destruction, and she's definitely got female genitals. Yeah. Everything's cool. Everything's Woo hoo. Nothing to think about. What? Oh, well, to pull a statue down, it'll look good off the telly. We're there to do a job. Do you think that what they do is present you with certain issues that can appear like victories? Because I believe that there should be equality and people should be free to express themselves sexually in consensual ways however they want to and that identity is important and libertarianism and identity politics actually meet at the back as it were because you should be free to be whoever you are. But when these things are continually broadcast in your face, it might be as a bit of a distraction that centralized financial, corporate, military, industrial interests are carrying on in the business as usual way while you're sort of clapping blindly that someone's a woman. Some people count cheap at night. I count votes. I don't know what Paul's doing there. He seems to be counting something as well. Maybe he's Apple stocks, which seem to be doing well at the moment, but that's nothing to do with me. I don't have any connection to that. You can't get tired. You can never get tired. Are you gonna be on your best behavior tonight? Yes. I am. Don't do anything I wouldn't do. Thank you very much. 

Oh. Oh. Democracy. Oh. You there you go, baby. Take that, uh-huh. There's your democracy standing up to Trump, you sexist pig. I did you tear it up with a total pack of wax. What it does is it frames as meaningful the differences and distinctions that take place within that house. They are not meaningful. I recognize that people will say, oh, there might be a small gap, but millions of people live and die in that gap if this care package gets granted or that bill gets passed. But have a look at the trends over the last thirty years and look at who's continually benefiting, and you might come to some interesting conclusions about the true validity of the things that they say are significant and important. 

Let us pray that today, January sixth, it will be an epiphany for the American people. Look at the protesters outside the capitol. Oh my god. How did that guy get up there? Mister Redfemi, don't let anybody know where you are. To be fair, he probably doesn't know where he is anyway. We always knew that this responsibility would take us into the night. We'll stay as long as it takes. January sixth, I think, is pivotal and significant only in so much as the reporting around it attempts to suggest that there is something in there that is sacred. Suddenly, democracy is sacred. Don't storm that building. That's where we do all our business deals with Rafay and Lockheed Martin and fight. That's where our lobbying money is handed over. How dare you? How dare you knock over a statue of a person that used to take bribes? 

You're always odd message. There's no cracking you, Well, then, if that's what you wanna do, crack your mom. Yes, I do. I wanna crack you. We've been promised a candid documentary, and and it looked to me like a hagiography that presents Nancy Pelosi as a uniquely and solely benevolent figure who represents a victory for women's rights, which are important. That's why they always use that narrative because it's an important thing. But I believe they use it to mask areas of corruption, 

duplication, collusion, and even conspiracy elsewhere. Here are some things that could have been in that documentary, but may have made it a little more illuminating and valuable to a discerning viewer who's interested in understanding how the system works and how a particular figure within that system, like Nancy Pelosi, can be used to tell a story about democracy and in particular, its shortcomings because most of us are told and led to understand that the function of democracy is to allow the will of ordinary people to be enacted systematically across vast nations and wide populations. But many of us believe that what happens really is the establishment gets co opted by corporate interests and ultimately democracy becomes a kind of piece of theater. So maybe it's a good documentary on that basis. Here's some things that are not in that documentary that you might be interested to learn. Pelosi is one of the wealthiest members of Congress. Her and her husband Paul's net worth has increased rapidly over the past few years After generally hovering near an estimated hundred million dollars throughout the two thousand and tens, the Pelosi net worth began shooting up in twenty twenty and by the end of twenty twenty one had reached a hundred and seventy one million dollars. Their wealth doubled during a time of massive crisis for the world. Her personal wealth doubled. So what do you think tells you more about Nancy Pelosi? Her tearing up a bit of paper behind Donald Trump or the fact that her wealth doubled during a time where the majority of people in the world were suffering. What's more significant? You tell me. Let me know in the chat. Let me know in the comments. This is thanks in part to her husband's holdings in the likes of Slack, Tesla, Disney, Visa, Salesforce, PayPal, Alphabet, Facebook, and Netflix. All of the major corporations that spend untold millions every year to lobby the government. What a coincidence. And yet every time Nancy Pelosi says anything about what motivates her, 

seems like you it seems like you've got other motivations. Although your children are also doing quite well. So during a time where the narrative was, we're all in this together. Although you're suffering economically, we're all in this together suffering. I don't know though because Nancy's personal wealth doubled, Alphabet's wealth increased, Netflix's wealth increased. All of these organizations evidently benefited from a time of crisis. Should that be in the documentary? Is that something you're interested in? It's really weird, isn't it? At a time when you see someone who's presented as a heroic figure double their wealth in a time of global crisis that there would be like civil unrest and uprisings, those people must be so racist to do that. Oh, the racism must have really bubbled up during that time when powerful figures doubled their wealth and some of the most powerful corporations in the world increase their profits. The racism just went almost as if it's not racism at all, but in fact, corruption 

that drives these people. Much of their added wealth is due to extremely lucrative and lucky decisions about when to buy and sell stocks and options in the very industries and companies over which Pelosi's house speaker exercises enormous and direct influence. No wonder they have to work so hard to keep people divided because all of us would benefit from changing these systems. We would all benefit. So as long as you're thinking these people are too lefty liberal, these people are too right wing nationalists, as long as you're all caught up in that, which obviously houses some significant and important issues, you won't be able to unify and confront true corruption. People parading about on the TV set in pearls, doubling their wealth and saying that the real problem is Donald Trump and poor people. To underscore the towering conflict, towering conflict of interest at the heart of Speaker Pelosi's self enrichment, considered the company in which the Pelosi's traded most often, Apple. Buying and selling in that one company accounted for seventeen point seven percent of the Pelosi's overall trading volume. And yet during this same period, Pelosi held at least one private conversation with Apple CEO Tim Cook about the state of Apple and possible effects on the company from various pending bills to reform Silicon Valley, but that wouldn't influence their stock price or their value or give you any advantageous information. And even if you don't use that one direct clear example, it shows you a kind of systemic 

symbiosis that is the heart of real power. These relationships are what important do you think your vote's important? The hanging chads, the blue one, the red one, or Apple and the speaker of the house having meetings during a time where her wealth doubles? You tell me. I don't know. Maybe make a documentary about it. Indeed. All five of the Pelosi's most traded stocks over the last two years just so happen to be the five Silicon Valley giants that would be most affected by pending legislation at the time. Wow. Wow. Is that in the documentary? Paul Pelosi in March exercised one point nine five million dollars worth of Microsoft call options less than two weeks before the tech stalwart secured a twenty two billion dollar contract to supply US army combat troops with augmented reality headsets. Poor Pelosi, he may not be so good at driving and he may have some dubious houseguests, but by God, when he gets a hunch about Microsoft, he's always on the money. Paul's feeling some feelings. Paul's feeling some feelings. Better have a little drinky, then a little drivey, then a little visit, and then buy Microsoft Microsoft. 

Please, please, intruder alert. Intruder alert. In January, he purchased up to one million dollars of Tesla calls before the Biden administration delivered its plan to shift towards electric vehicles. Good at investing in them. Not so good at driving them while on the boozy woozy. Arrested for driving under the influence. Beyond that, Google, one of the companies in which the Pelosi stock trades have made millions, is one of the top five donors to the house speaker. You could draw this as a graph. You can just look at all the interconnections. You can look at the convergence of interest. It's not a conspiracy theory. It's just business. The wealthy couple buys and sells in Google stocks making millions. She works on bills that directly affect the future trajectory of Google, and they lavish her campaign coffers with cash, a key source of her entrenched power. What a hero though. What a hero that's focused solely and exclusively 

on the women's rights aspect of this. Because if you look one millimeter to the left or right of the women's rights issues, it suddenly becomes a story about the relationship between congress, the speaker of the house, and powerful big tech lobbyists and organizations in whom her family owns stocks and shares. And that's not such a good documentary, is it? That's not so encouraging. That's not, yeah, everything's improving, is it? That's Oh, everything's corrupt as you've always suspected. The reason certain people are doing well is because of their connections, their relationships, lobbying, legalized bribery, and legislated for corruption. But just keep focusing on a plucky woman who just against all the odds 

made it. It's sort of a bit like Ratatouille, really. But instead of manipulating a chef's head, you're manipulating congress and apple stocks. Hey. But that's just what I think. Let me know what you've Oh, the ratatouille. See, that's why you gotta mix the comedy with the news because we all we all grow when we laugh like that. So this Pelosi name keeps coming up. And I know I heard a Pelosi name the other day, but it wasn't related to this story. And it had something to do with Hunter Biden 

and the Pelosi kid and maybe John Kerry's kid. And they're on are they in a, a funding place for Metadata for the Ukrainian labs? As well. Okay. Yeah. What was the what was the was it Rosemont, Seneca, Partners, or where's the place? Hunter had a place funding, and then that funding was going to the Ukrainian bio labs. And then it was, like, Pelosi's son, maybe, and Hunter Biden and John Kerry's Let me find it. Someone or other in his family. What I what I sensed was a lot of nepotism and flowing of American 

dollars. Rosemont. Yeah. Hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca Investment Fund financed the Pentagon. Let's see this. Yeah. Who's who else is on Rosemont Seneca? Let's put that on screen. Let me, this is let me put it at archives. This is the Washington Post, so give me two seconds. Yeah. We're gonna get behind that. We're gonna look behind real quick. Or the civilians can't see. Search He's just using archive dot what? I s? Yeah. Yeah. Dot I s. Yeah. So this is just it might just be a whitewash, but let's find out. 

The truth about Hunter Biden and the Ukrainian Bio Labs. This was written today at three o'clock. Is that correct? What? No. That's March twenty ninth twenty twenty two. So this is probably a whitewash, but it does mention what you're mentioning. Quote, Hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca Investment Fund financed the Pentagon's military biological program in Ukraine, said Igor Vrilov? This isn't Burisma. This isn't Joe getting the guy fired. This is a this is another set of deals in Ukraine that the Biden crime family 

had, you know, been doing on behalf of the United States Pentagon Department of Defense. This is a allegation made by Igor Kirillov, head of the radiation, chemical, and biological defenses forces of the Russian armed forces. And so it goes into a timeline. Russian state owned domestic news quote the national policies reporting tonight. Apparently, a private equity firm run by Hunter Biden fund funded some of the research into pathogens in these biolabs, Tucker Carlson, also March twenty fourth, Russia's assertion that president Biden's son Hunter was financing biological laboratories in Ukraine was based in truth according to emails 

reviewed by The Post, New York Post So they could figure that out, but not his laptop. That was a big enigma for them, but they could figure this part out. And there's a New York Post article. This is March twenty sixth twenty twenty two. Bomb show. Did Russia invade Ukraine because of Biden's biolabs? Hunter's laptop says yes. And mine on PJ Media article, March twenty six. The Russian defense ministry gotta make this bigger for people. This is where I'm at right now. The Russian Defense Ministry knows how to stir up the interests of the right leaning news media in the United States. Just mentioned Hunter Biden, the present son, so they get some of the whitewashing 

of this. Oh, because it's Russia, Russia, Russia, where Hunter was the one that thinks with his niece. They're setting up Russia as a straw man, basically, and this is, like, Glenn Kessler. Who don't know how to search the Internet for Hunter Biden's laptop contents to see for yourself, you'll just trust Russia, Russia, Russia. Okay. There is a spectrum of people that does that. I don't know which side of the bell curve they're not they're on, but I'm not on it. Oh, is it was it Alexander or Pelosi? Yeah. Plus okay. Fourteen documentaries for HBO or fourteenth documentary. No. No. That's connected with the Rosemont 

investment. No. I think, Pelosi must have a son. I'm thinking it's her son. I've never I've only read the stories that were looked at the Wiki for the company or anything. Let's see. But we're getting down to it because there is, That's a Reuters fact check. There's an agency that was involved with these bio labs in Ukraine that had I think it was funding that came from a group that had on its board or in its participants all these people who are of of left powerful politicians. 

So it's like their training op for the next generation and also gets them into like, there you go. Is that, This is strange. This is finance dot senate dot gov. Hunter Biden, Brisbane, and corruption, the impact on US government policies and related concerns, US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, US Senate Committee on Finance, majority staff report. So let me see if it gets into anything juicy here in regards to It starts the word crack. No. I'm just kidding. Let's see here. 

Since the offices of chairman John okay. Rosemont, Seneca Partners. Let's see. For example, according to media reports, Dirk Control plus that so people at home can see it on the screen. And Deer cock is responsible for spreading let me start here. For example, according to media reports, Deerkak is responsible for spreading allegations that Brisbane made direct payments to Joe Biden in the amount of nine hundred thousand dollars, which were allegedly funneled to the Biden through his son's consulting firm, Versmont Sun and Co Partners, and marked for, quote, unquote, consulted 

con consult consultative services. This claim about direct payments made to Joe Biden is not evaluated in the committee's report of investigation. Yeah. We're just not gonna look at it. It's just a claim that's out there, but we're not gonna evaluate it in any capacity. It's kinda like Hunter Biden's laptop. Just it's in the same folder, in the same drawer. Just put that in there and stuff when we don't touch. I love this. So it says here, this claim about direct payments made to Joe Biden is not evaluated in the committee's report of investigation nor has it ever been cited as a predicate for any of the committee's inform information requests. In other words, like, we're not gonna evaluate it, and we're not gonna request it for information. 

But we know it exists, and we'll mention it in this report in case we get blackmailed. We we we is that what they're saying? Why you bring it up, man? It goes on to state, however, during the chairman's staff interview of George Kent, ranking member, Peter's Peters' staff inserted into the interview record the same Derickat created document that the Democrats relied on in their July thirteenth letter to falsely accuse the chairman of relying on disinformation. So the other words, just setting up Deercock is, I guess, one of the individuals who, 

leaked this information as being and who is I'm not sure if they go into who Deercock is. Possible Deercox, Deercox, however you pronounced it, efforts could have shaped the committee's investigation anyway. Does it go into anything? It doesn't mention him a number of times, but doesn't mention that they evaluated it in any they're sort of setting him up as being like, just don't look there. It's just some allegation made by this individual. Let me see if I can find more information about who this individual is. Well, he pops up, eighteen times. 

So according, it says here, a subsequent political article again citing unnamed sources reported that in twenty nineteen, Dercock Der Kock allegedly sent information to several members of congress, including the chairman and ranking member Wyden and ranking member Peters. The article then further suggested these weak parallels reinforce the, quote, unquote, suspicions of some Democrats that the committee's investigation was, quote, laundering a foreign influence campaign to damage Biden, end quote. The political article also suggests that deputy assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs, George Kent, 

and several other individuals have been the subject of the committee information requests. The chairman repeatedly rejected claims that, I mean, engaged that he had in the engagement with DRCAAC in August twenty twenty. DRCAAC was publicly identified by the ICU as a proponent of a foreign source influence campaign to influence twenty twenty election dollars. Okay. So that's what they're playing here. So fascinating. Paul Jay (3five thirty three): Alright. I put a link in the chat, and this is coming from Reuters and it's a fact check. It's pretty exciting. Tony Robbins (3one forty four): Denying what I was just trying to tell you. So let's read between the lines and see what's actual factual about this. Yep. Fact check. Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, and Mitt Romney do not have sons on boards of energy companies doing business in Ukraine. What about Joe Biden? They don't even mention that Joe Biden doesn't have a son doing these things also. And just for the record, this is from February first. 

They also don't know that he had a laptop apparently either. February fourth twenty twenty one, Reuters staff. So let's go dive into this a little bit. Post claiming that the sons of US president Joe Biden, senator Mitt Romney, and house speaker Nancy Pelosi, and special presidential envoy for climate John Kerry, quote, are all on the board of directors for energy companies doing business in Ukraine, end quote, have been flagged by Facebook in its efforts to combat online misinformation. Like they did with Hunter Biden's laptop. I love how they go with the this so they go on to state, the claim is false, although Biden's son, Hunter, previously held such a position. 

Okay. So they don't go into any fax. They say it's false. I'm sure they're gonna fax down here. So let's go here. And, really, those people are on the board of something else and it's not the energy company. It's the bio It's probably like a holding company or a shell company or city or you know how this game is. Some operation Gladio blackmail network company. Examples opposed to making this claim could be found here, here, and here. Well, whatever. Hunter Biden. I mean, we can look this up, but let's just get into how they create a straw man and tear it down. That's what we're trying to figure out. Where do they work together? Because this is a straw man. They always debunk straw man articles. 

So there's gonna be something in here we can use to find the truth. So Hunter Biden during the twenty twenty campaign for the White House, Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, became hold on real quick. Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, became a focus of attacks from former president Donald Trump and his Republican allies who questioned potential conflicts of interest from Hunter's position on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma. At the time, his father was vice president to Democratic president Barack Obama. As Reuters reported in October twenty nineteen, interviews with more than a dozen people, including executives and former prosecutors in Ukraine, paint a picture of Hunter Biden 

as a director who provided advice on legal issues, corporate finance, and strategy during his five year term on the board, which ended in April of twenty nineteen. Let's just break that over for a second. They paid him to consult on what, what, and what? Because we've all seen Hunter buy a laptop. I don't know. He's qualified to consult on such things. Am I so bold as to be one of the first people in history to observe such things? Yeah. I'm in a small couple percentage of people who've been saying that for years. And they go on to be bullshit. 

He had a five year term on the board. It just ended in twenty nineteen. You got to love how they built a straw man. They say he's still a part of it, but he's not really a part of it. That's false. But he was a part of it for five years doing what? Corporate finance and legal issues, corporate finance and strategy. Oh, okay. That doesn't spell a conflict of interest at all. They also said Paul, what about Pia? What about Vic, Victoria Nuland? What about George Soros? Open foundations, his foundation in Ukraine, the Maidan coup in twenty fourteen. Okay. Anyways, let's go continue forward. 

They also said his presence on the board did not protect the company from criminal Mykola Slokevskiy. The allegations concern tax violations, money laundering, and licenses given to Burisma during the period when, Zlokevsky was a minister. In June twenty twenty, an audit of thousands of old case files by Ukrainian prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hunter Biden. 

That's it? Okay. Let's click on that one. On No wrong. Was this was this after hold on. Hold on. What was it? When was the CFR with, Joe Biden when he's like, well, if you don't fire that prosecutor, we're not gonna send you the money. Call it. See what happens. You give them a call. See if you'll get those millions or billions or whatever it was. And that's in front of the council I'll get one year. What do they put another prosecutor Look, it turns up that now there's no wrongdoing here. He just wants to report it. Trump over that because Trump tried to check it out and they impeached him for calling the guy and trying to check it out, which shows you how gangster the gangsters are. So this let's look into this. This is June fourth twenty twenty. And this is so if you follow this last claim here, on December eighth twenty twenty, Hunter Biden announced that the US attorney's office is in Delaware is investigating his tax affairs here. Oh, I'm sorry. The one above. In June twenty twenty, an audit of thousands of old case files by Ukrainian prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hunter Biden. 

So this is where it takes you, I believe. Yes. Ukraine found no evidence against Hunter Biden in case audit, former top prosecutor. Kyiv or Kyiv, this is Reuters. This is from, what, June of twenty June fourth twenty twenty up here. In order to thousands of old case files, Ukrainian prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing in the part of Hunter Biden, the former prosecutor general who had launched the audit toward Reuters. And Ukraine's prosecutor general Ruslan oh, now you're gonna try to pronounce that. Speaks during a news conference in Kiev, Ukraine, October fourth twenty nineteen. 

Ruslan Uriaboschotka was in the spotlight last year as the man who would decide whether to launch an investigation in the former price president vice president Joe Biden's son Hunter and what became a key issue in the impeachment of president Donald Trump. President Volodymyr Zelensky described, Robayo Shapka Shapka as one hundred percent my person. I mean, he is. It's on a call in twenty July twenty nineteen, which Trump asked Zelensky to investigate Biden, the man who became his main rival in the twenty twenty presidential election or presidential race. 

After taking office, the So Zelensky was hap he was on the scene and helping out before the war. Preyab Daschapka in October announced an audit of cases, and he inherited, including those related to the energy company, Burisma, where Hunter Biden was a board member between twenty fourteen, twenty nineteen. And what was he a board member doing? He was what was it? Legal. What is it? Yeah. He's doing consulting. It's consulting, but Consulting. 

See here. How many times he can use your crack pipe before you have to clean it? It's over here. Tutorials to that, and he had some tutorials like that. Yeah. Here it is. He is a consulting for twenty fourteen to twenty nineteen. The legal issues, corporate finance, and strategy. Nothing to see there. Nothing at all. So the audit was intended to probe whether t x. I mean, there's an overlap in the Venn diagram between all these crimes that are going on. My favorite here so it goes on to state. The audit was intended to probe whether cases Oreo Bashapka had inherited from his predecessors. I think the predecessor that got fired under threat of Joe Biden. Yeah. I think, if I remember correctly, when he's in front of the council on foreign relations. So 

that's a neglected aspect fallacy. That would kinda change things and make this fact check a little bit more dubious, but they don't you know, maybe I'm wrong. They must not know that, Reuters. Only people like us know that, Tony. And, of course, you ability to know such things. He had been handled properly given the reputation that the prosecution service has been riddled with corruption and influence peddling. The audit was part of a broader reform of the prosecution service, but became politically charged given some of the cases related to the Burisma's founder. Quote, regarding to the call to Zelensky and the story of Burisma, I can see that there was no pressure on me. Ariel Vyshabka said, the audit was completed, 

end quote. And continuing, the different quote here. Because he's Zelensky's guy. So he's gonna he's gonna do it in favor of the people that put Zelensky in office, which, among which are former vice presidents group. That's correct. Exactly. One hundred percent. Yeah. Quote, I specifically asked prosecutors to check especially carefully those facts about Biden's alleged involvement. They answered that there was nothing of the kind. Yeah. The big guy was not there, man. He was not there. He doesn't get his cut. It's not in the- It's not 

in the Hunter Biden laptop at all, that type of stuff. Those details are not on the laptop. Don't look at the laptop for those type of piece of evidence. Reyba Shabka was fired in March after lawmakers accused him of not moving quickly enough in prosecuting cases. Reyba Shabka said he was axed because he had started bringing real reform to the prosecution service the first time in a way that threatened the interest of corporate politicians. Maybe it's I don't believe it's the same prosecutor. I I have to go back. I no. It's not. They all have too many consonants in their last name. That's why. Trump was impeached on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of democratic blah blah blah. Hunter Biden's activities at Burisma have also been the target of scrutiny by the US senate committee. 

If I remember correctly from, it wasn't a poor Schenker. No. But it's, Verisma scandal. I'll just bring it up because it'll tell me because there's a oh, luckily, there's a Wiki Wikipedia on this whole situation. The Prisma Hunter bot. Maybe they got rid of it. Wikipedia. I think it's called the Burisma scandal. Plus, wiki. Well, Burisma is just one energy company that they had Biden Ukraine. So here's here's the Biden Ukraine conspiracy theory. Oh, there you go. 

Because there's no evidence that Hunter was on the board of the company doing business over there, and there's no evidence of his dad threatening the the prosecutors over there to do his like, there's no evidence. It's just conspiracy theory. It's just Tell me more. I'm I'm fascinated. Tell me more, Tony. And real quick, it's Viktor Shokin, former prosecutor general of Ukraine. He was the one that was fired, if I remember correctly, after Joe Biden made the threat. So here's but here's the Biden, Ukraine conspiracy theory. A series of false claims make this really big for people. I love when they start out like that. Yeah. Right. They're like, in case you need to find no further, read no thing an epithet, you know? 

That's like, that's according to the question begging epithet. It's a bit of circular reasoning. You can start out the story of Jesus the same way. Is that the way we're gonna represent history now? Oh, boys. Well, if you take them literally and not as a metaphor. Okay. Anyways, a series of false claims are centered on the baseless allegation that while Joe Biden was vice president of the United States, he engaged in corrupt activities relating to the employment of his son, Hunter Biden, by the Ukrainian gas company, Burisma. They were spread primarily in attempt to damage Joe Biden's reputation during the twenty twenty presidential campaign. United States intelligence community analysis released in March twenty twenty one found that proxies 

of Russian intelligence promoted the laundered, misleading, or unsubstantiated narratives about the Bidens to or, quote, to US media organizations, US officials, and prominent US individuals, including some close to former president Trump and his administration, end quote. The New York Times reported in May twenty twenty one that a federal criminal investigation was examining a possible role by current and former Ukrainian officials, including whether they used former Trump personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, who's the subject of a separate federal investigation to spread unsubstantiated 

claims. The conspiracy theory alleges that then vice president Biden withheld loan guarantees to pressure Ukraine into firing a prosecutor to prevent a corruption investigation into Burisma and to protect his son. United States did withhold government aid to pressure Ukraine into removing the prosecutor. And Biden did admit to it on the Council on Foreign Relations statement. But it's a conspiracy theory, Rich. That's what it says. Scholar Richard Haass. I mean, how convenient. But it's a conspiracy theory. I mean, she just start calling them conspiracy facts. And then we have this fucking fact check. Excuse my language, but goddamn. 

Goddamn. Ukraine found no evidence against Hunter Biden case audit when they have this other prosecutor, prosecutor general Ruslan Ryubashapka, saying, oh, and then and then so when he's like, this is my guy. Article. Yeah. He was like, this is my guy. And we he comes in and he's reforming the audience. Let me pay it out for you guys. Oh my god. Are we kidding me? He's a former comedian who on the show became president and later became president Zelensky of Ukraine, who also was on a show where he played the piano with his Johnson. His guy 

says there's nothing to be seen there just like fifty FBI directors told you that it didn't come from a lab and Hunter Biden's laptop doesn't exist, and you guys are all Russia, Russia, Russia. That's all. You need to worry about Russia more. But you can trust the fact that they found nothing, Rich. According to this article, according to the call to Zelensky and this story with Burisma, I can say there was no pressure on me, Rey Abishnabka said. The audit was completed. I specifically asked prosecutors containing the quote to check especially carefully those facts about Biden's alleged involvement. They answered that there is nothing of the kind, he added. 

Really? Think you could prove it both ways for Hunter and dad. And then it goes on to state that he was still fired. Was fired in March. The lawmakers accused him of not moving quickly enough in prosecuted cases. Said he was axed because he had because the other guy had set such a pace that you have to keep up with it. Oh, wait. Didn't I get rid of the guy before him too? Victor Shoke. Because he was prosecuting Hunter Biden. It's this guy. Victor Yeah. He was he was he was knocking off the cases like a mofo. He's going after Hunter Biden. So That's right. That's an interesting change in protocol. Of Ukraine having previously worked as investigator for the prosecutor general office. He served as prosecutor general for a year between twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, mid domestic and turn international pressure. 

He was removed from office by the Ukrainian parliament on March twenty sixteen to move wealth in by the Look at this. Who else would ken it about? What goes on in Ukraine? In a move welcomed by Oh, Joe Biden. Sorry. In a move look at this. In a move welcomed by the European Union, Mhmm. The United States and the IMF. Oh, and the World Bank. And don't forget NATO. Oh, and NATO and the CFR. Alright. I mean, come on. Sponsored by all of them. But there's nothing to see there. The Joe Biden, they all made money. They all made money. Hunter Biden. Joe Biden, nine hundred thousand dollars. Yeah. He's he was, on a board advising on legal legal matters and strategy and finance. 

Very important for five years until April twenty nineteen. And then but there's nothing to see there. Nothing at all. Isn't that when Joe Biden started running for president around that time? What a brilliant what a kind of I can't even say it's a brilliant Almost as if there'd be a known conflict of interest. I mean, how do you not because at first, they try to debunk the first article by stating that this this Well, they do for any fan of Reuters who believes Reuters, they debunked it. But if you understand how to read past what Reuters is allowing you to know and look at that, that which exists, 

which is the focus of this show, then you can see and you could be in the know. As far as Mitt Romney, Nancy Pelosi Sonic goes on to say, according to LinkedIn page here, Paul Pelosi junior, the only son of house speaker, Nancy Pelosi. Let me highlight so people will keep on There you go. Is currently a management Hammer, junior. Phytopharmaceutical company, ST Biosciences, a board member of the San Francisco Shanghai sister city committee, and a business development executive at the corporate governance initiative. What the fuck is that? The shitty sister city committee? 

Yeah. Shitipa town. Go to a shitty walk. Get Get your shitty food. So the person in question was Paul the hammer junior. Yeah. Yep. Okay. The hammer bring out the gimp or the hammer. Excuse me. The claim that Paul Pelosi was on the board of directors for an energy company doing business in Ukraine may stem from his time on the board of Viscoil, a US energy companies excuse me, a US energy company based in Southern California. That did business in Ukraine? Most likely. As as explained here by PolitiFact in twenty nineteen, Viscoil, which was focused on US business, dissolved and reformed in Singapore under a new name according to Drew Hamill, a spokesperson for the speaker. Hamill told PolitiFact that mister Pelosi was not involved in the new entity. Reuters Reuters could not reach Hamill for comment on the recent recirculation of these claims. In addition to PolitiFact, fact check dot org, why don't you wanna talk about circular reasoning? Here we go. In addition to PolitiFact, fact check dot org, Snopes, and US Today, 

all rated claims of Paul Pelosi's connection to Ukrainian gas company is false. Well, they're all stating the same sort of false. Like, they're all citing each other as though it's it's false. So, yeah, it's certainly not a gas company? Maybe it's a different type of energy. Maybe it's a division. That's a classic example of a chain version of circular reasoning. You don't see those as much. Usually, see the question begging epithets and redefinition. So that's as a nerd in logic, that's actually wow. They're that bad at it. They're just, like, setting it up. As a fact check, they should be, like, as Reuters, they should go to these people's LinkedIn pages 

and say Go check. According to their resume on LinkedIn, it says they'd never worked at these places. Let's go check. Let's go check. Plus, this coil plus. Let's see what pops up here. Back check was enhanced to release some executive, service BDUs. Because the straw man part could be misattributing what type of energy company or all these different things that they use to throw you off the trail to be like, just like Fauci says that it's not gaining a function. 

Nancy Pelosi's this this is six other words that mean gaining function. So this comes from January fourteenth twenty twenty two. There's a New York Post article. Nancy Pelosi's son linked the five shady companies probed by the feds report. Paul Pelosi junior, right, son of the house speaker, Nancy Pelosi, has reportedly been linked to these five business entities under investigation son of the hammer, the only son of Nancy and Paul Pelosi senior, I guess Hammer's the other guy, was hired by several firms that were subject to both federal and state probes and meanwhile has, quote, 

connections to a host of fraudsters, rule breakers, convicted criminals, end quote, although he has never been charged himself according to the Daily Mail. We'll click that link and see what's going on there. The website reports that in February two thousand seven, Pelosi Junior was hired as senior vice president by Omaha based InfoUSA, database marketing company investigated by Iowa. Data was okay. So it goes anyways, investigated by Iowa Iowa attorney general's office several years earlier for allegedly selling consumer data to fraudsters. That's one of the businesses. 

And, the data was then used to scam sick and gullible elderly people out of money. It was alleged. The investigation was closed. No arrests were made. Paul Pelosi junior was paid a salary of a hundred and eighty thousand dollars per year, joined the firm after the probe ended. Nothing's either. So he's competing with Social Security? Let's see. We're yeah. That's pretty much. Talks the SEC alleged that the company was sickly run by two convicted fraudsters, James e Cohen and James Joseph Carazzi. In twenty fourteen, the agency brought fraud charges against Cohen Carazzi, former New Mexico governor Tony Anaya, and a former executive of the company Eric Perry. 

Let's see what some other companies here. He was a is there any, this let's look at this coil. Nothing. Charisma. Nothing. Not some other shady companies he's involved with that have pending investigations or carry out investigations by various attorney generals of various states or whatever. So what it could be is Technically about Burisma. What it could be is sensing that there's scrutiny on some of these very powerful people and their nepotistic children being placed very high up at these 

opportunistic early insider information type places, right? They might be scared of people putting together where Pelosi's kid works, where John Kerry's, these different, right? Joshua P. (zero fifty five:forty five): Right here. Joshua P. (zero fifty five:forty five): So in order to keep people away from it, somebody at the meeting says, Let's say they all work at the same place. And then that gets out there and then it gets fact checked even though he's working at five suspicious places all by himself. Who else was Hunter getting money from? China. 

Who else is Carrie's family getting in the the opium Forbes family, legacy getting you know, what are they doing business with? Right? The skull and bones aspect of that that equation. So there's more to be seen in the fact checks and these types of things, PolitiFact Reuters, they're telling you to go the other way. Why? Because somebody has paid them money to say go the other way. There's something to hide on the other side of that. Yeah. Basically, Plutifact is, again, circular reasoning chain style with all referencing each other without providing the source. Yeah. Right. There's no primary source. There's no there there. They just said they researched it and it basically comes out that this coil was dissolved and, 

reincorporated, or restructured in Singapore. So is that correct? But we found the situation that's similar to Hunter Biden's appointment, the board of Ukrainian energy company, Prisma. Paul Pelosi junior once served on the board of an American energy company, Viscoil. After he left the board, the company dissolved and reformed in Singapore under a different name. Pelosi Junior had no part in the new entity, which is not based in Ukraine. It's unclear to what extent the company has done business Any business in Ukraine. So that's a big question there. Wayne duPree dot com where this supposedly emerged did not respond to an inquiry for the article. I tried to click, and I clicked on the source material. This is what this but the server 

can't find it. So Oh, what a shame. Internet didn't used to break so readily back in the day. So those links used to be there for years and years and years, and you could look them up. So it goes on to state position with this coil. The source appears to be an October third tweet from Patrick how Holly, a conservative writer who publishes material in the website national file dot com. Quote, boom. Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul Pelosi junior, went to Ukraine in twenty seventeen, was a board member of his coiled executive at its related company, 

NRG Lab, which did energy business in Ukraine. Howie sent That's interesting. And is that Howie related to the other Howie, Brendan Howie from the witness tree? Wouldn't that be interesting synchronicity for this episode? Yeah. How h o w l e y. L h o w l e y. Wow. That's Interesting. Little bit Maybe more. Synchronicity style. Mhmm. Holly said that your luggage has been retreated almost fourteen thousand times. Nancy Pelosi appeared in promotional video for the company. As evidence, how he linked to two YouTube videos published March fifth twenty thirteen. The first shows Paul Pelosi Junior speaking at an event in Washington. The video opens with clips of a speech from Nancy Pelosi and then shows Paul at an XPRIZE Foundation competition. 

In September twenty ten, the nonprofit group organizes public competition with businesses to encourage the technological developments. So that's what they claim is what, this national file, which Patrick Halley wrote. It's natural file national file article, which Patrick Kelly wrote, which was entitled, boom, Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul. Let's see if we can find this, by the way. Paul Pelosi junior went to Ukraine in twenty seventeen. Was a board member of this quote and executive That's very random. He just likes to go there for the the tourism aspect. 

See if we can find the national file on this. Not because they're helping to set up a war infrastructure. Here it is. So here's the original article that they're attempting to debunk here. What's the title? What's the date? Who wrote So this is November fifteenth twenty nineteen. This is by Patrick Holly. So COVID is out there, but nobody knows it at this point when this article was written. Correct. Yep. Vaccine Modernization Act is assigned, like, September ninth or something twenty nineteen, then the Milken Institute, I think, is being held in November of that year or December or something like that. October. October. Okay. As well. And wasn't the, event two zero one in October? October. 

Bill Gates and Johns Hopkins. So breaking Nancy Pelosi's son was exec so let's see if we can find some source material. Last update on November ninth fifteenth twenty nineteen. House speaker Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul Pelosi junior, this is the claim made in the article, visited Ukraine in twenty seven to meet twenty seventeen to meet with government officials in connection to a business initiative. Now on Earth, records view that Paul Pelosi junior was the executive of a gas industry company that did business in Ukraine, and his brother Nancy Pelosi was featured in one of the company's promotional videos. 

What? Paul Paul Pelosi junior Where's the evidence of that? That's true. See a video? That would put an end to it. Right? The American Mirror, which flagged Paul Pelosi junior, her parents in twenty seventeen, preserved a clip of Pelosi junior on the Ukrainian station following the video's removal from YouTube. Let's see here if I can find. So here's a Twitter, but God knows this is probably deep six by now. But let me see. But we could potentially find it on Bitchute, Odysee. Yeah. It says this page doesn't work. This is a Twitter. So it was deep six on YouTube, but then they quote, they linked to this Twitter 

that saved the video. But when I click on that and put in a this says, assuming this page doesn't exist, and that sucks. Anymore. It used to. It used to. As Patrick Kelly found, Paul Pelosi junior previously held top positions. Yeah. We should look for it on Rumble or Odyssey or something. Put or a bit shoot or something like that. Our March fifth twenty thirteen Energy Lab, new technology posted two videos on YouTube. One video opened with a clip of Nancy Pelosi discussing energy efficient technology followed by a direct to camera statement from her son, Paul Pelosi junior, 

filmed in Washington DC in twenty ten. So these are this is what EnergyLab plus Nancy Pelosi video. One of the problems here is that's what they're saying. They're okay. So the article here is claiming that, and then the fact check by PolitiFact is claiming the same thing. Is that what's that is what debunks Yeah. The connection. What? Right. Right. That's a because they made a strong It's a strong it's more of it's a strong man. It's also, patidio per kipi. It's a form of, circular reasoning where they're just restating it and then building a straw man based on the restatement. But that just proves that there isn't a connection. Wow. This is just Well, the people at PolitiFact don't have the budget to afford your logic and fallacies course, Tony. Paul Pelosi Junior is a member of a management team at Biscoil Group of of Companies and Energy Lab. 

So, yeah, a lot to be done here in regards to a little bit more research, but it seems like Energy Lab and Viscoil and Energy Lab might be one of the companies look into to see if there's a connection with Paul. Now was Energy Lab open at the same time that FTX opened? Because remember, FTX opened when Biden launched his campaign, and then it ended right around, this midterm election. So it's also the timing of that because it was laundering, allegedly, a lot of money 

over in the Ukraine situation and that started before the Ukrainian war kicked off. It'd be interesting to find her promo video. Oh, yeah. Let's go to it. So I'll be, I'm gonna send this to you. If you wanna play this, see what this, put in production chat. Let's play this and see what this looks like. First comment underneath of it. I thought the family was in the tuna business. Oh, boy. 

Alright. One second. Here we go. Yep. Coming up, serving it hot off the surface. Way to predict the future is to create it yourself. When president Obama became president of the United States, he elevated science to a higher place in our national priorities. It is Hang on. What's going on? I don't understand. Did she say Joe Bama? President Joe bama? I thought she did, so we're gonna have to rewind it anyway to be President Yo mama or Joe bama? 

Your ma Joe bama is your mama? I just think it's funny that Reuters will gaslight people and say, there's nothing to see here, and there's definitely nothing to see here like Pelosi, Nancy, doing an ad for the company that her son worked for doing energy in Ukraine. Nothing to see there. Is in Ukraine. That's not news to work. Energy lab, which is owned by Viscoil. So Viscoil is an American energy firm that was then, restructured in Singapore, reincorporated, restructured, whatever, in Singapore after he left. But they apparently, it was a subsidiaries 

of theirs Energy Lab, that was at least that's the claim, which supposedly did energy business in Ukraine. So Almost as if they're doing it on purpose. And they they they see the news, but they're like, we don't see that news. We can't you know, I'm not gonna tell you that. Reuters would you would think that that'd be a story. You would think. It's almost like they don't need to tell the truth, stay in business. It's almost like they stay in business because they don't tell the truth. Let me try to play this again. Alright. Let's just play it again. The best way to predict the future 

is to create it yourself. When president Joe Obama became president of the United States, he elevated science to a higher place in our national priori. Joe Biden. Did he just say that they have to create the future themselves? Because that's the best way to predict the future. What's what the milk and ex milk and excuse was on stage. Right? Milk and excuse. And there's also what was this quote in the beginning of volume two? Not Jared Madler, not Henry Kissinger, not Nicko Niccolo Machiavelli, but Ron Susskind, quote, we're an empire now. When we act, we create our own reality. And And while you're studying that reality, judiciously You should say as you will. Will act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors, and you, 

all of you, will be left to just study what we do. Senior adviser to Bush, Ron Susskind, New York Times two thousand four. But that's Karl Rove's quote. The the writer Ron Susskind brought to. Yeah. I thought it was Carl Rove. Because when we I remember I don't know why she didn't attribute it to Carl Rove in her book. We're talking about one nation under black male by Yeah. This is volume two. That's what I was reading from. This is in the beginning of volume two. I have the, I have the document cam here, but I need to set it up. See how a document can. Oh, nice. Nice. I thought it was really remarkable right after Whitney Webb was on, 

Glenn Beck, the netting netting the, can't be. Yeah. BB. BB made an appearance in the studio. Oh, did you see BB mentioning earlier this week? They caught a clip out on Alex Jones. Usually, we play that later about how he's like Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Basically signed a deal with Pfizer, and we're like, said, you can experiment. We have a medical ID card. You can take all the data you want from the mass experimentation of you know, these mRNA jobs. See what happens if someone yeah. We should yeah. We should play that clip. Yeah. Next. Next. Okay. So it's, sorry, LD. Go ahead. I just had to 

call my attention there. Go for it. Entities. It is science, science, science, and science. Breaking our crippling addiction to oil, they are developing desirable efficient cars that get more than one hundred par for the course and not to be, overwhelmed by that prospect that will be considered the normal. We're having a very exciting day here in Washington DC. 

A lot of focus on innovation and technology to help solve a lot of the world's energy crisis. Both oil spills, which we'll be participating in, cars and efficiency, which is represented today, and space and different adventures and using technology from space to make human conditions better here. My name is Paul Pelosi. Of course, I'm on the board of Bisco Oil, and Bisco's here today to talk about accelerating the future. It's about using cars in a more efficient manner. It's about utilizing natural resources, whether it be electricity or gas or fossil fuels in a more efficient way, and fiscal oil is part of that solution. 

We're also gonna take place in the next XPRIZE competition. This XPRIZE rewarded cars, utilization of natural resources through the use of technology, and that's what oil does. It uses technology to maximize the use of natural resources, like oil and other resources. We're excited about the x prize. Today, we're awarded some cars that use oil efficiently and use alternative energy efficiently. The next x prize has to do with oil spill, oil spill cleanup, and preservation of our planet. 

This oil will be part of the next x prize and should be very successful in cleaning up oil spills such as that happened in the gulf to improve the quality of life for the people in the gulf area and around the country and around the globe. And fiscal oil is the leader in technology, and that's what's re rewarded here today in our innovative agenda for the United States. Will boil Yeah. We get it. We get it. Say resources again, motherfucker. I didn't hear him say sustainable. 

Third, we wanna talk about efficiency, but I didn't hear the word sustainable. I'm not sure if I'm buying into his rap. It could be circumstantial, but there seems to be at least some connections in regards to Energy Lab and the Ukraine, whether he's directly a part of it or receiving kickbacks. That's maybe not been substantiated, but there does seem to be some connections. It goes on this national file that Plutifac is trying to build a straw man of basically goes on to state. Paul, quote, Paul Pelosi junior is a member of a management team of this coiled group of companies, Energy Lab. Paul Pelosi junior is interested in developing clean energy. You can see there in the video that can replace gasoline and diesel as transportation fuel sources. Read the description of the video. Another video posted that same day confirmed that Energy Lab was working in the Ukraine. Quote, Walter, 

Athanasiev, Brandon Stone, Mika Newton, and other artists are actively involved in promoting the clean technology of Viscoil Group of companies and Energy Lab. For example, Mika Newton helped to secure the rights to build a plant for the production of SH boxes in Ukraine. Read the description of an NRG lab and research council video. We could do So it's actually NRG lab. NRG. N Yeah. NRG lab. In twenty thirteen interview, and it has a, hyperlink there, with Energy Labs lead technician, 

Ziv Drori reported that Energy Lab was funded by environmental businesswoman Anna Schell, who writes about Ukraine energy issues in our blog. In the interview, Drori discussed gas generation techniques in Ukraine. Quote, currently, Anna Shell Fund also provide finances and support to groom talented artists like Mika Newton, a Ukrainian singer and representative of Ukraine in the Eurovision twenty, song contest in twenty eleven, reported a twenty thirteen interview with Anna Schell, referring to the singer 

who brokered the SH box deal in Ukraine. Continuing the quote, in brief, SH boxes are environmentally friendly generators. It's in blah blah blah. It's, you know, new technology. And then it goes on to a video showing performing as Ukraine's representative of the Eurovision Talent Contest. Energy Labs' website states that the company is based in Singapore and notes, quote, the company's additional projects include strategic partnership and investment from BIST Coil Holding Holdings to recycle waste materials into eco friendly diesel fuel. NRG Lab has obtained an exclusive license for the Biz coil technology from the Southeast Asia region for all of our materials. 

Viscoil Holdings is currently suspended by the California secretary of state. It was registered in two thousand nine to manager David Strahan in Escondido, California. As of twenty ten, it listed to manager Strahan, an individual named Sergei Sorokin based in Moscow, Russia. Paul Pelosi junior cofounded the company Natural Blue Resources, which the SEC charged in securities fraud in twenty fourteen. Nancy Pelosi led a congressional delegation to Ukraine in twenty fifteen to discuss issues including, quote, unquote, energy security. So one thing's for certain, there is a lot of circumstantial evidence 

around not only Nancy Pelosi and Paul Pelosi junior, but NRG Labs as sort of a a front company for Viscoil. Yeah. The rotten apple doesn't far fall fall far from the tree. And so now all it's missing is the financial connections that actually we do have information for in regards to Hunter Biden and Joe Biden, especially substantiated through the laptop. Well, luckily, NRG did all that work through FTX, so you don't need to you're gonna have to think about it. Oh, boy. That's, and as far as the other one, Mitt Romney and or 

Spawn Bones, John Kerry. Yeah. We can you guys can you get this gist of how we do research. I leave it up to the Yeah. You can look it up more yourself. Yeah. Go and see what you guys find out in regards to the connections they're in. They're up to some skull and bones duggery. Yeah. To say the least. It it restores my faith in Reuters, though, that they can totally take what exists and twist it up to make you think it doesn't exist. And that's the value of Reuters. And when it comes to, like, 

fallacies that Reuters, what affects Snopes, what was that other fact checking? There's a bunch of them. The way they work is through straw men, circular reasoning, neglected aspects, exert lifting. It's a very specific group of fallacies that make it seem like they're presenting arguments when in fact Yeah. They make a decision, then they write an article to to justify it rather than doing research to come to a decision. But they try to they try to front load it with a bunch of supposed evidence that's not really evidence or is misquoted or out of context and a whole bunch of non sequiturs. So there's a sort of group of fallacies that make it it's a little bit more pernicious in the sense they try to build a specious argument, if you will, which would be a straw man, then tear it down. You utilizing all host of different fallacies that I go over in my course. So that that was sort of fun to do. I haven't done that in a while. 

So Many such stories like that out there. Alright. So Netanyahu. AJ, do we have that clip? I don't have one. Not the one with Kanye and the Net and the Yahoo. I'm talking about where okay. So the clip this past week because I I I played it for I thought there were two relevant clips if I if memory serves. One was BB talking about how they have all this database and went to Pfizer and cut this deal, test on his population. 

And I'm pretty sure Borla also talked about having this perfect test population database. I got it. So there's multiple angles to this to consider because real time data these days and these other euphemisms that they use to masquerade their Nazi experiments on people, I think they need to be de euphemized and called what they are, which are acts of inhumane experimentation on unwitting, uninformed people, 

and they should be held to account for it instead of giving the rest of the world orders under threat of blackmail. Right. Right. Demystifying it, unaculting it, a veil lifted and have a sense of apocalypse or apocalyptic vision or revealing. I mean, that's, education. Yeah. Education, we call it. And the drawing out of that which exists. It's like a yoga. Yoga of the mind. There you go. Yoking. Drawing out. Yeah. Untying the knots that ties in people's minds. 

Alright. Let's go to, something from Bandai Video. Here's the man himself, Serval Remort of Austin, Alex Jones. We came out of COVID first. I described that in my book, my conversations with Albert Bourla of Pfizer. And I persuaded him to give tiny Israel, the the necessary vaccines to get us out first from the COVID. And the reason I could do that is because we have a database. Ninety eight percent, a medical database, ninety eight percent of our population 

has digitized medical records, a little card. And anywhere you go in any hospital in Israel, north, south, doesn't make any difference. Boom. You punch it in, and you know everything about this patient for the last twenty years. I said, we'll use that to tell you whether these vaccines, what do they do to people, not individual people, not with their individual identities, but statistically, what does it do to people with, you know, with, meningitis? What does it do to people with high blood pressure? What is it you know, you wanna know that. So Israel became, if you will, the the lab 

for Pfizer. By using the people in Israel, the Jews, the Christians, the Muslims, as guinea pigs under forced injections, lockdowns with a genetic database to see what the mutinogenic injections do to the host body. Benjamin Netanyahu is not stupid, and he just got reelected yesterday to the Knesset to be the leader of Israel. And I just so happened to come across a clip of him from a few weeks ago that I hadn't seen. We went on Jordan Peterson's podcast. 

We'll play a clip in a moment, and it's only two minutes long, and it's filled with lies. He says Israel has this national ID card that tracks everything our citizens do health wise. That's true. But he says that way we could, you know, make sure it was safe. That way we could track what it was gonna do. That way we would know what the health effects of the shot were. But they've used that database and the claims of that database being there as the pretext to say then later that it was totally safe when Israel had the worst adverse reactions 

of any country in the world. Look it up. We've shown the statistics from the UN, from Israel, from the United States, from Canada, from them all. Israel had amongst the highest injection rates of the so called shot in the world that was experimental and doesn't protect you and erases your immune system. And it is a huge, huge controversy in Israel, and the Israelis are pissed off and rightfully so because there they are locked in that country. 

And remember, the government tried to roll out vaccine passports, tried to say it was forced, tried to make people take it. I was telling you at the time, it'll be one, two, three, four, five, six, seven shots a year because Bill Gates had said it two and a half years ago that you'll have to have these on a routine base basis because it'll lower your immune system. Bill Gates said that. Scientists at Pfizer and Moderna said that. They giggled and laughed and said the stock's gonna go way up because you're always gonna have to take this now. And the more you take it, the more you get sick. 

And then there's Benjamin Netanyahu saying, I used my country like a lab experiment, meaning he used the Israeli people, the Jewish people that live there, and the Christians and the Muslims and others as a lab experiment. Well, I'm not a lab experiment, and people in Israel aren't a lab experiment. And when this was done to black people with Tuskegee, it was illegal. And what was done here and when our troops were made to take it, the federal courts have ruled that was illegal because you can't make troops take an experimental shot. So what our government did was illegal. What the Israeli government did was illegal. What the UK government's done is illegal. What the Australian and Canadian and German government 

and all the rest of them have done is absolutely illegal. And they used Israel, like China, as a beta test of lab rats to not just give them the poison shot, but to track everybody and to ban protest and to attack the orthodox and ultra orthodox Jewish groups that are smart and were following Leviticus and said we're not taking that into our bodies. So shame on Benjamin Netanyahu 

and shame on the evil leaders of Israel that went along with this and used their people that believe they're there for their protection and safety, that have come there fleeing persecution in many cases to only be be persecuted at an even greater level than what Joseph Mengele did. Joseph Mengele reportedly did test on over fifty thousand people, killed more than ten thousand. He's known as the angel of death. How many Israelis got forcibly injected or intimidated into it? How many got sick and died? How many are sick and dying now? 

So the test sites were Israel, Italy, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand, communist China. And that's all this was was a giant exercise in tyranny. The Israeli people and the people of the world are all being targeted by the same global world government operation with Albert Bourla and Bill Gates at the head of it. And Benjamin Netanyahu is nothing but their little pimp. 

Here's a clip. Give me one example, so you'll see because I don't wanna bore you with detailed detailed plans. I I but they are detailed in my mind. We came out of COVID first. I described that in my book, my conversations with Albert Bourla at Pfizer. And I persuaded him to give tiny Israel, the the necessary vaccines to get us out first from the COVID. And the reason I could do that is because we have a database. Ninety eight percent, a medical database, ninety eight percent of our population 

has digitized medical records, a little card. And anywhere you go in any hospital in Israel, north, south, doesn't make any difference. Boom. You punch it in, and you know everything about this patient for the last twenty years. I said, we'll use that to tell you whether these vaccines, what do they do to people, not individual people, not with their individual identities, but statistically, what does it do to people with, you know, with meningitis? What does it do to people with high blood pressure? What is it you know, you wanna know that. So Israel became, if you will, the the lab 

for Pfizer, and that's how we did it. We got it out, and we gave the information to the world, not only been published in medical magazines and so on. That's a database we have. I intend to bring on that base database of medical personal medical records for entire population, a genetic database, genomes. Okay? Give me a saliva sample. Volunteer. But I'm sure most people would do it. Maybe we'll pay them. Now we have, genetic record on a medical record 

of a robust population. It's got you have to have diversified populations. We have people from a hundred lands. This is a very powerful engine. Now now let, pharma companies, let medical companies, let them run algorithms on this database. Okay? I'm telling you right away that I'll give preference for a few years to Israeli firms, but you can create and then to the world. But you can create, you know, a biotechnological industry that is unheard of right now, unheard of, unimagined even. 

And and these are just the examples. So we can become a light stave off Iran, become a light unto the nations in, groundbreaking. A light unto the nations by using the people in Israel, the Jews, the Christians, the Muslims as guinea pigs under forced injections, lockdowns with a genetic database to see what the mutinogenic injections do 

to the host body. And, of course, a lot of the big companies that are pushing all this are based in Israel, so they're sacrificing that population to set the precedent to be able to test GMO deadly gene therapies on the public so the elites can actually get some of the breakthroughs for themselves while testing on humans instead of testing on rats and pigs and other animals. And that's just evil. Out in the open, calmly said, very cavalierly, very proud of what he's done, 

and they're all just doubling down. Albert Bourla, Bill Gates. You know, in fact, I'm gonna continue along this line. I've got an Albert Bourla clip talking about the four shots you're gonna be made to take every year, and we got Bill Gates' twenty twenty three announcement where he tells you what's coming in the future. And then I'm gonna get into a lockdown of the cities and the climate lockdowns that they're now calling fifteen minute cities or fifteen minute prisons. They'll they'll have actual fences and gates around them. You can't get out. We'll be right back. Info wars dot com. 

Very interesting. So, LD, let's go ahead and go to the two clips right above that. Let's just get an idea of what these shots are actually doing a little bit. First one's where the flu go and then miscarriages statistic. Let's display those two back to back. These are John Donne reports, investigated journalist for Band. VideoInfoWars, and he always does great videos. Let's let's check out what some of these shots are doing that, BB is relating to that they have, a database, a medical database for ninety eight percent of the citizenry, and they're gonna do genetic testing. That, of course, it'll be voluntary. But maybe we'll pay them. Yeah. Uh-huh. Sure. So let's let's get a taste of what's going on with, what these shots seem to be doing 

from John Brown. The president was also very clear that COVID is not over. Is the pandemic over? The pandemic is over. We still have a problem with COVID. We're still doing a lot of work on it. It's but the pandemic over. But the COVID is not over. The president has been very clear on this. If you notice, no one's wearing mask. Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape. So they're like, well, the public's woken up to us. Let's just claim it's over and then turn it right back on, which they've turned all the same fear, all the same lies back on again. Probably the worst flu, outbreak we've seen in a decade. 

There, and there are some places where flu may be peaking, but it's very early data, but a lot of flu out there. Again, the worst in a in a decade. There was basically zero flu. Almost nobody's had flu now for eighteen months. Literally, there was nearly no flu, this this year in the Southern Hemisphere. They went from tens of millions of flu deaths to basically zero. Remember that? Look, flu you you can type in the headlines. The flu is gone. Why is the flu gone? Because they counted the flu deaths in two thousand and twenty to scare everybody as COVID. We've taken a very 

liberal approach to mortality, and I think they're reporting that those if someone dies with COVID nineteen, we are counting that as a COVID nineteen death. Now that they've taken the poison shots and death rates and all these other viral infections and erased immune systems are so bad. Oh, now it's it's the flu. We know this virus is constantly changing. New variants have emerged here in the US and around the world. We've seen cases of hospitalizations 

rise in Europe in recent weeks, contagious viruses, and, like COVID, they're gonna spread considerably more easily. The most important thing you can do to prepare for your holidays is to get your updated COVID vaccine. And if you get it now, you'll be protected in time for winter holiday gatherings. Hi, everyone. Thank you for joining the Global Citizen Concert, especially our frontline workers who have carried us through this pandemic. 

We're deeply grateful for all that you've done. The vaccines are safe. I promise you they're safe. They work. Dear Santa, I don't want games. I don't want toys. Just get me the COVID vaccine. Here we are going into the third year of it, and we are still in the middle of a pandemic with the numbers that you just showed. In the US alone, the COVID vaccines have saved more than three million lives and helped We've heard, figures of around three million lives saved 

globally as a result of the vaccine. Do you really want anybody that's in a vulnerable situation, an older person, somebody with a high BMI to hear you talking down the vaccines and then die from COVID. I mean, here's the thing, Asim. Surely, the COVID vaccine is by definition the most tested vaccine in history given the fact that billions have had it. Yeah. Sadly not, Mark. And in fact, that figure of three million, that isn't based upon any good hard evidence. I mean, there was a a headline about twenty million lives saved from COVID vaccines, 

but it was based upon the lowest level quality of evidence we can ever have a modeling study. In other words, you know, people like John Aeneidus, who I consider the Stephen Hawking Medicine, describes such sort of studies or observational studies as being spurious. In other words, fake. This is science fiction, not scientific fact. We have a vaccine that unequivocally is highly effective and safe and has saved literally millions of lives. The Commonwealth Fund has come out with a report just this past week that vaccinations that have been administered over this period of time, this last year and a half to two years, has saved three point two million lives, 

eighteen million hospitalizations, and approximately one trillion dollars in costs. So what's the problem with vaccines? It's not a vaccine. It wasn't approved. It's not safe and effective. It doesn't protect you. It erases your immune system. Everyone knows it. And he just went back to the lie of two years ago that it's safe and effective and protects you. You are a lying dirtbag criminal that produced the weapon and then released it and then gave us the deadly shots. And you need need to go to prison, you little Joseph Mingala. 

Let's first go back to this great Mike Adams article, that came out in July of last year, and it links right to the New England Medical Journal that hides it deep in the study. That's an eighty two percent of pregnant women who got vaccinated for COVID during the first and second trimesters suffered miscarriages, and it's still a very, very large amount as well you can read, in in the third trimester as well. That's also in the, 

double digits. Here's one of the studies. Preliminary findings of mRNA COVID nineteen vaccine safety in pregnant women, miscarriage, stillbirth rates exploding worldwide as depopulation continues unabated. You can see the graph there, from started using being forced to get COVID nineteen shots. Australia sees sixty three percent drop in births after introduction of COVID vaccines. What will the government's excuse will be? 

Hospital president. COVID nineteen vaccines causing miscarriages is complete myth, plain and simple. I'm very happy to report that among the tens of thousands of women who have been closely studied after they chose to get the COVID nineteen vaccines, the data is clear these vaccines are safe. The often mentioned but completely unsubstantiated concerns about COVID nineteen vaccines causing either miscarriages or other problems with their pregnancy or causing problems getting pregnant 

is a complete myth, plain and simple. Where's the study? The tens of thousands of women, where is it? They admit it's all lies. Pfizer fake reports as well. This guy is a lying scumbag. So he doesn't give any facts, doesn't give any statistics, doesn't give any numbers. He just says we have thousands of women and none of them had a problem. No. No. No. There's no there nobody's nobody's dying. No children are dying. I've been actively miscarrying since the eighth. I have gone to a doctor, and this is my second visit to the ER. If you're wondering why women's rights 

matter, this is my way. Nobody actually is coming down. They're always gonna send me hope. These are the folks that tell you that two men can have a baby. It's all upside down world. You know, they use DNA to prove somebody committed a murder thirty years ago. That's all scientific. But now the science guy, Bill Nye's new shows tell kids that there are no x and y chromosomes. They're murdering the truth. They're murdering science. And he sits up there and says, out of tens of thousands of women, nobody's had a miscarriage. 

Nobody's had a sick baby. That's a damn lie. I see a vast vast number of patients a year. I don't know of any other maternal fetal medicine physician in this country that sees as many patients as I do by ultrasound. At one point in time, this year, I was on track to see nine thousand, Nine thousand high risk OB ultrasounds. So I I know what's going on, and I've seen death and destruction like I've never seen before. The stillbirth rate is measured in terms of live births 

per thousand. And, really, it's come down in my career from about ten to about almost five point eight or six. Now let's go to twenty twenty one and look at the stillbirth rate for Michelle's. This is horrifying. But if you take this death figure and you look at that rate at twenty nine point three, that's Sigma that you're looking at is forty plus Sigma, 

standard deviation. Let that sink in. And what I've seen in my clinical practice has been a substantial massive increase, unprecedented, in menstrual abnormalities, prior to pregnancy. A substantial increase in infertility, a substantial increase in miscarriage, fetal death, and fetal malformation. We published many studies this year, over the last two years. Our latest study, which we've used from VAERS and CDC 

data, and we compared the COVID nineteen vaccines over the last fifteen, eighteen months with those of the influenza vaccine in pregnancy. And what we see is catastrophic. What did Alexander Seltzer needs to say about this? He goes, we know they are lying. They know they are lying. They know we know they are lying. We know they know we know they are lying, but they are still 

lying. They're still lying and lying squared these days. What do you think, Tony? Should we check-in with Jackson Report? Because it seemed like the interlude there with, the Bandot video crew begs for more information of that Ilkka higher level of scrutiny. Because I saw a couple things in there. Like that Mike Adams report where it's like eighty two percent of We didn't debunk it. We dealt with it and put it in context, and it you might not wanna hang your hat on that type of thing. 

Sorry that it got recycled there in that video, but there are other valid points being brought up for which there are substantial pieces of evidence that aren't being mistranslated as opposed to recycle. Right. Yeah. That's fine then. It's not too terribly long. It's only, like, twenty five ish minutes. Just a report. So it's not too long. Yeah. Yeah. So we'll we'll round out the latest stuff with COVID and such, and then we'll, brace ourselves for intermission because we got a couple different spicy things we can discuss tonight. Yeah. Yeah. There's there's some good choices. That's for sure. 

Fantastic. Alright. So this is coming from Del Bigtree at the High Wire. This is his weekly segment with Jeffrey Jackson, investigative Del and Jeffrey and see what, the Jackson report contains this week. My god, Jeffrey. Twenty twenty two went by in a flash. And maybe it's because I've been traveling so much, but I just it's it's incredible to think 

that, you know, all of this is just flying by. We're so busy, and there's so much information. But here we are, last episode of twenty twenty two. And I gotta say, I'm not gonna miss reporting on Anthony Fauci's double speak for the rest of my life. I'm done. It's put a fork in that reporting. We're done with that unless there's prosecutions happening. And then I guess we can bring that back up again. But farewell to that that chapter of the high wire, I guess. Indeed. One of the, you know, one of the most important stories 

that was reported throughout the summer, it's still been going on in the background. And we forget about this because it's in another country here in America, but it's in the Netherlands. We have the Dutch farmers, and they've been protesting because their farms are are being really closed in upon by the government. The government put nitrogen restrictions of up to ninety five percent on Dutch farmers. And the Netherlands is really the breadbasket of of one of the breadbaskets of Europe. As far as this land size, it's it's there's a lot of farmers that are proportionate to its population. So it's a very interesting, you know, if you wanna call it attack on on farmers 

via this sustainable matrix. And they were asked to cut their fertilizer. They're asked to cut their heads of of cattle, and they were already implementing a lot of these a lot of these things, but it wasn't enough. So the government really moved in on them, and you saw a lot of protests throughout the throughout the summer months. And now we're seeing kind of the next phase ratchet up here into this. And, you know, it's it's not an accident we're reporting on this because this is such an important topic at the end of the year here moving into this neck into twenty twenty three. Here's the headline now as we're closing out twenty twenty two. Netherlands to close-up three thousand farms to comply with EU rules. It says here farmers will be offered a deal well over the worth of the farm according to the government plan that is targeting the closures of two thousand to three thousand farms. Earlier leaked versions of the plan put the figure at a hundred and twenty percent of the farm's value, but that figure has not yet been confirmed by ministers. 

This is the, nitrogen minister. She says, there's no better offer coming. They're kinda playing hardball here. This is Christiane Van der Waal, nitrogen minister told MPs on Friday. She said compulsory purchases would be made with pain in the heart if necessary. I'm sure that will be painful for the government to make compulsory purchases. Wow. So what's going on here? We're we're looking at this happening and people are saying, you know, there's we're moving into a food crisis. There's, you know, there's inflation. People can't really afford groceries, and you're shutting down the farmers in in in the Netherlands. 

Well, the World Economic Forum has a plan that's kinda coming to light here and it's really shedding a different angle on this. And a lot of the farmers had also said this may have been the plan. Check out this video from the WEF. Okay. It's amazing when I watch these videos coming out from the Economic Forum. I just wonder who's their head of promotion in PR. I mean, it it 

always seems like this is the worst advertisement this reminded this reminded me of when I was working on as a producer on the CBS talk show, The Doctors, we went to Haiti right after the big earthquake that just killed an incredible amount of people. And being there, what you realize is these giant tent cities like nothing I'd ever seen in in my personal life before. But those were all people that used to be farmers and out in the country. And just over the years as sort of industrial agriculture took over, all of these people just forced into the cities. And so that's where you really had just amazing amounts of squalor and sewage running down between these tents and 

children no clothes. And it it just reminded me of that sort of progress, right? Where we go away from people having jobs and working and being able to be a part of the land to just stacking them on tops of the on top of each other with just very little to even survive on. And if that's some dream for our future, I hope below the no box, there's definitely like a check. Hell no. Oh, hell no. Right. And, you know, it may not be it may not be really easy to see what's going on in some place like China or as I said in the video in Africa when they're packing everybody in these cities, you know, 

hundreds of millions of people. But in the Netherlands, there there this is all pretty much farmland, and they're trying to kill this farmland as quick as possible. And on the top of that, all of a sudden, this megalopolis tristate city, this is what it's being called. This is an article from twenty seventeen. This is when it really started to roll, but the farmers were weren't under this much pressure. They were still feeling some pressure from this, net zero push, but they weren't getting this heavy hand from the government like they are now. So here's the headline in twenty seventeen. Dutch investors launched new marketing program for the Netherlands. Tri State City, it's called. They said a group of institutional investors in the Netherlands have joined forces to present the Netherlands plus parts of Belgium and Germany as a single city network named Tri State City. The project, backed by Dutch employer organization VNONCW, 

that's the largest, employers organization in Netherlands, by the way. Says the region's population of thirty million people creates a sustainable urban powerhouse. The project supporters include property developers and pension fan pension funds as well as Utrecht's, economic board. That's one of the larger cities there. It goes on to say, you know, why are they doing this? We had talked about this, Dell. Why are they doing this? They according to these people, the Netherlands must present itself as one of the most powerful and sustainable city networks in the world, the project's backers says. It's it is about how Dutch companies present themselves to companies such as Apple or big Chinese firms. 

Prologist Benelux, director Bram Wennerhoven told Financiala Dagblad. That's one of the papers in Netherlands. So it's not about, you know, individuality, independence, really helping communities grow. It's about how we present ourselves to Apple and big Chinese firms. We have to look on the international stage. That's why we're gonna do this. We're gonna get rid of farms to do this too. That's mean It's amazing. Reading between the lines here is what it's looking like. So this is actually they have a website, tristatecity dot n l. And if you go there, you can see kind of these these dream plans for this megacity. You have this megalopolis with a population around forty five million people extending across the Netherlands, 

Germany, Belgium, and, maybe not as many farms there anymore if this if this comes to fruition. And and we've seen, you know, in these mega cities, even in the smaller cities that wouldn't be it wouldn't be considered a megalopolis, but cities like Oxford or Canterbury, we'd reported on this before. These cities become so big and their traffic becomes really bad. And we're getting situations like this, a fifteen minute city within the city. And this was the headline we reported on just a couple months ago. Find if they leave their neighborhood too often. And in Canterbury, 

this is, the same thing that was happening there. This is now moving forward. This is the latest headline from that. Canterbury traffic zones like post war Berlin without the wall. They're talking about the segmentation that they have going on there. So this is this is what's going on when they think this interconnected sustainable powerhouse. Well, it's gonna be divided up like pies, and you're gonna need permits according to these plans to go from districts of the city to other districts. Wow. I mean, it it's it's it's horrifying. But I think, you know, in some ways, many of us that have been in cities, like we were in Los Angeles before we moved out to Texas, I mean, that kind of already is a megacity. Right? I mean, you can drive from, 

you know, I don't know, at this point, Ventura all the way down to San Diego, and you never get a sense that the city is leaving. And more and more as you go up through Bakersfield on your way to Las Vegas, you could easily imagine a point where all of that is connected and just becomes this giant, cesspool of, you know, mask lovers. It's terrifying. And and you you can drive in LA unless there's some issue with the electronic grid or the electric grid and you have an electric vehicle. And that brings us kind of in the next conversation here is this move. You know, this is kind of on par with with what we're talking about here in the Netherlands and moving away from farming, bringing it to the to the more urban development. But also, now we have this switch to the the electric energy grid and the vehicles as well. So John Kerry was just interviewed recently. And, you know, we're racing towards 

the the the electric vehicles. I believe California said there by twenty thirty, they want all electric vehicles. This is what John Kerry just said. John Kerry says green energy transition isn't happening fast enough. Everything has to accelerate. He's talking twenty times faster for electric vehicles. But as we've talked about, there's a problem here. Into his cell phone from his own private jet. You know? Right. Yeah. Exactly. So there there's a problem with that, though, because these batteries, they require lithium. They require cobalt. Lithium in South America's lithium flats and in in the Congo with the cobalt mining, you have basically slave labor and kids that are working down there doing this, and it's it's an environmental disaster. And here's you know, luckily, we have some balance in the reporting here. Here's one of the headlines here. Elephant in the room. Clean energies need for unsustainable minerals. So they're finally realizing people are finally this is like a a a a topic at, you know, dinner tables now that these minerals are unsustainable. And we're rushing this push into this, and we don't really have a contingent plan for how we're gonna find all these minerals. But also the renewables themselves, they rely on energy storage. Not when we're talking about cars, when we're talking about tire 

grids for cities. And some more conversations are coming out to balance this. And these people are saying, look, this isn't really realistic. This is a study, just recently. This is the headline here. Lack of energy storage makes renewables only grids a pipe dream. And it says in here renewables only grids require large amounts of electricity storage to make them viable. However, the world currently lacks any power storage technology that is both affordable and scalable. As the paper's author, Francis Menton, explains, the amount of storage required is very large, perhaps as much as two months of average demand. The cost then becomes absurd. You can spend all of your GDP on batteries every year, and it's it it would still not be enough. Hydrogen is better, he goes on to say, but it's astonishingly expensive, and it's very insufficient 

to, or, yeah, insufficient to to really power this. But so we have this grid, you know, in this in this perfect world, we have this grid. It's great even if we did have the the minerals for it. And even if we did have this this storage technology. But what happens, when, you know, people like Switzerland have an energy crisis going into the winter like they're having right now? So we have Switzerland, which has over half of its energy is is, hydroelectric. But in the winter months, they have to rely pretty much on imports. And we're going we're obviously in the winter 

in Europe there in a lot of these countries, and they're having energy issues heating their houses. And so when there's an emergency, this is what Switzerland plans to do. Headlines, Switzerland could ban electric vehicle use during energy crisis. This is a report. And so they're talking about basically banning electric car use for nonessential travel. So we go back to the same thing, right, during the power, you know, sort of rolling blackouts they're having in California. You know, there was people that are being told don't charge your electric vehicles right now, which is amazing because aren't they you know, in California, they're trying to have, like, all electric by, you know, what, ten, fifteen years from now or something. Yeah. Yeah. Exactly. So they're saying that's great. We can have that. But if there's any issues with the power grid, electric vehicles 

are banned. And in this in this contingency plan in Switzerland, they're talking about only keeping your refrigerator to a certain, degree and and so on and so forth. We've heard those headlines before. But that all goes into effect in Switzerland, you know, coming into these winter months if they have problems with imports. And we know there's a lot of problems with imports as we reported on before as well. And then another angle and kind of a final angle to this I wanna put in here is this thing called ESG. This is environmental, social, and governmental investing. And this there's an explosion of looking through investments 

decisions through this ESG lens. An asset management industry has responded to this by offering sustainable social responsible funds for people to invest in. But there's an issue with that as well. This is Harvard business law and there's a lot of great research going into this now to uncover an inconvenient truth about ESG investing. And it goes on to to study a lot of, reports showing showing what are some of the issues with this. But one of the studies we'll look at here is it is a title here. It says, do ESG funds make stakeholder friendly investments? It says, using a comprehensive study of self labeled ESG mutual funds as identified by Morningstar in the United States from twenty ten to twenty eighteen, we find that these funds 

hold portfolio firms with worse track records for compliance with labor and environmental laws relative to portfolio firms held by non ESG funds managed by the same financial institutions in the same years. Wow. It also goes on to say, finally, ESG funds appear to underperform financially relative to other funds with the same asset manager and year and to charge higher fees. Our findings suggest that socially responsible funds do not appear to follow through on proclamations of concerns for stakeholders. So as you're seeing there, it's kind of it's kind of an issue there. And Yeah. Not only are they not returning the the capital, but even for people saying, well, I'll take a little bit of sacrifice on my returns to help the environment. They're not seeming to do that. So what's the answer? We're seeing huge backlash now. And from one of the biggest one of the biggest portfolios, Vanguard, this was out of Reuters. This is mainstream headlines now. Vanguard quits net zero climate efforts, citing need for independence. 

Vanguard manages about seven trillion dollars in assets. They're one of the top ones next to BlackRock in this, and they've exited. They've really they've really become the biggest ones to do this. So this is a major blow to this ESG investment paradigm or scheme or however you wanna look at it. It's all so confusing because we've talked about Vanguard before and BlackRock, these two monolithic companies that essentially own the world between the two of them. And you would imagine they're the ones investing in World Economic Forum and all these things that are pushing these agendas. And all of a sudden, when they say, no. We don't want to be a part of this. It's not sustainable or financially intelligent. 

You know, it it leaves me just looking forward to next year and all the investigations we're gonna need to do to figure out what the heck is going on here. Right. And, yeah, maybe twenty three twenty twenty three is the year of gray area and, you know Right. No more polarization. You know, things may not be exactly what they seem, black or white plus or minus. And Yeah. So this also goes to states. Now states are taking a, a stance on this as well and withdrawing some of their portfolios. Now this this talks about BlackRock and concerns them directly. State treasuries yank one billion from BlackRock due to ESG worries. This is South Carolina, Utah, Louisiana, Arkansas, Missouri. 

They're all backing out of this. Now, again, BlackRock holds multibillion dollar investments. So this is a small drop in the pot, but is a drop nonetheless. And one of the biggest people to pull out recently was Florida. Here's the headline here. They're the largest they're taking out the largest amount. Florida pulls two billion from BlackRock and largest anti ESG divestment. And we go to their finance, manager at Florida. This is his Twitter account. He says, using Florida's cash to fund BlackRock's social engineering project isn't something we signed up for. It's not it it's got nothing to do with maximizing 

returns and is the opposite of what an asset manager is paid to do. We are divesting from BlackRock. And so, a lot of the headlines that we're reporting on this saying, oh, it's just a couple Republican states, but we have now a Democratic run state in North Carolina that is making, you know, maybe not such a bold move because they're keeping their assets at the firm, but North Carolina treasurer wants BlackRock CEO to go. So they're asking the CEO to step down because they're not really treating the funds correctly. So this is Larry Fink. That's the head of CEO. So that's that's a good move, I guess, on that part for people that are really seeing the balance of this ESG conversation. 

Well, and when we say just a couple of Republican states, now maybe one, you know, Democrat state, these couple of states get to sort of stand as a historical reference point as these things move further and further down the road, and you start watching what states invested correctly and how their finance is doing. Just like I think we're now reflecting on Florida and Ron DeSantis' decision to pull out of the COVID lockdowns earlier than almost anyone else, being told that he was gonna destroy humanity and certainly the humanity inside of Florida instead. He's got skyrocketing numbers and everyone moving there. I think that, you know, slowly but surely, one state, five states, fifteen states, you know, this is how change really happens. It starts in this grassroots space, and it's where politically, you know, I've said growing up progressive liberal that, you know, I'm now politically marooned, but one of the tenants I really do and I'm starting to appreciate more and more of is this idea of localized government. You know, bringing the power of government closer to you. The smaller the government, the more power it should have. So give city and, you know, county councils more power than the state than state over the federal because we just it's so hard to affect federal government and change there. Whereas if it's close to us, we can elect and and and and deelect 

those that aren't representing us. And so these states stepping forward and watching them really find that power, I think it's kind of exciting. Absolutely. And and in local government, your voice and your needs will be as a greater percentage of being heard and being valued as well. And, you know, as we're going to these conversations, especially moving into this new year, the COVID conversation starts to blur with the climate conversation starts to blur with, you know, the exposing of the conflicts of interest in all of these agencies. We're really in new territory here because we have a population that is more educated than ever before that we're speaking to. So 

we're you know, our organization, along with many others, we're taking we're taking people along with us in these investigations. And sometimes they're as smarter and not smarter than with than us with these conversations. So it's pretty it's a pretty exciting time, and the population is really awake and aware. And, you know, moving to the health conversation here, we're gonna need a really activated population because here's the headlines coming out here. Let's talk about diabetes, obesity, type two diabetes cases among young people skyrocketing due to rising obesity rates. Remember, type two is lifestyle related, 

diabetes. And here's obesity, nation's obesity epidemic is growing. Nineteen states have adult obesity rates above thirty five percent, up from sixteen states last year. And even this headline, you know, it goes all the way into cognitive issues, ultra processed food intake linked with cognitive ish, decline study. And so where can we point to this? Well, there is a organization. They started in nineteen seventeen. They have the roots and it's called the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. And they're responsible if you go to their website, they say this is their mission. The academy is committed to improving the nation's health and advancing the profession of dietetics through research, education, advocacy. 

Dell, this reminds me a little bit of HHS saying their mission is to enhance the health and well-being of Americans through scientific research and public health. So we have this organization and boy, on their watch, they're really not doing a good job. So what gives? Well, scratch under the surface a little more. Thanks to the US right to know. It's a nonprofit organization. We have some FOIA emails. And here's the headline of The Guardian, reveals group shaping US nutrition receives millions from big food industry. It goes on to say the academy, they call them, accepted at least fifteen million from corporate and organizational contributors from twenty eleven to twenty seventeen and over four point five million in additional funding went to the Academy's Foundation, which is that nonprofit foundation they have. Among the highest contribute 

contributions came from companies such as Nestle, PepsiCo, Hershey, Kellogg's, General Mills, ConAgra, and then National Dairy Council and the baby formula producer, Abbott Nutrition. Now, Dell, hold on and listen to this. It goes on to say the email reveals the academy in twenty fifteen was in a sponsorship deal with Abbott and was discussing how the academy could use its dietitian's influence in pediatricians offices to push PediAssure, one of the pharmaceutical giants infant form infant nutritional products. Abbott at the time had in place a two year three hundred thousand dollar sponsorship deal. It goes on to say the academy also owned Abbott stock at the time of the deal and plans, a record show, it it it also owned stock in companies with which it had a sponsorship deal, PepsiCo, as well as financial contributors like Nestle. This is Gary Ruskin. He's the head of US Right to Know. He says, this is astounding. 

That belongs in the conflicts of interest hall of fame. It is off the charts, he says. And then it goes on to say separately in twenty fifteen, a partnership between the academy and Kraft ignited controversy when the academy agreed to allow the company to put its kids eat healthy seal on Kraft singles packaging, which suggests an independent source verified the product's nutritional value. But you and I know that they didn't. And Wow. So you wanna talk about the the baby formulas just as a side note to that. Remember, there was a recall of Similac in this country. This was a big story here. And this was one of the headlines. The the legal 

the legal industry really jumped on this because they they were, pushing suits for for infant deaths, wrongful infant deaths. In wake of Similac recall, FD announces strategy to keep Cronobacter out of infant formula products. That's the bacteria. So Abba had to close his plants because of a necrotizing enterocolitis. That's the NEC. These are lawsuits from kids in the NICU that were given this, this formula. And, you know, they basically passed away because it was it was this stomach, basically a stomach of formula that was, eating their stomach. It was a pretty terrible situation. But Abbott, you know, internal emails show that Abbott knew about this and they still market it to the hospitals, you know, the typical corporate playbook. 

But this is what's going on behind the scenes here. There's, you know, there's there's real damage when these organizations that you know, I've heard some people say, oh, it's agency capture is great. It helps them work more closely with the industry. Oh my god. Not not to the evidence I've seen. And so here's the paper. Those those FOIA documents, those internal emails were actually incorporated into a research paper. And this is, the paper. If anyone wants to read it, it's a long read and it's amazing. The corporate capture of the nutrition profession in the USA. The case of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Now understand, they, 

are influential at setting the US dietary guidelines. So that's a huge thing. They're also big in lobbying, for for any changes to the state for health and nutrition. So that that's a big deal because that's where a lot of these, these guidelines really do come from. And so we have this organization, really a behemoth organization that's a front for our companies. But we also have as a last stop gap gap measure like the ACIP committee, we have this independent advisory committee 

that sets the the dietary guidelines. It's the dietary guidelines advisory committee. And so this was a study, showing how how they were balanced. Was there conflicts of interest within this committee? Remember, this is kind of the last stop gap independent committee for these dietary guidelines. Here's the here's the headline, conflicts of interest for members of the US twenty twenty dietary guidelines advisory committee. It says here, results. The researchers write our analysis found that ninety five percent of the committee members had conflicts of interest with food and or pharmaceutical industries. And that particular actors, here we go again, including Kellogg, Abbott, Kraft, Mead Johnson, General Mills, Dannon, and the International Life Science had connections with multiple members. Research funding a membership of an advisory executive board jointly accounted for more than sixty percent of the total number conflicts of interest documented. So they're top heavy. Their leadership 

is com conflicted. So you know what's gonna come below that is more conflicts of interest. And so, you know, the the reason we report on this so much, people say, I know this story. I know this story. But until we can clean this up, until we can get everyone on the same page and realize that these industries and these watchdogs may not be working in our best interest, that's one of the biggest first steps to changing culture and to changing how we live, in our everyday lives when it comes to these overarching agencies. Yeah. I mean, it truly is the regulatory swamp. I think, you know, at this point, I'm I'm resigned to just assuming every regulatory agency that says it's looking out for my own good is probably, 

mostly being staffed by executives from the very industries I'm supposed to be being protected from, whether it's aviation, drugs, vaccines, food. I mean, the environment, you name it. It just seems like regulatory capture is complete. And anybody that thinks it's a good idea, then there's a couple bridges in this country I'd like to sell you. These are outrageous times. It is really the forefront of our work, Jeffrey, and it's what I'm really excited about. People have been watching throughout this year. We really are taking this knowledge that you and I and our team has gained through being very specific early on for the last, you know, five or more years, however long we've been doing the high wire now, 

since, two thousand seventeen. But that work was really specifically around vaccines and that research. Well, we really have, I think, completed all the research that needed to be done or could be done on the childhood vaccine program. Now we're gonna be connecting the dots of the COVID vaccine to that program so people understand it. But our understanding that we've gained in going down all of those rabbit holes, opening every door, talking to all the legislatures involved. We now see the pattern and are understanding these other issues, whether it's banking or energy, food supply, all of that, which is why it's been so exciting to be stepping into these other spaces. And we're gonna be doing a lot more of that as as we've discussed as we move into next year, really broadening, 

you know, our our our view. And we're still gonna hold on to this sort of transparency, you know, that that we're talking about. We talk about the high wire protocol, but moving into these other sectors that I think are really gonna be affecting our lives and certainly our children's and grandchildren's lives. But, it all comes down to this generation, this moment, and I'm just so proud of the work that you did throughout this year and, of course, all the way through COVID. Just you're such a fantastic team player, and it's just an honor to know you. And I I look forward 

to, you know, getting even deeper in these issues in the new year. Oh, thanks, Del. That's that's really sweet to say. Thank you so much. And I'm I'm looking forward to bringing our integrity to these spaces of research and our transparency as well, really to just blow these things wide open. So let's do it. Alright. Have a have a happy new year, and, I'll see you, in twenty twenty three. Alright. Thanks so much. Alright. Take care. Now speaking of health and what it takes to be healthy, I think it's a good time to queue up that clip from Joe Rogan this past week with 

the esteemed, the erudite, Doctor. Peter Hotez, who has been an authority on all things vaccine and representing the establishment status quo position for quite a few years going back to pre pandemic days when people just had questions about their children's side effects, unforeseen consequences of their vaccine schedule. Yeah. Adjuvants, MMR, 

all those types of things that were going on. And, yeah, Hotez is gonna reveal his cards. He's gonna show. He's gonna he's not playing it close to the vest in this clip. I think it gives you a lot of deep insight into what brings a character like Peter Hotez to the Joe Rogan studio. It's not for the conversation. It's probably for the snacks. Let's check it out. I'm trying to track it down. Yeah. Just to be clear, this is from this is the clip is from twenty nineteen. 

Oh, is it? The commentary. It just circulated. It just it's it's circulated in context now. And I think okay. So this is, TLav. This is the last American vagabond talking with Alice Morrow, and they're reviewing, this hotels clip. And then I saw it on Twitter this week, courtesy of TLAB. Yeah. That's what we're looking for. The hot stuff. I'm just waiting for load rumble to load up. So It's alright. Are we ready to rumble? Well, in the Could be. We are now. Because You know, it's the Okay. Never mind. Sorry. Good. Good. 

We'll go back to that. I don't know where that's playing from. Hang on. Well, in the so this is, Alright. Let's see. December sixteenth twenty twenty one when COVID was going on. Well, it was, affecting people primarily with high BMI, at least two or more comorbidities. This is what the US FDA tweeted, pizza and chocolate anyone. So that's, you know, this is national chocolate covered anything day. Everything is up for grabs. Just be sure to also had some interesting tweets in the last twenty four hours that Elon had commented on. You got some FDA. You know? Get healthy by Edmund d. You know? Get some sunshine. Get some exercise. No. Beat some pizza with covered chocolate. Looks absolutely disgusting to me. But, you know, they can get your vaccines. I'm sure there's something else they were probably already. 

Pizza pudding there. Oh, yeah. They do. Since we stirred the pot with the pizza, now's a great time to remind you that COVID nineteen vaccines were sent to prevent COVID nineteen. They stirred the pot. Look. Look what they say. They stirred the pot brownies with the beans. COVID nineteen. This is December twenty twenty one. Yes. So this is US FDA. Prevent is a very interesting word. We can look that up. We should look that up in the dictionary and see what prevent means. Since we've stirred the pot with the pizza, now is a great time to remind you that hashtag COVID nineteen vaccines prevent 

COVID nineteen and serious health outcomes that COVID nineteen can cause, including hospitalization and death. He head to vaccines dot gov to find a location near you and make sure you dip your pizza in chocolate. Putting loving petos over there. There you go. But that's There's no pizza gate euphemisms there at all. It reminds me a lot of the lipid hypothesis in the nineteen fifties. And after we get to the Hotez clip here, the courtesy of the tea lab, we will go to another pizza story from the past week. Oh, boy. And the the rogue stories Oh, the other of deliveries 

that didn't get him busted. We should probably cover Paul Dosawatza on a good just breakdown before it all happened of the Greta Thunberg versus Yeah. We'll have to wade into that topic. It'll take us probably in through intermission. We'll get it started, and we'll kick it off and let it fly. Alright. So, with Alison Morrow talking about the the Hotez. The Hotez Jesus, not to be confused with Hotep Jesus. Everyone. And do we have a present for you? Santa has delivered officially on Twitter with, Peter Hotez, the, 

well, he's most well known, I think, for his bow tie. But then secondly, most well known for being, like, I think the biggest man of vaccines on the face of the planet. And I don't say that just casually. He is he is, like, all in on every vaccine, but definitely the COVID vaccine. And so all in that I'm gonna show you something I did vagabond here to opine as well. But he wanted, vagabond here to opine as well. But he wanted, surveillance even of what he called anti vaxxers, you know, and to really go after anti vaxx aggression and just, like, go after those people who didn't want the COVID vaccine and use use, the 

the three letter agencies to do it and and really combat misinformation. And we'll talk about that in a second. But but he really delivered on Rogan recently. As you see here, this is doctor Corey retweeting the video. This might be my all time favorite Joe Rogan moment. In just a few minutes, Peter Hotez inadvertently shows the world exactly what has gone wrong with our medical system and why his endless push for more vaccines will never create health. And that's because he admits, and I don't even think he admits he was kind of like happy and laughing about it, not realizing, I think, what what the bigger picture was gonna be when this quote was, shared around that he loves junk food and he just doesn't he doesn't necessarily feel bad about it. He just likes fries and hamburgers and all that good stuff, Ryan. And, and so he's telling you, you gotta get vaccinated 

for public health, but he doesn't care if he eats six hamburgers a day, apparently. I don't know. Anything you wanna say before I play it? Yeah. You know, it's it's you've you've opened that well. And I think what's interesting is there's there's two ways there's a few ways to look at this. I mean, obviously, there's infinite ways to look at it. But in my opinion, there's a few important ways to consider this. And that is ultimately that it's possible that he may not even truly realize why he looks so stupid in that clip. Right? And that's that's interesting to me. I in no way am I saying this guy is not aware of what he's doing. I think my opinion is I think that's very clear, but who knows for sure. But the way he discusses this on, like, the largest podcast 

on the planet as if it's, like, a casual admission to, like, doing literally nothing for your health. I shouldn't say that. I mean, he well, you'll play it. He talks about running in thirty minute intervals. But talking about doing all of this, like, all this, like, casuals the things we know are paramount for your health. We historically understand this for as long as you wanna look back, casting that aside because vaccines. And that's that's the gist here. And I think he genuinely, to some degree, doesn't understand why that's so stupid. But on the other side of it is that there's obviously a a push 

to make it about that's not real health. Vaccines are real health. And it's just this alarming undertone, and I think it's interesting. So the other point last point was that Joe Rogan of all people, which I'm still torn about whether I how I feel about what his true intentions are. Maybe it's just Joe, me, and Joe, and everyone makes up you know, who knows, really? But how how interesting it is that this podcaster, this host of of of of of of of oh, jeez. That's been, ultimate fighting. The fighter. Ultimate fighter. You have I was kinda just trying to be facetious. So, you know, the guy I mean, I I I think Joe's interesting, and he's got some good takes. But, like, someone from that background who's able to make these people look ridiculous, like Sanjay Gupta and plenty of others on the show by asking 

basic questions. That's why I like Yeah. Hear Corey's point because it's simple. It's easy to see. Yeah. Well, he's certainly, like, not as militant about about the very stuff that for the last couple of years, we've heard more and more that you're more at risk for well, I mean, just illness in general if you're eating junk food all the time, and that includes COVID. And so, you know, we we that we've heard over and over again that, like, it's an inflammatory response your body has. And so, you know, if you have diabetes or you're overweight or you, you know, you have all these, 

these preexisting conditions that in large part are related to lifestyle that you're more likely to get ill. And, and so he's definitely not as militant apparently about those things, which we know are real contributing factors, to just illness in general. You know, not even just the last couple of years what we've been discussing, compared to, like, his real militancy about if you get vaccinated, you know, and and so I just found that to be interesting. One other thing too is interesting is that you have to ask the question about whether he he truly understands the risks of not just that it's high fat and calories, but that he's ingesting horrible chemicals and hormones and additives. And whether he understands that that is another side of that. The GMOs means things because the way he pushes back on a lot of stuff in the in the mainstream conversation suggests that he either doesn't think those are dangerous or is overlooking that for clear reasons we could discuss. I think that's another angle to it, but go ahead if you wanna play it. Okay. Let's play the clip. Here we go. I guess I won't play it all, but or should I play it all right? Yeah. One minute. Yeah. Go ahead. Four minute? Okay. Yeah. Play it all. Before Here we go. 

Your immune system in other ways, do you take probiotics? Are you cautious about your diet? I'm not as cautious about my diet as I should be. I'm a junk foodaholic, actually. Well, that seems like a terrible thing for your health. It is a terrible thing for your health. And that's my favorite part of the whole thing. It's just like right there. It's that seems like a terrible thing for your health. Yes. It is a terrible thing for my health. I I love right there that what goes right past this is the where Joe is, like, just almost flabbergasted, like, expecting some kind of a justification, 

and he just smiles back at him. He's like, like, that's pretty stupid. Like, Joe is, like, you just can't get it past himself. Like, there must be more to that con conclusion. There's not. I I love this is so telling. Surprised he wasn't wearing a lab coat, by the way. Well, yeah, he doesn't understand why that would even be an oxymoron for, like, his position or like you were saying earlier, it's it's almost like, he just doesn't even understand why why this would even matter because because he probably would have a better defense for it if he thought it was a big deal that he was saying this. That would remind this my assumption. You're you're absolutely right. Or maybe this is, you know, I think meta on this stuff. Maybe this is the way to make it seem as if it doesn't necessitate a response because it's not necessary. Like, you know, who knows how they think into this? Either way, whether you think he's being honest or he's not, this is embarrassing. Like, from a health professional in fact, I responded to him on Twitter. I called him not a health professional. He's a pharma or rather yeah. A pharma professional. 

For someone in that position to make these statements, it's embarrassing. But, well, actually, let's let's keep going. We're only seventeen minutes ago. That's something my wife is, working on that. But that seems ridiculous for someone who works with health. Mhmm. Yeah. Yeah. What's going on with you, man? Sometimes, man. I just don't get it right. How often? Yeah. Sometimes. What? How often? How often do I steal a bag? Oh, sorry. Say how often did he yeah. He's about to say how often does he steal a bag of chips? Let's see what he said. A chips or something like that? Garbage. I don't know. No. No. Hopefully not every day, but, you know, hopefully not every day. Maybe a couple of times a week. Oh. That's what it's with. Rachel, my, my daughter with autism, that's, like, our thing is to 

go to the, it's called the burger joint or to, Shake Shack to get a to get a cheeseburger. We'll stick sneak some fries. So Mhmm. So you Living large, we call it. Like that mouth pleasure so much you're willing to sacrifice a little bit of milk. Yeah. I you know, I, you know, I I can I have to concede that's the case? Well, there's, I mean, I don't have to tell you, but there's a a large body of data that connects poor diet to a host of diseases. That seems like a crazy decision for a guy in your line of work. There you go. Sometimes the, 

sometimes the it's not all brain. It's, it it's something else. But I mean, it's What I'm thinking as I'm listening to him is the amount of compassion he has for himself and his bad decision making and no compassion for the decisions of other people, which are probably actually good decisions Right. That that that he he thinks are terrible decisions. We can talk about that in a second. But I just think it's interesting how much compassion and humor he has for his bad decision making where he's he has written countless articles at this point about how there should be no mercy for people who make decisions that he thinks are the wrong health decisions. 

Exactly. I mean, it's just blatant hypocrisy. And no matter how you it's see, this is a a major shift to get away from, like, the holistic natural mindset to chemicals, you know, in that direction, you know, the pharma direction. And so that that's what we're seeing. This this is okay because these things are meaningless. These are small choices. As long as you get your vaccines, we can laugh off the fact that I'm fifty pounds overweight and that I'm completely clogged my you know, whatever else we're talking about. But just to you're right. It's a great point to make there that it's just such a casual laughing dismissal, and, you know, it gets better with Joe Rogan's points. But just the fact that this is something that can be dismissed as nonimportant from somebody in that position, 

it's just I've never seen something more transparent. We need to see that this is the this what Pierre Kory is saying. This is the one stop reality of why our health system has been so lost is a lot of them actually think this or they're doing it for other reasons. And that's it's not correct. We I mean, as as you said before, when I end this, I'll make a point about the the weight. Don't let me forget that. That this has been proven based on the trust the science crowd even, that the weight is a huge factor in regard to COVID specifically. And yet Mhmm. Mattered to him. You know? Mhmm. Bob Whittelfish is saying daughter with autism is worth dwelling on for a second thing because, 

you know, he has said on Rogan before that, you know, there's no connection between vaccines and autism because he said that his science has or others have shown that there's, yeah, it happens pre pre, or not preconception, in the womb, pre birth or something. I I don't know. I'm just I'm throwing it out there that he has been he's very militant about that exact Of course. That exact thing, that connection. He's talking about that. And most likely because his daughter has autism. So he's gonna be aggressively on the stance that it's not my fault this happened. Right? That's that's an easy way to look at why you'd be so resistant to even considering 

all of the peer reviewed science that has found very clear connection. Wait. There the it was even been it's even been forced. It's been admitted to a grudging degree throughout this process pre COVID that, yes, there is a link. They just argue that it's not necessarily as severe as we made it out to be. That was the the the furthest it's gotten. But if you wanna go back to the doc the vaxxed documentary, the MMR injections and the conversations there, it's it's it's just like we dealt with with COVID nineteen and the vaccine misinformation there. I mean, this and, remember, this is Dell Bigtree and the same people back then pushing on the MMR vaccine. And the important reality and I'm not saying I know for sure that his daughter had autism because of that. Now I I I based on what we are taught, 

I I believe you could make the argument that autism existed before all of this, but that's a big question to ask because you can see a gigantic increase in autism in the perfect correlation from the act of nineteen eighty six forward. And now we're at this horrific reality of, like, one in every three or whatever the number is today. Not I no. That was, I I don't know stat. I forgot off the top of my head, but it's way higher than it used to be. Mhmm. The point is higher. The the point is that there is a connection there, and there's no denying this. And and for someone like that to push back on science, peer reviewed and otherwise, because he disagrees, it's the same thing we're seeing today. That it's the good science versus the bad science when all of it is using the scientific method, some are just using anyway, go ahead. I can go off Well, no. I was gonna say, Cheryl has been on before, and she was talking about how, like, in the late nineties, 

she was able to do reports about that topic with not really much concern from management. And, it and things changed in the early two thousands, and and that became like an untouchable topic. You couldn't discuss the connection. And she said flat out, and, somehow the video still lives on YouTube. She said the same thing you said, which there is a connection. She had looked into the research. She was doing a report on it, and this is the late nineties. No problem in network news. And then something happened, you know, the sort of five to seven years, 

following that. She did have, calls from like nonprofits that really show for the pharmaceutical industry saying, you know, you guys shouldn't be doing this report, blah, blah, blah. But her manager still stuck up for her right, you know, her ability, I guess, to do the report. Whereas nowadays, you know, people like me who just pitched us, pitched a story about it, didn't even do the report. I mean, I just pitched like that there was gonna be a conference and maybe we would go talk about it. And my boss said we would never we would never let anybody question that, question vaccines 

on our newscast because you would be essentially a psychopath, crazy science denier if you did that. Wow. And I think a lot of that is because of the messaging from people like Peter Hotez. And I think he's proud of that, You know? Proud that you would have a news manager look at a journalist like me and say that you would never let anybody question that. He would look at that as a win, I think. A win for truth. You're that and that's that is shutting down the scientific method. Like, think about how absurdly contradictory that is for a scientist to be actively promoting the lack of research and due diligence because we've already made our minds up on something. Right? The whole science is settled argument is literally counter counter to the scientific method. I mean, this is what's so this is why we have so many doctors who you know, there's a lot of people that were afraid to speak up in the beginning. You know? I get it. People You know? I get it. People were being attacked, losing practices, but it's gotten to a point to where anybody who has even a mock of honesty is going, okay. This is getting out of control. Like, they thought maybe this would dissipate. They're standing up and standing up and going, look. There's no trust the science. Saying trust the science is counter to scientific method. You know? So these people like Hotez, I I look. I don't 

I I look. I don't I find it almost impossible. I don't know for sure I can't prove this other than the base of the on the surface government funding and so on that people like this have, that I can't prove that he is doing this for one reason or another. But how you can possibly look at this, like, the entire COVID nineteen agenda and not walk away going there's something beyond right and wrong here. Like, this is this is malicious. Like, there are people that are making choices that know that people are being hurt by them, and it keeps happening. I don't know what level he falls into this, but when you've got people around the world, like doctor Peter McCullough, doctor Malone, 

doctor you know, I mean, everyone we've possibly talked about throughout this entire process, Jay Bharachara, doctor doctor, Bhakti, and then entire health ministries around the world, entire governments saying these things are dangerous to the point we won't even touch them anymore. And yet he's over here going, you better put that in your child's arm or you're not gonna be able to school and you're a crazy dangerous anti vaxxer. He literally just said online the other day actually, I have that tweet pulled up. I'm realizing right now we're getting away from the video. This is what always happens. But but I I had this oh, right here. And, k, if you wanna show it, the, oh, here it is. Yeah. So this is the tweet that went out, and this is a really alarming step. 

This is Peter Hotez, and this has been misrepresented to a small degree as claiming anti vax anti vaccine people is a major. Being anti vaxx is a major killing force. What he says is anti vaccine activism. Your words are a major killing force globally. That is this guy. That is Hotez. Mhmm. Saying you're not even allowed to speak up. Like, what if nobody had spoke up about the old swine flu vaccines? What if nobody spoke up about these past ones we knew were hurting people? You know? Mhmm. He he would call you an anti vaxxer for having questions. Even if you've already taken three shots and suddenly started asking questions, suddenly you're anti vaxxed. Nobody can take these people seriously. 

Yeah. This was what I was gonna show. We we will get back to the video in a second, folks, where we talk about If you're not my show, they know this is how this is how it goes usually. Yeah. Ryan's like, I'm short on time today. But, anyway, here's my screen. Let me go through thirty other things. Okay. This is what he wrote in twenty twenty one, COVID vaccines time to confront anti vax aggression. And this is the the famous, article where he talks about who should be helping. And if you scroll down, it's, cybersecurity law enforcement, public education, 

international relations, a high level interagency task force reporting to the UN secretary general could assess the full impact of anti vaccine aggression and propose tough balanced measures. And, that the task force should include experts who have tackled complex goal global threats such as terrorism, cyberattacks, nuclear armament because anti science is now approaching similar levels of peril. And it is becoming increasingly clear that advancing immunization requires counter offensive. That's so that's again yeah. Just to give context of who this is. 

You know, he doesn't talk about wine, but you know what, doctor Hotez? If you if you are a wine drinker, I even despite all that you've said about people, you could go to alison wine promo dot com and see the differences. I'm not gonna send a task force after you. You can go drink wine and I'm not gonna send a task force after you. You could do it without any, monitoring of your you know, I'm not gonna surveil you or anything. And also if if any of you all out there would like to get some wine, I know we're past Christmas, so it doesn't matter for Christmas gifts, but you still have time for new year's. And these are actually I mean, if wine can be healthy, they're healthier. We'll just put it. I've had a glass of wine, 

get some organic roast. Which point it does not. But, ultimately, the interesting part about it is that why can't we reflect on that? So, like, in today's world where we are right now with what they're telling you, this is this way and this is that way. Like, whether or not it's it's misinformation and the psychological operation, couldn't they just be wrong? And we know that's possible, but yet people like Cortez won't allow you to speak your mind because you're an aggressor against the narrative. And, see, that's the real danger in all this. Even though I think there's a whole layer and obviously verifiable data around how dangerous these things are, not not not the wine, the, the the injection stuff. 

That that yet it doesn't matter because you're just not allowed to challenge it because Hotez says so. You know? And he's got a white coat, so you make sure you listen to him because likes Alright. Just to be clear, Twinkie's bad. Wine, good. You can buy Allison's wine. I'm glad she hosted TLIVE for that commentary. If it goes on longer, you can go check it. We're gonna have it in the show notes in its entirety. I brought up the question in my mind when I heard them talk about, yeah, since nineteen eighty six because they had that vaccine prevention act where they don't get held accountable 

with respect to damages caused by vaccines to children, especially. Then I had a question. I said, When did they make that film Rain Man? Because that's what really popularized autism and put it on people's radar. That movie was made in nineteen eighty eight. Jay Gould (3one forty three) Oh, crazy. Jay Gould (3one forty three) Almost as if they sensed there would be a need for people to recognize and have a movie they could attach to when someone's parents were saying, Hey, my kids have autism. You could say, Oh, it's like the guy in Rain Man. Right? But without a Barry Levinson film to give us that form factor handle on the situation in public, we'd all be lost. 

Yeah. It's a nineteen eighty eight American road drama film directed by Barry Levinson, written by Barry Morrow and Ronald Bass. It's with us. Now Morrow and Bass, I think it was Morrow, he he actually knew some people who were, like, intellectual savants but had intellectual disabilities that weren't, I don't think, autism, but maybe later classified to to fall in that realm of autism. So he was basing it on, successful adult savants who did have an intellectual, 

disability like that. Then later, they kinda evolved it into, you know, the character has autism, but then focused on the relationship between Charlie and his brother. Correct. Yeah. And became the, just for people to get a sense of how impactful the movie was. It was theatrically released by MGM UA Communications Company in United States on December sixteen nineteen eighty eight to critical and commercial success, grossing three hundred and fifty four point eight million on a twenty five million dollar budget, becoming the highest grossing film of nineteen eighty eight and received a leading eight nominations of the sixty first Academy Awards, winning four more than any other film nominated. Best picture, best director, best actor screenplay. And best original screenplay. 

Now they're gonna remake that movie. You know, they're gonna do the forty year anniversary. Tom Cruise is gonna be in it again. Only in the beginning where he's hawking those supercars, they're gonna have Andrew Tate in there for the clicks to make sure the marketing is built in. And with that segue, segue, that guy went off a cliff. Right? With that segue, let's move into the Tate situation because it's been tainted by some bad intel that people spread What's the saying? A lie goes around the world before the truth can get his pants on? 

Well, that sort of situation was going on and it makes it even more of a precarious interesting situation. So heretofore, I don't know, have we mentioned Andrew Tate on the show before? Maybe vaguely, lightly. Pablo Fernandez (zero twenty three:forty four): Yeah, a couple of times, but not really shown much from him. He's the top g. That's all I need to say. He's the he's the top g. And, apparently, he's got marketing capabilities Cause everybody found out who he was, but just like in the last six months. Right? That's the sort of thing that went on. And he made provocative content 

comments and the guy got banned a bunch of places, which built more notoriety. And then he became like a Voldemort. So he was on Voldemort senior show over at the Infowars. Right? And then he's been speaking out. And so the other day, he sent some tweet to Greta. Can we bring that up, LD? It's such a priceless tweet. Is it available easily within your reach, or it'll be covered in the videos? I mean, they'll they'll probably talk about it. We don't have to talk about it. Watch them as a whole thing. Yeah. He's gonna show us. So we got the we got the long we got the short form with PJW. We got the long four form with PBD. 

We're probably going to put that in the intermission, but we'll get it wound up before intermission. So long story short, Tate sends this tweet at Greta. Greta slam dunks on him like she's Michael Jordan jumping over Akeem Olajuwon. And yeah. See, that's a good reference. Yeah. And a good reference indeed. He tries to make, what they call a cope video. But in that cope video, this is how they classify it. He's coping with it, so he makes a response. Right? Because he got dunked on, so now he has to, like, try to do something. 

So he has this video. He has these pizza boxes, not recycled material type thing, and then he gets raided. And his compound gets raided. He and his brother get, apprehended because they don't wanna say arrested because they got, they got held or something like that. It's not the same as an arrest. It's like they're looking for the evidence to arrest him, but they're gonna hold him over thirty days detained, I think is the term. And, the accusation is something that they said they had been investigating since last April, but all of a sudden, right after these Greta tweets go off, they went and raided them. So they've been working on it since April, but they just decided to do it. He's also been charged or, yeah, I think charged or raided or swatted in the past for the exact same accusation. 

Right? And so when you find out, as you will during the intermission, that the US consulate and stuff's involved, it gets a little more gray than the cut and dry that people would like you to believe. Now, there are those who follow Andrew Tate and whatever he says is gold. There's people who whatever Andrew Tate says is shit, and we're not on either ends of the spectrum. We're looking at it. Here's a flawed human being who's very charismatic, can very accomplished in many ways, very disciplined and very intelligent in many ways, 

who has some different perspectives. And he uses his free speech expressly and he says a lot of things that people in power don't want to hear. So for the rest of us, we're like, that's kind of entertaining. You know? Okay. Some people say he says not so nice things about women. Well, he's not influencing me to not like women. So we're all good on that. But this whole other thing where the people who don't have power and don't work together, all of a sudden show their power and work together, but yet that we're supposed to say that doesn't go on. 

So somebody picked up the phone and said take that guy off the streets. And then like that, they all of a sudden they had a case, they had a warrant, they had everything they needed, and he's, well, I think he's being held, but he has access to his phone or something like that. So we're gonna see there are statements by, a friend of his that lives there, his cousin who lives there. You're gonna get to see, you know, several different clips, several different perspectives, you know, and and choose your flavor. I'm covering it because whether or not the whole thing's a distraction in the psyop to keep us from looking at something else that's going on Or 

somebody spoke truth to power and they're fighting back against him. That also goes on. Look at Julian Assange. Right? They can't they can't say, Tate, is involved with children because there's there's no evidence of that. But they can say, oh, there's evidence he's involved with women. What if we put a couple of women in his house and then later they testify against him that he did whatever? Right. They do plant informants in these sort of things in these situations historically. I'm saying that goes on. Right. So 

is it where's the evidence? Is there a video? How do we know this happened? How do we know it's not just somebody with a grudge against him that he's spoken out against taking liberties? So and we the other important thing is right now, we do not need to make a decision on this yet. This is something that's gonna go on probably for a little bit. We can afford to collect data over time. Was actually something said at the dinner table earlier tonight with extended family, an opinion on so and so. I said, you're always free to say, I don't actually know so and so, and I don't have an opinion on 

them. That way, you don't have to get take sides in the conversation. Right? And they thought that was pretty clever and interesting. And I said, it'll also be useful because we don't have to have an opinion on everything, especially if we don't know anything about that thing yet. So it's okay to say we're wrong. It's okay to not have an opinion. It's not okay to let baby rapists run the planet and say nothing about it. So now let's go to post Paul Joseph Watson's coverage of the arrest of Andrew So this is the Greta Thunberg. So this is, like, the setup for, like, what the The setup. Okay. The arrest. So this will be, like, the feud. It's about name in a video that gets into, like, what what the hell happened. And then it's Thank you. Perfect segue into then the PVD that goes into greater detail. Yeah. Thank you for setting it up. So, eventually, spoiler alert, Andrew and Kristen Tristan Tate get arrested or detained 

as a function of maybe they're related. Maybe they just had them scheduled for the same day. Maybe they happened to tweet with Greta and hundreds of millions of people saw it. That exchange. Right? Maybe it just happened. Massive. I mean, it got major, publicity. That Klaus got a text about it, I'll bet. Right? Oh, yeah. So And then he'll show you all the various news outlets that picked it up and acted as though she was just the force of righteousness and, you know And then if anyone remembers after intermission, 

there was a a YouTube link for Hustlers University, five hours, hundred lessons. I started going through it. So we can talk about that later too. But I'm gonna put that evidence aside, and let's just do deal with the evidence of this particular situation and see what's going on. And the video is called Small Dick Energy. So She's still So we'll get a good laugh out of this. That's Greta's email address in case you need to get talk get in touch with her. She's got a specific man in mind. She's looking for some small dick. Maybe she identifies with a small dick. Maybe. 

Maybe. I don't know. Small dick. I don't know. I mean, that's never sure dick or something like the equivification there. Although, that's your name, so I shouldn't be saying that. So that didn't work out. Here's summit dot news's Paul Joseph Watson as seen on Bandai video. How dare you? Welcome to a new episode of the clown show. Okay. First off, Greta Thunberg is an adult. She's She's nearly twenty. It's almost twenty twenty three. It's not twenty sixteen anymore. She's not a child anymore. She's a public figure. So, yeah, we can talk about this candidly. Hello, Greta Thunberg. I have thirty three cars. My Bugatti has an eight liter quad turbo. My two Ferrari eight twelve Competizione 

have six point five liter v twelves. This is just the start. Please provide your email address so I can send a complete list of my car collection and their respective enormous emissions. But for Andrew Tay, a snarky tweet soon turned into a global shit storm. Yes. Please do enlighten me. Email me at small dick energy at get a life dot com. Macho Man has small peepee. P. How dare you? Cue orgiastic regime approved NPC bot form. Yes. You go slay queen reaction. This may well be the greatest tweet of all time. I expect the views feature to be removed after this public slaughter was witnessed by so many. Who'd have thought twenty twenty two Twitter would peak so late in the day? Cue regime media rushing in to take the victory lap. Greta Thunberg humiliates Andrew Tay after enormous emissions boasts. Viral. Greta Thunberg tweets slamming Andrew Tate quickly gained two million likes. Greta Thunberg says Andrew Tate has small dick energy and savage tweet. Uh-huh. Macho Man has small peepee. I mean, you've gotta give Greta or whoever writes her tweets credit. Normally, the pithier the response, the better it lands, and her response backed Tay into a corner with seemingly no way out. What's he gonna do? Post a picture of his knob? It would have been the only response that was pithier, but you know what the reaction would have been. Oh, no. Sexual harassment. Then she would have become the victim again. Is he gonna get angry at a teenager for suggesting he has a tiny winky? Probably not the best idea. Is he gonna start making fun of Greta Thunberg's body? Oh, no. No. No. No. Toxic misogyny? Body shaming can't win because body shaming's only okay when they do it. Clever, Conservative men, please stop being creepy about Greta Thunberg. It's literal sexual harassment. Her talking about men's penises though. That's 

not sexual at all. You see, they write the rules of the game, then they hand themselves a bunch of cheat codes that you're not permitted to use. Only the left is allowed to be offensive. If Tay had gone pithier with his first response, it would have led to another regime orchestrated, deadly toxic masculinity, moral panic meltdown. Couple of years ago when she was legally an adult, I insulted Greta in a similar context to how she insulted Tate. Milder, in fact. What happened? They banned the video and hate speech striked the account. The regime says you're not allowed to ridicule Greta because they've turned her into some kind of deity. It's only okay when they do it. We'll take a look at Tate's video response after a word from the sponsor of this video. So I've had Scott Manning on my podcast, subversive 

dissidents, and analyzes English verse we need to lift up talent on our side and get him to over ten thousand subs. So pause the video right as the mob to go defcon one on him again, but here's what he said in a follow-up video. She replied by telling me her own email address. Grela's email address is I have small dick energy. Why would that be your own email address, Greta? Strange. I mean, also, I don't wanna assume her gender. It's fifty fifty, but it is what it is. Know how Tate can only walk around eggshells with his own joke despite the fact that it's on a similar level to hers because only the left's allowed to be offensive, but then he landed more of a direct hit when he got serious. So I'm actually mad at Greta. Right? Because she doesn't realize she's been programmed. She doesn't realize she's a slave of the matrix. 

She thinks she's doing good. Someone has sat her down and convinced her to try and convince you to beg your government to tax you into poverty to stop the sun from being hot. And that's the crux of it right there. The only way to respond to Greta and her ilk is to demolish the notion that any of them have the moral high ground. That's what really pisses them off. Greta Thunberg is the number one figurehead for a craven, nefarious, elitist global transfer of wealth scam. An agenda that will impoverish the world and cause untold misery for generations to come. But, yeah, to her credit, she's really good at dick jokes on Twitter. Liberals going after Andrew Tate for challenging Greta Thunberg with the line, how insecure must you be to feel so threatened by her? And you can't even call her that even though she calls herself that because they'll ban your content. Truth is, doesn't matter whether she's nineteen or ninety one. She's dictating a global energy policy that will end up killing millions. 

People across Europe are freezing in their homes right now because Germany and all these other countries became totally dependent on green energy. They shut down almost all their coal fired and nuclear power plants. Now people can't afford to pay their energy bills. Food inflation is through the roof. Our living standards are being decimated. Our means of mobility are being banned. We're being prepared for climate lockdowns by the very same forces that inflicted the outrageous evil that was COVID lockdowns. Under Greta's green dystopia, the cost of living will be barely living at all. Living on the breadline. In the coming years, this will exacerbate 

devastating levels of poverty. And guess what poverty leads to every single time? Death. And although she may be completely naive as to her role in all this, Greta is the figurehead, the totem pole. She literally wants the entire system of capitalism to be overthrown. Now I know its modern incarnation has got many problems, but generally speaking, capitalism lifts people out of poverty and greatly improves their lives. What Greta and her ilk want to replace it with ends life on a mass scale. 

Reference, the entire twentieth century. Don't make fun of her though because only the left's allowed to be offensive. I don't tell people what to do. This is exactly what you keep doing. You're acting like spoiled, irresponsible children. I don't tell anyone what to do or what not to do. I want you to panic. I don't tell people what to do. I want you to panic. I don't tell anyone what to do or what not to do. I want you to act as if the house was on fire. I don't tell people what to do. I want you to act as if the house was on fire. I don't tell people what to do. This is exactly 

what you keep doing. She's a contrived manufactured fraud being fed lines by her activist parents and handlers. I mean, look what happens when she doesn't have a script to hand. Could you please, tell us what kind of message what you are doing here today, what kind of message would you send by doing this to world leaders? And also, can I ask you, do you think it's about time that, president Trump would respond to what you have, said today? 

I think I'm sorry. What was the first question? What's the message you would like to hear? Attribute to it when you said Trump. I think what we want to send is the message we want to send is to say that Nothing is already we have had enough. And, anyone else wants to ask another question? 

I can't speak on behalf of everyone. Anyone wants to answer, I got the message to world leaders. They act like she's this brave, courageous, anti establishment activist when every single tentacle of the establishment supports her every move. So that's the truth about Greta. She's the cult symbol for an anti human agenda that will make everyone's lives immeasurably worse. She's one of the regime's most loyal servants, And that's why the regime rushes to her defense every time someone dares make fun of her. But, yeah, good dick joke. 

So they want you to think that after that all transpired, that somehow Andrew take, arrested because of those pizza boxes. They want you to think that the Romanian authorities, the US consulate, the CIA, MI six, did not know that he was in Romania until Andrew Tate mistakenly responded by putting those pizza boxes and then they were able to track his location and send 

a SWAT team over there to go apprehend those dangerous criminals over there. So we'll wait and see. Again, innocent until proven guilty, but it seems a little fishy that Greta responds to the fake news that he was busted from the pizza boxes because her quip was, This is what happens when you don't recycle your pizza boxes. Right? So we're going to get into that part of the story, but I also, LD, there's a bunch of clips that you guys were posting here in the, Grand Theft World production. Do we need to cover these, 

leading into intermission? Are they short, or what's the sitch? They are short. I think it's some valuable points of data from the past. I mean, I Well, let's look at some points of data. You could say it's not relevant to the actual whatever the investigation is really about or whatever the situation is. But, you know, I think they're relevant points of data, when evaluating that guy. 

Well, like, there's there's stories out there. He got kicked off the big brother program, and then they'll show you this piece of video where, he was apparently beating and, you know, whatever to some check. But then I've also seen the interview with her that it was consensual and that they were they were not doing that, to hurt each other. It was more of an adult bedroom type situation. Yeah. I mean, that's one of the problems that I'm gonna take is, like I saw the same video. I saw the back and forth between that. It's also Well, he's close enough to the sex trade that it is possible for people to believe 

if they if there's no evidence and people are just assuming that the authorities are telling the truth about Andrew Tate because he's telling the truth about the establishment. So I don't know. You you have to see the evidence. But, yeah. Let's Well, he's also hyperbolic to make a point as well at times. Yeah. It's an effect. It's an effect. He does. So, like, I'm not a fan of Andrew Tate, actually, but I'm and so not, like, justifying his actions. I don't have enough inform I just see in both sides of the story, and I could see how both have potential merit. And so it just he's sort of a polarizing figure, as you mentioned, Rich, in regards to it's, like, friendly people. Polarizing, 

Tony. Yeah. Did Tate's dad work for the CIA as a chess grand master type dude? And is That, I don't know. Is Tate playing chess right now with opposing forces knowing that they're gonna attack him at some point, so why not create a situation and trick them into attacking you early? I don't know. We have to wait and see. We don't have to have opinions or come to conclusions yet. It is important though we take in some raw data so we have some data points of knowledge on such situations. Not to just assume it's a distraction and not to just assume they're telling the truth, but maybe in the between in between, there's something to be learned. 

Alright. LD, what do you think these, have you seen these clips? Yeah. Yeah. I have. I saw one was posted by Syrian Girl. I've seen, follow her stuff on Twitter, for years. I don't follow her, but I've seen her stuff and clicked links and stuff. So, yeah, let's let's check. You wanna intro them? Because I haven't seen them yet. Oh, yeah. And I'm not sure how far back this was, but Owen Benjamin this is probably a few months ago. Owen Benjamin played played the clip of of him and a girl from I don't know how long ago, 

but, we can play that really quick. And then is Andrew talking about how he would hypothetically choke and violently rape a woman, and Andrew Tate talking about how he moved to Romania to escape sex assault allegations in the UK and because Romanian law, has lax laws on rape. He's not a rapist, but he likes to be free. But, yeah, we could put these real quick. Interesting. Add in-depth dimension to the characters. 

Indeed. Peter Tate's a piece of shit, and he's trying to normalize a really fucked up masculinity in my country. Think of me as like a white blood cell, like an immune system. Alright? And so if I can move the needle in any way I can, I will? Because I saw, like, literally kids saying they're heroes, Andrew Tate, and all this shit. I'm about to play you guys a video, so skip ahead. If you don't wanna watch this with I which I recommend, just skip ahead five minutes from now and it'll be over. Alright? This is Andrew Tate. And remember this, every time someone fucking promotes this guy, and I did not know this about him, 

this is him handling one of his whores for money. Alright? Do not normalize this in America. Our country is better than this. This guy is and he brags about this. He doesn't feel bad about it. He doesn't apologize. He doesn't say this is bad behavior. He says that this is good. Okay? Let's watch this video and fucking justify this to my face, asshole. Okay. Here we go. English, proper English, no Slovak say it to the camera. 

Okay. We're gonna continue here. So bear in mind what just happened. He said, in your Slovak bullshit language, this is a young girl. Oh, the the the bullshit conservatives are gonna go, well, she's of age. Guys, they're fucking disgusting. Alright? So he's breaking a whore right here. This is pimp tactics. 

He's getting them on such eggshells that they will evacuate and do exactly what he says. You can call it a fetish all you want. It's not a fucking fetish. It's how you break a whore. This is a whore who works under him for money. Alright? And he's and he beats her and then he gets her down and he beats her with a belt. Okay? I didn't say the word list. Did I say listen? Did I say listen? No. Look at the camera. Did I say listen? No. Did I say This motherfucker's going on Tucker Carlson. Alright? Can I say it? No. Can I say it? 

Alright. So now she's crying. He's beating her with a belt. He did this with other men in the room. He videotaped it, and then he broadcasted it and told that's how you handle your horse. Alright. So is that or is that not the clip that that Tate has disavowed and then showed the woman from that video where she said we were doing that for the camera because it was, like, I don't know, big or whatever show they were on? Or is that something that came from his house in Romania? Same clip. I'm pretty sure. I could be wrong because this has gone on memory. This is one of the reasons why I don't like him because even if it is a fake situation and it was all stage play, that should never have been done in the first place. And that's that's where he's an extreme hyperbolic individual. Then the way he likes to make points is by being 

overly extreme. Show. In Romania, that's an issue. If it was filmed under the auspices of whoever produces big butter brother because they're looking for clicks and views Right. Right? And that woman was later on video, and she's like, it was completely consensual. We're doing S and M, b d BDSM, bondage, you know, sex role play type stuff. Right. Then that's a different situation, and Owen jumped to a conclusion without what what is the grainy sort 

like, that was filmed, but it got leaked. What's the source of that video? Because it looks like it's been heavily, like, degraded through compression and stuff. Is there a clear original piece of that video? And are there things in that video that were cut off the front and end to make that look like a really bad situation? Maybe someone did that to frame him up long ago, and it's still out there at work with honest people like Owen Benjamin who were trying to protect his audience. I agree. If that's really what's going on in that video, I don't, I don't like that and I don't support that or promote that. However, 

it's yet to be seen. Now what are these other pieces of footage, LD? Because they might corroborate exactly what Owen was saying, and it it goes beyond reasonable doubt. Yeah. This is posted by Syrian girl, Andrew Tate, describing how he would hypothetically choke and violent violently rape a woman. So it's just a minute long. Have you ever seen a woman try and do anything competently? Like, imagine a girl pick this up. If I pick this up, you ain't fucking with me. I'd have my left hand. I'd still, like, jab. I'd fucking swing low, take her fucking knee out. You ain't gonna see it coming. What would a woman pause it for a second. 

Is that an Islamic dude holding a machete the day after there's a machete attack by an Islamic dude in Times Square? What are you doing playing this clip, man? So But that's that's too sensitive. That's that's how he right. Like, that's I know. I'm being facetious. Yeah. It's just yeah. Too soon. Too soon. Alright. Let's go back to the clip with Angie Tate with the machete. Slap the machete. Slap her in her face. One hand. Machete and a backhand. I perfected this in pimp school. When I got my PhD, we had to practice if a girl comes at you. 

You're cheating. It's bang out the machete, boom in her face, then grip her up by the neck. But shut up, bitch. Her panties get wet. Machetes on the floor. Her panties are all wet. You go fuck her. That's how it goes. Slap, slap, grab, choke, shut up, bitch, sex. These are the basic moves of of pimping. Fucking some little amateur. What if a girl picks it up? You're a fucking loser. Now that seems to corroborate everything Owen Benjamin just said without having to use that species piece of source material. Right? 

Perhaps. That's interesting too. Perhaps. Perhaps. Perhaps it's all an act. We don't need to come to a conclusion right now on this, but that is an interesting piece of footage. And then I would say, didn't we play maybe five, ten episodes ago, Dave Chappelle's joke about, the book Pimp? And what he describes in the training of the women involuntarily working for the pimp is something like what I just heard 

Andrew Tate describe as his process when he got a PhD in pimping. That's interesting, isn't it? Did you see that in Infowars? No. You didn't. You saw it in Grand Theft World. What's the other clip? This is Andrew Tate talking about why he moved to Romania, apparently. This is probably forty percent of the reason I moved to Romania because in Eastern Europe, none of this garbage flies. If you don't know the police and say he raped me back in nineteen eighty eight, eight, they said we should have done something about it then. If you don't know the police that say raped me yesterday, say, okay. If you got physical evidence, or it's a CCTV proof where it happened. Okay. Let's go interview him right now. And if it wasn't really right, oh, that's oh, we went to the club. We got drunk. She agreed to go back to my house. We started having sex, and then we carried on having sex. And then we had sex, and she didn't say anything wrong. And then she texted me afterwards, and I didn't text back. And now she's saying I raped her. The police would be like, okay. She's an idiot. Bye. But no. Not in the west. In the west, you can tell them that exact story. You're still fucked. You're fucked in the west. When people say why do you live in Romania? I explained my five reasons. One of them is the me too era. They go, oh, well, you're a rapist. I say, no. I'm not a fucking rapist. 

But I like the idea of being able to just say to to do what I want. I like being free. Yeah. Very interesting. Freedom in Romania. What was, what did they used to call Romania? Cause Romania is like a new name for the place there. They had an old timey name for that place back in the day. What was it called? Transylvania. That's what it was. Transylvania. I know you guys knew that. So, these ongoings in Transylvania. 

So the webcam business could definitely get him in trouble in the UK. I could see him move into Romania for that and then that additional freedom. Plus, Romania, I'm sure on his side, the cops were tippable. But when the state department comes by, they tip heavier. You know what I'm saying? Like, by Biden and those guys, they they they pull away a billion dollar funding over if you don't fire the right person. So they might have been a little touchy. They might have been is Romania receiving any money from the United States on a regular basis? 

Are they on the the take as it were? They on the team? Team. That's what I meant. Team, not take. It's early morning. Been on livestream a long time. How are they on the team? We haven't we haven't yet discussed all these things. So it does look like just researching a little bit. I mean, this is such a mess. I can't, I really can't stand this guy because like, I don't know what to think. And it's all very I don't like the type of masculinity he supports or sort of popularizes, 

but that's a separate issue. Even if it's even if it really is just a caricature, it's not a holistic way to approach being someone who provides a protector. There's a much cleaner way to express some of the ideas than what he's doing. And then when you check out, like, his business ideas and the you know, that sort of stuff, the implementations are damn shady. Oh, for sure. They're not even slim shady. They're fat shady. You you just see it, you know. So yeah. There's a video here. So this this says, 

system sort of pop blog, genuinely terrifying video of Andrew Tate beating a woman resurfaces online. It is a video of him, Andrew Tate beating a woman. It's not the same one we watched that Owen Benjamin was commenting on. So there seems to be a number of these videos that we're collect them all. This one supposedly is the one that got him banned, the big brother twenty sixteen or something like that. But I don't know. I mean, there's a lot of claims. I saw another one that said it was from an earlier video, so I'm not quite sure. But it's, you know, according to Andrew Toy, just looking around at like message boards, Reddit threads, Twitter, you know, 

he claims that it's all just sort of like, you know, sort of a BDSM sort of foreplay that he's into or whatever. But a couple of these there's different videos now, very granny videos where, you know, he seems he granted what didn't he run a webcam business, him and his brother or something like that as well. I mean, so he has an intimate understanding of it may not be your standard sort of, pimp industry, your standard sort of So is the documentary on him gonna be called digital pimp? Okay. Digital pimp dot com. 

And sometimes I wonder if he's hiding behind the facade of, like, this idea of promoting honorable elements of masculinity and upstanding and scrupulous elements of masculinity in order to sort of hide behind that to protect himself from the fact that those things up. Either muck them up or whatever. Masculinity is now they put it on the spectrum with Tate and all this other stuff. Right? Right. Right. Many such cases in history have done since there's, like, you know, that's some secret agent shit right there. And I'm not sure he's I don't know. He's not the dumbest guy in the world, but I'm not sure he's sophisticated enough to really equate the two. But Anglo American citizen. That's two of his six passports. Oh, speaking of the passports. Yeah. Yeah. He he does have a number of passports. I 

I learned from from an interview a while back, and I kind of, appreciate his philosophy. Well, yeah, that's what I was getting at. I appreciate his philosophy of, like, I can't exit the system, so I'm just gonna spread out all over it. You know, that that appealed to to certain people, I think, in the interviews. But this you know, take it for what it's worth. 

I I don't know this, this person that Syrian girl is is, citing, but she made a joke a couple days ago. The difference between Epstein and Andrew Tate is that Tate doesn't work for the Israeli Mossad. And then she said, Brakeig, I was wrong. They both Andrew both the Tate brothers have Israeli passports according to, she says journalist, Stephan Lord, and talking in a space, 

Twitter space. So Or that's a clever way by the Israelis to be like, oh, we're calling this guy for our team. So they won't think he's on yours. And then the last this is just Right. I mean, just say he's got you know, because there's has anyone I wanna see. Is there a picture of an Israeli passport with him and Tristan? I would think that's more legit. If I saw even a good Photoshop job, I'd have to weigh it, like, give it five percent maybe. But For sure. Well, how about this Photoshop job? This is just this is just funny. 

George Soros between Tate and Greta. Listen. I want a clean sigh up. Yeah. Yeah. Could be like that too. I mean, the timing of all those events is very suspect. Well, appreciate it. It's almost like when Peter Power was there at seven seven and was running the drills at the time, the things that he was running drills on happened in London during that fateful day. They just happened to be running drills on the same places that happened to get attacked 

by the terrorists they happened to need funding to protect their people from. It's miraculous. Miracles do happen. It's not just the holidays. Just be anywhere around government official narratives. Magic bullets. Yeah. The more you research, the more it just gets into more and more of a quagmire. Some people claim there's extended video where she clearly is playing a role. Other people say it's not the case. I can't find the extended video. It's all in clips, and the clips seem to be different. It seems to be a number of different clips from a number of different situations. 

Either way, he shouldn't have done it in the first place. Yeah. It seems like somebody we don't need to hang out with. Right. It seems what it's And his brand of masculinity, like, the fact that he's sort of equivocating or creating this false equivalence between what is, you know, the real role of male masculinity in the scrupulous and morally upheld situ situation or fortuitous situation. Yeah. There's problems with feminism for sure, but I also would like to think that we could all get along with most feminists. It's just the extreme ideas where they're like, you know, 

we don't men we don't need men climbing the power poles and keeping electricity going because that's the pay the, you know, the patriarchy at work. Right. No. That's your phone working, ma'am. Right. That's your electricity working. Yeah. Men, you know, are overrepresented to the top. Peterson before, you know, went down the different road. He was always mentioned that men are overrepresented all the very dangerous jobs the world over. But if you're not overrated, it's just no kids or splinters if you try to do that dance on them. A lot of other things as well. 

They live they have a lower life expectancy, you know, and a whole host of different so it there's definitely differences, obviously, between males and females, both the femme, feminine aspect and the masculine aspect should be upheld for the differences and should be, you know, be able to find union in the the sort of contrary positions that exist within nature. Instead, they sort of blend the two as though they're not distinguished at all. And that's, that's Well, because in the future, it's just lines. You know, 

the the pods decide the gender during the incubation period gestation in the factories. It's chapter one, Brave New World. That's true. Alright. So there's a couple more, pieces of the Tate conundrum, before we go to the intermission. Do you wanna LD, do you have the one where, his cousin who lives there made a statement? Because he didn't get arrested. I will also point out just as a 

second amendment person that when I saw pictures of the raid and the firearms that were on display on the table, they were easily recognizable as what looked to be. I didn't look at a close-up of the photo, but I went from the shape of the pistol and they looked to be Walther P99 pistols, more than one of them, which is a very not common pistol, but happens to be the pistol used by James Bond, specifically like the Pierce Brosnan, 

James Bond back in that day. (zero fifty seven:forty seven) That was a classic pair. That's- (zero fifty seven:forty eight) Yeah. It's a gun famous. (zero fifty seven:forty nine) I couldn't tell what caliber, but that shape comes in nine millimeter forty five and twenty two. Yes. And I doubt they were Spawn would be using If they carry twenty twos, maybe they're hitmen. Oh, that would be yeah. That'd be it. Didn't Seth Rich get shot with a twenty two? What respect what self respecting gang members in the back. Walking around at four four o'clock in the morning with a twenty two to shoot Seth Rich? None. But what most I'm sorry. What intel agent might be doing stuff like that with twenty twos? Long history. 

Long history might go back to the Galen organization. They like twenty twos. Cause, when you get someone in the cranium, it's such a small round. It rattles it won't go out the other side a lot of times. It'll rattle around and make sure the job's done. And it makes less sound. It's smaller form factor to carry. There's a lot of reasons that people who whacked people for a long time would carry the old, twenty two. Oh, yeah. If you're a good shot and you're tuning in at close range, twenty two would be a preferred 

weapon to use, quite quite frankly, especially when you're trying to do Not a lot of recoil, good accuracy on the second tap. Alright. So I'd be curious as to what was the make and caliber of the guns that were in the crime scene because I only saw, like, little tiny picture. Maybe we'll see it in this video with Andrew Tay's cousin who apparently talks just like him, even though they were probably born in different cities, maybe even different countries. I don't know. But let's check it out. Let's weigh it in consideration. 

Because just because he beats women on tape doesn't well, maybe it does mean he could sexually traffic women. So I don't know. The jury's out. Well, there's no jury yet, but, no need to make a decision. Let's continue looking at material. Certainly didn't help himself. Let's just put it that way by doing that. Doesn't help. Many things he does doesn't see. He he seems to have an Alex Jones syndrome, or maybe that's a commonality for that type of agent. I don't know. Yeah. Alex Jones seems to be more innocent in his coverage, whereas Andrew Tate's deliberately allowing these videos to be 

filmed. I mean, it's I think what Alex does is much more Alex than than whether it's doing. Right. The type of attention Yeah. By far. Is that Tate's bringing is not useful for the perfect sort of honeypot straw man for the male like, the sort of male movement that's popped up as a counter movement to the toxic, like, feminist third wave feminist sort of movement that has taken over. Yeah. What if James Bond had an Instagram account 

and a YouTube following? Give him too much credit for the potentiality of being a b ninety nine Pierce Brosnan style. Maybe he'll jump off a dam and, you know, then fly. Just saying. Opportunity is there and the the possibility exists. So let's continue to weigh information and maybe we pick up little clues along the way. Alright. I I found a longer version of that video than was on Twitter. So this is some guy named Buck Army 

playing the video. We'll just play the video within the video. Let's get backed up with Buck Army then. First thing I wanna tell you guys is I promise you that Tate is too rich and too smart to do anything illegal. He's been too rich and too smart to do anything illegal for a very, very long time. As long as I've lived with him, I've never seen him do anything illegal at all in any way, shape, or form. Tate also, because he's foreseen of things, he always knew that this would happen. He's told you guys this would happen. He has many interview clips where he said this would happen. It's a three life process when you're someone that the, 

that let's say the matrix or the mainstream news or the people in charge do not like you. You have it's a three step process. First, they try and cancel you. So they try to cancel Tate. They really did. Unfortunately for them, they failed. So they failed on that end. So if they fail on canceling you, what's the next move? Well, the next move is jail. And by the way, you can see this playbook. They played this they do this playbook with with Julian Assange. They do it with with credible people. That that's what they do. First, they try and discredit you and cancel you so no one listens to you. If people keep listening to you, then they have to try and discredit you further and try and put you in jail. That's the next move, and that's what the matrix has done. The matrix is now trying to put Andrew in jail. It's completely bogus charges, 

but unfortunately, Romania is you guys can look this up, is known for corruption. And, unfortunately, corruption also works to where if the mainstream if the mainstream in the matrix wants you, they can find a corrupt judge to sign a bullshit paper to get your house raided. And that's really what it is. It's one judge signs one paper, and now your house gets raided. And then you're getting and that's that's how it goes. That's just how it goes. So, obviously, that's all in the news now because that's what it takes to discredit. Right? Just the house rate alone is massively discrediting. Julian Assange. Right? I don't know if you guys know who that is. He's the WikiLeaks guy who reported a bunch of news that the US government didn't want to get reported. Then one day, 

out of nowhere, some Swedish girl said that he her, and there's no evidence at all that that happened ever. And I'm pretty sure the charges were dropped, and it never even went to court. But, by then, he ran away and hid an exile in some embassy. He was in that embassy forever. Then they dropped those charges, and they added on some new charges about something about leaking something about leaking sensitive information, like, sort of terrorist thing. So, anyway, that's the playbook they played on Assange. Step two done. 

Will they attempt step three? Because step three is if they can't cancel you and if they can't put you in jail or if jail doesn't ruin your influence, the next thing they do is they kill you. They abstain you. They may and Andrew's clearly said on multiple podcasts, he will never kill himself. Andrew knew that this would happen eventually. It was always it it was it it was always a possibility on the board. It was always, okay. Well, we've done well in not getting canceled. We're not gonna shut up because we're gonna keep changing lives for the better. And okay. So that means step two is jail. And Andrew expressed in many podcasts that he knew that that was the case, and that's why he was worried. And, obviously, he was worried for a good reason as we can see now. Because of frankly, I'm extremely, extremely surprised this happened. I've been living with the guy forever, and I can tell you guys it's not true in any way, shape, or form. It's complete, 

just literal nonsense. I I actually can't believe it. It makes me really not trust the, justice system at all in any way, shape, or form. So that's everything that's come out so far. I purse Alright. So it's interesting. Take it as something you don't have to make a decision on right now. That's the lesson for tonight. You don't have to decide right now, but take in enough You keep an open mind until you get enough information to close your mind. But you can't close your mind seeing one clip. You definitely can't see these things that are the accusations 

without where's the evidence for it? Romania, United States, consulate involved, these sort of things. Might be some nation state grudge, might be some globalist grudge, Might be what's the story we can make up that people will believe about them based on things that Ethan Klein has said in the past couple months. That sort of thing. Right? So, also, I think one of the only people that do any coverage on this was that clip, with that guy's name, Buck Army. Like, he he's just popping into everyone's feed because there he's coverage on this, but none of us are followers of 

these people. So there's also the question of how are these things being proliferated? And is there some sort of alphabet agency algorithm going on behind the scenes to make all this happen, maybe even including Tate's rise to power in the last six months. But they have been looking into him for organized crime since last April. But my other question is if he's been doing this for years and years and had to leave the UK and move to Romania to continue conducting his webcam business, why wasn't they under 

suspicion or investigation earlier? If this has been going on and there's patterns in the past, why have these accusations been popping up for years? Why was it only after he came out and spoke some truth to power that all of a sudden the blackmail crew is out there and the frame up team is out there, you know, making things happen. So This is a quagmire. I mean, this really is because there is video of this woman, the woman that own and Benjamin was referring to that said it was just king play. But then, then there were, he was charged initially back initially back many like, a decade ago, potentially, or not 

many years ago with sex trafficking allegations, and they were dropped. But he's in a country where it's easier to bribe. It's also He also got six passports like Epstein. Epstein had a bunch of cases dropped too. Such a fucking quagmire, man. Like, this is I don't know. I mean, there's so it's like a he said, she said, you know, who knows whether or not he's blackmailing a girl saying it's supposed to be King Clay, but I know it's all it's like the edge. It's yeah. This is just it's a There's Johnny Depp and I was already in twenty twenty three. Oh my God. When I saw this, you posted in our production shot, I was like, oh boy, 

I don't, this is gonna be one of those rabbit holes that you're not gonna find the light at the end of the tunnel, or at least for some time in regards to trying to figure out what the hell is going on with this. I knew I didn't you know, I don't appreciate even if it all just is a sort of a a caricature, in regards to these more aggressive and extreme videos. Again, I've don't at all approve of it and don't find it, you know, useful to trying to tell young men to be, you know, leaders and, you know, to uphold, like, traditional western moral values and all these sorts of things and traditional masculinity. But I don't see how any of that stuff on that side that he preaches is possible if you don't respect women. 

Correct. Or people in general. Every son. Right? And people And the other thing is That's right. People in general. His cousin didn't say, Andrew is too smart and too good of a person to do anything unethical or outside of integrity. He's too smart and rich to do anything illegal. He lives in a country with lax laws on those things. So what he's doing is probably within the law, but highly unethical Well said. Immoral, outside of the bounds of integrity, and probably ties into some of the business examples he uses in that hustlers university where you get a PhD in pimpery, I guess. 

I'm not all the way through it. I'm only half. I'm only in, like, less than fifty of a hundred, but Oh, boy. Yeah. Well, if, he's oh, boy. No. I can't go on there. Yeah. That's, boy. And I don't to you, it's that's a great point. It's a great point in regards to may not have done anything illegal. He moved to a country in which the laws are more lax there. But we still don't have to like what he's doing even if it's legal. That's my point. Because and the fact that he's saying just illegal rather than ethical, rather than upholding If everything's voluntary, 

everybody's adults, then that's all well and good. It's business disputes between contractor and employer. But that's not the way they're presenting it to the public. And then having a video leak, quote, unquote, to the public I mean, or multiple videos for that matter, because I've seen a couple now just just doing quick searches and stuff. It almost had the graininess of a good, three letter agency hidden camera. Yeah. That might be too. But he refers to the camera in the video, I'm pretty sure. Like, look into the camera so it's not a hidden camera in that case. But it had that graininess, like Yeah. They don't really they don't really want you to see too much of the 

the what what's going on. They just want you to They want you to take over with your imagination and think and sort of put it on the wall. That the plane hit the Pentagon, those three frames that don't have a plane in it, and people are like, no. That blur is the plane. No. That blur is a blur. That's the epitome of unidentified flying object right there. Yeah. And you need to look a little closer with scrutiny because the people presenting you with that evidence have a long history of killing people and lying about it. Just saying, right? Yeah. Long history. 

And if you wanna go back to the Al Qaeda part, they have a long history of funding those guys too. Oh, by far. It's the opposite of a bifurcation. Oh, it's the database. Yeah. It's where it comes together there. Okay. All right. So now, let's set up the intermission. I would like first half Patrick Bet David commenting on the situation we just studied so you can hear somebody else. And from a multi hundred dollar millionaire type perspective, he's wondering why you need six passports. He hangs out with PBD hangs out with billionaires. Like if people have six passports, he's probably hanging out with No one he knows has that. So they have some legitimate scrutiny around that. I think that's good. And then, the second part, Burmese did a heck of a job on, 

the population bomb and Ehrlich and depopulation, but I'm pretty sure it's on his Rockfin and not on his YouTube. So if it's not behind the paywall and we can play that clip, that'd be great. And if not, we can find alternative clip that we can put in after Patrick McDavid gives you the hot take on the, the Tate situation. The Tate tainting of the the Boortain Borla evolution from last week to this week. Last week, we covered Borla's Boortaint, 

you know, Improvac. And this week, we gotta cover the taint taint on the the Greta situation. So what we got? When it comes to Well, I'm looking for those links. What which Burmese video were you talking about? Alright. So, the Burmese, it was the population bomb. Okay. It's got Paul Paul Ehrlich, but it's not on YouTube because it was too spicy for the YouTubers. 

It's the one at the beginning of the Patrick Bet David podcast. Yeah. There's a clip that was they talk about Rothschild in it, so it was also useful. Multigenerational wealth. They all of a sudden found out about Rothschild in there. But, the the clip was on, Andrew Tate. And, I think it was, like, twenty four minutes. So it's a clip, not the not the full show? 

Yeah. It's not a full show. It would be, in the YouTube playlist from probably earlier today. I found the clip. That way I didn't need a time code for the whole show. Can't find the Burmese thing on our auction. It's hidden. Might be behind a paywall. Might be, Not even the paywall ones. Just the names of the titles don't reference anything to do with What about thumbnail? Combination bomb. No thumbnails. Like here, I'll put it on screen. You can sort of see what I'm seeing. Hazel Bass exposes truth, the blacklist, 

nurses for sanity, Alex Jones, Musk, and Moore, deep State Musker Nuts, The Bronson Case on Making Sense of the Madness, America Show. America Show. Okay. For one hundred, Alex. I'll put that in there. Yeah. We're getting a ton. Alright. So population bomb, we're basically just looking, for the population bomb info in that part of the video. And then whatever setup he has for that will be great. 

And we're making an intermission on the fly because it seems like it would go better with what we're talking about tonight, these two clips. Now, and for context for Patrick Bet David, he and one of his co hosts, they flew to Romania and they interviewed Tate for four hours and hung out there at the place where the raid happened. So, he's going to comment as somebody who just talked to this guy in person like a month ago. 

And let's see what happens. So yesterday, while this is going on, we're in meetings. I'm doing Zooms. I'm doing a bunch of different things. People are texting me, Your boy got down. And, you know, your boy, they took him down. They they'll listen. I'm like, listen. Keep going. Keep going. Keep going. Keep going. Keep going. One more one more one. Right there. Click on that one. Right there. Click on that one. Zoom in a little bit. Okay. I said, don't know exactly the details of, Tate's arrest, but here's what I do know. A day after he publicly calls out one of Wouk's heroes, 

Greta Thunberg, they raid his place. Strange timing. Meanwhile, we haven't seen anyone from Epstein's list arrested. Weird. Strange. Now go to the bottom. At the bottom, I say he's loud. He pushes the envelope. He frustrates the left. He points at hypocrisy. He's duplicating young men to do the same. Having said that if they committed a crime, the proper agencies will do what they need to do. Till then, innocent till proven guilty. So then then I get invited on this Twitter spaces with, again, the guy, Mario Nuffal. I think he does a fantastic job 

as a host, and I'm on there. And he says, so Patrick, you've interviewed with them. You've spent many hours with them. How is he? How is he on camera? How is he off camera? Said, quite frankly, I liked him more off camera than on camera, and I liked him on camera. Yeah. I just liked him more off camera. I would agree. He says, so what do you have to say about, you know, all this stuff that's coming out? I said, here's here's a couple things you have to be very careful with. First thing you have to be very careful with is I I I said as a father, anytime the school calls me telling me what my son did wrong, my natural inclination is to say what? My son would never do something. Exactly. Until I talk to him, I'm like, oh, shoot. You know, he Yeah. You did it again. Yeah. You did it again. Yeah. So so and by the way, you know, that it ought to be that way. You know, parents ought to, you know, have a a certain level of loyalty and belief in their kids. You know, if I get a call 

from somebody saying what you did something and I'm getting a call and I'm talking to the person, you and I are gonna have a conversation and then I'm gonna sit there and say, listen. You know, it is what it is. Let's wait to see what's going on. Regardless of what it is, we have to know two things. Both can be right. One, I was going to bible study years ago and I'm an atheist and this guy's trying to convert me. I'm like, listen, listen, you're not gonna do it. Twenty five years I've been an atheist. You think you can convert me? And I told him, I said, look, I've been to churches. I've seen pastors do this. I've seen pastors take advantage of, you know, members, rip them off with money, marriages, what they were doing on the side, smoking weed, doing drugs, having sex, and then they're claiming up there on stage that they're so mighty. He says, here's a rule number one about if you wanna have a relationship with the man upstairs. 

If it's horizontal, you'll always be disappointed. If it's vertical, you'll never be disappointed. I said, explain that to me. He says people are gonna let you down. K? Everybody is. You've let down your kids. You've you've let down your parents. You've let me not that time, I don't have kids, but he's saying you've let down your parents. You know, your parents have let you down. Your sisters let you down. You've let her down. Your friends, all this stuff, none of us walk on water. Okay? Just hope you don't make the big mistakes, but we don't walk on water. We all make mistakes. Don't be surprised if a hero 

disappoints you. That's one. So years after that, I'm working at this church. Just one Assyrian guy comes to me. They wanna create an Assyrian part of this church. I wanna mention the guy's name. And he says, man, I will kiss the pastor's feet. He's this. He's that. He's saying this in front of thirty Assyrians in this one guy's house, Wilson. And I said, listen. Never ever put that much pressure on a man to be perfect because he's gonna fall. Never give that much, you know, love and attention and accolades to human being. 

Give him love. Give him respect. But you're talking as if he's god and he can't make any mistakes. He says he can't. He's never gonna make mistakes. I said, listen. I don't want that kind operation. I said, I'm not I can't help you guys out with this request that you have. Bring it to to today. K? You know, you have to know the people who really support this guy, they don't think he can do anything wrong. And that's unfair to him. And it's managing too much expectations for yourself. The other side, the people who can't stand, like, on yesterday's Twitter spaces, 

one Romanian lawyer got on. He says they're not gonna let him be bailed out. He's not gonna get out. They're probably gonna do fifteen to twenty years. And another guy comes, and he should go to jail. And another, you should go to jail, he's gonna go to jail. Do you realize what he does? This is unfair. All this stuff that they're saying about what's going on with this rep. People by the end of yesterday's Twitter spaces, everybody said, this guy's going to jail for fifteen to twenty years. If you're a salesperson, if you're an Uber driver, if you're somebody that say you do an Uber Eats, you do Lyft, you're out there running appointments, you run a small business, but you don't wanna have a gun because you don't wanna get arrested and you're not trying to kill anybody. You're just trying to stop somebody so you can call the cops so they can come to you and you have enough ample time for people to stop. You may want a gift for twenty twenty three for somebody. You may wanna buy buy McBurna 

Gunn. And this Burna Gunn, when I called, I said, I want this to come. Let's not get it twisted. A girl, yes, fifty states. Let's put a link below. A lawyer got on. Oh, wow. A Romanian lawyer got on and said, hey. Here's what's going on. The Romanian lawyer also says something that was pretty fascinating. But the people who don't like him, let's not get it twisted. A girl yesterday tweets at me, some comedian, Nicole something. I don't even know what her last name is. But she tweets at me and she says, you're you're this and you're that. You're exactly this. I said, listen. The difference between me and you is you're emotional 

and you're speak speaking factual like this is gonna happen. Mhmm. I'm being logical and paranoid. That's the only difference. I said, you're doing this. Yeah. I'm doing that. K? And, you know, so so the people that are happy that he got arrested, you know what crowd they're a part of, you know, why, you know, they're celebrating whatever they're celebrating. Having said that, let's set that aside. Let's set those two aside. This is the most important point to be thinking about. K? This is the most important point to be thinking about. If he committed the crime, he committed the crime. K? I don't know all the rules and regulations. I don't know, you know, 

Cardone got on and he says, well, I don't know anybody that does all the right business and has six different, passports. Why do you need to have six different passports and etcetera, etcetera? Okay. It's a valid point. Why do you need a six different passports? Maybe that's normal in, Europe. Maybe that's how he gets around. Maybe it's a valuable thing to have passports. I know billionaires that have multiple passports. Maybe not six, but I do know people that have two or three passports. In that area, it's actually very normal for somebody to have Don't forget. Multiple passport. He not so subtly addressed the fact that his father 

may or may not have worked for the CIA. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Weird. Right. Yeah. So so but here's the part, man. Like, you we were doing a video a month ago on generational wealth. Remember when the whole thing was on my generational wealth, generational wealth. Gotcha. One of the things we we realized is the Vanderbilts lost their wealth. They were the richest people in the world. They lost their wealth within two generations. Think about that. Damn. You're worth a few hundred billion dollars. The money's lost within two generations. But the Medici family and the Rothschild family has kept the wealth and the power for many, many years. You know what rule those guys follow? One basic rule. Don't be loud. Yeah. Do not be loud. Don't call out the establishment. 

Don't be too opinionated. Stay low key. Keep a low profile. You don't see a rat's child getting on TV, giving their opinions, running a podcast. You don't see a Medici family running the top podcast in the world. Now having said that, the Medici and the Rothschild is playing a different game. Right. They're in they're indirectly part of the establishment. Of course. Because they have the divide. Global elites. Exactly. The definition So so of the global So for for Tate to go out and you keep calling out the heroes of the left over and over and over and over again, you're taking the ultimate ultimate risk. This means the 

speed to stardom is a very, very quickly, but the fall could also be very very quickly by these guys trying to manipulate and take you down. FYI, one of the corruptest countries in the world is Romania. You know how many people messaged me yesterday from Romania? Listen, this place is corrupt. That lawyer on the Twitter spaces yesterday said the following. He said everything in Romania is about money. Everything. So if you wanna buy them out to get out, you can do it. Mhmm. If other countries wanna buy Romania, they can do it. Wow. If other countries want to call Romania to say, hey, man, you guys gotta get this thing squared away or else Yep. We're not gonna give you the support or we're not gonna give you this. You have to do it because Romania who's who's Romania? You is it a top twenty empire? Is it a top fifty empire? Nobody thinks about Romania 

as as one of the most powerful empires in the world that everybody wants to have a relationship with. Yeah. This ain't this ain't Rome. No. This ain't this is definitely not Rome. So meaning, if a place like Romania can be bought to take a guy like this down, that is very possible. Not saying that's what happened. That's very possible. Then last but not least, I get a message this morning from a guy that's very, very connected in, the the the what's the word I'm looking for? He's very connected in law and, 

FBI, PD, you know, all of them. Department of Justice type of thing? Qualified guy. I don't wanna give exactly what his job is because you know who it is. Okay. He said the following. I saw the interviews last night. Keep this in mind. If you talk to them, they have to have probable cause to do the war to do these warrants. The excuse that somebody made a complaint, an anonymous complaint, at that, and they send a SWAT team to his house is bullshit. Even though it's Romania, they still have laws in the US embassy, 

and the US embassy was involved. I think the embassy put them up to it. Wow. He needs to find out where the hell and, complain from there. Anyways, like, meaning he's trying to say, it's all it's they all work together. Meaning, this this is not accidental Or it's not. To do the warrant. Maybe there is a probable cause for it. But also at the same time, US embassy was involved to go in and taking him down. Yeah. So it's a it's a very, strange situation going on with this year. So it's not just a one-sided story. There's a lot of different sides to it, but 

everybody jumped to conclusions celebrating this guy getting arrested. It was like their New Year's came five days before, three days before with this guy getting arrested. Mhmm. It was it was weird. And that reminds me of Pat, like, John Gotti when he was out and everybody was telling him all the conciliaries, they're all like, listen. You're poking at the wrong he's like, shut up. He's like, we're not supposed to be out. You know? It's a it's a secret thing. You know what I mean? Like, he's the exactly that situation. With him, it's like you poked it, you poked it, just kinda disappear. You can't keep bother yo. You keep you can't keep messing with governments, and they're not gonna come after your ass. That's this is a prime example Well of the same shit with Gotti. Couple thoughts. 

A a famous story that I always revisit with you that you said I don't know who you were meeting with. You were meeting with some billionaire, and you had a you had a business idea for this billionaire. And I think condescendingly, but also, like, affectionately, it was like, Pat. There's two types of people in this world. There's the person who's trying to make their first billion and the person that's already made their billions. The difference between us is I'm just trying to keep my money, AKA the Medicis, the Rothschilds, these types of people. You're the first type of person. 

Good luck on your endeavors. I'm gonna keep doing me. Yeah. Right? Essentially investing in stocks or investing in bonds, essentially, if you wanna put it that way. Let's not forget. Nobody knew Tate one year ago. Okay? Unless you're a kickboxer guy. Yeah. Nobody knew Tate whatsoever. Okay? So he's essentially working on his first billion, if you know what I mean. So, you know, you in today's society, whether you're good, bad, up or down, it's all about views. It's all about eyeballs. It's all about status. So 

he's trying to make a name for himself. The problem is what what this is kind of akin to is, like, we all read Greek mythology as a kid. Icarus. You know? He flew a little too close to the sun, and he got burned. Yep. Regarding, I think, Romania, if I may address that, I had a conversation with a buddy, who lives in Colombia. He was, we were hanging out yesterday. I go, hey. Listen. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? He goes, Seth, you live in America. That's a real sweet idea. 

In Colombia, it's guilty until proven innocent. Mhmm. Like, he told the story of a buddy who got his house taken away from the government, and it's taken ten years of legal nonsense to try to get his house back that he's entitled to. So I don't know the framework in Romania, but something tells me in corrupt countries, you can kinda just do what you wanna do. Yeah, bro. Money talks. The the one thing I will say about Romania, do you think this is a good look or a bad look for the country of Romania? I would argue that nobody has done more 

to help tourism and to make Romania popular as it is now than Tate. If Tate didn't live in Romania You didn't If he lived in Croatia, if he lived in Serbia, if he lived in somewhere in Russia, nobody would be talking about Romania. Of course. Like, in a and and and he's said only good things about Romania. I come here. It's a Christian country. Yes. It's corrupt, but everywhere is corrupt. And this difference is you can pay people off here. Mhmm. I I I there's nice people, nice women. Like, it it's it's, like, almost done the exact same thing 

that Borat did for Kazakhstan. Yeah. Nobody know the Kazakhstan before but the difference is Borat kinda Yeah. Collapsed then. Yeah. Tate did good things for Romania. We're talking about Romania. Bro, he has a casino, though. You know how much money the the with taxes that they're gonna get for the country? Are you crazy, bro? Yeah. So here's, I don't know. The look. I I here's what I actually wanna say. You talked about, like, the people that love Tate, they're coming to his defense. The people that hate Tate are just jumping on it. 

By the way, now for whether it's me, whether it's you, whether it's anybody out there listening now is the easiest time ever To shit on Tate, to pile on, I knew it. He's a scumbag. Like, but like now is actually where you show conviction and actually show friendship and actually show someone, you know, what you respect. So for me, I'm not believing any of this nonsense. I'm gonna I'm gonna stand by my innocent until proven guilty. Good. And I'm we've had a great time with Tate. I have nothing but good things to say about Tate. Are there gonna be some things we disagree upon? Sure. Yeah. I disagree with you. You're one of my best friends. You know? Same with Pat. 

But I'm not believing any of this nonsense. I I I again, innocent until proven guilty. Pull up the story I just texted you, Rob. Let's read that Reuters story that just came out an hour ago. I agree with you, Adam. Push for sure. So By the way, one other very, credible lady got on yesterday saying, what's her name? Liza? Eliza? Something like that. Okay. Let me read this article and I'll tell you what she said. Mhmm. Execute box, Andrew Tate, detain about Romanian rape and human traffic case. Okay. Go down. Alright. So, Romanian prosecutors asked a Bucharest court on Friday to extend detention on Dendritate thirty days, 

back to the divisive Internet personality was arrested on suspicion of human trafficking. Tatum former kickboxer, and his brother, Tate. Okay. Got that. And anti organized crime prosecutors have notified the rights and liberties judge with the Bucharest Court with a proposal to remand the four suspects for thirty days. The brothers declined to comment on Thursday, but the lawyer confirmed they had been detained. Prosecutors said the Tate brothers have been under criminal investigation since April. The four suspects appear to have created an organized crime group with the purpose of recruiting, housing, and exploiting 

women by forcing them to create pornographic content meant to be seen on specialized websites for a cost. Go a little lower. Keep going. Keep going. Keep going. Prosecutors said they would have gained the, impo important sums of money. Prosecutors said they found six women who had been exploited by the suspects. Tate gained notoriety for misogynistic comments and hate speech. He said, women are partially responsible for being raped, and they belonged to men. A number of social media platforms banned Tate, including Twitter, but his account here 

became active active no again, November after the platform was taken over by Elon Musk. In one of his tweets following his return to platform, said he was flying to California to tell Musk he was a legend. Tate appeared to have sent a tweet on Friday suggesting get access to his phone and social media while in custody. Early this week, the British national was told to get a life by climate activist, Greta Thunberg, on Twitter. K. We know that whole story how this thing takes, takes place. But so there are six so one of these girls, who was on the, Twitter spaces yesterday said the following. 

She says, look, you have to keep in mind that I've been dealing with one of the, I've been dealing with one of the, individuals that's, making these claims, women, that's making these claims, since summer about, that she was taking advantage of. And I've been working with her since April or May. This lady says, I I can't give you all the details. I can't say anything. I can't do this. I can't do that because I'm the, you know, I'm representing her. I'm helping her out. But this is real. They have been doing this. And the phrase that was constantly being used yesterday 

is the following phrase called the lover boy allegation. I don't know if you're familiar with the lover boy allegation. Pull up lover boy allegation. Type in lover boy allegation, which, lover boy human okay. Right there. The the first one. Yeah. Okay. So, zoom in so we can read it in. So lover boys or Romeo pimps are human traffickers who usually operate by trying to make young girls or boys fall in love with them. Sometimes they manipulate young people in other ways. Once they have victims under their influence, they exploit them, for instance, in sex industry. 

Loverboy method changing due to Internet and social media. Traditionally, Loverboy seduces young, vulnerable girls and boys over a lengthy period of time in order to exploit them sexually. Later on. This practice is being used less and less. Nowadays, lover boys resort more quickly and frequently to threatening their victims using blackmail and violence. The Internet and social media are playing an increasing role in this phenomenon. For instance, social media provides Loverboys with much greater scope for establishing contact with victims and gathering information about vulnerable boys and girls, this makes it easier for them to force their young victims into the sex industry. So that is the methodology they're saying they used. Yeah. Well, 

if I may, the definite like, the lover like, listen. I go out in South Beach. I have friends who are good looking dudes, lover boys, like, pimp type dudes. What they're describing are sociopaths and criminals. Yeah. Okay. Since when is being a good looking, suave, methodical dude a bad thing? I think that's actually a good thing. So they're they're kinda copying and pasting and and and a a a nice name over actually a very criminal intentive Yeah. Type of description. 

So I don't know. This this lumber boy thing Have you guys seen have you go on anything that Dan Bilzerian's doing. It's go on his go on his Instagram. It's Dan Bilzerian, Pat, with, like, fifty Yeah. Of the hottest and he's just in the back chilling. They he just Lover boy. Lover boy. I mean, more like, obviously and mind you, these girls are getting the notoriety. They're with them. They're on Instagram. All these girls have a massive following everywhere. Everybody's getting paid. He's the, like Adam said, lover boy. He's the playboy, and it's an image. But like I said, Pat, the it's all I'm not a conspiracy guy, but it's all cahoots. Everybody if the US embassy is involved and they go, bro, go in there, get the cameras, record it. And mind you, when this hit, Pat, it hit 

all my notification. It's a it's a it's an effort by everybody altogether to try to knock this guy down because we messed with them. Let me tell something about these lover boys. Okay? Whatever this is. There's exceptions and there are rules. Okay? Let's talk about the rule because obviously, we can go to exceptions. If you're Dan Bilzerian Mhmm. If you're Andrew Tate, for example, if you're Leonardo DiCaprio, if you're Matthew McConaughey, you're George Clooney, you don't need to resort to this type of fucking nonsense. Yeah. You have girls throwing themselves at you. Yeah. You don't need to induce. You don't need a drug. You don't need to, like, manipulate. 

You get what you want. Now the exceptions, you're fucking scumbag like Bill Cosby or Harvey Weinstein. Those are the exceptions. But if you're an exceptional dude or you're a high dude of man of status, you don't need to resort to these types of measures. It's just something you don't need to do as a dude. Yeah. The worst dudes out there, the guys that can't get laid, that get no attention from girls, got nothing going on for them, those are the sociopaths that you need to look out for. Yeah. Those are the rapists. Those are the criminals. I'm not buying this bullshit. I mean and and and the beauty like you said is that he's lucky that it is Romania. Dude, he has he has money, bro. He's not gonna go to jail for for I don't think he's gonna go to jail at all. Yeah. Not at all. But that's the problem because I know Pat here, the Rico thing with that like, Julian and them did, is it now think about this. If he has somebody in his crew that was being shady, does he get in trouble? So so what they're what they're one of the things, you you guys had a lot of different things here, so I wanna make sure we address this lover boy. Hugh Hefner was a lover boy. Exactly. Number one. He's the ultimate lover boy guy. You don't you don't think he had accusations? What of course. He had women still to this day accusing him of, like, holding them hostage. He did. But the only difference is he didn't call out climate change activists. He didn't call out Exactly. The left. He didn't call out any of this stuff. So there there's a there's a rule of thumb. If you go after the establishment, 

be ready. Yep. If you go after the establishment, be ready, especially the louder you are. By the way, there are only a few people loud enough to go after the establishment. One of the guys today that's super loud is number one is Musk. Yep. Mhmm. And Tate's in the top ten of the loudest against establishment. We know what happened when Trump went after the establishment. Yep. We're seeing what's going on with Musk going after the establishment. We're seeing what he went after the establishment. Those are couple things you gotta be careful with. Here's the part about what you just said. One of the claims is what they're trying to do, k, 

is, you know, how a lot of times, like, well, how come he doesn't come to US? I don't wanna come to US. I don't wanna come to US. I don't wanna come to US. Mhmm. One of the claims that one of the lawyers made is they're trying to use this to bring him to US courts to get him to be seen guilty. This is an outcome of trying to bring him here. Expiration. Yes. To bring him here and have the US courts hold them accountable. Okay? Because, who's he calling out? If you were to take out of the hundred and ninety six countries or so that we have, give or take, what country does it call out the most? 

US. Not is there even a Western society, western culture, globalist. Western society is the first Hundred percent tree he calls out nonstop. He's count constantly calling out. Okay. And what's he calling out about the Western society? The the like, making men into like, making us all. Miss Riggs. And he's he's basically saying that, you know, when you wanna come and, let's say, take over a country, you gotta take the men get the men out, make them feminine, and da da da da da. And he's just calling out all the woke shit. Who you know, the the the woke folks don't wanna hear that. The left folks don't wanna hear that. Of course not. Which many of women also don't wanna hear that. No. No. Look. I I'm telling you. Yesterday, the the amount of, 

DMs that I got I've never gotten DMs like this. You piece of shit. You yes. You die. You By the way, I might as well die. The same nonsense. You no. You you I can't believe you said this, and I can't believe you said that. To me, that's not triple, you know, typical protocol where people message me and stuff like that. But to defend him, he's that much of a trigger to the left because Greta don't forget that that post, the tweet by her got couple hundred million views on Twitter, and this is under Musk. That thing got a couple hundred million views under Twitter. What does that tell you? She's got a following. Of course. She's got influence. 

People actually wanna sit there and believe that she's right. And by the way, thank god she's nineteen years old because some people do come back and said, you you're going after a minor. Right. Yeah. But she's nineteen years old, so it's not like she's a we all know her as twelve years old or fifteen years old. She's no longer fifteen years old. She's nineteen years old today. So, yeah, they're trying to bring them to the states to that's what a lot of people said they're trying to bring him out here, but we'll see. Here's where I think Tate message gets lost in translation. So when we sat with him, I said, what's the number one reason you thought you were canceled? He goes, I already know. I already know. Because I asked it. I'm like, if is it masculinity? Is it toxic masculinity? Is it chauvinism? Is it calling out the system? Is it calling out the matrix? Is it male self improvement? He's like, I already know. The reason I got canceled is because I call out the establishment. I call out the matrix. They don't wanna hear what I have to say. But if you talk about text messaging, 

I believe there's three major, themes that he talks about. So number one is he's called out the matrix and the system and everything in the global elite that comes with that. Cool. Fair. We just addressed that. Number two is what he's labeled as a misogynist or chauvinist and toxic masculinity. And that's kinda how he's labeled. Like, if you look at any article out there, any headline, it's male chauvinist, Andrew Tate. You know, toxic masculinity, Andrew Tate. And that's kinda what he's framed as. But if you actually peel back the onion and you actually listen to what Tate's saying and not taking it little sound bites, 

all he's talking about at the end of the day is male self improvement. Mhmm. And that's essentially everything that we stand for here at Valuetainment. That's everything that we that I talk about here is no matter what you're doing in life as a man, there's always room for self improvement. Personal responsibility, being positive, whether that's being stronger, faster, cooler, wealthier, doper, sexier, everything is about status. Mhmm. Okay? So when it comes to self improvement here, I'm gonna go on a little rant for a sec. The the number one thing 

that a man can have is status. There's three types of status that a man can reach. There's number one, wealth. Okay? And everything that comes with wealth. Money, success, ambition, your network, everything that you collect resources, that's number one, part of status. Number two is attractiveness as a man, status. So meaning you're good looking, you're in shape, you're you're you're suave, you're you, you dress well. Like Jordan Peterson talks about dressing in suits and looking like a man. So that is attractiveness. Women obviously like dudes with six packs, and most like that's part of that. And then the third one is having game. Now everyone there's different types of game out there that can approve your status. So whether it's you're you're funny, you're a comedian, you're clever, you're witty, you, 

you're romantic, you like, you're kind. Whatever it is, that's your game. Now here's the deal. If you're in the top ten percent of any of those three categories, you will get women and you and women will come to you. What do I mean? If you've got a ton of money, I don't care if you look like Yeah. We've seen Jeff Bezos. Yeah. Women are gonna be attracted to. Number two, if you're an attractive guy, you're in shape, you're a good looking dude, like, that's done. Like, no matter how much money you have, you're gonna get women. If you've got game, whether you're a funny comedian or whether you're a suave dude or a man that's a dumb whatever it is, whatever your skill set is, if you're in the top ten percent of any of those three categories, you'll get women. Now to put this all together, 

like Tate would do, he would say, keep working on all three. Make your money. Work your ass out. Improve your game, learn how to talk to women. You know, famously in the red pill community, what he's he's a part of it's money, muscles, game, and hold frame. Mhmm. So, again, back to my initial point. Yes. He talks about the system, and he talks about people label him as a misogynist and a and a toxic masculinity. But at the end of the day, I think the reason that he's resonated with so many dudes is he's like, nobody's coming to save you, bro. Bro. Yeah. Nobody's walking in this door. You need to do it yourself. 

Keep improving. Keep working. Outwork, outstrategize, outimprove, outlast. And that's his messaging. But nobody wants to talk about that. So if you like this clip and you wanna watch another one, click right here. And if you want feel too little. More the machinery. We need humanity. We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, as if that's the way it's supposed to be. We know things are bad, worse than bad. They're crazy. 

You've gotta say I'm a human being. Goddamn it. My life has vanished. You have meddled all the primal forces of nature. Don't give diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men. Machine men with machine minds and machine hearts. 

It's Showtime. And now, The Elevate with Jason Bermas. And who loves you and 

who do you love? Good morning, everybody. It is Reality Rants. I am Jason Bermas. This is Red Voice Media. Remember, you can get the second hour exclusively, at least the video, over at red voice media dot com slash jason. This is America. And today, although we are going to have our usual raucous amount of clips, 

probably going to end up doing a, watch along with the case for population control with Paul Eric, Elric, nineteen seventy documentary, which, again, there there are times where it's very bland, but it lets you know even then what the agenda was. You're bad, you're a human, we need to save the earth, we're ruining the earth. Oh, humans are bad for the earth. 

And Elric is also a, the author, I believe with his wife, of the population bomb, which is now more than fifty years old. And, you know, it's this idea that we have to restrict human life, and there's a a lot of talk back then, about birth control in particular because you go back fifty plus years and that's still a controversial 

issue. And, look, I've never beat my chest about women, you know, not being able to take birth control. I've never made abortion the issue here. Another thing that I don't really talk about too much is, the border and migration in a lot of cases. We're gonna talk about all of those things today, okay? And you might like what I have to say, you might not like what I have to say. Hopefully, 

we can have the discussion. But before that, I mean, there are several things about America that I really wanna hit on. Okay? And the first thing, I I thought that I'd start the show with, the absurdity of America and in particular, the Waffle House. Yes. The Waffle House. Now Go ahead. Let's go. If you've never eaten at a Waffle House, I'm not gonna say count your lucky Yeah. You know how how far in it is. 

Walk I was looking at it, and I can't find Doesn't look like there's anything about it. Right there in the middle. Okay. It was hard to find whether or not where he talks about. True colors and what they were Maybe we have to go to Red Voice Media to get that part. Central into Yeah. That is Any Unfortunately, when I heard him say that now, I was like, oh, shit. I might be behind Period. That paywall instead of an offer. For my Well Just, Let him play for a minute, and then we'll bring him back. We'll go I I in the intermission. I I I know my audience out there gets it, 

but there are so many people again that are in that waffle house me me me mentality, they just can't do it. They can't do it. Okay? So, again, it's reality rants. We went on another big rant there. Let's let Ron Paul talk about the FBI. You you know, most of our history, we didn't didn't have those institutions. The FBI came in, during the first World War. And interestingly enough, the one thing that Woodrow Wilson did, he used the FBI to spy on American citizens 

and actually arrest them if they disagreed with his foreign policy about going to war in Europe. And isn't it interesting how recent they used it in the Vietnam era? Democrats used it there. Republicans used the FBI to spy on a hundred different groups in this country, including the churches, who disagree with the policy in Central America. It almost looks like the FBI was designed to spy on Americans who might be disagreeing, with policy, especially the foreign policy. So the FBI, although I don't think I can condemn everything they've ever done because I'm sure, 

some of the investigations and investigation of crime, has been beneficial, but that could be accomplished through justice department within our states. We wouldn't reject that, portion of it. I think the the FBI has, kept and continues to keep a lot of records on a lot of individuals. The CIA has only been here since nineteen forty seven. Their record is lousy. I mean, you just think of the CIA used by the Democratic, administration to You know, not just the Democrats, but you look at the FBI. He mentioned Woodrow Wilson. 

There's an interesting quote from Woodrow. I I didn't plan on playing it here today, but we're gonna play it. Why not? We we can do that. It's gonna be tough because usually when I queue this up over here, and we'll do it live, when I do it right, Invisible Empire sits right at the top. So let's see. Let's see if we can't get Invisible Empire up here and get that quote from Wilson because 

Wilson felt like he was used. And see, this is the craziest thing, man. I mean, look how this works. Look how shadow banned I am for myself. I'm signed in. Alright. And I type in the title, invisible empire. Alright. The the, you know, the movie. I wonder Wonder if I type in a new world order to final come back and I can't even to have it come up. Instead, Barbie's big brother from twelve years ago, a minute and thirty six video is the first video that comes up? 

I mean, come on. Give me a break. Invisible or I'm sorry. Let's do, a new world order defined. World order defined. Can we there we go. There we go. I I guess invisible empire just just too tough too tough indeed. So it's towards the beginning for sure. Let's see what we got here. Let's see. He and basically, he says there's a power so great that when somebody speaks, about it, they dare not speak about it above their breath. 

Alright? Period. Because it is a power let's see. There's, the current it's gotta be coming up right here. Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. Oh. 

Oh, all the way back then. Been a long time coming. A long time coming. So now the question is, do we just go over news stories for the next fifteen minutes and then, do the case for population control with Paul Ehrlich on the premium side. We might have to do that because I do have a ton and and the Bella Thorne clip I wanted to play. Okay, because we're talking about this is America and this is the culture. 

We've got a culture not only of vanity and one that is self serving, but one that is so enticed and enthralled with celebratards, okay, that we give Hollyweird and the entertainment industry in general a pass on abusing children, especially when we talk about 

staples within children's entertainment via things like Nickelodeon and Disney. And disclaimer, warning, the whole nine, it's a minute long clip. Bella Thorne curses a lot in this, and Bella Thorne, I believe she, I'm not sure if she started her own porn company, but she directed pornography, a lot of people don't like her. She's put out Instagram posts where she's in Scanlon. I think deposit. This is 

That's a good part of the broadcast. You guys should listen to it, but it's getting past four AM. And since he did bring up the Invisible Empire quote, I said, you know, I remember when I was incredulous when I saw that part of the movie. And then at one point, I went out with my incredulousie to the market, and I bought a first edition of The New Freedom by Woodrow Wilson. This is the London publication from nineteen thirteen. And it has the quote that Jason just referenced here 

right here. Since I've entered politics, I've chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the United States in the field of commerce and manufacturer are afraid of somebody or afraid of something. They know that there is a power a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so in lock, so complete, so pervasive that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it. They know that America is not a place of which it can be said as it used to be that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as so far as his abilities enable him to pursue it. Because today, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent him from building up a business that they don't want to have built up. Organizations that will see fit see to it that the ground is cut from under him and then the market's shut to him. Now they're not talking about Kanye, and they're not talking about Andrew Tate. This is back in nineteen thirteen. 

And that was Woody Wilson who later, became president of the United States, took us into World War one along with his British counterpart, Lord Grey. And they lied America. Signed the Federal Reserve Act. Yeah. Now I did have another question about the date of origin of the FBI. So let me just go to the history blueprint real quick, and let's nail that down because Ron Paul is talking about back in World War one. And I was pretty sure that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was created in it's so many entries over here to find it. Nineteen o eight, at least on the Wiki. July twenty six nineteen o eight is what they claim. 

Let me just see what I can find here. Can I find FBI? I don't have it connected to FBI, so it's connected to FBI. FBI. How about if I do? Fed Bureau investigation? Usually, I have it listed. Yeah. I thought FBI came from FBN. According to the Wiki, I'm not saying. I mean, obviously, it's a WikiVac. 

But does the FBI was established in nineteen o eight as Bureau of Investigation, the BOI or BI for short. Its name was changed to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in nineteen thirty five and its headquarters of the J. Edgar Hoover building. That's just what, you know, standard Ricky said. Oh, here it is. Here's what I got. It's in here. Nineteen o eight to present. I shouldn't So it's I shouldn't second guess Ron Paul. That's the lesson there. I should've just listened to him. But, no, if I listened to him and assumed, then I wouldn't know this useful date. 

It is pre World War one. You know what else? There's a couple of things going on in nineteen o eight. That's when the Warburg brothers had bought all three people in the election, I'm pretty sure according to their Ron Chernow family biography. You can find that in there. Yeah. Interesting. I'm glad that I cleared that up. Yeah. Because I think I made a mistake a couple weeks ago. Because I thought Jager Hoover was in charge of FBI since its inception, but I don't place him as being there in nineteen oh eight. I place him as being there like in the 1920s to nineteen seventies. He had a fifty year career ish. Right. Right? Yeah. So I guess there were some 

directors in the FBI. Popularized or came up with the idea of COINTELPRO. If I remember correctly, it's been a while. Jagger Hoover. Yeah. Here's COINTELPRO. Surveillance. Yeah. Clyde Tolleson. That was Yeah. There's a lot of this, Jagger Hoover stuff and Whitney Webb's one nation under blackmail. Yeah. Nineteen political groups However, covert operations on the official COINTELPRO label took place between nineteen fifty six, nineteen seventy one. 

Many of the tactics used in COINTELPRO are alleged to have seen continued use, including discrediting targets through psychological warfare, smearing individuals and groups using forged documents, and by planning false reports in the media, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, illegal violence, and assassination. I have an answer for you. Here you go. Sounds a lot like what the FBI is still doing. Jager Hoover was an American law enforcement administrator who served as the first director of the FBI. Okay? Now get this. He was appointed director to the Bureau of Investigation, 

the FBI's predecessor in nineteen twenty four. So in nineteen twenty four, FBI didn't exist. It was the Bureau of Investigation and was instrumental in founding the FBI in nineteen thirty five. I was thinking it was nineteen thirty six, so I was a year off, where he remained director for another thirty seven years until his death in nineteen seventy two. So he worked for Bureau of Investigation. And then between World War one and World War two, they created FBI. So this is the only ten year predecessor to CIA. This is well within the Anglo American establishment's grip on America 

because within three years of this, they're running b British security coordination out of Rockefeller Center with Hoover knowing that they're doing that. They also had blackmail on Hoover because of the Meyer Lansky organization, starting in 1930s with MI six. So there's yeah. There's a little bit more to be looked into. And so, yes, trust but verify Ron Paul. That's the lesson there. Alright. Good. Good. Good. 

Now we're moving toward the runway. We can see the lights on the tarmac lining up. LD, are we rounding up, people we need to thank? And as far as other stories, Tony, I had it to fifteen minute cities, World Economic Forum. We could there's we could play two clips. One's John Donne and one's Greg Reese that would cover, I think, the last two things that would have to be covered if we want to. Actually, but let's do a race or Greg Rees, actually. One's, one is talking about what was a potential intermission piece that, no. He was talking about with Amen Jabi. I think it's how you pronounce his name, Amen Jabi Jabi. 

Talking about the digital Panopticon. Gregory said a good sort of break three minute breakdown or four minute breakdown of that, and then he also has another one of those fifteen minute cities and right to travel. So we could probably just play those back to back and co that would cover essentially the whole gamut of Alright. Cool. So we'll use those two videos to play us out, and then we'll just go to, who do we have to thank beyond our fantastic members. And then I'll have a report next week if we made it over a thousand twenty five members in this week. Alright. Asked them. I don't have an answer yet, So we'll find out by next week. 

Well, I did send an order off to Lauren, who was our thousandth subscriber. Thank you, Lauren. Yeah. Thank you. Enjoy your swag. Oh, by the way, town hall this Tuesday? Yes, sir. So, if you wanna come participate in the town hall, grand theft world dot com, top right hand corner, pick your donation tier. And we're back to a normal town hall schedule, so that should be fun. And we'll utilize a new forum for a discussion. I know there's people who can participate, but can't 

go on mic. So I real time people will be talking in the town hall chat. So, we'll utilize a new forum for that. It's like a member's summit as much as it is a town hall. Yeah. It's a town hall for members. Exactly. Let your voice be heard. Enjoy the fruits of membership. It's one of them. The book club's another. There's many, many, many fruits of the the membership. So more value than is asked. That's the deal. Alright. Alright, LD. Racking it up. 

Alright. We got a yeah. Big thanks. Huge thanks to the Grand Theft World community, the members that support us, and a big thanks tonight to the Rockfin Tippers, Nick the sound guy. Five dollars being a sound guy. I know what sound is supposed to sound like. That's why I listen to all my favorite thought criminals on my JM Audio Editions headphones I got from j m audio editions dot com. Thank you, Nick. Good, 

good tip. Thank you, Nick. Jake Sheen. John Massari as well. Awesome headphones. Wearing a Yeah. That's John Massaria. I got, look. I got this. This is signed to Grand Theft World. Here we go. This is this is what Nick was just tweeting about. This is, Grand Theft World. This is a custom set that John made. And, yeah, that's what I listen to when I'm not on set. That's what I listen to to listen to good music on. There you go, Johnny. 

Thank you for the super chat, Nick. My sound guy for many, many of those missions. And we had Jake Sheen, five dollars. Whenever Ian Fleming is mentioned, this eighties punk song plays in my head. It is double o seven first song on this album. It's at I love big mistake dot com. Haven't checked that out. Love to see the size this crowd has gotten in just a short while. Happy twenty twenty three to all of the people that make this happen. 

Thank you, Jake. Teresa m, five dollars. Thank you. Ross Guy, five dollars. Thank you. Hamcar hemp car, twenty dollars. Thank you very much. ARAM tips, fifty dollars. Said happy New Year. Thank you, ARAM. Star by Childlight, five dollars. Thank you for what you're doing. And Jake Sadiq, five dollars. Thanks for bringing me confidence in helping me seek autonomy. 

Thanks for allowing me to justify how I think, how I feel, and what I want for myself and the world. All the best for next year. And last but not least, b one, five dollars, a happy New Year to you all. And for you, a message if you can read. I am grateful and thankful for you all and for the food we have to feed. Wisdom says, never mind the greed. Take only what you need. Hold your loved ones tight for tomorrow is not guaranteed. Right on. Thank you, b one. Thanks, everybody, and and, happy New Year. Hope it's a prosperous, 

healthy one for you. Yeah. Thank you, guys. This is a it's a good workout tonight. We covered a lot of news, and we're gonna I feel like there's gonna be even, like, a a surge of news in the next week because the holidays are over and the investigations are gonna begin. So, LD, Tony, Cody, everyone in the control room, thank you guys, for the ride tonight. And for you at home, we got two special clips. We got, John Bau, Greg Rees back to back, and, thank you all for yeah. Go ahead. Two great it's two Greg Rees. My bad. Oh, two Greg Rees. Double double scoop of Greg Rees. Reese's piece is here. 

And with that, thank you guys all for tuning in and not dropping out. Here's double scoop of Reese to play us out. We'll see you next week, Sunday night, nine PM ish eastern time. Peace. Have a good night, everyone. Happy New Year. Aman Jabi has worked in Silicon Valley for twenty eight years. His background includes work on deep technologies that are involved in the new digital prison system being designed by Big Tech. 

In twenty twenty, he moved to Montana and became a whistleblower warning the public of the very real threat about to be unleashed upon us all, known by many as the mark of the beast system. Aman explains how accepting the digital ID is the basic premise behind it all. So by default, a digital identity implies that you are always in a digital prison. Since you have a digital identity and you're in a prison, you are by default 

a criminal. So we don't trust you. Just like the old system, this new one is also voluntary, and you are supposed to know that it's a digital prison that you are voluntarily signing up for. And the reason for this is because in this new system, having a digital ID will be proof that you are a criminal. Because having a digital ID means that you are in a digital prison. And because you accepted it, you must be a criminal. Because of this, there is a new protocol being introduced with this system 

known as zero trust. How is zero trust going to be used? Here's a lady. She wants to go and buy some beef, but let's say her carbon footprint or her beef footprint for the month has been exceeded. That door won't open. This digital prison is sneaking up on us all. There is no need for an implanted chip because everything is being done with facial recognition, which is already plugged into the entire system. America already has more cameras per capita than communist China, and our social credit score is already being logged. 

All we need at this point is a series of events that lead us all into having to make the choice of either accepting the new digital ID or saying no. Since the COVID lockdowns, new state of the art LED lights have been replacing streetlights in cities throughout the West. Aman explains that this is all part of the plan. These lights will be connected to everything, including your phone and your car. And in new cars, that includes 

sixteen different cameras with lidar and sonar. These lights are being outfitted with LED incapacitators, which is a light technology that was first announced fifteen years ago, back when it caused enough brain damage to make a person sick. Another strange weapon in the final stages of development is able to mount an all out barrage on the optic nerve. The LED was developed under the auspices of the Department of Homeland Security for the purposes of creating what we call a non lethal defense system. And, this technology consists of a bright set of LED technology, light emitting diodes, 

that is designed to create, sort of temporary blindness, meaning temporary ability to not be able to see the person who we're trying to protect. If aggressors caught in its bright pulsating glare don't shield their eyes or turn away quick enough, temporary blindness isn't the only effect they'll feel. The first time I saw the LEDI was in a darkened room, and within three or four seconds, I had reached forward and grabbed a hold of a lab bench because I was feeling a little bit, 

dizzy or disoriented. The device's combination of different colors and random flashes can induce psychophysical effects, including vertigo and possible nausea. It's been nicknamed the puke light. It's been fifteen years, and our Silicon Valley whistleblower believes that this technology is now capable of killing people. Ultimately, we can say no to this. But if there's a critical mass that doesn't sign on to the digital ID, then this agenda gets weakened substantially. 

But we will have to first unify and come together. Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Rees. The fifteen minute cities that everyone is talking about now is the Great Reset's trendy new name for open air prison camps. The idea is to corral everyone into neighborhoods small enough to walk from one end to the other in fifteen minutes. 

Everything you need within a half mile radius so that you'll never ever have to leave. These Dutch cities are banning petrol and diesel delivery vehicles to tackle air pollution and climate change. From twenty twenty five, all deliveries must be made in electric vehicles in fourteen cities across the Netherlands. It will prevent CO2 emissions equivalent to taking two hundred and sixteen thousand cars off the road, and businesses will get to help make the switch with grants of five thousand 

euros towards an electric van or lorry. The cities implementing zero emission zones include Amsterdam and Talberg. Other areas around the world are also banning exhaust fumes. In the US, Santa Monica has set up a voluntary zero emission delivery zone. The UK's first zero emission street has opened in central London. Beach Street will be closed to polluting vehicles for eighteen months. The scheme could expand into London's financial district in twenty twenty two. What's your city doing to encourage cleaner, climate resilient transport? 

Brought to you by people who wanna keep you in a fifteen minute prison city, the World Economic Forum. I'm the tyrannical lisp. While the post edit tyrannical lisp voice over is satire, it still reflects the truth. The great reset is pure fascism, hiding behind an effeminate homosexual veneer. Perhaps this is because some people see it as harmless and others are rendered silent out of fear of being called homophobic 

or maybe fascism healthy, stay active, get around, and enjoy the outdoors in your tiny, little, open air prison camp. These organizations are telling you that there isn't enough room for you because you are the reason that mother earth is sick. This is the subtext convincing people to not have children 

and persuading them to castrate the ones they have. Comfortable lies for the fearful. And those with the courage to see the truth can see that this is just an accounting issue. We, the people, are seen as livestock, looked down upon as useless eaters by godless psychopaths who want a more manageable herd to exploit for their own selfish desires, who want us to own nothing and be happy and eat the bugs. 

This plan was officially announced in two thousand fifteen and made actionable in two thousand seventeen with the goal of accomplishing most of it by twenty thirty. Paris is being celebrated for leading the charge on the trendy new fifteen minute city prison camps. But they are not alone. Melbourne, Australia is building theirs. And in America, New York City, Los Angeles, and Cleveland are doing the same. The right to travel 

is not in the Bill of Rights. In the past, the courts have ruled that this presumed right is firmly established in US law, but things have changed. Today, we are at risk of losing it all. And if we don't stand up for our own freedom, then who will? Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Rees. Conspiracy is a story of history. It's a story of plunderers taking care of people who produce. They claim to take care of them through government, which doesn't give you anything. It doesn't take away first. So it's not creating something out of nothing. It's very real what they're doing. They're taking your rights or taking some people's rights and adding more to someone else's rights. If you haven't heard about our Grand Theft World community membership, here are a few of the things you've been missing. A mobile app where you can access replays of the Grand Theft World podcast and show notes. Access to the Grand Theft World community on Discord where we crowdsource news and resources, and you can contribute to the show. The opportunity to participate in the Grand Theft World biweekly town hall. Exclusive content from Richard Grove, including behind the scenes footage and future access to unpublished material,